backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 21 comment(s) - last by Kim Leo.. on Jun 19 at 5:31 AM


An image of a sample collected from the Martian soil shows many kinds of particles. The white bar represents 1mm.  (Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University Arizona)

A second image clearly shows the strips of machine silicon which form the special substrate used to capture microscopic soil particles. The middle visible strip has captured the most particles. Each strip is .4mm in width.  (Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona/Imperial College London)
After a short sticky situation, Phoenix returns some images to Earth.

After successfully reaching Mars at the end of a nine and a half month jaunt through interplanetary space, the Phoenix Lander landed safely on the surface and began broadcasting data back to Earth. Phoenix's well known mission is to study the Martian surface and air, scanning it for traces of life and help to discover how a planet once thought to be at least partially covered with water became an icy desert.

To examine the rust-colored soil, Phoenix uses a robotic arm which wields a small backhoe type bucket to scoop up soil and bring it to the various instruments aboard the lander. Presently, the probe has gathered at least one sample which has been imaged by its Optical Microscope instrument.

The soil sample surprised Phoenix mission crew, being somewhat more clumpy and sticky than was theorized. However, the particles that were imaged by the microscope were successfully deposited upon a custom silicone substrate. The substrate contains several different strips with different sizes and patterns of pegs and holes machined into them. The various patterns are designed to help capture and hold different sizes of particles for imaging not only by the Optical Microscope, but by Phoenix's onboard Atomic Force Microscope.

The images show various types of particles, most notably large particles of dark glassy appearance, probably volcanic in origin, and smaller particles which are more similar to the dust that swirls endlessly in the Martian atmosphere. Also in the mix are at least four different types of minerals.

No reports of life are flooding in from the Phoenix control center. Though the lander has been on Mars for nearly 20 days, data from the instruments is just starting to be collected and analyzed. It may be weeks or months before a sample of ice, what the mission planners are most enthusiastically seeking, is collected for analysis.

Mars may have an active, though slow climate. It may have once teemed with primordial life in liquid water. With any luck and a little work, thanks to the Phoenix lander, we may soon have answers to these unknowns.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

why bother?
By nosfe on 6/15/2008 4:02:37 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It may be weeks or months before a sample of ice, what the mission planners are most enthusiastically seeking, is collected for analysis.


why not just call Marvin and ask for a little ice?




RE: why bother?
By Poopstar on 6/15/2008 4:16:17 PM , Rating: 5
YOU IDIOT!
The first thing Marvin would do is blow up the Earth because it obstructs his view of Venus!
:)


RE: why bother?
By SlyNine on 6/15/2008 4:30:08 PM , Rating: 5
Well, back to the old drawing board.


RE: why bother?
By Smartless on 6/16/2008 4:22:10 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah all you need to do as melt that ice and get instant Martian. "Retrieve the Uranium PEW-38 explosive space modulator!!!!"


RE: why bother?
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 6/17/2008 5:10:41 PM , Rating: 2
Earth shattering KaBoom, there's suppose to be an Earth shattering Kaboom. Where's my Earth shattering KaBoom?

and that my Marvin impression. Sounds pretty good, just like him, no?


RE: why bother?
By Pezman37 on 6/15/08, Rating: -1
RE: why bother?
By Kim Leo on 6/19/2008 5:31:48 AM , Rating: 1
I don't get it?


If they wanted dirt on Mars...
By BladeVenom on 6/15/2008 4:03:33 PM , Rating: 2
Mars was fooling around with Venus.




RE: If they wanted dirt on Mars...
By Larrymon2000 on 6/15/2008 8:44:13 PM , Rating: 5
Obviously mars was fooling around with Uranus


RE: If they wanted dirt on Mars...
By zsdersw on 6/15/2008 10:49:15 PM , Rating: 2
A few hundred years from now Uranus will be renamed to Urectum.


RE: If they wanted dirt on Mars...
By 8steve8 on 6/16/2008 12:45:23 AM , Rating: 2
futurama


RE: If they wanted dirt on Mars...
By MrPoletski on 6/16/2008 5:01:12 AM , Rating: 2
The Chances of anything coming from Mars, are a million to one, he said.

The chances of anything coming from mars, are a million to one.

BUT STILL, THEY COME.

DUN DUN DAH... duddan duddadaaa

DUN DUN DAH... DUDDUDAN DUDDUDAHH!!


RE: If they wanted dirt on Mars...
By Phaedra7 on 6/16/2008 12:47:06 PM , Rating: 2
Jeff Wayne's "War of the Worlds"...

A little dated but a pretty good album


wheels?
By mahax on 6/16/2008 12:24:50 PM , Rating: 2
The picture of the lander shows solid legs, doesn't this lander move at all?




RE: wheels?
By geddarkstorm on 6/16/2008 1:14:10 PM , Rating: 3
Nah, I'm pretty sure it just sits there and digs. Hence that name "lander" instead of "range rover" or "cadillac".

There is going to be another rover like Spirit and Opportunity sent sometime in the near future, named Phoenix or something, but I don't remember when.


naughty pastime
By root mean sq on 6/15/2008 6:08:31 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The soil sample surprised Phoenix mission crew, being somewhat more clumpy and sticky than was theorized.

sounds like Marvin has been gettin his moon rocks off over that space pr0n...




RE: naughty pastime
By Treckin on 6/15/2008 7:30:35 PM , Rating: 1
ROFL. How immature yet funny. The best kind of humor :)


creationism explanation
By BoxCutterLou on 6/17/08, Rating: -1
RE: creationism explanation
By BoxCutterLou on 6/17/2008 9:38:56 AM , Rating: 2
wow, I posted in the wrong story. It's early here.


RE: creationism explanation
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 6/17/2008 6:29:40 PM , Rating: 2
Dude...an big explosion will create a lot of light.....and will create a Big Bang....

On areas where science and the Bible talk about the same subject... When science finally gets it right it has always matched what the Bible states. Of course there are many areas in science that the Bible does not talk about – was not important to God to explain – Bible is about him not science. The Bible just explains it in simplest terms and ways...many times you do not even understand what it is talking about until science unravels something new. Like DNA and cloning. Where the best DNA samples from? I've been told from the bones. God puts Adam to sleep, removes a small rib and makes woman. (simple). Same story more complex (I'm not a Doctor, of course they would make it sound even better) God preformed open surgery on Adam he used gas to put him into a deep sleep. While under God cut into the lower part of the chest area. He then cut out and remove the smallest rib. Then closed up Adam's cut. God then took Adam's rib and extracted DNA from this rib. He then alter the DNA to make it from male to female. God then incubated the DNA sample and created women. He brought the woman to life and introduced her to Adam. Simple and complex stories are the same story. The second story is when science and knowledge has advanced enough to explain how it was or could have been done

“After all after thousands of years a book could be greatly altered. We all know how the telephone game works, takes 10 people to screw up a story.”

The Bible by it's own words was written down not verbally – for the beginning things God told Moses who then wrote it down (if you are believing the story). All the stories in the Bible were written down by the author for their area or their scribes wrote it for them (St. Paul was poor on vision near the end of life so needed a scribe). The telephone games works only in verbal passing of a story. Now if you want to talk about meanings being lost or changed in translation, well you might have a point there. I do not know Hebrew nor ancient Greek – the two key languages you would have to know in order to read the original documents (copies documents of course)


RE: creationism explanation
By Kim Leo on 6/19/2008 5:31:24 AM , Rating: 2
"God preformed open surgery on Adam he used gas to put him into a deep sleep. While under God cut into the lower part of the chest area. He then cut out and remove the smallest rib. Then closed up Adam's cut. God then took Adam's rib and extracted DNA from this rib. He then alter the DNA to make it from male to female. God then incubated the DNA sample and created women. He brought the woman to life and introduced her to Adam. Simple and complex stories are the same story."

That is probably the dumbest thing I've ever read in here.. Science and christianity(or any other religion for that matter) is not compatible, especially not if you look at it like that.. I never get why it is so important for you to state this, Science isn't about stating something random as a fact, in science before you can even call it science you will have to be able to test, disprove it and find that it seems to be true. Like evolution. The bible says there were jewish slaves in egypt, wich has been proven prettymuch to be false. Even if you analyze it in the wierd way you did you will find that the bible really isn't compatible with real science. you should instead try and think like a science and be skeptical.


"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki