quote: we are in debt up to eyeballs and nukes are EXPENSIVE
quote: Like wind farms along the cost, where the majority of population is concentrated and nuke is a no go.
quote: 890Million tons. We'd be fine on our own.
quote: Who should decide which suit is "frivolous"?
quote: Some sort of backup non-nuclear plants are needed, anyway.
quote: One way to store is EV batteries.
quote: The new Tessera plant in Calif. cost 2 billion and will power around 500,000 homes
quote: Tessera's Calico plant will cost more than $2 billion and will power 200,000 to 500,000 homes
quote: If they start construction by December 31, the plants can qualify for a program that provides a 30 percent cash grant from the Treasury Department
quote: The new Tessera plant in Calif. cost 2 billion and will power around 500,000 homes.
quote: Nuclear power has certain advantages, just like wind or solar
quote: Why should it be only one or the other? Why so much radicalism when it comes to renewables?
quote: There are plenty of places where renewables just make sense, don't you agree?
quote: How do you conserve 1 CMO?
quote: OR we could just aspire to use less and not build anything. Implement a 'negawatt' program similar to china
quote: Renewables need to be the future, too bad we will need a 'real' nuke disaster to prove it.
quote: Just my two cents, course I'm writing this on a ATOM netbook off-grid. I already went down the rabbit hole and not expecting many to follow.
quote: yes, because forcing a family off its farm to preserve the environment is 100% analogous to systematically exterminating 7 million innocent people in gas chambers.
quote: I could be wrong, but it seamed like a good idea to me.