backtop


Print 27 comment(s) - last by Kefner.. on Aug 6 at 8:09 PM

Fap on your own time and network

The Pentagon has warned staffers and contractors working for the Missile Defense Agency to stop using government computers and networks to surf the web looking at porn. The announcement came from the Missile Defense Agency's executive director John James Jr.
 
James wrote in a recent memo that employees and contractors in recent months had been discovered "engaging in inappropriate use of the MDA network." 
 
He wrote in the memo, "Specifically, there have been instances of employees and contractors accessing websites, or transmitting messages, containing pornographic or sexually explicit images." He continued, "These actions are not only unprofessional, they reflect time taken away from designated duties, are in clear violation of federal and DoD and regulations, consume network resources and can compromise the security of the network though the introduction of malware or malicious code."
 
According to James, any individuals identified for violating network usage rules would be referred for "appropriate" disciplinary action. He also noted that people surfing pornographic websites using government computers and networks face losing their security clearance and could be subject to both suspension and removal from federal service.
 
According to spokesman Rick Lehner, the memo was a response to "a few people downloading material from some websites that were known to have had virus and malware issues."
 
Bloomberg quotes an unnamed government cyber security specialist stating that many pornographic websites are infected with viruses and are not only used by criminals, but are often used by foreign intelligence services to gain access and harvest data from government and corporate networks. The cyber security specialist specifically called out Russia's intelligence service as being known to use pornographic websites to gain access to networks.

Source: Bloomberg



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why no fire?
By elderwilson on 8/2/2012 9:18:29 AM , Rating: 4
I thought this was grounds for automatic termination?




RE: Why no fire?
By TO on 8/2/2012 9:33:04 AM , Rating: 4
It would be, if it was anywhere else than a government agency. It's actually very difficult to get terminated from a government job.


RE: Why no fire?
By nolisi on 8/2/2012 11:57:45 AM , Rating: 2
I don't think this article specified what happened with those discovered, and while it did say those would "face" losing security clearance, I think they're giving themselves leeway for unique circumstances.


RE: Why no fire?
By Cypherdude1 on 8/5/2012 5:46:05 PM , Rating: 2
Once Government employees in such sensitive positions lose their security clearance, they effectively lose their jobs. Once they lose their clearance, they cannot access the government computer system or work on any sensitive projects. They might not even be able to enter the premises.


RE: Why no fire?
By FITCamaro on 8/2/2012 6:30:27 PM , Rating: 2
Yup. Even in the private sector though usually you get a warning or two.


RE: Why no fire?
By mike8675309 on 8/2/2012 9:41:14 AM , Rating: 2
My WAG:
#1 - They finally have a tool that allows them to trivially detect who is accessing sites they shouldn't be. Previously it wasn't easy.
#2 - One or many people identified have enough responsibility within the agencies that they wanted to give them a warning before bringing the hammer down.


RE: Why no fire?
By JasonMick (blog) on 8/2/2012 9:44:39 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
I thought this was grounds for automatic termination?
Not to defend the wankers, but I wonder how many of these contractors/etc. were on day long isolated missions/service runs??

Such things are not common in the Armed Forces, though I'm not sure how many contractors have to work those kind of hours.

I had a friend who worked for the USAF, and he worked for a while in a nuclear missile silo, and it was essentially he and another dude sitting alone in a hole 24/7 with virtually nothing to do. Each had a gun in case the other "went rogue".

Now, I realize we don't want our servicepeople wanking it, but in a scenario like that, I think human nature is understandable.

Now if this occurred at like 3 p.m. in the office that's just uncalled for and I agree with you totally.

(And to counter the inevitable argument that we don't want silo workers wanking it and miss launching a nuclear counterstrike, I would argue that if it comes to that we're all f**ked anyways, so you might as well enjoy yourself before you go.)


RE: Why no fire?
By JasonMick (blog) on 8/2/2012 9:45:28 AM , Rating: 2
*not uncommon in the AF, I meant...


RE: Why no fire?
By TeXWiller on 8/2/2012 11:03:35 AM , Rating: 3
The US has a relatively large porn industry, mildly speaking. Perhaps the industry could raise to the occasion and express their patriotic impulses in the form of collaboration with the government. They have done it before and they can do it again for that unavoidable release of pressure in the stressful circumstances.
That said, the stresses of the working environment can be dealt with many other ways as well. The compulsive natural highs are the last resort when there is no other way to not to go "bonkers." There is no miles long forest trail to run on in a missile silo.


RE: Why no fire?
By TSS on 8/2/2012 12:02:32 PM , Rating: 5
So your buddy can have a few magazines that the brass will turn a blind eye to. Good luck getting a virus from those. For the office workers they can use their smartphones and browse porn on an entirely different network.

And people wonder why US cybersecurity is so bad. There's a time and place for everything folks, and government networks aren't the place to browse porn.


RE: Why no fire?
By augiem on 8/2/2012 3:16:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Now, I realize we don't want our servicepeople wanking it, but in a scenario like that, I think human nature is understandable.


Why should I care if our service people are "wanking it"? They have every right in the world to if they want, just not at their post. It's not like they change from human beings into robots the moment they sign up.


RE: Why no fire?
By Kefner on 8/6/2012 8:09:46 PM , Rating: 2
You sure you're not just remembering the opening to Wargames? Time for WOPR!!!! :)


RE: Why no fire?
By MrBlastman on 8/2/2012 11:11:51 AM , Rating: 5
Why no fire? Would you rather them have a failure to launch?

For all we know they were just working on the basics. Things such as proper handling of the targeting joystick. Maybe they were polishing their servos? Perhaps they were checking the missile ejector feed? Or, possibly they were trying to build their stamina for when the Russians... come?

Sitting in a silo all day long has to be boring.


RE: Why no fire?
By RedemptionAD on 8/2/2012 9:02:50 PM , Rating: 2
The real point is at the explosive moment it may lead to premature detonation....


RE: Why no fire?
By brasstax on 8/3/2012 1:36:51 PM , Rating: 2
The Russians do not approve of our keyboard defense shield.


U.S. Tax Dollars
By Akerans on 8/2/2012 12:22:28 PM , Rating: 2
It's true, U.S. tax dollars are hard at work!




RE: U.S. Tax Dollars
By geddarkstorm on 8/2/2012 12:54:52 PM , Rating: 2
Taking missile defense to a whole new level.


RE: U.S. Tax Dollars
By MrBlastman on 8/2/2012 2:27:07 PM , Rating: 2
Especially when they unload their warheads...

Oh wait, I think I said that the wrong way. ;)


RE: U.S. Tax Dollars
By Rukkian on 8/3/2012 9:41:32 AM , Rating: 2
Apparently very hard!


You can never stop the porn....
By rvertrees on 8/2/2012 12:22:34 PM , Rating: 2
Now they will just load porn on their smartphones and wont use the network. If someone is going to yank it at work you probably wont stop them.




RE: You can never stop the porn....
By Florinator on 8/2/2012 4:53:47 PM , Rating: 2
I want to see the smartphone that gets a signal inside a nuclear missle silo :-)


By RedemptionAD on 8/2/2012 9:13:24 PM , Rating: 2
Can you hear me now?


By Strunf on 8/3/2012 8:02:43 AM , Rating: 2
There's no need for signal when you have a 32GB SD card full of porn on your smartphone ;)


Just Block the Sites !
By jemix on 8/2/2012 10:43:43 AM , Rating: 2
It's easy to do, and is good 'IT' practice.




RE: Just Block the Sites !
By kmmatney on 8/2/2012 11:45:25 AM , Rating: 3
It's dead easy - just use the OpenDNS for the DNS servers:

208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220

This would greatly mitigate the problem. I'm sure they'll just waste time browsing non-porn sites with this, though...


WOW!
By Narvanetsi on 8/2/2012 12:35:28 PM , Rating: 2
Even the place that i work those kind of sites are blocked, i cant understand why in an agency with such a high profile and supposedly high security the should have access to those sites?!?!?!?!?!?!?




Well...
By LedHed on 8/2/2012 8:50:03 PM , Rating: 2
"any individual identified"...

It's not like they don't know who these people are. I worked for the State Govt where I live in our IT Dept and these are a few of the security measures required by law.

1. User must have unique PWs to the hardware and the network
2. User must change these unique PWs every 90 days
3. User must never leave his/her computer logged in while AFK

etc etc

The feds know exactly who is doing this. My question is why are they acting like it's a mystery novel to figure out such a basic thing? Either do something or quit telling the world about our Federal Porn Addiction.




"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007











botimage
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki