backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 24 comment(s) - last by kayronjm.. on Aug 7 at 8:55 AM

New breakthrough allows light to be compressed much more readily

Looking to the future, optical computing is one of several technologies being considered as a high-speed replacement to traditional electrical-based computing.  While quantum computing is considered by many as the ultimate future of computing, optical computing is more realizable in the near future. 

In fact, optical computing components have already been realized with fiber optic services available in select parts of the country for high speed computing.  However, more exotic devices like light-based storage or light transistor-composed CPUs, necessary to build a full optical computer, remain in the really of conjecture.

An important breakthrough in optical computing may help to change that.  Researchers at the University of California Berkley have developed a novel method to squeeze light into extremely small spaces, an important hurdle that optical computing faced.  Previously researchers could get light to fit in relatively small spaces -- even as small as 200 nm, about 400 times smaller than a human hair.  This size helps to dictate the necessary size for the smallest fiber optic fibers, which for various reasons are about five times this width -- or about 1 µm wide.

With the breakthrough, researchers were able to cut light down to fit into spaces a mere 10 nm, 20 times smaller than ever before.  The space was a mere five times the width of a single piece of DNA, a size previously thought infeasible to shrink light to.  Rupert Oulton, research associate in the group led by mechanical engineering Professor Xiang Zhang, stated of the discovery, "This technique could give us remarkable control over light and that would spell out amazing things for the future in terms of what we could do with that light."

Professor Zhang added, "There has been a lot of interest in scaling down optical devices.  It's the holy grail for the future of communications."

Mr. Oulton theorizes that the advance and further compression will yield key breakthroughs due to the properties of electricity and magnetism.  In order to achieve an optical computer, you would need at least some electrical components.  However the vastly different scales of electricity and light mean that they do not interact neatly or behave in similar ways.  He believes by shrinking light to wavelengths similar to that of electrons in computer systems, a plethora of new uses will arise.

The key problem is light doesn't like to fit in spaces that small, normally.  While light technically has been squished even farther using a technique called surface plasmonics that bonds photons to electrons, this method in its current state is relatively useless as it only travels a short distance and then the wave dissolves.  And traditional waves were constrained to the bulky 200 nm barrier.

After delving into surface photonics research, Mr. Oulton developed a new approach -- a "hybrid" optical system consisting of a very thin semiconductor wire placed in close proximity to a thin, smooth sheet of silver.  Normally, light would travel down the center of the wire.  But in the new design light travels in the very small gap between the semiconductor and the metal.  This yields a light wave with size similar to surface plasmonic waves, but with longevity closer to normal waves.  The light waves are able to reach 100 times farther than the most advanced surface plasmonic waves.

The end effect is thanks to the semiconductor/silver combination behaving like a capacitor.  As light travels along the gap, it excites electrons, creating a charge on the sheets.  This charge in turn helps to feed the light, helping it to travel farther, in an effect similar, but not identical to surface plasmonics.  Mr. Oulton was surprised at the simplicity of the design.  He stated, "It's really a very simple geometry, and I was surprised that no one had come up with it before."

The approach will offer the best of both worlds in terms of size vs. propagation distance, according to Professor Zhang.  He stated, "Previously, if you wanted to transmit light at a smaller scale, you would lose a lot of energy along the path. To retain more energy, you'd have to make the scale bigger. These two things always went against each other.  Now, this work shows there is the possibility to gain both of them."

Work does remain in physically implementing the device, but this step should be straightforward.  The main reason the team has not yet connected the theoretically modeled devices is that no existing instrumentation can measure light at that small a wavelength.  The researchers are looking at exotic ways to detect the new smaller than ever light.

In the end, though, Mr. Oulton believes the research is a giant leap towards the greatest challenge of optical computing -- achieving unity between light and electricity.  He stated, "We are pulling optics down to the length scales of electrons.  And that means we can potentially do some things we have never done before."

Other researchers on the project included Volker Sorger, Dentcho Genov and David Pile, all part of professor Zhang's group at University of California Berkley. 

The project was funded by the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the National Science Foundation and the Department of Defense.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The article contradicts itself or has a hole...
By MrBlastman on 8/4/2008 9:28:39 AM , Rating: 5
I quote:

"The main reason the team has not yet connected the theoretically modeled devices is that no existing instrumentation can measure light at that small a wavelength. The researchers are looking at exotic ways to detect the new smaller than ever light."

Now, how can they be sure that this processed worked in the first place, if they have no way to measure it?

It's early, yes, but I found a little humor in this paradigm.




By Misty Dingos on 8/4/2008 9:30:19 AM , Rating: 5
Is the cat dead or what?


By MrBlastman on 8/4/2008 9:32:17 AM , Rating: 2
exactly. :)


By masher2 (blog) on 8/4/2008 9:45:25 AM , Rating: 5
The article is misleading on a few points. Light of much smaller wavelengths has been measured many times. It's the spot size that's too small for current detection equipment. It also suggests researchers were able to "cram" light into smaller spaces than ever before. This isn't correct -- the researchers simply found a way they believe will allow light to pass such narrow gaps without losing large amounts of energy...a critical constraint in data transmission or optical computing.

Finally, to answer your question as to how they know this worked-- they don't. This was all done via theoretical modeling, rather than any actual experimentation. The article probably should have pointed that out.


RE: The article contradicts itself or has a hole...
By Iketh on 8/4/2008 11:56:49 PM , Rating: 2
article says the photon traveled 100 times farther than the other shrink method... this implies they detected the photon at the other end at a measured distance...


By kayronjm on 8/7/2008 8:55:52 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
article says the photon traveled 100 times farther than the other shrink method... this implies they detected the photon at the other end at a measured distance...


Not necessarily. Theoretical modelling is just that, modelling. Via use of a computational model with use of correct mathematical modelling of effects and physical properties, one can obtain numerical answers that provide some form of proof toward the phenomenon in question. In essence, you could use a programming language such as C or even a package such as MATLAB to write a theoretical model of a system undergoing such a process and with that, obtain numerical answers (theoretical limits essentially).


By Treckin on 8/4/2008 10:34:58 AM , Rating: 1
You used paradigm incorrectly


By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 8/4/2008 11:03:34 AM , Rating: 2
JUST Paradigm?! How about "realizable!?" What ever happened to "realistic?" JMack is really just a language butcher. But remember, he gets lots of posts for it, and that is what pays the bills.


By Guuts on 8/4/2008 8:01:00 PM , Rating: 2
I'm glad someone else noticed his butchery...


By MrBlastman on 8/4/2008 11:25:14 AM , Rating: 2
I don't think I did. Look further young jedi.


The Grail
By shiner on 8/4/2008 9:01:24 AM , Rating: 5
Oh, wicked, bad, naughty Zoot! She has been setting alight to our beacon, which, I just remembered, is grail-shaped. It's not the first time we've had this problem.




RE: The Grail
By theapparition on 8/4/2008 10:13:02 AM , Rating: 5
we have but one punishment... you must tie her down on a bed ... and spank her.

A spanking! A spanking!


Corrections
By masher2 (blog) on 8/4/2008 9:20:47 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
In fact, optical computing has already been realized with fiber optic services (FiOS) available in select parts of the country for high speed computing
Fiber-optic data transmission is *not* optical computing. A computer must compute, i.e. it manipulate and store data, as well as transmit it.

Furthermore, Fios is Verizon's own trademark for their fiber-to-the-home, and is not an acronym for fiber optic services in general.




RE: Corrections
By GaryJohnson on 8/4/08, Rating: -1
RE: Corrections
By foolsgambit11 on 8/4/2008 3:59:19 PM , Rating: 2
I'm no expert in hardware, especially for fiber optics. Do they have any basic switching/routing done without translation from photons to electrons and back to photons in fiber networks? If so, wouldn't that count as a 'computing task', in a primitive way? There is data read, interpreted, and manipulated. Sounds like computing to me.

And while Verizon might complain about the use of FiOS as a generic term for fiber optic data services, I bring your attention to Q-Tips and Kleenex... erm, I mean cotton swabs and facial tissues.... But really, I parse the quote you picked out as saying, "... with fiber optic services ((i.e.) FiOS) available ...." See? The part in the quotes isn't giving an abbreviation for what proceeds it, but rather serves as a specifier, telling us what fiber optic service he's talking about.


RE: Corrections
By masher2 (blog) on 8/4/2008 5:20:31 PM , Rating: 2
> "The part in the quotes isn't giving an abbreviation for what proceeds it, but rather serves as a specifier"

The article was edited subsequent to my post.

> "Do they have any basic switching/routing done without translation from photons to electrons and back "

Such photonic switches exist; they're a (very) small part of the overall market. However, they're still just a means of transmitting data. They don't allow any storage or (more importantly) basic logic-gate functions capable of performing computing tasks.


By rtrski on 8/4/2008 9:05:14 AM , Rating: 5
Did you really refer to FiOS as "optical computing"? And mean it? If so, wow...just wow.

Fiber optic data TRANSMISSION has been around for quite some time. That's not even remotely the same thing as performing actual computations solely with light.

Someone who blogs about technology should really have a better grounding in what they're talking about than that.




I think ...
By Proxes on 8/4/2008 9:47:57 AM , Rating: 3
this article is proof that people talk just to hear themselves talk. When I was reading this all I kept thinking was, "he must post things just to get comments."

And here I am feeding it.




RE: I think ...
By EricMartello on 8/5/2008 7:55:48 PM , Rating: 2
Comments = traffic!

When I see his name as the author, I just read the first and last sentences.


cabling?
By paydirt on 8/4/2008 8:56:50 AM , Rating: 2
OK, so would this be used in a new fiber optic cable? if so, then how would they bundle it so the metallic (silver?) sheets did not interfere with eachother?




RE: cabling?
By Nightskyre on 8/4/2008 9:07:40 AM , Rating: 2
No - not even close.

This kind of optical computing is dealing with IC's and circuit boards. It would serve to replace the copper connections on boards with optical ones.


o rly?
By Grammar Nazi on 8/4/2008 3:49:48 PM , Rating: 1
Second paragraph, last sentence: ...necessary to build a full optical computer, remain in the really of conjecture .

shouldn't it be

"reality of conjecture"?




RE: o rly?
By soydeedo on 8/5/2008 11:42:27 AM , Rating: 3
My vote goes to "realm".


Global Warming
By EricMartello on 8/5/2008 7:53:57 PM , Rating: 2
I'm just looking foward to JM's next artical about how can optic FiOS computing lasers reduse clomal warming...increbibdl! Did anyon here about teh audioionic compurting that uses sounds + lasers + oranic LEDs?




"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki