backtop


Print 29 comment(s) - last by MozeeToby.. on Aug 19 at 6:46 PM


  (Source: businessinsider.com)
Porn companies and others are getting frustrated over potential trademark infringement associated with the new .xxx domain

The .xxx domain is the new kid on Web block, and while it was specifically created for pornographic sites, its presence has caused nothing but headaches for both the porn industry and non-pornographic businesses.

The .xxx domain was first proposed in 2000 by ICM Registry, a private company founded by Stuart Lawley, as a voluntary option for pornographic sites on the internet. It faced strong criticism from many politicians and conservative groups, but was resubmitted in 2004. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Board finally approved the sTLD on March 18, 2011, and it went into operation on April 15, 2011.

The new domain will not launch until December of this year, but many companies are paying the $200 to $300 fee to preregister their domain names now whether they want to or not because they fear cybersquatters will register trademarks before them.

Cybersquatters register domain names of large businesses like Coca-Cola and Apple, for instance, before the actual companies have a chance to buy them. There are also typosquatters, who register well-known brand domain names as well, but with slight typographic errors like "Peppsi" instead of "Pepsi." To prevent brand theft and regain control of these corporate Web addresses, these large businesses are at the mercy of the cybersquatter who beat them to the punch, and the result could be a hefty ransom and legal battles.

ICM Registry said it has received 900,000 requests from companies to preregister their trademarks. So far, 80 percent of preregistered companies are non-pornographic businesses. These companies do not necessarily want to do this, since many corporations already own several domain names. According to Frederick Felman, chief marketing officer of MarkMonitor, a company that helps others protect their brands, most large companies "own tens of thousands of domain names."

Companies may not like it, but many are jumping on the chance to preregister now to save the trouble later. MTV Networks, VH1, Comedy Central and Budget Travel are among those who have preregistered at least one .xxx domain name.

Other companies are not only jumping on-board to preregister, but are also going along with the pornographic correlation of the .xxx domain. For instance, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has preregistered peta.xxx, and plans to make it a pornography site that also promotes the importance of animal safety and respect. 

The porn industry, which the .xxx domain was designed for, is not happy with the upcoming launch either. While these companies also have to deal with cybersquatters and typosquatters, the industry also fears censorship associated with the new domain.

Many adult entertainment companies are refusing to pay the fee or register the domains, but are demanding protection. Manwin, one of the world's largest online porn companies based in Canada, had its lawyers send Lawley a letter in June warning his company to protect all 57 of Manwin's preexisting domain names under the .xxx domain or "risk the consequences." 

Hustler, a U.S.-based adult entertainment company with dozens of domain names, has sent Lawley a similar letter. These companies have claimed that the registration of their domain names without their consent will be a violation of their rights. 

ICM Registry responded to these companies by saying that a registry cannot be sued for trademark infringement. Lawley also noted that he is not launching the new domain to blackmail corporations with brand protection or for monetary reasons. 

"We're doing it on a cost-recovery basis," said Lawley, who said the fees would only cover the cost of the applicant's trademark ownership verification. "We don't make a dime out of it."

Some companies will receive the exemption that the porn industry desires. For instance, the Red Cross and the International Olympic Committee will have protected domains without having to pay the fees because they have international status.

ICANN will begin allowing companies to apply for their own domains starting next year, such as .Coca-Cola or .Nike, which is likely to result in another registry explosion and an increase in the cost of brand protection. 

"Multiply .xxx times several hundred, and that's the scale of the problem," said Felman.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Oh Lord
By VoodooChicken on 8/16/2011 10:35:59 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has preregistered peta.xxx, and plans to make it a pornography site that also promotes the importance of animal safety and respect.


I can only imagine what will pop up here.




RE: Oh Lord
By quiksilvr on 8/16/2011 10:43:50 AM , Rating: 2
Oh god, I can picture bananas going places it really shouldn't be going.


RE: Oh Lord
By ShaolinSoccer on 8/16/2011 10:50:10 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I can only imagine what will pop up here.


stuff like this?

http://www.treehugger.com/galleries/2010/02/do-pet...


RE: Oh Lord
By sprockkets on 8/16/2011 1:19:41 PM , Rating: 2
Kinda funny too, as most of the time, they protest in the street naked too with a banner over them.

nsfw like you didn't know

http://www.weirdpalace.com/peta-protest/


RE: Oh Lord
By DJ Brandon on 8/17/2011 10:22:48 AM , Rating: 2
Dear God


RE: Oh Lord
By The Raven on 8/16/2011 4:53:37 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I can only imagine what will pop up here.

All Pam Andersen...All the time.


RE: Oh Lord
By The Raven on 8/16/2011 4:55:34 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sure it will be like the stuff on www.donkey.xxx.mx


RE: Oh Lord
By ET on 8/17/2011 4:05:10 AM , Rating: 2
"Sheep want foreplay, too"


RE: Oh Lord
By blueeyesm on 8/17/2011 10:48:36 AM , Rating: 2
"All Hollywood celebrity sex tapes - Now, all in one place!"

:S


if we had done it right to begin with...
By kattanna on 8/16/11, Rating: 0
RE: if we had done it right to begin with...
By ShaolinSoccer on 8/16/2011 10:47:36 AM , Rating: 1
I agree. I couldn't believe there wasn't an .XXX domain back in the late 90's and I still can't believe it took this long...

If only we had Captain Hindsight to save us all...


By MozeeToby on 8/19/2011 6:46:29 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I still can't believe it took this long...
The porn industry doesn't want it because they fear the slippery slope forcing all internet porn under the XXX domain. The moral guardians don't want it because they think it will make porn easier to find. The businesses don't want it because they have to worry about someone buying up their brand.xxx and posting lord only knows what on it. (Incidentally, I'm sure the porn producers are worried about their branding getting trampled as well).

So who wanted it? I think there may be a hint if we combine "$200-$300 fee to preregister" with "900,000 requests so far"


RE: if we had done it right to begin with...
By tastyratz on 8/16/2011 12:47:47 PM , Rating: 2
absolutely, this should have been for quite some time.

also Icann has specifically made remarks about preventing people from registering .xxx domain names with trademark names. There will be protection in place so walgreens for example can complain about walgreens.xxx and get it shut down.

This is no different from any other domain in that respect, and that protection is not offered for .biz/.tv/.uk/etc. If you want to protect your brand you get the .net and the .com and any other suffix combination available then call it the cost of doing business, end of story.


By The Raven on 8/16/2011 4:59:41 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
This is no different from any other domain in that respect, and that protection is not offered for .biz/.tv/.uk/etc.

You mean .etc right? ;-)


By GuinnessKMF on 8/16/2011 1:11:39 PM , Rating: 2
While I agree with you to an extent, you're starting to step into territory that's no business of ICANN, and that is defining what is and what isn't porn. I agree that there should be voluntary tagging of content as porn in a manner that would allow for parental controls and business environments to censor content, but that there should be no penalties for that content on the "commercial" domain.

I don't want to see an internet where people are relegated to the ".FreeSpeech" top level domain in order to speak freely.


By delphinus100 on 8/16/2011 8:07:53 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
.XXX domain would have been there from the beginning and ALL porn sites would have been required to register there instead of any other domain like .com etc.


'Required to.'

Which brings us pack to the old question: What is porn?

We might agree that, say; 'doglovinglesbianleathersluts.com' is porn (and not that there's anything wrong with that, as long as you're an adult), but is Playboy.com? Is Maxim.com?


Another case
By knutjb on 8/16/2011 12:59:21 PM , Rating: 2
Here we go again where the "cure" is worse than the disease. Instead of creating a location of one-stop shopping/blocking for porn as intended they are causing chaos for non-porn based companies too.

Too many cooks in the kitchen... Isn't that the mantra of government?




RE: Another case
By sprockkets on 8/16/2011 1:25:28 PM , Rating: 2
Uh, why would you go to anything.xxx?

I mean, bankofamerica.xxx isn't a dead giveaway? Or, I mean, what, there are those who don't know what xxx means?


RE: Another case
By cjohnson2136 on 8/16/2011 3:19:40 PM , Rating: 2
X is has been used to tell the strength of alcohol so a XXX to some could be a strength of alcohol :D. But yeah if you see xxx at the end of a url I would get the hell away.


RE: Another case
By blueeyesm on 8/17/2011 10:52:05 AM , Rating: 2
Children don't know the difference, especially those with technically inept elders/parents.

Further, what's to stop malicious website devs from using re-directs from a seemingly innocent domain name, so long as <companyname>.xxx is registered?


RE: Another case
By cjohnson2136 on 8/17/2011 4:09:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Further, what's to stop malicious website devs from using re-directs from a seemingly innocent domain name, so long as <companyname>.xxx is registered?


They can do this now. So it doesn't really matter about the xxx


RE: Another case
By bigdawg1988 on 8/16/2011 2:52:00 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think the government started it, that Stanley dude did. The government just went along with it since they really had no legal reason not to. Blame Stanley, not the government. Stupid people exist outside of government too.


Easy/Obvious answer
By ilkhan on 8/16/2011 3:52:59 PM , Rating: 4
The easy and obvious answer is to make any domain name only available on one TLD and make any alternative entry point to the registered owner. So if somebody tries to register google.xxx it would denied because google.com is already registered. Then if somebody does try to reach google.xxx, it would redirect to google.com.

Squatters should just be gut shot.




RE: Easy/Obvious answer
By cjohnson2136 on 8/16/2011 4:05:14 PM , Rating: 3
It's funny how the easy answers are always passed over


RE: Easy/Obvious answer
By jwbarker on 8/18/2011 10:05:22 PM , Rating: 2
Uh, if you're going to do that, what purpose would there be in having multiple TLDs at all?


Dibs
By Loveless on 8/16/2011 1:39:40 PM , Rating: 3
I just registered:
anandtech.xxx
dailytech.xxx

Cha-ching!

Want it back? Show me the money!

Thanks for the tip, Tiffany!




RE: Dibs
By DJ Brandon on 8/17/2011 10:25:03 AM , Rating: 2
jagoff


Why so serious?
By YashBudini on 8/16/2011 5:39:06 PM , Rating: 3
If IE can stop and query me every time a temporary font needs to be downloaded it can have a setting to do the same when directed to any .xxx domain.

Perhaps it can also display an icon of a boob, or maybe the mouse pointer to change to a woody.




By Hafgrim on 8/16/2011 1:19:49 PM , Rating: 2
The XXX domain is just a sneaky way for telecoms to place a GIANT TOLL booth on the internet to porn companys and thats its sole sneaky real purpose. Becareful people it will not help anyone except the big telecom companys.

They already are sneakily trying to head that way with secret anti net neutrality laws & behind closed doors deals




"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki