backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 58 comment(s) - last by OxBow.. on May 24 at 4:39 PM


Photo courtesy of Gearlog.com
DisplayPort takes the lead over UDI and HDMI for computer displays

Consumers have made one thing clear about the tech industry over the past several years: format wars are confusing and often times deliver more issues than solutions. Display technologies consisting of DisplayPort, HDMI and UDI have all been ferociously vying for industry support over the past two years. Despite a strong push from all three standards, DisplayPort crossed a major milestone in April when it received approval by VESA to be an industry standard.

The big question on most consumers' minds however, is the proliferation of products that actually use the DisplayPort standard.

This week at a business strategy meeting at Dell, the company showed off what it calls the next generation in LCD displays. Dell demonstrated a prototype LCD panel based on DisplayPort. DisplayPort has several advantages that will allow manufacturers to design thinner LCD panels,  Dell's chief technology officer Kevin Kettler said.

Kettler showed a LCD that was only half an inch in thickness. The panel also incorporated speakers and a microphone. Audio and video signals route through a single DisplayPort cable. DisplayPort LCD panels will be available later this year, Kettler claims.

The DisplayPort standard recently wowed consumers by adopting a standard that takes advantage of fiber optic cables for signaling. Using technology from a leading DisplayPort task force member named Luxtera, DisplayPort devices that use fiber optics will be able to accept cable lengths unheard of in the industry.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Thinness and Cables
By ChronoReverse on 5/18/2007 2:27:13 PM , Rating: 2
Could someone explain to me how a cable and connector standard would lead to a thinner panel?

Aren't all three standards digital and thus have somewhat similar requirements?




RE: Thinness and Cables
By Murst on 5/18/2007 2:43:21 PM , Rating: 2
I was wondering the same thing. The only thing that really comes to mind would be if the displayport somehow did not require as much processing of the signal as DVI, for example... that would mean that the hardware (and all associated fans, etc) wouldn't need to take up as much space... but that's just a guess.

If anyone really knows the answer to this, I'd love to read about it.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By jpeyton on 5/18/2007 5:04:47 PM , Rating: 2
You guys are easily amazed.

All Dell did is take a bare LCD panel and affix a sheet of Lexan/polycarbonate onto the front.

Already been done by modders for cheap:

http://metku.net/index.html?sect=view&n=1&path=mod...

I personally hope it doesn't have that huge of a bezel, as pictured; my desk space is limited as is.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By heffeque on 5/18/2007 5:35:19 PM , Rating: 1
They must have never seen one of these iMacs before:
http://www.cedmagic.com/history/imac-2002.jpg


RE: Thinness and Cables
By ChronoReverse on 5/18/2007 6:19:19 PM , Rating: 3
Did you reply the wrong posts? I'm not commenting on the design of the panel but rather the claim that DisplayPort will lead to thinner panels.

See, I don't follow how DisplayPort would reduce the electronics for conversion anymore than HDMI would. And if they're comparing to the old VGA cable, the claim becomes disingenuous to be polite.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By sxr7171 on 5/19/2007 7:34:17 PM , Rating: 3
Simple. The connector is way thinner and shorter than the current DVI connector, and if placed on the bezel vertically can allow for thinner displays.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By phusg on 5/22/2007 3:33:27 AM , Rating: 2
They are comparing it to HDMI and UDI (which are both thinner and shorter) as the article does, and not to the previous generation DVI.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By Bigginz on 5/18/2007 2:54:27 PM , Rating: 5
If you click on the link to the article at GearLog.com you will find the answer. One of the Dell exec's says "By eliminating a lot of the electronics used for video conversion, new LCD monitors will be super-thin, and super sleek."

Personally, I am waiting on an 24 or 27 inch OLED monitor with 1920x1080 resolution, DisplayPort or HDMI connections for about $500 USD. I might be waiting 2 or 3 years.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By Murst on 5/18/2007 2:59:14 PM , Rating: 5
Can't wait to play DNF on my OLED!


RE: Thinness and Cables
By Pirks on 5/18/07, Rating: -1
RE: Thinness and Cables
By Slappi on 5/19/2007 9:04:38 AM , Rating: 2
I miss Duke. Hopefully it will see the light of day.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By noxipoo on 5/18/2007 3:24:27 PM , Rating: 2
try 5-7 years, maybe


RE: Thinness and Cables
By TheDrD on 5/18/2007 4:53:04 PM , Rating: 2
Heh, yup


RE: Thinness and Cables
By MetaDFF on 5/18/2007 4:42:33 PM , Rating: 2
Isn't the vast majority of the space inside an LCD monitor occupied by the CCFLs and power conversion circuits? The DSP electronics themselves are already quite small.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By ChronoReverse on 5/18/2007 6:20:38 PM , Rating: 2
That's what I thought too especially since all the new standards are digital.

Either the claim is bogus or they're comparing with the old VGA cables (which would need more converting) or there's something about DisplayPort that's quite unusual.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By Fluppeteer on 5/21/2007 8:34:14 AM , Rating: 2
Quite - I can see no reason why thinness, of all things, should be an argument for DisplayPort. It might apply inside a laptop, where DisplayPort is trying to replace LVDS with a lower-wire-count video interconnect, but for desktop devices the DisplayPort connector isn't significantly smaller than HDMI. A DVI TMDS receiver is tiny, but even a decent VGA ADC chip is hardly huge.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By PsYStuMmY on 5/20/2007 5:03:25 PM , Rating: 2
we don't really need thinner lcds. they are already thin enough. what i see want to see the picture quality improving, like with led technology.


RE: Thinness and Cables
By Belard on 5/22/2007 4:27:36 PM , Rating: 2
1920x1080?? That is such a LOW resolution...

1920x1200 is standard for todays 24" LCDs. The 27~30 models offer more pixels - think beyond the HD-TV.


wow...
By Xavian on 5/18/2007 2:57:13 PM , Rating: 2
WOW, that screen looks awesome, did Dell steal some designers from Apple or something, just wow.




RE: wow...
By darkpaw on 5/18/2007 3:02:03 PM , Rating: 3
I really don't get why people always say Apple has good designers. For the past few years their design for pretty much everything has been "shiny white box".


RE: wow...
By ATC on 5/18/07, Rating: -1
RE: wow...
By EntreHoras on 5/18/2007 3:16:32 PM , Rating: 3
Q: What else is a mac than a shiny white box?

A: A wannabe-cool guy in TV ads.