backtop


Print 44 comment(s) - last by Pirks.. on Nov 27 at 2:19 PM


CT Scan of Skull from Philips Brilliance CT scanner  (Source: BBC News)
New Philips 3D CT scanner produces manipulable 3D images

The first commercially viable CT machine for medical use was invented in 1979 and the technology earned two independent developers of similar technology the 1979 Nobel Prize in Medicine.

Since 1979, CT machines have become much more sensitive and better equipped to help doctors diagnose and treat medical problems like tumors and cancer. BBC News is reporting that Philips unveiled its latest 256-slice Brilliance CT machine at the Radiological Society of North America.

The new CT machine is much faster at imaging than previous machines thanks to a 22 percent faster rotation of the X-ray emitting gantry that spins around the patient inside the familiar CT ring. The machine is able to take the 256-slices and arrange them into 3D representations of a patient’s body that can be viewed from any angle and manipulated to see all sides of the body or organ.

Steve Rusckowski, chief executive of Philips Medical Systems told BBC News, “This scanner allows radiologists to produce high quality images and is also designed to reduce patients' exposure to X-rays. It is so powerful it can capture an image of the entire heart in just two beats."

Another feature of the Brilliance CT machine is that it allows the digital scans to be shared and viewed on any computer in the hospital and allows for remote viewing of scans when needed. The faster scan speeds also result in the patient being exposed to as much as 80 percent less radiation.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Just an FYI
By Ackbar on 11/26/2007 7:44:25 PM , Rating: 3
The technology for this 'new CT scanner' is not particularly new or novel. Basically, it's the standard helical type CT scanner with some tweaks to increase the number of slices within 'each scan', this is not particularly hard to do just required some small development. Unfortunately, media is reporting this technology as completely new and novel and here you see it being presented as if it's going to be the next big thing.




RE: Just an FYI
By TomZ on 11/26/2007 8:08:34 PM , Rating: 4
The term for what you describe is "marketing." And good marketing makes small incremental improvements sound revolutionary.


RE: Just an FYI
By Pirks on 11/26/2007 8:14:56 PM , Rating: 4
Mac OS 10.5 Leopard immediately comes to mind.


RE: Just an FYI
By Polynikes on 11/26/2007 8:25:50 PM , Rating: 5
That made me giggle.


RE: Just an FYI
By Pirks on 11/26/2007 8:35:03 PM , Rating: 1
I laugh hysterically every time I remember those "top secret" features that Jobs boasted about - now this is _the_ flop. Before that the WinFS was occupying the first place in my rating of software industry flops. Jobs and his "top secret" features shifted it to the second place. Good job, Jobs!


RE: Just an FYI
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:48:13 PM , Rating: 2
As long as it is USEFULL features.

I couldn't even use them if they were top-secret all the time ;)


RE: Just an FYI
By Pirks on 11/26/2007 9:54:53 PM , Rating: 1
I suppose they are very useful for developers (64-bit OS! Woohoo! At last! Only a year after Vista 64 - wonderful, I didn't expect Apple to move THAT fast) but they are "top secret" for users ;-)


RE: Just an FYI
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 11:19:28 PM , Rating: 2
Have You even seen the feature update video at Apples site?


RE: Just an FYI
By Pirks on 11/27/2007 2:19:47 PM , Rating: 1
No, I just read John Siracuza's review. Anything useful in that Apple video that Siracuza hasn't mentioned?


RE: Just an FYI
By hiscross on 11/26/2007 10:18:13 PM , Rating: 2
When I 1st starting reading DT I thought it offered a nice blend of technology news that was available on Slashdot and other blogs. Now I am convience is nothing but a windoze sounding board for dos heads that weren't capable of using C/PM yet alone any NIX distribution, including Linux and much superior to anything windoze MacOS X. I don't mind intelligent feedback on anything, but the mindless crap coming out of ths current DT sudience is senseless at best. UNIX isn't going away children, so do your homework, brush your teeth and go to bed. The world will be abetter place.


RE: Just an FYI
By Talcite on 11/26/2007 10:45:08 PM , Rating: 2
My sentiments exactly.

Bravo, a little grammatically lacking, but very well articulated otherwise.


RE: Just an FYI
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 11:21:57 PM , Rating: 2
Right on the nail <8O


RE: Just an FYI
By JKflipflop98 on 11/27/2007 3:16:49 AM , Rating: 5
Shouldn't you *nix hippies be out spreading the word against evil corporations or handing out love beads or something? Better get back to it, lest "the man" catches you wasting his time.


RE: Just an FYI
By Cygni on 11/27/2007 12:33:29 PM , Rating: 3
WINDOZE SUX LINUX RULZ HACK DA PLANETTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TT

Jesus, not everything has to be turned into a conversation about your choice in PC operating systems, you know that right.


RE: Just an FYI
By Runiteshark on 11/27/2007 9:31:57 AM , Rating: 2
Are you KIDDING ME? Mac OSX 10.5 is possibly the best iteration of OSX ever. It packs TONS of features that are way better and much more useful in Windows Vista. Nevermind its still based off the same tired poorly written rewrite of the bsd kernel and thus the reason it has such horrible server performance. Besides, who runs Apache, Samba, Named (bind) or anything like that?. Of course by that, I mean anyone who doesn't use Job's version of those totally awesome apps. Lots of people think he is just stealing those open source applications to make his godlike OSX seem better then it is, but those people are liars. I hear Jobs himself recoded Apache so it its invincible to DoS exploits, buffer, heap, proc race and int overflows.

*Note this argument to a degree was taken from an actual Mac User™©


RE: Just an FYI
By SandmanWN on 11/26/2007 8:18:27 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, so lets not ruin Philips hard working advertising dollars and the medias "special" story of the day. Then again if it saves my life I'll gladly call it the most revolutionary radiology equipment on the face of the planet. :P


RE: Just an FYI
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:22:33 PM , Rating: 2
Anyone scanned a Mac yet?


RE: Just an FYI
By SandmanWN on 11/26/2007 8:28:03 PM , Rating: 2
Don't know but unlike an MRI you can scan metal objects in a CT scanner. Would be interesting to see.


RE: Just an FYI
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:30:22 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry, wrong place. Was a comment for the Leopard thing above..


RE: Just an FYI
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:38:44 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, that could be nice to do!

This from YouTube about CT-Scanners:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi_eliLnqI0


RE: Just an FYI
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:58:28 PM , Rating: 2
Five times lower exposure to X-rays is pretty revolutionary.

(But I know - waiting for quantum computers and total holographic memoryunits is painfull!)


Very good move indeed :)
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 7:28:46 PM , Rating: 2
I really like the "...and is also designed to reduce patients' exposure to X-rays." 80% less acc. to article.

And not just the surface: "It is so powerful it can capture an image of the entire heart in just two beats."
I'm only wondering what they mean by two beats. "Meditation" or "Running" beats??




RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Orbs on 11/26/2007 7:34:35 PM , Rating: 2
Since they are talking about scanning the heart, I'm going to go with Hearbeats for 500, Alex.


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Lifted on 11/26/2007 7:44:56 PM , Rating: 2
Never ever go on Jeopardy.


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Orbs on 11/26/2007 7:50:02 PM , Rating: 2
and by Hearbeats I mean Heartbeats :).


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:11:26 PM , Rating: 2
I assume Pulse=Beat?

So two beat's wouldt equal to ~2 sec. (with a resting pulse of 60) which is pretty fast I think.


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By SandmanWN on 11/26/2007 7:58:29 PM , Rating: 2
It isn't very useful as a lifesaving technology if you have to be calm and collective while your bleeding to death to use it. :)


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:02:56 PM , Rating: 2
I think these machines are mostly used for scanning the inside of Your body, not the outside ;)


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By SandmanWN on 11/26/2007 8:14:55 PM , Rating: 2
Bleeding as in "Internal Bleeding." Left out the oh so important adjective. :)


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:16:00 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, and inside bleedings of course, my mistake, but it should be possible to do the scanning with a drugged patient too, I think.


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By SandmanWN on 11/26/2007 8:18:47 PM , Rating: 2
haha, beat yah too it. :P


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:20:06 PM , Rating: 2
Yep :)


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By SandmanWN on 11/26/2007 8:21:21 PM , Rating: 2
Also, keep in mind, its not wise to drug a patient before you know whats wrong.


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 8:26:23 PM , Rating: 2
If the scan of the whole body can be done in under a minute, isn't there a drug that would "sleep" the patient for that short period of time?


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By semo on 11/27/2007 6:38:37 AM , Rating: 3
a surgical 2x4.


RE: Very good move indeed :)
By SandmanWN on 11/27/2007 11:00:13 AM , Rating: 2
Hooooooooooo! *with thumbs up and toothless grin*


No top teeth?
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 11/26/2007 7:08:44 PM , Rating: 3
What happened to that guy's top row of teeth?




RE: No top teeth?
By masher2 (blog) on 11/26/2007 7:25:22 PM , Rating: 1
Looks like an elderly patient with a bad case of prognathism.


RE: No top teeth?
By Zirconium on 11/26/2007 7:26:19 PM , Rating: 4
He was beaten against the Philips 256-slice Brilliance CT machine when he asked too many questions...


RE: No top teeth?
By SandmanWN on 11/26/2007 7:27:48 PM , Rating: 2
Dentures, false teeth, got punched in the face to death, etc, etc...


meh
By audiophi1e on 11/26/2007 8:16:12 PM , Rating: 2
CT has always been able to recreate 3D images. Hence the name of the technology: Computed Tomography.
That is not new.

The claim of 80% less xray exposure is for real though. If you can develop a sensor array that can process faster than the previous model, you will achieve the same image with less irradiation. This is definitely a step in a positive direction. So developing a 256slice CT machine is definitely good news--similar to the idea of Intel developing 65nm architecture vs the previously larger fab process ability. It's better in every possible way compared to the previous generation (smaller, generates less heat, consumes less power, etc).
A 256slice CT vs a 64slice CT is faster, has higher resolution, and subjects the patient to less xrays.




RE: meh
By audiophi1e on 11/26/2007 8:18:43 PM , Rating: 2
but as per the previous comments, yes I agree this is not revolutionary--just further extension and development of existing technology.

Again, akin to the smaller and smaller nanometer processes that are developed every few years.


By jhinoz on 11/26/2007 10:28:09 PM , Rating: 3
Current CT scanners cost 1.6 mil in Aus. How much are these ones?




Phillips Press Release
By Clauzii on 11/26/2007 11:35:13 PM , Rating: 2
"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki