backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 15 comment(s) - last by KristopherKubi.. on Jan 2 at 2:49 PM

More Qualcomm products barred from the United States over patent infringement charges

Broadcom announced yesterday that it won an injunction against rival Qualcomm Incorporated for patent infringement by Qualcomm. Honorable James V. Selna, United States District Court Judge  for Central District of California handed down the ruling yesterday.

Judge Selna hit Qualcomm with an injunction barring any further import of product infringing on Broadcom patents into the United States (PDF). This latest injunction marks the second Broadcom win against Qualcomm with the first  injunction issued in June of 2007 barring 3G phones using Qualcomm chips from entering the United States.

The patents at the core of this new suit include Broadcom’s U.S. patent numbers 6,847,686, 5,657,317, and 6,389,010. The injunction for the violation of the first patent bars Qualcomm from making, using, selling, offering for sale and importing 3G WCDMA and EV-DO chips in its “Enhanced Multimedia” and “Convergence Platforms.” The judge also ordered Qualcomm to pay Broadcom a royalty of 6% of all revenues from found to infringe on patent number 6,847,686.

Patent 5,657,317, also covered in the injunction, prevents Qualcomm from making, selling, offering for sale and importing EV-DO chips infringing the patent and prevents Qualcomm from using Broadcom technology allowing for the simultaneous use of two networks or more at the same time by a device. In addition to the injunction, Qualcomm was also ordered to pay Broadcom 4.5% royalty on all revenues from infringing products.

The final patent number 6,389,010 bars Qualcomm from using, selling, offering for sale and importing cellular devices using Qualcomm's QChat “push-to-talk” software; and from developing new software that infringes the same patent. The royalty that Qualcomm will pay Broadcom has yet to be determined by the court.

The injunction allows Qualcomm to continue selling in the U.S. infringing legacy products using EV-DO chips to legacy customers from May 29, 2007 to January 31, 2009.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Ding dong, I wish the witch was dead
By AlexWade on 1/2/2008 11:38:00 AM , Rating: 3
Qualcomm, Rambus, SCO, and Sony form the league of pure evil companies. Microsoft wanted to join, but when it was discovered they actually do some good things (such as TechNet, look into it), those 4 companies rejected Microsoft's application. Macromedia's application is still under review, but the 4 are probably going to accept them.

Of course I'm not serious, but Qualcomm is a thoroughly evil company. Like Rambus, Qualcomm charged unfair royalties. Ericsson and Nokia sued them over their unfair practices. I won't shed a tear if Qualcomm went under tonight.




By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 1/2/2008 11:42:19 AM , Rating: 2
Unfair or not, what Rambus did and what Qualcomm did are two different animals.

Qualcomm blatantly ripped technology from Broadcomm and others. Rambus still invented the tech that got sliped into JEDEC, but then charged royalties on that. In some ways you could compare Broadcomm more to Rambus than Qualcomm to Rambus.


By TomZ on 1/2/2008 1:09:46 PM , Rating: 2
That's too bad - Qualcomm was once a very reputable company which developed quite a lot of advanced technology on its own. Seems they've stooped pretty low if what you say is true.


RE: Ding dong, I wish the witch was dead
By Oregonian2 on 1/2/2008 1:42:35 PM , Rating: 3
Except that Rambus I think helped their technology get into the JEDEC spec without disclosing that their ownership of infringing patents. Much more dastardly IMO.


By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 1/2/2008 2:49:54 PM , Rating: 2
To my knowledge, Broadcom did something similar with 3G. I don't know if that's true for these ones too.


Typo
By Schadenfroh on 1/2/2008 10:07:08 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
More Qualcomm products barred form United States market for patent infringement




RE: Typo
By sprockkets on 1/2/08, Rating: -1
RE: Typo
By sprockkets on 1/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: Typo
By TomZ on 1/2/2008 10:34:46 AM , Rating: 3
I believe that DT automatically downrates comments with profanity.


RE: Typo
By James Holden on 1/2/08, Rating: -1
RE: Typo
By sprockkets on 1/2/2008 1:39:57 PM , Rating: 2
Uh, Buffalo routers were sold in the US until the injunction placed on them BY AN AUSTRAILIAN GOV AGENCY, AND HERE IN THE US.

Better, yet, people like Linksys, Netgear and Intel have all sued them over the patent. If they and Buffalo lose, prepare to pay them royalties over wifi, something they didn't even bother to whine about until two years ago.


RE: Typo
By sprockkets on 1/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: Typo
By sprockkets on 1/2/2008 1:51:42 PM , Rating: 2
Wow it works.

Look at this link:

http://www.buffalotech.com/press/releases/buffalo-...

Thanks to them, those Buffalo routers, especially the nice ones with the built in high power antennas, are no longer for sale here.

Check out also the http://www.buffalotech.com/products/wireless/wirel...

They sold this for $40, had better output than the Linksys WRT54GL, and ran dd-wrt as well.


Next step
By HrilL on 1/2/2008 11:56:06 AM , Rating: 2
Now Broadcom needs to take this to the WTO because the U.S. is really just a fraction of the over all market Qualcomm is infringing on...




..
By wookie1 on 1/2/2008 11:06:46 AM , Rating: 1
Broadcom to Qualcomm: "All your base are belong to us"

Sorry, this is still on my mind from the GPS speed-limiting article, but it seems to apply very well here.




"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser

DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone? 




17 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki