backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 22 comment(s) - last by jeddragoon.. on Mar 20 at 6:33 AM


The Chip Mounted in Plastic  (Source: MIT)

MIT Researchers with Low Voltage Chip  (Source: MIT)
New chip design uses only 0.3V of power

Back in February a group of researchers from MIT and Texas Instruments designed a new chip for portable devices that uses a mere fraction of the power required in similar chips today. The researchers were able to design a chip that may be up to ten times as energy efficient as current technology.

Current chips operate at about 1 volt and the new design from the MIT researchers operates on 0.3 volts. Anantha Chadrakasan, Professor of Electrical Engineering told MIT Energy Initiative, “Memory and logic circuits have to be redesigned to operate at very low power supply voltages. Chadrakasan directs the MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories, where the work was conducted.

Simply reducing the voltage required for the chip to operate wasn’t the only trick the researchers used to get energy savings for the chip. The researchers also optimized the energy processing circuitry to account for several factors including environmental conditions and variations in circuit demands.

One key to the efficient nature of the new chip design according to Chadrakasan says was a high-efficiency DC-to-DC converter used to reduce voltage to lower levels built right onto the chip. At this point the chip design is only a proof of concept and significant obstacles remain to be overcome before the chip can enter production and ultimately end up in your cell phone. Researchers say that one of the biggest problems they had to overcome was the variability in chip manufacturing.

Lower voltage levels mean that differences in variations and imperfections in the chip building process are magnified and become a problem. Chadrakasan says that commercial applications for the new chip could be seen in five years or sooner. The researchers are also looking at applications for the low voltage chip other than in electronics.

Since the chip can operate on such low power requirements, the researchers also believe it could be used in implantable devices like pacemakers. In this application the chip would be able to get all the power it needs from body heat or the movement of the person with the implant. This would allow implantable devices to be powered indefinitely. Battery life is currently a very big concern for implantable medical devices.

One of the main reasons cited for the lack of encryption on telemetry data sent from pacemakers and internal defibrillators is the added strain encryption would put on the battery inside the devices. A low power chip that gets all the power it needs from the body may be just what is needed to allow stronger security in implanted medical devices.

These researchers aren’t alone in their quest for lower voltage, less power hungry chips and processors. Intel recently introduced its Atom processor which is a full x86 processor and requires only 0.6W of power. The Atom processor still consumes more power than the 0.3V design from MIT.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Encryption on a pacemaker?
By Spivonious on 3/18/2008 7:23:55 PM , Rating: 1
Why on earth would a pacemaker need encryption? So the haX0rs don't steal your heartbeat data?




RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By i3arracuda on 3/18/2008 7:27:06 PM , Rating: 5
i'm in ur arteries, stealing ur cholesterolz...


RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By jbzx86 on 3/18/2008 7:32:32 PM , Rating: 2
No, so they don't kill you.

You shall see that a genetic mutation will force all of mankind to use pace makers. Then, an elite few will get the genetic marker that fixes this problem in the heart. Next, they will hack into all pacemakers world-wide and kill everyone with the press of a button.

It is far cleaner than nukes, after all.


RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By deeznuts on 3/18/2008 7:34:27 PM , Rating: 4
There is a way to disrupt pacemakers. The story floated around the net last week I believe. Which is weird, because my friend just got on installed, he's only 27 but something f'd up in his heart.

Prolly too much blow and hookers.


RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By jlips6 on 3/18/2008 9:16:28 PM , Rating: 1
I read the story about pacemakers. It's bullshit, and bad bullshit at that. You have to be within a few centimeters of the pacemaker and you can't do it instantly. The "kill you with a pacemaker hack" doesn't work. Or at least it won't work as long as the "can I put my laptop right against your chest for a few minutes? It runs on body heat and I don't have enough myself." excuse doesn't work.


RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By omnicronx on 3/19/2008 9:05:50 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
It's bullshit, and bad bullshit at that. You have to be within a few centimeters of the pacemaker and you can't do it instantly.
First off, just because they need to be a few cm away now, doesn't mean they will forever. This was just a bunch of hackers having fun, not trying to kill someone.
Second, even in the article they stated with high powered devices it could be possible to get the same outcome from further away.

I dont know about you, but if theres even a remote possibility some random person can control my pacemaker, I would expect that something would be done about it..

why on earth you would take a passive approach on a device that one day could control the hearts of millions of people is beyond me.


RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By sprockkets on 3/19/2008 6:09:37 PM , Rating: 2
Hey, you got modded down due to quoting someone who said bull it. Lovely system, right :)


RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By tastyratz on 3/19/08, Rating: 0
RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By Samus on 3/19/2008 4:13:11 AM , Rating: 1
mmmm blow and hookers... ::drool::


RE: Encryption on a pacemaker?
By kkwst2 on 3/18/2008 9:06:20 PM , Rating: 2
Well, I guess in theory if you can read from it you could write to it as well. You could in theory reprogram the pacemaker. However, they usually require a probe be right over the pacemaker to interface with it. I assume that the range on it is very low. I also think there is a magnet in the probe that activates the communication. Not sure about that part.

At any rate, the risk is low I think, but it is there.


0.3 Volts of power? makes no sense
By Fenixgoon on 3/18/2008 8:46:43 PM , Rating: 5
voltage is a potential difference - a driving force as a result of a gradient in the electrical field.

watts = power = joules/second

sorry to be picky.




RE: 0.3 Volts of power? makes no sense
By duaine on 3/18/2008 9:58:45 PM , Rating: 5
Fenixgoon -- I commend you for being picky. I presume that Shane McGlaun will note your comment and try to be more precise in the future. As a staff member of Daily Tech, he probably values getting it right. Some general (non-tech) journalists would probably ignore you, or curse you for criticizing "their property". They're beyond help, so it doesn't do much good to try to educate them. Keep up the efforts (but expect frustration).


By FITCamaro on 3/19/2008 8:14:06 AM , Rating: 3
Yeah but those guys work at Toms Hardware.


By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 3/19/2008 11:14:36 AM , Rating: 2
Sorry - this has been corrected.


Powered by Body Heat, huh?
By BarkHumbug on 3/19/2008 3:27:06 AM , Rating: 2
I guess there's one place you could count on the body temperature to be near constant, but I'm not so sure it would be very comfortable in the long run... ;)




RE: Powered by Body Heat, huh?
By lhlinlhlin on 3/19/2008 5:21:06 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I guess there's one place you could count on the body temperature to be near constant, but I'm not so sure it would be very comfortable in the long run... ;)

I am not sure if you're thinking the same place as I am, but I don't think that the temperature of that place will be constant for most of the people who are doing certain type of exercise. It probably will cause power surge :)


RE: Powered by Body Heat, huh?
By FITCamaro on 3/19/2008 8:16:24 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe for women. Not for men. Unless you've got your hand on it all the time in the cold in which case typing must be very difficult for you.


RE: Powered by Body Heat, huh?
By BarkHumbug on 3/19/2008 9:15:00 AM , Rating: 2
I guess this one went straight over your head? Why would I wanna keep my hand on my ass all day? Sheesh, some people...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_thermometer


ITS THE MATRIX!
By daftrok on 3/19/2008 2:02:07 AM , Rating: 2
THE END IS NEIGH! WE WILL SOON BECOME THE POWER SOURCES FOR THE MACHINES!




RE: ITS THE MATRIX!
By nugundam93 on 3/19/2008 11:27:56 AM , Rating: 2
'bout time someone put in a matrix reference. hahaha!

but hey, it makes sense to use us to power electronic gadgets.


Body Heat
By jpknoll on 3/19/2008 12:17:03 PM , Rating: 2
Don't you need an energy gradient to derive the energy from the body? A pacemaker doesn't exactly sit in an area where this is possible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics




RE: Body Heat
By jeddragoon on 3/20/2008 6:33:39 AM , Rating: 2
..i need a hug cuz i to cold to recharge my pacemaker....cpu ops battery


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson

DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone? 




17 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki