backtop


Print 22 comment(s) - last by drewidgho5t.. on Aug 21 at 2:28 AM


Glass laser test board can withstand lasers designed to melt steel  (Source: GTRI)
System uses special glass that can withstand laser energy

Lasers have moved from fiction into reality, and the military is nearing completion of many weapon systems using directed energy beams. Some of these weapons will be in the field in the coming years to protect troops and civilians from things like mortars, rockets, and missiles.

One of the problems with testing lasers for military use has been finding a way to easily evaluate the efficiency of the laser. A group of researchers at the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) has developed a system to accurately measure the power of a laser. These sorts of tests are crucial before laser weapons can be used in the field.

The system designed by the researchers is able to measure the power and spatial energy of an energy distribution at the same time. The system directs the laser beam onto a special glass target board that is able to withstand the intensity of the laser and not affect the beam as it passes through.

GTRI senior researcher David Roberts said, "The high-energy laser beam delivers its energy to a small spot on the target -- only a couple inches in diameter -- but the intensity is strong enough to melt steel. Our goal was to develop a method for determining how many watts of energy were hitting that area and how the energy distribution changed over time so that the lasers can be optimized."

The special glass used in the testing system chosen by GTRI is made by a company called OptiGrate. The glass is handmade from a sodium-zinc-aluminum-silicate material that is doped with silver, cerium, and fluorine. The team of researchers changed the characteristics of the glass so that the target board the glass is part of could withstand laser damage and degradation. OptiGrate also had to produce a new mold to create the glass used by the team because the researchers needed glass 4-inches by 4-inches, which was four times larger than other pieces of the glass previously produced by OptiGrate.

Roberts said, "This glass is unique in that it is transparent, but also photosensitive like film so you can record holograms and other optical structures in the glass, then 'develop' them in a furnace."

The team secured the glass target board between a test target and the laser. The laser beam irradiance profile on the glass target is measured by a remote camera and the images captured can them be analyzed to provide a contour map of the laser beam that shows the lasers power density in watts per square inch at every location the beam hits the glass target.

Roberts said, "We can also simultaneously collect power measurements as a function of time with no extra equipment. Previously, measuring the total energy delivered by the laser required a ball calorimeter and temperature measurements had to be collected as the laser heated the interior of the ball. Now we can measure the total energy along with the total power and power density anywhere inside the beam more than one hundred times per second."

Prototype testing boards were delivered to the Air Force Laser Effects Test Facility at Kirtland Air Force base in May. At the test facility, the glass targets were used to test a 50-kilowat fiber laser and measured power density as high as 10,000 watts per square centimeter without any damage to the test device. 

Laser weapons are being tested for use by multiple branches of the military. Raytheon tested its laser weapon system in July and scored four kills with it. The Air Force also has a fleet of aircraft with lasers on board that are near combat ready.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Oh, GREAT...
By HercDriver on 8/18/2010 1:20:18 PM , Rating: 2
Now our enemies will just put this glass on their stuff (missiles, tanks, planes, etc.) and they'll be LASER-proof. D'oh! </joke> (in case anyone thought I was being serious) This will, however allow more precise information to evaluate the effectiveness of future LASER weapons. I think I'll actually see widespread use of LASERs as weapons in my lifetime (not just prototypes, or special-use). Once they can miniaturize the power supplies, they may even be man-portable. As long as they don't look as gay as the phaser rifles from Star Trek TNG!




RE: Oh, GREAT...
By shaw on 8/18/2010 1:23:52 PM , Rating: 2
Or they can build a tank out of aerogel.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By MrTeal on 8/18/2010 2:34:54 PM , Rating: 2
That really wouldn't help. The silica would absorb most of the energy and melt very quickly. What you want is a mirrored surface with a dielectric coating tuned the the laser frequency that the enemy lasers produce. It's much better to reflect away 99.99% of the light rather than absorb it.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By Chudilo on 8/18/2010 2:50:27 PM , Rating: 2
I think it would be easier to build a chrome-plated tank. if it's clean enough it will simply reflect the laser beam.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By Voyager3084 on 8/18/2010 3:29:48 PM , Rating: 4
No. The cleanest chrome plating, even it was atomically flat, would not be reflective enough to avoid damage. Even if you reflect 99.9% of the beams energy, for a 1MW laser, you'd have 1kW of laser energy still incident on the surface. Of course, the cross sectional area of the beam and it's energy distribution will come into play (because we really care about the power density), but most kilowatt lasers I know are pretty bad ass. Also, I don't think chromium is that good of a reflector, but I couldn't find a graph of reflectance vs wavelength.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By Solandri on 8/18/2010 7:48:28 PM , Rating: 3
Best materials for reflectivity are aluminum, silver, and gold. Silver and gold are poor at certain wavelengths, and silver tarnishes. So aluminum is probably your best bet, but that tops out at about 92% reflectivity. Chrome is actually not very reflective - only about 40%-50%. In most applications, the nickel mixed with it provides most of the reflectivity. Its primary advantage is that it's considerably more durable than an aluminum, silver, or gold mirror finish.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_coating#Types...

Do note however that there are tricks you can do to get higher reflectivity. At very high angles of incidence, lots of stuff becomes highly reflective (e.g. pavement can form a mirage). Optical fiber uses this trick to achieve over 99.99% reflectivity. Diamonds (faceted and polished to "shine") and erecting prisms in SLRs and binoculars are another example. Of particular interest as defense against lasers may be dielectric mirrors.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_mirror


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By 91TTZ on 8/19/2010 10:04:08 AM , Rating: 2
When threads about lasers come up, I always see people suggesting that a mirror finish is the best way to reflect away the light. However, if all you care about is reflecting the incoming light you'd probably be better served by a dull color paint that reflects energy of a certain wavelength.

For example, If you look at the albedo of a chromed finish vs. white paint in sunlight you'd see that the white paint actually reflects more of the solar energy. It doesn't reflect it in a specific direction like a mirror does but more energy is reflected. A good way to test this is to put two identical plates of metal out in the sunlight. One chromed, one painted white. The chromed metal nearly always gets hotter because it's actually absorbing more energy. Think of a hot seat belt buckle.

I'm not sure what color would reflect the wavelength of the laser most effectively but the same principle applies. You don't need the directional reflectiveness offered by a mirror, you just need the most overall reflectiveness.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By theapparition on 8/19/2010 11:31:01 AM , Rating: 2
Mirror finishes do indeed provide the best level of protection. However, most materials don't have anything approaching a true mirror finish.

What you are talking about is blackbody radiation. Light spectrum is absorbed/reflected in certain ranges. For example, a red object is absorbing the light around it and reflecting the red spectrum, which our eye perceives as red color.
The object then re-emits the absorbed radiation at it's current blackbody temperature, which for anything that you can touch, is in the infrared spectrum. Glass is opaque to infrared radiation, hence why you can have a window in your oven and where the "green-house" term for glass enclosures originated from.
Interestingly enough, black cars don't get demonstratively more hot than white cars, it's the interiors color that affects it the most. It just so happens that most dark cars also have darker interiors than lighter cars. Amount of glass also makes a huge impact (more energy in-less out).

So far most have concentrated talking about the energy transfer of lasers, yet none have commented on the impact energy of the beam.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By Voyager3084 on 8/19/2010 3:20:49 PM , Rating: 2
No, mirror finishes do not offer the best protection. The best mirrors only have 98-99% reflectivity, and then, only at certain wavelengths. They have to absorb the other one or two percent, which is a substantial amount for a high power laser. A Bragg mirror, on the other hand, is a much better choice. If you know the precise wavelength being used, you can make a dielectric mirror that reflects an amount as arbitrarily close to 100% as you like. If you don't know the precise wavelength being used, but have some idea of what is likely, you can still make a mirror that is 99.9% or more reflective at the wavelength being used.

Eventually, after people figure out how to make 100KW+ solid state lasers, they are going to try and make them tunable. If you can widely vary the wavelength of light emitted, I can't think of any defense, short of making a perfectly transparent vehicle/building/target-of-choice. Or maybe a broadband meta-material cloaking device?

What do you mean by impact energy? Do you mean to say that the light has some intrinsic momentum, and that momentum from the laser will be imparted to the target? This will happen, but it is a very small effect for hugely massive targets, like tanks and airplanes and missiles.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By ekv on 8/20/2010 12:33:33 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Eventually, after people figure out how to make 100KW+ solid state lasers, they are going to try and make them tunable.
Seems like the same cat-and-mouse game that played out with radar. We made a strong radar, they figured out how to block it. We made it frequency agile, they countered. Current phased array radar is damn effective, especially if you've got someone who knows what their doing at the controls. Similarly, there's not much risk in saying high-powered lasers will carve out a niche.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By drewidgho5t on 8/21/2010 2:28:15 AM , Rating: 2
in which case your super shiney toy will be so easily detectable that old school technology will ENSURE that EVERY rpg will have a direct hit. Reactive armor only works once, then there is no more "reactive". the next barrage will penetrate.

But you'll look cool, Zohan!! Disco, Disco, Gut Gut


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By namechamps on 8/18/2010 1:45:36 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
Once they can miniaturize the power supplies


That is the largest problem and I doubt it will be solved in our lifetimes.

Chemical forms of energy (gasoline, explosives, gun powder, missile propellant) have a very high energy density and it is unlikely that will be overcome anytime soon.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By Smilin on 8/20/2010 2:20:56 PM , Rating: 2
The USAF airborn laser is chemically powered, not electrically.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By nafhan on 8/18/2010 3:02:44 PM , Rating: 2
I know you're joking...
However, judging by this:
quote:
and not affect the beam as it passes through
using this glass as protection would be a really bad idea as everything inside the glass would still be impacted by the beam.


RE: Oh, GREAT...
By xthetenth on 8/20/2010 1:01:46 PM , Rating: 2
I don't care about phasers looking 'gay' as much as being horribly unergonomic and poorly designed. The firing ergonomics on a phaser pistol are atrocious and they don't even have sights, and it took forever until they had something with a sight, a scope and a sensible means of using both (STFC, if you're curious). Then, adding insult to injury they made no way of quickly reloading. That, not the M16 is what you'd actually get if a weapon was made by Mattel. Oh, and it took forever to add trigger guards, so one has to wonder how many people got vaped by accident.


easier method to test laser
By Danger D on 8/18/2010 3:56:14 PM , Rating: 5
Shoot it at bad guys.




RE: easier method to test laser
By ekv on 8/20/2010 7:41:53 PM , Rating: 2
Nancy Pelosi, anybody?

But then you'd have to tax it, regulate it -- tanning salons fall under health care now -- and dare I say, "investigate" those funding the project.


black smoke
By mudgiestylie on 8/18/2010 9:57:56 PM , Rating: 2
Seems to me that a cloud of dense black smoke could be a cheap and effectively shield against laser weapons. Even if the beam isn't completely blocked out, it makes keeping the beam on one spot long enough to defeat a target very difficult. Getting behind the smoke to engage cleanly eliminates the advantages of a laser. Any thoughts?




RE: black smoke
By DougF on 8/18/2010 11:30:55 PM , Rating: 2
Smoke may serve to obscure the target, but these lasers are being primarily designed to hit aircraft, ARTY, missiles, and other fast moving targets. The other problem with smoke is you can't see the laser shooter. I don't think smoke, even "thick" black smoke, would do much to attenuate a megawatt class beam


Awesome...!
By CloudFire on 8/18/2010 2:57:43 PM , Rating: 1
My dreams of a shark head mounted laser is coming ever closer to reality! >:D




RE: Awesome...!
By ARoyalF on 8/18/2010 5:18:11 PM , Rating: 2
I was thinking sea bass.........


let me add this up...
By Kutcher on 8/20/2010 1:03:44 PM , Rating: 2
Lasers and laser shields and maybe chrome tanks...

OMG WW3 will be EPIC




"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki