backtop


Print 26 comment(s) - last by tangtangtan.. on Jul 11 at 10:05 AM


Just a year ago, iAd was showing off vigorous performance. Now it's been forced to slash prices as its clients have abandoned ship.  (Source: AP Photo)

Many advertising agency executives think that iAd could have one foot in the grave, thanks to Apple's diminish market share and thirst for complete control of its partnerships, including iAd contracts.  (Source: Treehugger)
Company is cutting its rates as customers defect

When Apple Inc. (AAPL) launched iAds in June 2010, it unleashed an unparalleled mobile advertising platform.  At the time Google Inc.'s (GOOGAdMob's mobile platform was still a work in process and was far less attractive than Apple's slick, easy to use implementation.  Powered by its recent acquisition, Quattro Wireless, Apple's iAd platform looked like a market bull.

I. IAd -- Going Downhill Fast

Fast forward a year and not only is Android outselling the iPhone two-to-one worldwide, but iAd is also floundering.  High profile clients Citigroup Inc. (C) and J.C. Penney Comp., Inc. (JCP) have reportedly dropped out of $1M USD iAd contracts they entered at launch, opting for cheaper competitors.

According to unnamed sources quoted by Bloomberg, Apple is privately now offering identical advertising packages for $300,000 USD -- a 70 percent discount.  To qualify, advertising agencies have to bring several campaigns to iAds.  Generally, Apple now offers a $500,000 flat rate -- still half off the original price.

Apple's slipping foothold in the advertising market comes at a time when competitors are cashing in.  AdMob is now polished and has the advantage of being able to work across all the major platforms, including iOS, Android, and Windows Phone 7.  And new players have risen, including Millennial Media and ValueClick, Inc.'s (VCLK) Greystripe -- both of which also offer multi-platform deals.

Thom Kennon, senior vice president of strategy for the Young & Rubicam ad agency in New York tells Bloomberg that Apple's underlying model is flawed, stating, "Apple's closed ecosystem may have been interesting in the short run for advertisers, but in the long run they priced themselves out."

II. Hope for iAds?

Apple still has a massive footprint, with 425,000 applications in the App Store at last count.  And it still offers developers a pretty attractive deal -- 60 percent of ad-click revenue.

The company is also taking some additional steps to try to steer the iAd platform back to success.  They've added a suite called iAd Producer online, which allows advertising firms to develop iAds more quickly and easily.  It also hired Carrie Frolich, former head of digital for WPP Plc’s MEC -- a top ad agency.

There are some signs of progress.  Apple currently only has 20 major iAd partners, and many of those are companies that are closely tied to Apple, such as the iPhone's original carrier AT&T, Inc. (T), or Walt Disney Comp. (DIS), a company in which Apple chief executive Steven P. Jobs is a major shareholder.  Still, company officials are quoted as saying that the company's ad stable will soon expand to 50 companies.

The platform does have some proponents.  GroupM North America's chief executive Rob Norman currently pushes advertising client Unilever NV's (AMS:UNA) products via iAds.  Mr. Norman admits the price must be right, but says the prestige of using iAd is currently worth it.  He states, "Everyone likes the consumer experience it creates. Everyone wants to be there because they think that, possibly since television, this iso ne of the most elegant customer experiences. We'd all like to stay at the Four Seasons, but not if it costs $150,000 a night. There’s a price equation."

Others are already shoveling dirt on the iAd coffin, saying that the platform is doomed due to its smaller audience and Apple's demands for complete control.

States online marketing firm ICrossing's vice president of mobile, Rachel Pasqua, "I haven’t encouraged any of my clients towards it. I haven’t seen a huge value proposition."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By tng on 7/8/2011 10:02:24 AM , Rating: 2
Is what has made Apple successful elsewhere? The ads that they sell are restricted to the iOS platform?

I am not sure that I see the difference between what Google does to sell an ad compared to what Apple does except that Google spreads ads across a wide variety of platforms where Apple is only on Apple? That seems an insane way to limit yourself, tell me I am wrong and Apple is not THAT dumb.




RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By tng on 7/8/2011 10:09:15 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
tell me I am wrong and Apple is not THAT dumb.
OK After thinking about it, Apple is not that dumb, but they are that arrogant, to think that the same business model they use for hardware will work for advertising.


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By Pirks on 7/8/2011 10:32:19 AM , Rating: 2
How about this explanation - Apple thought if they had the largest number of apps in their app store they have the strongest appeal to ad makers, but then ad makers realized that all these gazillions of fart apps in Apple store are actually worth zero from the point of view of making any ad revenue from them, so Apple had to slash the prices as a result. Sounds plausible?


By tng on 7/8/2011 10:45:05 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
but then ad makers realized that all these gazillions of fart apps in Apple store are actually worth zero from the point of view of making any ad revenue from them
LOL, you know that it wouldn't be funny if it were not true. Don't have a smart phone so I don't shop apps, but I have seen allot of apps on iPhones and Android that are just crap, sometimes fun for about 10 minutes, but crap nonetheless. The crap ones seem to outnumber the useful ones.


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By macdevdude on 7/8/11, Rating: -1
RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By cjohnson2136 on 7/8/2011 10:33:21 AM , Rating: 2
Why advertise to only a certain percentage of the market when you could advertise to the entire market. That is dumb from an advertising stand point. If they had their easy to use iAd plus allowing it to hit Android, and all the other platforms then maybe they wouldn't be doing so bad.

Stop being an appletard


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By Tony Swash on 7/8/11, Rating: -1
RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By themaster08 on 7/8/2011 11:56:14 AM , Rating: 2
As a commenter of that post mentioned, where's the evidence to back that up? The commenter also posted a link:

http://www.mobilemarketer.com/cms/news/research/10...


By bug77 on 7/9/2011 6:21:01 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Why advertise to only a certain percentage of the market when you could advertise to the entire market.


Because you can't actually advertise to the entire market. A closed platform is closed both ways.

There's a fundamental difference here. Apple sells gadgets. So they made sure their hardware and software play nice together. Ads were just an afterthought, to supplement their income. Google, on the other hand, sells ads. Their only plan is to give away Android for free, because the more Internet surfing devices are out there, the larger their market gets.


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By Pirks on 7/8/2011 10:38:53 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
It's not dumb, its brilliant
So slashing price for your service because you can't compete is now called "brilliance"? Nice example of iLogic here.
quote:
Once the iPhone lands on Sprint and T-Mobile it will start selling Android again
Good point! It arrived on Verizon and actually indeed started selling Android , now with other US carriers it will be selling Android even more! Android fans rejoice!


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By themaster08 on 7/8/2011 10:49:00 AM , Rating: 1
Nicely put, Pirks.

Seriously, what is it about Apple that makes people like this macdevdude feel and act so religiously towards a piece of plastic?! All common logic and substance seem to be thrown out the window in order to support their utopia, even when Apple are having to slash prices in order to compete.

I understand preferece, and that's fine, but really, why does that have to mean blind faith and pure ignorance in the eyes of Apple lovers? Take it for what it is. Apple's iAd service is floundering. Customers are leaving. They need to cut prices in order to compete. How is any part of that brilliant?


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By xpax on 7/8/2011 10:44:38 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
That's really biased. Once the iPhone lands on Sprint and T-Mobile it will start selling Android again. It's just a matter of time.

I believe we've heard this sort of nonsense before. "Oh, when Verizon gets it, then it'll kick Android's ass."

It'll never happen. This is the main flaw in Apple's strategy and always has been, right back to the original Mac. That's not to say that they aren't making money -- they are -- but in the long term, one company can't fight 100 no matter how good their products are or how many people they brainwash along the way. Apple is akin the Bismarck: it's a big, powerful ship -- but up against several less powerful ship, it's still outmatched.


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By Pirks on 7/8/2011 10:59:13 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Apple is akin the Bismarck: it's a big, powerful ship -- but up against several less powerful ship, it's still outmatched
If Bismarck's captain could predict the future as well as Jobs all the British sailors would be with the fishes. Apple can easily keep pwning anyone including Google and MS and RIM and Samsung and everyone else, because all these guys can't predict the future like Jobs. While Jobs is at helm Apple is the invincible Bismarck that no one can seriously hurt or damage. Samsung tried and now they are going to get hit with main caliber guns of that fruity Bismarck. Sit back and enjoy the fireworks. I gonna enjoy watching a few senior Korean executives cringing and crying under the main caliber fire, hahaha


By gixser on 7/8/2011 7:46:31 PM , Rating: 2
Guess its a shame the prescient captain is already mortally wounded.

quote:
While Jobs is at helm Apple is the invincible Bismarck


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By Tony Swash on 7/8/2011 8:08:29 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
This is the main flaw in Apple's strategy and always has been, right back to the original Mac


So - after nearly thirty years of pursuing the wrong strategy Apple is the most succesful, valuable and profitable tech company on the planet.

When are they going to get their heads out of their butts and start doing things right ;)


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By themaster08 on 7/9/2011 4:16:42 AM , Rating: 2
Who said it was the wrong strategy? Their strategy limits their userbase when compared to an onslaught of more affordable, just-as-functional devices.

The point being made is that it is more likely you would find an Android in every person's pocket than it would be an iPhone. One device does not suit all.


RE: A disadvantage for Apple in this case..
By Tony Swash on 7/9/2011 6:41:29 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Who said it was the wrong strategy? Their strategy limits their userbase when compared to an onslaught of more affordable, just-as-functional devices.

The point being made is that it is more likely you would find an Android in every person's pocket than it would be an iPhone. One device does not suit all.


OK if you want to play semantics you said Apple's strategy was flawed. I just was wondering how this 'flaw' was manifesting itself?

Is Apple doing badly financially? Well no - it's doing better than any other technology company.

Are Apple's products lagging behind the mainstream, are they suffering from worse third party support (software, accessories, etc)? Well no - Apple's third party support is better than any other tech company.

Are Apple's sales stagnating or showing any unhealthy symptoms? Well no - growth in Mac sales has out paced the PC market rate for years, Apple makes the world's best selling smart phone handset and the world's best selling tablet and all Apple core products are showing strong growth.

Is Apple falling behind Android in some race? Well no - iOS outsells Android in pretty much every market and outside of the US (where Android sales seem to be stagnating) it outsells Android handsets in most major markets.

Are Apple's customers expressing some sort of dissatisfaction or disquiet about Apple's products and service? Well no - Apple consistently tops or comes near the top of all surveys of customer product satisfaction, customer loyalty and customer service quality.

So what is the metric that you use to expose this apparent flaw in their strategy that you have discovered? Do tell.


By bug77 on 7/9/2011 7:47:56 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
OK if you want to play semantics you said Apple's strategy was flawed. I just was wondering how this 'flaw' was manifesting itself?


For instance, I don't think they were planning to recoup their $275M in chunks of $300k. They wanted $1M, but the market said no.
It's not likely they were actually planning to release the service at an inflated price and cut 70% within a year. Nobody does that.
But, as I said above, ads are not Apple's main revenue source. As long as they break even, they're fine.


By luseferous on 7/11/2011 7:18:05 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Are Apple's sales stagnating or showing any unhealthy symptoms? Well no - growth in Mac sales has out paced the PC market rate for years...


What does this actually mean ? That system A with around a 4% market share is able to improve its sales figures more easily than system B with around 96% market share.

If this out pacing has been going on for years and Apple has only 4-5% market share how long before they have 30-50% ?


ddsfvds
By nvnvlai3535 on 7/9/2011 8:34:12 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.ifancyshop.com

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




fgdfgd
By ninainaidbuxing on 7/11/2011 7:20:56 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.ifancyshop.com

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




dhdfd
By ninainaidbuxing on 7/11/2011 7:21:03 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.ifancyshop.com

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




fdsa
By tangtangtan on 7/11/2011 10:05:25 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.benzlogo.com/

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




vxcvxcz
By babanbang on 7/8/11, Rating: -1
"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki