backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 36 comment(s) - last by Justin Case.. on Feb 16 at 12:00 AM


Click to view animation

Model (a): cone outer segments (CO), cone terminals (CT), horizontal cells (HC), bipolar cells (BC), narrow- and wide-field amacrine cells (NA,WA), transient ganglion cells (OnT, OffT), sustained ganglion cells (OnS, OffS). Model (b): Transistor synapses

Chipdesign and human photoreceptor mosaic: phototransistor (P), outer plexiform (synaptic) layer (OPL), bipolar cells (BC), inner plexiform layer (IPL), ganglion cells (GC), narrow-field amacrine (NA)
One step closer to creating the cybernetic organism

Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and Stanford University have made a breakthrough in the field of vision. Kareem Amir Zaghloul and Kwabena Boahen have proposed a silicon retina that reproduces signals in the optic nerve, a technology which could be used to provide vision to those who suffer from blindness-related diseases, such as retinitis pigmentosa.

 

Unlike previous attempts to create an artificial retina, which relied on external cameras and processors, the silicon retina integrates many functions of the mammalian retina in a package that could be suitable for implantation.

 

“Here, we present a silicon retina modeled on neural circuitry in both the outer and the inner retina,” Zaghloul and Boahen introduced in their paper for the Journal of Neural Engineering. “It is constructed at a scale comparable to the human retina and uses under

a tenth of a watt, thereby satisfying the requirements of a fully implantable prosthesis.”

 

It is estimated that the silicon retina will maintain sensitivity over at least 15 years of average use relating to vision.

 

The mammalian retina was used as the basis for the design of the artificial retina. 13 neuronal types were made into transistor form, each mimicking the function of its biological equivalent.

 

“We morphed our retinal model into a silicon chip by replacing each synapse or gap junction in our model with a transistor,” Zaghloul and Boahen revealed. “One of its terminals is connected to the pre-synaptic node, another to the post-synaptic node and a third to the modulatory node. By permuting these assignments, we realize excitation, inhibition and conduction, all of which are under modulatory control.”

 

Conveniently, the binary nature of transistors lends itself well to replicating the functions of neurons, which operate in a similar “all-or-none” fashion. The silicon retina uses “on” and “off” signals similar to those found between amacrine cells in the mammalian retina.

 

Another aspect of the silicon retina that’s copied from the real retina is that it filters out all the useless, unchanged and redundant data from a scene, which reduces the bandwidth required to produce an image.

 

While much of this may sound like science fiction, the researchers already have working silicon. The die measures 3.5 × 3.3 millimeters and has 5760 phototransistors, which mimic photoreceptor cells. The phototransistors are then connected to another group of 3600 transistors which act as ganglion cells.

 

“Our chip design was fabricated in a 0.35 µm minimum feature-size process, with its cell mosaics tiled at a scale similar to the mammalian retina,” the paper reads. “Phototransistors are tiled triangularly 40 µm apart; this spacing is only about two and a half times that of human cones at 5 mm nasal eccentricity.”

 

One major difference the researchers had to deal with when designing the artificial retina is that silicon micro-fabrication technology cannot produce three dimensional structures found in the real retina.

 

Power consumption is an area where the researchers are still currently trying to improve.

 

“Our artificial retina satisfies the requirements of a neural prosthesis by matching the biological retina in size and weight and using under a tenth of a watt,” the researchers stated. “Although this energy consumption is 1000 times less efficient than the mammalian retina, it still represents a 100-fold improvement over conventional microprocessors.”

 

Zaghloul and Boahen are currently working on improving energy efficiency, spatial resolution and dynamic range. According to the researchers, advances in chip fabrication will be of great aid to this technology.

 

Further development of the silicon retina not only benefits those suffering from impaired vision, as the technology can also be applied to artificial neural systems and robots.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Yeah...
By Kozman on 11/6/2006 8:58:40 AM , Rating: 5
...but how well does it overclock?




RE: Yeah...
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 11/6/2006 9:07:28 AM , Rating: 4
Hell, I don't want people shooting red lasers out their eyes a la Cyclops :D


RE: Yeah...
By GhandiInstinct on 11/6/2006 1:01:42 PM , Rating: 1
Cyborgs here we come.


RE: Yeah...
By darith27 on 11/14/2006 11:32:51 AM , Rating: 2
No neuro-net processor, but cybernetic organism here we come.


RE: Yeah...
By ajfink on 11/6/2006 12:12:30 PM , Rating: 2
Overclock, hehe. Knew someone would say that.

This is a great jump, but what worries me is the massive size of the silicon structures. Compared to other modern processors this thing is downright antique. Shrinking things down and adding cone-shaped structures (the current rise of nanotech, anyone?) would, quite possibly, produce an electronic eye better than the mammalian one. That's a long way off, though.


RE: Yeah...
By S3anister on 11/6/2006 2:13:17 PM , Rating: 3
i don't know how well the first generation will OC, but with die shrinks maybe you could get a 10% increase in performance with overclocking....

lol :D


RE: Yeah...
By scrapsma54 on 11/9/2006 5:39:56 PM , Rating: 2
overclocking? I wouldn't doubt it. However, The human eye sees
life at a refresh rate of 60hz; jumping it further requires a huge modification to the human brain. This would be usefull in soldiers. seeing at a rate of 200hz would ultimately make soldiers see bullets in slow motion. The drawback would be self explanitory. Also watching television would be like watching a slide show. I have heard something about placing neodymium magnets in a incision and when the wound heals the magnet can pick up electric charges and the nerve tissue picks them up. The drawback is the coating would crack and the implant would have to be replaced. Scientists are working on a more durable coating.


power not a problem
By marvdmartian on 11/6/2006 9:56:11 AM , Rating: 2
Just implant some photo-voltaic cells in the top of their head!! ;)

Seriously, this is cool stuff. I'm sure 3D rendering will be in the forseeable future. The only real question I have, that I didn't see here, is how does the quality relate to that of a functional eye? As far as megapixels, if we have to break it down to that??




RE: power not a problem
By Justin Case on 11/6/2006 1:37:17 PM , Rating: 3
3D rendering? Meaning? This is meant to replace an eye, not generate artificial images. Our eyes don't "render" anything; they simply capture the image (meaning 2D projection) in front of them.

Real eyes have variable spatial and temporal resolution and different luma and chroma resolution (the general rule is: great at the centre, crap at the edges, none at all around the optic nerve), so you can't really measure it in an orthogonal way (actually, measuring digicam resolution in megapixels is also wrong, but that's another subject).

The current resolution of artificial vision systems is obviously much, much lower than the real thing (the main problem is the interface with the brain, not the image capture itself).


RE: power not a problem
By yipsl on 11/6/2006 11:11:05 PM , Rating: 3
Regarding the brain, I don't think I'll live long enough to see the nanotech, but it should someday be possible to reprogram the brain's visual centers. I was born with strabismus (ie lazy eye, should be called lazy brain).

I had surgery to correct the positioning of left eye at age 14, but it was too late to allow the brain to comprehend the images. Thus, I'm legally blind in that eye. With glasses, I can see the big E on an eye chart and that's all. I can navigate a room but not see people's faces clearly.

So, I have one good eye correctable to 20/20 with no natural depth perception. What's more, I had cataract surgery on my right eye, so I have a low tech intra-ocular lens implant already. It's great and my vision is better than it was before the cataract.

We took my son to see "The Nightmare Before Christmas 3D last weekend". He and my wife could see the 3D effects, but I could not. It was just a good 2D movie.

My wife mods for Morrowind and Oblivion, and I play both games, but it seems I'm missing out on some of the normal map effects in Oblivion.

My brain simply cannot interpret the signals from my once misaligned eye, and I hope that someday there's a way to fix that for people like me, but it would involve the brain's visual center, not the eye itself.

So bring on the nanotech reprogramming of the brain itself. Just as long as it's not used by Big Brother for nefarious purposes.


RE: power not a problem
By Justin Case on 2/16/2007 12:00:54 AM , Rating: 2
Unless you're playing with stereoscopic glasses, Oblivion (or any other game) is just being rendered as 2D images on your 2D monitor, so with one eye you see exactly the same as you would with two.

BTW, I have a friend who is blind from one eye and she's actually less sensitive to some types of optical illusions than people with stereo vision. Namely, she does not appear to have a "blind spot" in that eye (which everyone with stereo vision has, even if they're not aware of it - but it's easy to show it with a simple trick). It seems her brain compensates for the lack of stereo vision by keeping previous data and "covering" the blind spot with it, instead of "covering" it with data coming from the other eye. Smart things, brains, eh?

P.S. - Oblivion sucks. Okay, it's pretty, but the world just feels fake and superficial. Morrowind had its problems, but at least it had atmosphere.


RE: power not a problem
By frobizzle on 11/6/2006 4:14:47 PM , Rating: 3
Performance will be severely limited if the user enables anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering!


RE: power not a problem
By scrapsma54 on 11/9/2006 5:46:16 PM , Rating: 2
Makes me wonder if organic processing is more efficient. Diamonds prove to be more effective as semi-conductors than silicon. Both in conductivity and heat. I know that synthetic diamond film manufacturing has evolved to be more cost efficient.


options
By PrimarchLion on 11/6/2006 10:43:36 AM , Rating: 5
Hopefully they'll include options for infrared and UV (and x-ray) spectra like in Predator.

Also picture in picture and DVR.




RE: options
By Lazarus Dark on 11/6/2006 10:56:14 AM , Rating: 2
nightvision like those videocams that could see through clothes! (you know you were thinking it)

quote:
Also picture in picture and DVR.

nah, for that I'd rather have the digital signal beamed directly to my brain. I don't want all that digital-analogue-organic conversion introducing artifacts into the picture.


6ghz on Ln2
By jackalsmith on 11/6/2006 2:47:40 PM , Rating: 1
I heard eva2000 on xs got one up to 6ghz with Ln2 but it wasn't orthos stable.




RE: 6ghz on Ln2
By AxemanFU on 11/6/2006 4:33:15 PM , Rating: 2
Your eyesight crashes and you walk into a wall while you wait for it to come back up...ow.

Well, this will be interesting. all they need to do is attach a wireless transmitter to it, and a receiver and HDD recorder, and you can record everything you see, EXACTLY as you saw it. You could essentially have eyes that are concealed cameras themselves. Wouldn't that be weird.


RE: 6ghz on Ln2
By ADDAvenger on 11/6/2006 4:49:17 PM , Rating: 2
That would push the nervous types into the paranoia range, but I'd love to have it. So often I see funny or just downright stupid stuff that everyone else missed, and it's never funny when I tell the story to them because I'm just a bit of a loser like that.
I'd actually thought of hooking a flash drive or something into my head, like that annoying engineer on Andromeda, but never thought I might actually see something for real like this in my lifetime.


RE: 6ghz on Ln2
By mbf on 11/6/2006 5:30:45 PM , Rating: 2
Probably running Windows then... :D

But seriously, this is great news for a very near-sighted person such as myself. The idea that blindness may be "cured" is overwhelming!



Interceptors 0.1a
By InternetGeek on 11/6/2006 1:07:36 PM , Rating: 2
Just imagine if employers start using this technology to make sure workers do not leak secrets, read personal email during work hours or whatsoever...




RE: Interceptors 0.1a
By bjourdo on 11/6/2006 4:47:30 PM , Rating: 2
Somehow I doubt too many employees will volunteer to a surgical procedure that would replace their naturally functioning eye with a prosthetic.


RE: Interceptors 0.1a
By GaryJohnson on 11/7/2006 1:25:57 PM , Rating: 2
If the pay was good enough...


No VISOR
By encryptkeeper on 11/6/2006 9:24:58 AM , Rating: 2
I guess Commander LaForge won't need the VISOR after all.




RE: No VISOR
By Marcus Yam on 11/6/2006 9:40:11 AM , Rating: 2
Well, the dude did get rid of his VISOR for silicon retinas in Star Trek: First Contact.


nice! I like!
By RussianSensation on 11/6/2006 10:50:22 AM , Rating: 2
Can I get night and x-ray vision with that?




RE: nice! I like!
By Justin Case on 11/6/2006 1:39:08 PM , Rating: 2
To get working "x-ray" vision you need to plant a source of x-rays behind each thing that you want to look at (that's how x-ray photography works). Better stick to infrared (which pretty much everything emits naturally).


I wonder
By Regs on 11/6/2006 5:16:56 PM , Rating: 2
What the costs of this will be and if insurance will cover at least 50% of the bill. For someone to get their vision back I'm sure it will be priceless though.

Is it just me or is it that whenever I hear prototypes such as this they never make it to market? I've been hearing all sorts of great ideas and innovations but none seen to be readily available when I go to the doctors.

I do salute the people who added 10-20+ years for HIV victims however. Though I'd imagine the medication is expensive.

Now if only they can cure baldness! (and cancer, genetic diseases, and paralysis)




RE: I wonder
By Pythias on 11/8/2006 10:21:45 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Now if only they can cure baldness! (and cancer, genetic diseases, and paralysis)




Thats an admirable sentiment but before we go making people immune to disease, maybe we should where we're going to house all these newly cast immortals, and how we're going to feed them.


Just a thought...
By captchaos2 on 11/6/2006 5:26:17 PM , Rating: 3
but how long before I can actually have eyes in the back of my head?




Is it just me...
By jskirwin on 11/6/2006 10:26:32 AM , Rating: 2
Or is the person in the video dancing to a GoGo's song?

Man I've got to stop watching VH1...




Silicon?
By bldckstark on 11/6/2006 12:50:21 PM , Rating: 2
I'm gonna wait to get the ED (Eagle Definition) version, cuz I hear silicon has burn in. Besides, how long will it take to crack the DRM on this?




Power?
By BladeVenom on 11/6/2006 8:09:08 PM , Rating: 2
Just don't use Sony batteries. No one wants exploding eyeballs, even if they are prosthetic.




Amazing.
By Cincybeck on 11/7/2006 1:32:31 AM , Rating: 2
I've heard that over the next 30 to 40 years we'll have more technological advances then there have been in the last 2000 years. While I'm skeptical, it's things like this that make seeing, believing. Seriously the pun wasn't intended.




GITS?
By lethalchronic on 11/8/2006 1:58:33 PM , Rating: 2
This kinda reminds me of Ghost In The Shell stuff, I want a eye that works like a sniper scope!!!!!!




terminater
By zam786 on 11/8/2006 2:09:50 PM , Rating: 2
now i understand it must be rise of the machines they comin and its al because of cyberdine systems 101.
EVERY MAN FOR HIMSELF




THE WONDERFUL NEWS
By Cesar Alberto on 11/13/2006 6:26:00 AM , Rating: 2
I had an accident 29 years ago with an electrical unloading, that fundamentally affected the vision to me, as a result of this I have undergone in both eyes traumatic cataracts, iriotomias, pigmentosa retinitis in the eye izq and problems of tension in the right eye, this one last patient in 6 occasions, I have implanted an intraocular lens, the last operation has been the implantation of a valve to control the subject of the tension, but absolutely it is even so not controlled, in addition I must use 3 types of coirises to control it. I have taken this great news warmly, is clear that great advances are becoming on the vision, not if tests are already being made in humans on this new investigation. It would thank for greater information on this article, page Web or oftalmológica clinic that advise to you. Thousand thanks Caesar
I'm from Spain




"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser











botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki