backtop


Print 58 comment(s) - last by TakinYourPoint.. on Feb 16 at 12:18 AM


"Hubba, hubba, hubba! Money, money, money! Who do you trust?"  (Source: Warner Bros. Pictures)
Apple is now worth more than Microsoft and Google combined

While Apple has been in the news lately for allegations of unfair labor practices at its contracted manufacturing facilities in China, that hasn't stopped the company from increasing value for its shareholders and sending it surging ahead in market capitalization.
 
Today, AAPL crossed the $500/share mark for the first time in its history this morning. The stock has surged over 17 percent in the weeks following its blowout fiscal Q1 2012 earnings report. The company reported revenue of $46.33B USD and net profit of a whopping $13.06B. In addition, the company sold a record 37 million iPhones during the quarter.


Apple is currently ranked as the largest company in the world by market cap. In addition, Apple's market cap is currently more than both Google and Microsoft combined.
 
Following Steve Jobs' resignation as CEO in August 2011, AAPL hit a [then] all-time high of $411 pushing it ahead of Exxon Mobile as the world's largest company by market cap.

Source: Bloomberg



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Highly Overvalued
By Flunk on 2/13/2012 10:36:31 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Apple is now worth more than Microsoft and Google combined


Only in stock price, both have more significant assets. If Apple makes a bad move they risk their stock price spiraling out of control.




RE: Highly Overvalued
By Treknologist on 2/13/12, Rating: 0
RE: Highly Overvalued
By Just Tom on 2/13/2012 11:18:20 AM , Rating: 1
Lots of companies have higher stock prices than Apple. What was meant by Apple being worth more than Google and Microsoft combined is that Apple's market capitalization is greater than Microsoft's and Google's combined market cap.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By mellomonk on 2/13/2012 11:42:51 AM , Rating: 2
Share price is of relatively minor value compared to market capitalization which is price per share X number of shares. Google has always been a relatively expensive per share, and has actually traded higher in the past. Apple has built it's value from a low of less then $14 in July 97 including two 2:1 splits along the way. That is impressive.

Even more interesting is the $97 billion in cash and short term liquid assets it has squirreled away. That is a HUGE warchest and could cover a number of missteps. Not to mention giving them the ability to acquire if need be.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Uncle on 2/13/2012 2:15:16 PM , Rating: 2
97 billion, fed SJ grandiose thinking, Give some of that back to the shareholders.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Taft12 on 2/13/2012 2:47:37 PM , Rating: 2
People have been asking Microsoft to do that for many years. Neither will do it any time soon.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By sviola on 2/13/2012 2:53:38 PM , Rating: 3
Microsoft does pay dividends. Apple does not.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By kleinma on 2/13/2012 5:02:32 PM , Rating: 2
MS has been paying dividends for a long time. Get your facts straight before spewing fud.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Samus on 2/13/2012 5:36:29 PM , Rating: 3
Rounded for simplicity.

Apple:
932 million shares
500.00/share
Market worth: $466 billion

Microsoft:
8.4 billion shares
30.00/share
Market worth: $252 billion

Google:
325 million shares
$612/share
Market worth: $198 billion

Google is an even riskier buy that Apple, IMHO, but neither is nearly as stable as Microsoft who have a gigantic shareholder base and stable market fluctuation and growth.

The argument is Google is diverse in many markets, Apple is not. They make a lot of plastic junk and have some unsteady licensing agreements with developers and the RIAA. It's pretty obvious how saturated the prices of modern technology stock is, read Facebook as our most modern example.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By chmilz on 2/13/2012 11:10:48 AM , Rating: 5
Half the world runs on Microsoft, by choice. Apple makes gadgets for hipsters and housewives.

Even a minor fumble and Apple stock will crash hard.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By rvd2008 on 2/13/2012 12:42:06 PM , Rating: 2
choice?
I am not a fan of Appple, but not blind to a reality that Windows comes pre-installed on most Dell, HP and other computers.
Even if you build your own PC chances are no other drivers exist but Wintel. Try to install e.g. Linux Ubuntu on your average HP notebook and feel the pain: WiFi not working, video camera not working, hardware buttons not working, video hardware acceleration not working, sound not working etc..


RE: Highly Overvalued
By PrezWeezy on 2/13/2012 1:17:26 PM , Rating: 2
You are putting the cart before the horse. Windows does not have the user base it does because those don't exist. Those drivers don't exist because Linux does not have the user base. If Linux were to be a quality enough product that anyone could use it (I give an example of trying to install Java on Firefox that took me over an hour to figure out why it wasn't working. It was because I had typo'ed the command by one letter. If Linux wants a chance they will have to make point/click far better.) then they would have a larger user base and drivers would be written and people would choose.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By chmilz on 2/13/2012 1:24:27 PM , Rating: 2
I'm talking about business and enterprise. There's other options available, good ones, even some free ones, and yet MS still makes huge bank. MS products help people grow their business.

Apple products help my mom play Triple Town.

Tomorrow Android or MS or anyone else could make a shinier product that also plays Triple Town and those sales shift. Enterprise tends to stick with incumbents that perform.

I guess my point is that consumers are fickle, and that is currently to Apple's advantage, but could easily become their disadvantage.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Solandri on 2/13/12, Rating: 0
RE: Highly Overvalued
By Omega215D on 2/13/2012 3:15:21 PM , Rating: 2
Actually many of Motorola's current phones are business and government friendly. That's the Android way, tailor it to your needs. Of course there are problems with that model but it's all a preference thing.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By chmilz on 2/13/2012 6:14:34 PM , Rating: 2
I know a bunch of companies that have issued tablets to their employees. Some were iPads. Some were Playbooks. My company uses Toshiba laptops and we're testing Thrive tablets now.

I think what you meant to say was "Tablets are starting to show up in more business uses"


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Uncle on 2/13/2012 2:27:48 PM , Rating: 2
How old is your HP, 10 years.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Reclaimer77 on 2/13/12, Rating: 0
RE: Highly Overvalued
By invidious on 2/13/2012 4:59:16 PM , Rating: 2
The market decides not individual consumers. You can put linux on your custom box but you choose not to. You can even get linux from many big destributors like dell or hp.

The bottom line is that it doesnt matter if your choice is driven by cost, convinience, or your horoscope, its your choice.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By testerguy on 2/13/12, Rating: 0
RE: Highly Overvalued
By invidious on 2/13/2012 5:39:37 PM , Rating: 2
Actually its more like how more people choose to buy android phones over iPhones. Despite whatever magical marketing "records" Apply may be boasting about this week.

I have had my iPhone for almost 2 years because Android was too new back then, my next phone choice will be android. Just like my tablet choice was android.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TSS on 2/13/2012 5:34:48 PM , Rating: 2
While that might be, it's still a sad day when that company has a higher market cap then the company half the world's computers run on combined with the company half the world uses as search engine and web advertisements.

Kinda like saying facebook is worth tho IBM's.

Somehow there's just a disconnect between definitions. I know money technically isn't worth anything, but if the above can happen.... money *really* isn't worth anything.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By hiscross on 2/13/2012 6:28:20 PM , Rating: 2
And you are an expert of such matters, right? Where do you people come from Syria?


RE: Highly Overvalued
By chrish89 on 2/13/2012 2:41:40 PM , Rating: 2
Wake up, most people know(except this board) stock price does not equate to a companies market value(price x shares outstanding). Apple has almost $100 billion in cash, no doubt, and their net worth is almost $500 billion(Market Cap). Their net worth is greater than Microsoft($260B) and Google($200B) combined.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Motoman on 2/13/2012 2:51:31 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
If Apple makes a bad move they risk their stock price spiraling out of control.


You mean like making wildly defective products?
You mean like wildly overpricing their products?
You mean like not doing anything about employee welfare where their toys are made?

Yeah right. Apple is a marketing dynamo that sells nothing but bad moves. If CNN revealed that Apple factories were all lubricated by the fresh squeezings of kittens and puppies, no one would care. Gotta break some eggs to make an iPlod you know.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By sviola on 2/13/2012 2:57:59 PM , Rating: 2
Well, overpriced and/or defective products had one thing in their favour: Steve Jobs marketing. We haven't seen anything from Apple after his departure. Can't predict how they will fare if they release something that is not a success.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 10:03:52 PM , Rating: 2
All wrong, even the last point given that Apple is the only tech company that contracts independent audits of their suppliers and manufacturers.

Then again, you're the same guy that makes his clients buy inferior AMD products (inferior since the Core 2) because you honestly believe that Intel is "evil".

I feel so bad for whoever your clients are, putting their trust into someone who puts performance and practical utility behind irrational emotion and personal rhetoric.

"My multibillion dollar multinational corporation is more ethical than your multibillion dollar multinational corporation".

What a clown.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Motoman on 2/14/2012 9:25:19 AM , Rating: 2
On the contrary, you should feel sorry for people who force their clients to support criminal corporations convicted of horrid market abuses. It's called not supporting crime. You should try it some time.

...and while sure, at this point in time in a benchmark, Intel can show an upper hand for max performance, at any given price point an AMD box will give the same or better subjective performance from the standpoint of an actual human being, who is utterly uninterested in PCMark or anything else. Except for the tiniest few people in the world who have unlimited funds to blow on a PC and actually give a sh1t about benchmarks, it doesn't matter in the slightest what CPU is actually in there. Sorry to burst your little bubble...but it just doesn't matter.

As for Apple being "the only tech company that contracts independent audits of their suppliers and manufacturers" - that may or may not be correct, I don't know. What I do know - beyond the shadow of a doubt - is that they're the only tech company that's ever *needed* to.

Your reality distortion field is working over time. Wonder if it's transmissible by oral intercourse from the original source - that would explain braindead Apple zombies like you and Swash.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Reclaimer77 on 2/14/2012 11:00:06 AM , Rating: 2
I'm having a hard time agreeing with that. The Bulldozer's per-core performance is terrible regardless of threads, and the power consumption is frankly alarming for what mediocre performance you get.

If I was your customer, that WOULD matter to me. Things like that DO matter. However I guess if I was in your place, padding my profit margins by throwing in AMD garbage would be tempting. I would just have to look right into their eyes when they asked me about Intel and flat out lie to their face...

I agree with the Apple and Takin bashing though. Keep it up :D


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/16/2012 12:06:14 AM , Rating: 2
Bulldozer is trash.

Yes, performance actually matters, particularly in forums such as these.

Yes Intel offers the best performance per dollar across the widest range of products.

You are still a joke.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 7:35:46 PM , Rating: 2
Overvalued based on what metric?

Apple's PE and PEG ratios are surprisingly low for a tech, especially one that has continuously doubled their gross revenue year-over-year.

Apple's price to earnings is in line with "mature" techs like Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM. Their price is driven by revenue. Google is a high flier in comparison, and AMZN is grossly overvalued with a PE of about 140.

Investor fear of a company so large that continues to grow so quickly is the only thing that has kept AAPL's price where it is. If rapid growth was taken into account, even with a modest 20 PE such as Google's, it would be priced closer to $700 a share (oh lord).

It won't happen though, and their price will continue to be driven by actual revenue and profit rather than lofty expectations/dreams of growth.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Reclaimer77 on 2/13/2012 9:06:48 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Overvalued based on what metric?


Apple being "worth" more than ExxonMobile? That's all the metric you need. Of course Apple is overvalued. Only an iTard like you would suggest otherwise.

To be fair tech stocks in general are overvalued because they are too consumer driven, so you're just one bad mistake away from disaster. Remember when Netflix saw it's stock drop 70% in just one MONTH, from one controversial management decision? How could a stock valued at $300 fall that much in one month from just one decision that wasn't even drastic? Without any fundamental changes to the companies future profitability or outlook?

Companies within the tech industry are being incorrectly valued, and we're heading for another tech bubble. Investors have unrealistic expectations and too many people are playing the short game.

quote:
It won't happen though, and their price will continue to be driven by actual revenue and profit rather than lofty expectations/dreams of growth.


That's patently false. Apple cannot keep growing forever at the rate investors expect, at some point market saturation will be reached or a bad decision will lead to a poor quarter etc etc. When that happens, investors will get weary. There is already a considerable debate by insiders as to weather Apple is a growth or value stock. The fact that they're sitting on tons of capital, and refuse to pay dividends, is holding some sway on that debate.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 9:52:48 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Apple being "worth" more than ExxonMobile? That's all the metric you need. Of course Apple is overvalued. Only an iTard like you would suggest otherwise.


Stock value is a product of expected growth combined with revenue and profit. Apple is valued the way it is because they make a lot of money.

Saying that Apple doesn't "deserve" its valuation because electronics aren't as essential as oil, as you infer, is asinine. Why not apply the same logic to food production? I need food a hell of a lot more than I need any of the above.

quote:
Companies within the tech industry are being incorrectly valued, and we're heading for another tech bubble.


Based on what logic? Logic, not personal opinions. Big techs like Apple, Microsoft, IBM, and Oracle are priced the way they are because of the amount of money they make. This isn't the tech bubble era of +100x price multiples, these are conservative prices by any measure of a large cap. If their prices tank, it will be along with the rest of the market.

There are exceptions of course. Amazon for example is priced in the stratosphere right now. They are the one I'd be most worried about at the moment, when investors finally give up on them making the revenue to fulfill their expectations.

The other companies mentioned don't have anything to live up to, they are priced based on their revenue. Again, based on doubling their price year over year, Apple is very fairly priced given that they have a similar price-to-earnings value as companies that are static and pay a dividend.

It is a growth stock being priced as a mature one.

quote:
That's patently false. Apple cannot keep growing forever at the rate investors expect, at some point market saturation will be reached or a bad decision will lead to a poor quarter etc etc. When that happens, investors will get weary. There is already a considerable debate by insiders as to weather Apple is a growth or value stock. The fact that they're sitting on tons of capital, and refuse to pay dividends, is holding some sway on that debate.


Right, and this is a huge reason why Apple's PE is as low as it is. It isn't being priced as a growth stock, that's the whole point. It is priced very conservatively with a price-to-earnings ratio similar to stagnant companies that pay out a dividend. If Apple was priced as a growth stock, even conservatively, it would be worth more than it is now. A moderate 20 PE of Google's would put it over $700, which is insane.

Companies like Microsoft, IBM, and Oracle are sitting at about the same PE ratios as Apple. IBM is the only other company that is also showing any significant growth in revenue, and yet it is being valued conservatively at around a 14 PE. Investors are being very careful not to overvalue any of these techs.

I've said it again and again, but you should really start using hard numbers and logic to create arguments rather than basing them on rhetoric and emotion.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Reclaimer77 on 2/13/12, Rating: 0
RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/14/2012 7:31:32 AM , Rating: 3
There are many ways to value a stock. PE matters here because actual revenue is the main thing driving AAPL's stock price, not speculation on future growth.

I didn't address your Netflix example because it was stupid. I'll educate you though.

Netflix's price is driven by the same thing that is currently driving Amazon's and other high fliers: speculation on future growth. Unlike Apple, its revenue and income do not justify the stock price by the same measure as a well established large cap. Netflix was trading at a price to earnings multiple of nearly 100 before the stock tanked.

Netflix's price wasn't based on income, it was based mainly on potential for future income.

Stocks like this are much more vulnerable to rumors because so much of the price is based mainly on speculation. If Apple gets some sort of negative rumor, it doesn't hit it as hard. Why? Because it has no real material impact on their ability to make earnings that is a factor in its current price.

Let's look at the most negative news imaginable. People like you were saying that Steve Jobs' resignation and death would result in the stock tanking. Anyone bearish on the company would have said "$350 to $200, minimum" yet the day after his death the stock remained in the same trading range. A few months later and they are making more money than any tech on the planet, hence its stock price. Simple.

The same applies to companies like Microsoft or IBM. These are solid solid companies. Outside of global economic catastrophe, you're looking potential for daily drops of 3%-5% at the most, and over time you're looking at maybe 20% corrections, but that is completely standard based on market cycles.

Right now the main thing that can negatively drive the price of a company like Apple or Microsoft is panic over the broad economy and widespread selloffs, something like another market crash. Of course, that should be seen as a buying opportunity like the one we had in 2009.

Back to Netflix, what happened to them is entirely different because the company was priced very differently. If you applied the same price multiple to Netflix as you do to Apple, Microsoft, or IBM, its price would plummet again from its current price of 118 to about 40, or almost 1/10th of its all-time high.

Even with its value cut so much, it is still priced like a growth stock. Apple isn't, it is very conservatively priced based on its income.

quote:
Are tech stocks routinely overvalued in general? Sometimes yes. This is one such period.


Again, you use no real argument to back this up, aside from "it is overvalued because I say so".

The market is long overdue for a correction, but large cap tech in general is priced very fairly based on their income. When a big drop happens, it will be an opportunity to buy.

Anyway, people have been saying that Apple is overvalued for almost a decade now, and they give no real reason aside from "because Apple hurr durr", yet their income keeps increasing and the price keeps going up. At some point they will find a ceiling (whenever smartphones and tablets reach saturation), but nobody knows when that will be. I expect that they will be paying a dividend by then.

I've beaten you with logic in every single argument we've had, technical and otherwise. Your personal reality distortion field is pretty funny if you think you've brought anything to an argument aside from complete lack of knowledge backed by personal rhetoric and emotion.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By Reclaimer77 on 2/14/2012 8:18:19 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I've beaten you with logic in every single argument we've had, technical and otherwise.


WOW you really ARE channeling Steve Jobs aren't you? Amazing someone with such a big head can still cram it up his own ass.

quote:
There are many ways to value a stock. PE matters here because actual revenue is the main thing driving AAPL's stock price, not speculation on future growth.


And when we compare free cash flow to enterprise value, we see that Apple is slightly overvalued. But let's not use that metric, let's just use the ones that favor your argument.

quote:
Anyway, people have been saying that Apple is overvalued for almost a decade now, and they give no real reason aside from "because Apple hurr durr"


And they have all always been wrong every time because you didn't agree. What an ego!

Secondly, this is mostly opinion anyway. There is no solid metric to determine undervalue or overvalue. I've backed up my opinion, and so have others if you would Google, that Apple is overvalued. End of discussion.

Takin we all know you're incapable of being unbiased when it comes to Apple. This is the same old song and dance.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/16/2012 12:13:37 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
WOW you really ARE channeling Steve Jobs aren't you? Amazing someone with such a big head can still cram it up his own ass.


I drop real knowledge on you and the most you can do is call people fanboy. Open up your mind and you might learn something and stop relying on personal opinion backed by nothing.

quote:
And they have all always been wrong every time because you didn't agree. What an ego!


They were wrong because reality proved them wrong. I have no such power over the way the world works.

quote:
Secondly, this is mostly opinion anyway. There is no solid metric to determine undervalue or overvalue.


Over the long term, yes there are. Price to earnings is a widely used metric, seriously, and right now Apple's price to earnings ratio is actually below the historical average of the S&P 500, yet according to you it is overvalued!

My ego has little to do with anything, I just go by facts and reality. You on the other hand think that reality should follow your opinion and intuition. If someone doesn't agree with your intuition, you call them a fanboy.

Ridiculous.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/16/2012 12:18:09 AM , Rating: 2
Finally, I know that you and Moto like to use upvotes/downvotes to judge value. I don't for the most part given that much of this forum is an Android circlejerk and the hivemind supports that.

Even then, My posts in this discussion are 4s and 5s. You don't know what you're talking about in general, but at least here it is abundantly clear to everyone that you are way out of your element.


RE: Highly Overvalued
By TakinYourPoints on 2/14/2012 7:34:29 AM , Rating: 3
Also, this is annoying:

You:
quote:
That's patently false. Apple cannot keep growing forever at the rate investors expect


Me:
quote:
Right, and this is a huge reason why Apple's PE is as low as it is. It isn't being priced as a growth stock, that's the whole point. It is priced very conservatively with a price-to-earnings ratio similar to stagnant companies that pay out a dividend. If Apple was priced as a growth stock, even conservatively, it would be worth more than it is now. A moderate 20 PE of Google's would put it over $700, which is insane.


I explain over and over that Apple is being priced the similarly to stable divvy stocks like Microsoft and it flies right over your head. Unreal.


ignorance is bliss?
By Nortel on 2/13/2012 1:53:44 PM , Rating: 1
It certainly seems that many people commenting here have no concept of business, stock and market penetration.

A companies stock price does not represent its worth, Apple could split 5:1, making it $100/share. This would not have any affect on its worth.

Apple has over $100 billion in cash. If you added up Google and Microsoft's "significant assets" and compared it to Apple's cash + current company value, it would still pull ahead. Remember folks, Google is just an advertising company and recently, handset manufacturer (Motorola). It's worth noting that Motorola has actually been operating at a net loss for awhile now.

I fail to see how Apple can be "overrated" when they are the #1 company in the world, have over 100b in cash, consistently turn an extremely healthy profit quarter after quarter and create products people want to buy.

The world runs on Windows simply because Microsoft licensed out their operating system with healthy contracts first. I can't think of anyone who would actually say Windows is a superior OS to osX. Hell osX is based on FreeBSD (unix) and you can't help but applaud Apple for being the one to bring unix to the masses.

Apple does not sell throwaway gizmos. They have diversified themselves enough to produce iTunes, the appstore, notebooks, desktops, mobile phones, tablet devices, mp3 players, apple TV and software like osX and final cut pro. iTunes on its own is making enough money to be worth more then RIM.

Is Apple about to burst? Maybe transport yourself back 10 years ago and watch everyone saying the same thing. Speculators have been saying Apple is doomed at every level of stock price and even now at $500 a share, it is still overweight. Will Apple reach $650? The real question is what would make it not.




RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Reclaimer77 on 2/13/2012 3:11:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I can't think of anyone who would actually say Windows is a superior OS to osX.


You aren't thinking too hard then are you? How about 90+% of all people who run a business? And about 99% of all PC's?

quote:
Hell osX is based on FreeBSD (unix) and you can't help but applaud Apple for being the one to bring unix to the masses.


Only an Apple fanboi would say something like this. Applaud Apple for bringing unix to the masses? Who CARES! I don't care if an OS is running an Orville Redenbacher kernel and neither does 99% of all users.

quote:
The world runs on Windows simply because Microsoft licensed out their operating system with healthy contracts first.


Idiotic statement. Bill Gates transformed the world because he believed software made a PC. And that they should be common and widespread and affordable. Windows software made that a reality. Microsoft wasn't selling you a computer. Microsoft allowed EVERYONE to sell you a computer.

IBM and Apple believed in a controlled bundled approach where you had to pay outrageous sums for their computers with proprietary software running it. Guess which approach won? IBM doesn't even sell computers anymore and before iDevices came out, Apple was a 2-bit nobody with barely any market share. It had nothing to do with "healthy contracts", but simply a lack of vision on the part of Steve Jobs.

Go back to around year 2000 before there was an iPod. Where was Apple's 100 billion in cash then?

You can easily make the argument that Apple rules the mobile space. But claiming their desktop software is superior and hasn't always been second-class crap is ludicrous. History doesn't lie.


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Nortel on 2/13/12, Rating: 0
RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Pirks on 2/13/2012 5:42:40 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Just because something is popular does not make it better
You mean iPod? ;)
quote:
Are you trying to say that businesses could not use osX? What magical reasoning do you have to support this?
There's no magic, if you are not iFanboy this is very obvious. Apple targets home consumers and their hardware/software stack is not for business, it's for A/V consumption and games mostly. MS is very different, they market for businesses first and for home consumers second. This is why MS produces huge stack of large enterprise targeted software packages like SQL Server and SharePoint etc, where Apple does exactly ZERO in this regard.

If you don't realize these simple facts about principal difference between MS and Apple - you are just as blind iFanboy as macdevdude.
quote:
Apple is a software company
Lies. Apple is a hardware company. Software is secondary to them. They make all their money selling hardware, they just include software as a free value-add thing. This is as different from MS as it gets. MS sells software, not hardware, this is how they make their money.

In fact, within Apple, even hardware engineering itself is secondary. They are run primarily by designers. Hence Apple is in fact a hardware DESIGN company. This is their primary specialization. Then, secondary, is hardware engineering. And only then comes the software, which explains why they can't produce anything significant of their own and just suck off OSS all the time, with OSS unix kernels and sh1t.

I see that you are trying to be an iFanboy without even knowing much about your idol. This is fun! Keep posting please, I like that, hehehe :)
quote:
they are kicking Microsoft and Google's collective asses
Lies. They are kicking Nokia's and RIM's asses. Google and MS do not directly compete with them, so maybe time to read up on basic and stop posting stupidity like that, hmm?

You can say that MS sorta competes in smartphones and Google too, but you are too blind to realize that these are NOT their core markets. MS is about (mostly enterprise) software and Google is about paid search/ads business. Any serious competition from Apple in those core areas? Nope. Go figure.
quote:
It is hard to tout Microsoft's superiority when their market share is slipping every quarter to Apple
It is hard to tout Apple's superiority either looking at their laughable absolute marketshare numbers for desktop.
quote:
I'd like to know in all your wisdom how you fail to mention Windows Vista and how wonderful an OS that was
Vista was a product of unrivaled monopoly and absence of any competition, these times are gone now and MS is not sleeping under the rock anymore.
quote:
Going back to 2000 is an excellent point, they grew from little cash to $100 billion in only 12 years and yet you write them off as some shit company
I don't agree that they are sh1t company, I just wanna add that they made their 100 billions on a different market - smartphones. So just to reiterate - they DO pwn a few large smartphone makers like Nokia and RIM. Both Nokia and RIM were slaughtered by Apple and now are dumping their ancient smartphone OSes and developing new ones. However, if you're trying to imply that Apple pwned Google or MS somehow - every smart reader here will laugh at you since we all know how different core Apple markets and strategies are from Google's and MS's. So, please stop pushing your naive uneducated crap on us ;)


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Reclaimer77 on 2/13/2012 6:27:22 PM , Rating: 2
Damn Pirks, I agree with everything you just said.

Pirks getting Reclaimers back...man...it's snowing somewhere right now that's unseasonably warm.


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Nortel on 2/13/2012 10:20:50 PM , Rating: 1
Seems like Pirks and Reclaimer77 share half a brain, or rather the same person with two accounts.

I think you meant the failed Zune, not the iPod. I guess you don't care about user experience, superior sound quality through high quality DAC + headphone amp.

Apple does not create SQL server, or sharepoint but that is not the business they are in. Can you get third party software that runs on osX to do those things, yes of course but then I don't understand your point.

Apple is a software company, I think you are forgetting the most beautiful product with terrible software is not going to be attracting people. Ease of use, simplicity and an overall enjoyable user experience keeps people using their products.

MS is in enterprise software but guess what the world of enterprise runs on? Redhat, Solaris, Suse, etc.. Yes those are unix distributions, nobody runs windows server anymore unless they are getting major kickbacks. P.S. Google runs all their servers on Unix and apple WAS in the enterprise server market but cut the line.

11% Desktop market share and rising for Apple is laughable compared to the quickly shrinking MS OS numbers?

Wait, so your excuse for Vista was Microsoft had a monopoly on the OS market and didn't try hard enough in making a new OS? Are you serious? And MS is trying oh so hard now because they are trying to compete with.... Apple? That same company whom has "laughable absolute marketshare numbers for desktop".

Apple made its fortune off of a variety of products, not just off the iPhone but I wouldn't expect you to actually do any research on the matter. It seems you are caught in your own MS reality distortion field.


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Pirks on 2/13/2012 10:44:44 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I think you meant the failed Zune, not the iPod
Zune never was popular. You can't even understand what I meant. So sad.
quote:
I don't understand your point
My point was that Apple and MS target totally different markets, hence you can't say Apple pwned MS or vice versa.
quote:
Apple is a software company
You can sing a song or even write an opera about this or a movie plot or something, still whatever you say and however you promote the software side of Apple - this is not going to change the fact that PRIMARY revenue driver for Apple is DESIGNING hardware. Design is what keeps them different from their competitors, it is what makes their revenues and profits so high. Do you understand now?
quote:
nobody runs windows server anymore unless they are getting major kickbacks
Proofless lies from a unix zealot. Eat this, zealot: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/idc-dollarwise...
quote:
quickly shrinking MS OS numbers?
Don't be such a clown, 1% a year is not that "quickly".
quote:
That same company whom has "laughable absolute marketshare numbers for desktop".
If MS doesn't compete with Apple now when Apple share is laughable it's going to be harder to compete later when if it becomes above laughable level. Better to squash competitor while he's still a negligible quanitity on your market. Quite a logical decision, eh?

Plus, MS is going to attack Apple on their primary markets - smartphone and tablet, which is good for everyone.
quote:
Apple made its fortune off of a variety of products, not just off the iPhone
Here's a proof of your stupidity and lies: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/microsoft-apple-and...

See how much Apple makes from iPhone now, idiot? Now crawl back to your cave, uneducated one :P

P.S. for everyone else reading this thread: A PICTURE WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS: http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/eb-aapl-revenue-q42011.jp...


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 7:43:14 PM , Rating: 1
I wouldn't take what Reclaimer has to say too seriously, he honestly believes that OS X is a walled garden and that developers need approval from Apple to develop for it. Hilariously ignorant. You don't even need an installer if you're technically inclined and the developer has the binaries up, just type "sudo port install <app name>" in the Terminal and you're off (not that I'd expect Reclaimer to know anything about a unix command line).

That said, I think Windows 7 is great too. No need to bicker between the two, both have legit strengths and weaknesses. Hardware is a different matter, and it is ridiculous that so many PC manufacturers continue to get it wrong. It's why I've assembled my desktop PCs for 15+ years now.


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Reclaimer77 on 2/13/2012 7:59:03 PM , Rating: 2
I love how you say that as if ANYONE here takes you seriously.


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 8:22:09 PM , Rating: 2
Haha, look who's mad


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 8:26:39 PM , Rating: 2
And says the loony tea partier with rudimentary technical knowledge (sad in a place called "DailyTech") who calls anybody with a slightly different opinion an idiot.

What I think is funny is that for somebody with an opinion that is so in line with the hivemind here, that your average post comment rating is still about what mine is. Really strange given that I play devil's advocate here so often.


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By Reclaimer77 on 2/13/2012 8:40:08 PM , Rating: 2
My rating isn't even close to yours. When you have 8k posts it takes a LOT of votes either way to bring that average up. And obviously if I cared about ratings, I wouldn't bother being controversial.

Besides lets face it, I generate tons of page hits and discussions on a blog that would otherwise be frankly kind of boring. Any day now Brandon will send me that big check! Uhh right Brandon? We talked about this!

Go back to your little world where anything you say matters.

Idiot.


RE: ignorance is bliss?
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 9:55:52 PM , Rating: 2
Well, yeah, I actually bring technical knowledge to the discussion. It is amazing how little you know and yet you are completely unaware of it.

It's still cute how you throw "idiot" around all the time though, even to people who've never posted before. :3


bubble
By kanabalize on 2/13/2012 11:39:41 AM , Rating: 3
Like a bubble it is ready to burst...




RE: bubble
By chrish89 on 2/13/2012 2:54:55 PM , Rating: 2
I've been reading posts like this since Apple stock was $15, meanwhile my market account has quadrupled in value(most of it realized). Haters will hate.


RE: bubble
By TakinYourPoints on 2/13/2012 8:28:03 PM , Rating: 2
High five fellow one-percenter


Been there...
RE: Been there...
By geddarkstorm on 2/13/2012 1:37:29 PM , Rating: 2
This and the article picture are extraordinarily fitting.


I love it!
By JackBurton on 2/13/12, Rating: -1
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki