backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 19 comment(s) - last by feraltoad.. on Jun 8 at 11:11 PM


It appears reports that Microsoft "binged" Yahoo with its new search engine were mistaken. Three out of four major market research firms say that Yahoo still leads significantly in traffic.  (Source: DailyTech)
Microsoft's new product seized the number two search spot says one research report, others disagree

The Yahoo Microsoft saga is an irresistible one for the tech news community, both for journalists and readers alike.  After Yahoo scorned Microsoft's 2008 purchase offer, Microsoft decided to go its own way, cooking up Kumo.  So when the newly renamed Kudo, now Bing, was released last week and appeared to seize second place in searches from Yahoo, some quickly reported Microsoft to be victorious over Yahoo.  Now it appears those reports may have been premature.

If there has been one consistent thing about Bing and its reception, it has been the lack of consistency.  Some have showered praise on the search engine, arguing that while not a leap and bound over Google, it provides a much better experience than the old Live search and better options to refine your search. 

Other reviewers were less positive, including a particularly scathing review by PC World which accused Microsoft of "binging" customers.  It claimed Microsoft's Cashback discounted "best price" items which appeared as search results were actually substantially more expensive than offerings from discount retailers like Amazon.com and Newegg.com.

Then came a StatCounter report at the end of last week, which claimed Bing scored 16.28 percent of U.S. search traffic last week compared to 10.22 percent by Yahoo and 71.47 by Google.  The report put Bing's worldwide total at 5.62 percent, compared to 5.13 by Yahoo and 87.62 by Google.  Some blog sites like TechCrunch began to hail Bing as having stolen marketshare from Google and using to bing Yahoo, sprinting into second.

However, the weekend brought still other reports contradicting these figures.  Search Engine Land checked with leading market research firms Comscore, Nielsen, and Hitwise, which reported that Yahoo was consistently doing three times the traffic as Bing.  CNET, which owns a large network of sites also disputed the claims of a Bing victory, saying its own internal data indicated Bing did not pass Yahoo.

The dramatic reversal brings to question the accuracy of the original StatCounter report.  StatCounter's materials state that its numbers are "based on aggregate data collected by Statcounter on a sample exceeding 4 billion page views per month collected from across the Statcounter network of more than 3 million Web sites. Stats are updated and made available every 4 hours, however are subject to quality assurance testing and revision for 7 days from publication."

So perhaps poor quality testing let some bad numbers slip through.  What does this mean for Bing?  Likely not much; the search engine is unlikely to post any dramatic gains or losses so soon.  It may get a boost these first few weeks and then see a drop off, much like Google-descendant Cuil.  However, don't expect it to nosedive like Cuil, either -- after all, it has the backing of one of the tech industry's strongest players.  Ultimately, whether Bing will beat Yahoo likely won't be decided for months, while a challenge to Google would take years.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Bing Search Results
By Captain828 on 6/7/2009 4:26:27 AM , Rating: 4
Besides the usual conflicting reports when something new launches (like Chrome), I don't see what's all the 'Bing' about??

I tried Binging some things and comparing them against Google. VERY bad results.
I actually had to refine my search several times in order to find something, and I actually quit because I couldn't find something AT ALL with Bing, yet Google first posted it in the first 5 results and a refine got it to first.

Not trying to bash Bing, but am I wrong or is Bing that inaccurate?
How did your searches fare?




RE: Bing Search Results
By Mitch101 on 6/7/2009 12:49:08 PM , Rating: 3
As a website owner I did the same to try and figure out where my sites rank with Bing and its pretty much msn with the bing wrapper on it. In fact all results from MSN bring you to bing pages. I can certainly see why Microsoft was and should still should continue to pursue yahoo's search engine technology. I cant say MSN has ever really made my search engine of choice.

However I do prefer MSN/BING images over google. I prefer to scroll than next next next next next next.

I do shopping through Bing/msn/live because of the cashback.

I do like the category style options on the left side of the screen to weed out areas of interest however again the search needs improvement.

I also saw an option where you can see airline travel on destinations by graph so you can determine what time a year flights are at peak and a few weeks later they are a lot cheaper.

While I really like some of the new options in Bing its really hindered by its poor indexing of web pages. If they can fix this then Bing really stands a chance against google. Otherwise its just got good ideas but poor relative content and as a search engine your only as good as your relative search ability.


RE: Bing Search Results
By excelsium on 6/7/2009 1:07:10 PM , Rating: 3
I prefer the design of bings image search, various different views e.g. lots of thumbnails, no filenames etc visible, much more like a desktop app.

The results seem just as good as google at least for image search.


RE: Bing Search Results
By feraltoad on 6/8/2009 11:11:41 PM , Rating: 2
Download Cooliris!

http://www.cooliris.com/

You get a big 3D wall of images you can scroll through. It also works to view Facebook photos all at once instead of clicking on next...next... in the albums. It now feels like Firefox is broken without Cooliris. Very slick.

It will also let you search Amazon using images. If you like to party.


RE: Bing Search Results
By eddieroolz on 6/7/2009 10:28:20 PM , Rating: 2
Although I recognize that individual mileage may vary, I found Bing as good as or sometimes even superior to Google.

Every search I have done so far showed me the most relevant result first, which was what I was looking for, with the exception of FML which I couldn't find the home page to.

As a result, I've completely switched from Google to Bing. I was never a fan of Google anyway, and used Live Search as much as I could. Now, I have a good reason not to use Google anymore.


RE: Bing Search Results
By Hakuryu on 6/8/2009 3:11:13 AM , Rating: 2
I like the way Bing handles images, but...

I have Bitdefender anti-virus, and after searching at bing, the process vsserv.exe (part of BD) went mad. For a good 5 minutes the process took up 99% of my system resources and went over 100k memory usage. I didn't find much in trying to research this, but apparently BD didn't like something and was trying to analyze it (I could be wrong). I ran scans and Malwarebytes anti-malware and everything is fine.

The problem could have been due to something else, but I'll stick with Google instead of taking a chance with Bing that may hang my PC for 5 minutes. It's kind of like XP vs Vista... sure the new one is interesting, but if what I have now works fine then I'm not going to switch unless something really impressive about Bing comes along.


RE: Bing Search Results
By consumerwhore on 6/8/2009 2:13:37 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
went over 100k memory usage

Holy mother of the shiznit! That's... That's... Like... Wow... That's... Like...

An insignificant amount.

<mimics google>
Did you mean 100 MB ?
</mimics google>


Hadn't heard of it
By MrDiSante on 6/6/2009 11:58:05 PM , Rating: 2
I hadn't heard of this supposed "binging" of Yahoo! until DailyTech posted this article refuting the fact. It's hardly surprising: you don't take an additional 10% of the market overnight with a new search engine that may or may not be better.




RE: Hadn't heard of it
By amanojaku on 6/7/2009 2:03:23 AM , Rating: 5
The only way to make a story out of this was to tie it to the MS-Yahoo! soap opera. In other words, there's nothing to see here, folks. Move along.


kuMo
By Loser on 6/7/2009 8:06:20 AM , Rating: 3
it was kuMo not kuDo




RE: kuMo
By bpt8056 on 6/7/2009 10:30:05 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah, you're right as Kodu was the former codename for Boku.


this sounds like...
By inperfectdarkness on 6/7/2009 12:05:49 PM , Rating: 3
exactly how microsoft entered the console market.




RE: this sounds like...
By BBeltrami on 6/8/2009 1:33:53 PM , Rating: 2
and the browser market...


By MarcoP123 on 6/8/2009 1:03:51 AM , Rating: 2
Why is there so much emotion (positive and negative) when a news story focuses on Microsoft? Let's stick with the facts and how they might or might not impact us. In what ways is Bing better or worse than Google or Yahoo? How will (or should) Bing's introduction affect marketers? Here are my newest thoughts on Bing, Yahoo!, and Google: http://domusinc.blogspot.com/2009/06/bing-yahoo-go... .




By rudy on 6/8/2009 10:47:17 PM , Rating: 2
Good job trying to increase your page rank.


bing.
By excelsium on 6/7/09, Rating: 0
a more correct statement would be
By tharik on 6/7/09, Rating: -1
By Smilin on 6/8/2009 11:09:23 AM , Rating: 1
Welcome to the 21st century.

Mullets are no longer in style and Microsoft is no longer a monopoly. Give that tired argument a rest and go get a haircut.


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki