Print 35 comment(s) - last by fcx56.. on Jul 3 at 8:43 PM

Porsche ACC InnoDrive screen  (Source: Autoblog)
System takes control of the pedals leaving the driver to steer

Walk up to most people and ask what they think of when the name Porsche is uttered and many will immediately think 911 and racing. Porsche is getting further and further from its pure sports car roots even though it still makes some of the best sports cars around. Most of the Porsche models sold today aren't the sports cars the company currently makes (911, Boxster, Cayman), but larger vehicles like the Panamera sedan/hatchback, and Cayenne crossover.

While performance remains a priority for Porsche, the company is looking into ways to make all of its vehicles safer and more efficient. Part of the investigation into efficiency and safety is a new system that takes adaptive cruise control a lot further than simply being able to slow down a vehicle in emergency situations.

The new system Porsche is working on is called ACC InnoDrive and it completely removes the driver's feet from the pedals. The car learns the route the driver takes complete with estimates of the speed limit, curves, and elevation changes and then translates that into data the car uses to completely control the pedals.

The goal is to create a car that constantly monitors speed, throttle, and other aspects for a smooth and comfortable ride that optimizes efficiency. Autoblog was able to take a ride in a prototype Porsche Panamera S that is equipped with the system. The hardware to make the ACC InnoDrive function is a second ECU in the trunk of the car that gathers additional data. 

Autoblog says that allowing the car to take over the pedals completely was unnerving in some parts, but the system performance flawlessly.

ACC InnoDrive has three modes: Comfort, Dynamic, and Off. The Dynamic mode is where the pedals are taken over by the car. Apparently, the system will bring your car to a complete stop, slow for curves, and knows the speed limit so you just have to steer. The system is expected to be production-ready in about three years and of course will be optional. InnoDrive is expected to be offered on most Porsche vehicles, including its sports cars.

Porsche did note that its system would not touch the steering wheel. It feels the hands-on aspect of steering is integral to the Porsche experience. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By jr9k on 6/29/2011 12:41:36 PM , Rating: 5
It feels the hands-on aspect of steering is integral to the Porsche experience.

What about the foot down on full throttle? Not a Porsche experience?

RE: .
By JMC2000 on 6/29/2011 12:53:26 PM , Rating: 2
That's only for those 'pedestrian' people that drive 'Italian' and other 'German' vehicles. We Porsche drivers are beyond merely pushing those archaic devices known as 'pedals'...

RE: .
By amanojaku on 6/29/2011 1:00:50 PM , Rating: 4
What about foot down on brake? I'm not worried about my normal driving patterns. I'm worried about someone else swerving in front of me and my fully automated system being unable to adjust. Sure, I can steer, but I would want full control of the gas and brakes at that point. Many drivers instinctively handle issues on the road, like deer jumping out, or stuff flying off the back of a truck. Computers should be better, but I have yet to see one that actually is.

RE: .
By DanNeely on 6/29/2011 1:04:54 PM , Rating: 4
I'd be shocked if foot on the break wasn't a method to instantly switch back to manual speed control.

RE: .
By xti on 6/30/2011 10:45:12 AM , Rating: 2
just the way it works with cruise control, i assume the same.

RE: .
By Slyne on 6/29/2011 2:21:46 PM , Rating: 2
Working daily with computers and humans, I can tell you that I've come to trust the machines to do their job a lot more than the humans.

RE: .
By Camikazi on 6/29/2011 7:33:43 PM , Rating: 3
Ok, but do you trust the machine to take your place, and take over for your experience?

RE: .
By someguy123 on 6/29/2011 10:54:22 PM , Rating: 2
I think a machine is much more reliable for specialized tasks like this one.

Obviously they need some method of disabling computer control just in case, but I'd trust computers more than I'd trust the average person to pay attention to the road, especially with how popular texting and internet browsing on phones have become.

RE: .
By Strunf on 6/30/2011 8:06:42 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly a few well placed ultrasound sensors in your car and you could detect all incoming objects and the computer would do a much better job choosing what to do and faster.
For instance if a deer jumps into the road chances are you will not see it coming, with sensors the computer could be aware if it and warn you or takeover and do what needed to reduce the risks of an accident!

RE: .
By KillerNoodle on 6/29/2011 5:04:44 PM , Rating: 2
From reading this brief synopsis, it seems as if the pedals are still there and the InnoDrive needs you to drive the route at least once before the car can do it.

It is a nice idea, not relying on GPS and maps that could be wrong, and a computer that knows the upcoming terrain can probably drive more efficiently than a person.

And with all other Cruise Control Systems there will be the disclaimer that the driver should still pay attention and be prepared for the dynamic situations that arise while driving.

RE: .
By JediJeb on 6/29/2011 6:19:21 PM , Rating: 4
It will work ok where you have long drives with no intersections. I wonder what it does when you come to the places you have to stop and wait for crossing traffic, or things like rail crossings? Those are variables it just can't learn and are part of many peoples daily commutes.

RE: .
By nafhan on 6/30/2011 9:32:09 AM , Rating: 3
What'll be really interesting to see (from a legal perspective) is what happens the first time a pedestrian is struck and killed by one of these things... Is it Porsche's fault or the "drivers"?

RE: .
By fcx56 on 7/3/2011 8:43:10 PM , Rating: 2
Morally I'd say the driver, considering they are the one who pressed the button and took their eyes off the road. That being said, in America it's usually whomever has the deepest pockets..

RE: .
By Souka on 6/29/2011 7:33:14 PM , Rating: 2
I find it funny Porche is developing a system so you only need to steer your car, and VW this week talked about their system which its big feature is lane-holding..aka, self steering.

Just my thought....

RE: .
By Lazarus Dark on 6/29/2011 7:38:35 PM , Rating: 2
My concern is that the people buying Panamera's have more money than brains. They want a famous name, but don't actually want to drive a car. Many of them are likely ignorant enough to roll down the window and stick their feet out to cool, thinking the system will brake if someone comes flying into their path. Or better yet, falling asleep because they are so detached from driving thier brain isn't focused at all.

I'm in the camp thinking auto trans is the worst thing to happen to driving. If only we could force everyone back to manuals, they would have to put down the phone and pay attention... (I can dream of a world where I don't have to be constantly severely paranoid of someone ramming into me, cant I?...)

RE: .
By Wererat on 6/30/2011 8:50:07 AM , Rating: 2
You can't "force everyone" into anything. God knows the people who already want everyone (but themselves) to stop smoking, drinking, eating anything but tofu, using energy, buying interesting video games, etc. already have been trying to impose their will on all of us.

I would at least like the option to actually drive if I want. That seems to be drying up as people clamor for more automation in driving. There is no inexpensive "people's sportscar" any more; the Caterham 7 that was a $12k kit is now a $50k rich-kid's toy.

So, even though I'm a "car guy" I've been getting into motorcycles as the last refuge of those that want to control their vehicles and aren't yet independently wealthy.

The day is coming
By lightfoot on 6/29/2011 3:06:09 PM , Rating: 2
Pretty soon cars won't have a driver's seat. You'll just get into the trunk with the rest of the cargo, and the car will take you where you're going.

RE: The day is coming
By theapparition on 6/29/2011 3:59:30 PM , Rating: 3
As long as Jessica Alba gets into the trunk with me, I have no issue with that.

RE: The day is coming
By drunkenmastermind on 6/29/2011 4:59:19 PM , Rating: 2
Jessica's pregnant!

RE: The day is coming
By Camikazi on 6/29/2011 7:48:00 PM , Rating: 2
That is supposed to change things? Get a car with a bigger trunk if anything :P

RE: The day is coming
By FITCamaro on 6/29/2011 11:39:38 PM , Rating: 2
Pregnant chicks are really horny.

Fancy cruise control
By Dug on 6/29/2011 1:12:50 PM , Rating: 3
It kind of defeats the purpose of having a Porsche. I also wouldn't buy one with an automatic.

RE: Fancy cruise control
By Flunk on 6/29/2011 1:21:40 PM , Rating: 2
The Panamera defeats the purpose of having a Porsche already. This is another toy for the sort of people who buy them.

RE: Fancy cruise control
By aharris02 on 6/29/2011 2:01:19 PM , Rating: 3
Agreed. Not that I own a Porsche, but I'm disgusted everytime I see a Panamera on the road.

Station wagons are and should have remained a foul relic of decades past, not produced by a sports-car manufacturer in 2011.

RE: Fancy cruise control
By silverblue on 6/29/2011 6:06:37 PM , Rating: 2
I somewhat agree about the Panamera, however what about everyone's views of the Cayenne?

SWs (or estate cars as we know them) might not work for some people but do work for others. People carriers (MPVs) and estates are relatively popular in Europe. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the increase in popularity of people carriers gave birth to a surge in people buying large 4x4s even if they weren't planning on using them for that purpose. There must be something soothing about lording it over everyone else on the school run... and there's definitely something unnerving about someone sat right up your backside in their roadgoing tank paying more attention to their brats than to the road.

RE: Fancy cruise control
By FITCamaro on 6/29/11, Rating: 0
Something doesn't add up...
By bitterman0 on 6/29/2011 1:19:39 PM , Rating: 2
I find it hard to believe that Panamera and Cayenne sell more than 911, Boxter and Cayman. While, I'm sure, Panamera and Cayenne are not bad vehicles in their own right, Porsche enthusiasts tend to gravitate towards sports cars and roadsters rather than station wagons and SUVs.

By Brandon Hill on 6/29/2011 2:49:30 PM , Rating: 2
Well, it's true. Sad, but true. Vehicles like the Cayenne and Panamera pay for the development of uber-cars like the 918 Spyder.

RE: Something doesn't add up...
By Camikazi on 6/29/2011 7:51:05 PM , Rating: 2
Panamera and Cayenne opened Porsche up to non sports car nuts, and there are more of those then there are nuts so I believe they outsell their sportier cousins. Remember 4 door and Crossover allow for more people including kids making them possible family cars.

'equiped with what?
By 225commander on 6/29/2011 12:37:33 PM , Rating: 2
"take a ride in a prototype Porsche Panamera S that is equipped with 'the situation'."

ha, I don't think having a member of the jersey shore crew onboard will help your driving experience in a Porsche

RE: 'equiped with what?
By Brandon Hill on 6/29/2011 12:40:12 PM , Rating: 3
What? Who left the 'roids in the glovebox? :)

So basically...
By rs2 on 6/29/2011 7:21:03 PM , Rating: 3
They've invented cruise control. How quaint.

Wrong Direction
By btc909 on 6/29/2011 2:58:16 PM , Rating: 2
What Porsche should do is yes control the throttle but towards fuel ecomony coupled with a adaptive cruise control. Drivers tend to give a vehicle gas but not to either maintain or gain speed wasting fuel. Modern engines shut the fuel flow off when you are off the gas. You can actually hurt fuel ecomony on a level surface if you are slighty on the gas using fuel plus the drag from the engine running instead of coasting. Say if Porsche system detect what the elevation is, you are maintaing a constant speed & is monitoring the distance of the vehicle in front of you a Porsche system can modulate the throttle to maintain your chosen speed. I would also add very minor steering adjustments as well not detected in the steering wheel to maintain perfectly straight travel. This system would allow higher speed limits as well.

BMW sales pitch for this
By FITCamaro on 6/29/2011 11:44:06 PM , Rating: 2
BMW. The ultimate non-driving machine.

By FlyBri on 6/30/2011 3:45:26 AM , Rating: 2
Shane, in the the line, "but the system performance flawlessly", I think you meant "performed", not "performance".

You guys seriously need to proofread your articles more carefully before you post them. The occasional mistake is fine, but I'm seeing glaring errors such as the one I just mentioned way too often, and it makes the site seem a little more second-rate to me. Just my two cents...

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki