backtop


Print 28 comment(s) - last by Christopher1.. on Mar 25 at 6:14 PM


This detail from the report shows a BearShare setup screen. Though it appears that filesharing has been disabled for all folders by clicking on the "Deselect All" button, the program continues to surreptitiously share the Downloads folder.
Peer-to-peer networks are playing fast and loose with your personal information, according to the USPTO

File-sharing programs that "dupe" users into inadvertently sharing files could be to blame for turning our nation's children into criminals and government workers into unwitting spies. That's the gist of a just-released report from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PDF), which thoroughly documents the ways in which filesharing programs are designed to share files on users' hard drives, whether they want to or not.

The 75-page report, "Filesharing Programs and Technological Features to Induce Users to Share,” contains a foreword by Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and USPTO Director Jon W. Dudas. Dudas said the November 2006 report was published at his request after reviewing troubling allegations from USPTO staff that the most popular file-sharing programs -- BearShare, eDonkey, Kazaa, LimeWire and Morpheus -- are all designed to encourage users to share their files, often without their knowledge or express consent.

The report is rife with examples of ways that programs fail to disclose, or willfully disguise the extent to which users are making their private files available on peer-to-peer networks. In some cases, the programs have been shown to continue sharing files and folders even after users have deliberately deactivated sharing features.

The patent office issues many ominous warnings in the report, charging that inadvertent filesharing victimizes copyright holders while making users vulnerable to lawsuits. Charging that the P2P filesharing systems "prey upon the young and the naive," the report goes on to charge that numerous features in P2P software clients "have been deployed to trick the young and the unwary into uploading infringing files that culpable, revenue-generating `leechers' could download with little risk to themselves."

The report also suggests that the practice of automatically harvesting personal data files without users' knowledge carries other, more sinister implications. "The anonymity, cheap pseudonyms, and indiscriminate sharing that make these networks an attractive venue for infringement also attracted `unstoppable' pedophiles who share violent child pornography," the report states. "Identity thieves were searching for inadvertently shared financial data (while) pedophiles were searching filesharing networks for hard-core child pornography — and for inadvertently shared data about particular children."

Finally, the USPTO document charges that unintended filesharing could endanger national security, citing a 2005 warning from the Department of Homeland Security that federal employees with filesharing programs on their home or work computers repeatedly "shared" files containing sensitive or classified data. The report notes that, "It seems highly unlikely that any of them intended to compromise national or military security for the sake of `free music.'

"A decade ago, the idea that copyright infringement could become a threat to national security would have seemed implausible. Now, it is a sad reality," Dudas wrote in the report.

While the USPTO acts in an advisory role on patent, trademark, and copyright protection issues for the executive branch and the Department of Commerce, the agency has no specific regulatory or enforcement authority in the matter.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

He's serious?
By Talonis on 3/17/2007 7:32:54 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
"A decade ago, the idea that copyright infringement could become a threat to national security would have seemed implausible. Now, it is a sad reality," Dudas wrote in the report.


What a joke, stupid people are to blame - not the technology.




RE: He's serious?
By Tamale on 3/17/2007 2:16:02 PM , Rating: 2
in a world where stupid people exist, programmers shouldn't be allowed to write software that deceives users into doing things they don't want to do.


RE: He's serious?
By leexgx on 3/17/2007 5:17:40 PM , Rating: 2
what intresting about this what thay talked about as all p2p programs share the download folder all the times if thay did not be it an moded ver not an officia it be Banned off the network quite fast , Bearshare is the Pluck in this one as you Can turn off uploading its the only p2p app i know off that does it in the official in an p2p program

the users know that there download folder is been shared


RE: He's serious?
By oab on 3/17/2007 7:05:48 PM , Rating: 2
Shareaza can disable the sharing of the "downloads" folder as well.


RE: He's serious?
By leidegre on 3/18/2007 2:22:41 AM , Rating: 2
Software developers have great responsibility, but still, this could be some sort of cyber-crime thing. It sadness me that people do take advatange, like SPAM, I think everyone hates it, still it's continuing...

Maybe a diffrent policy on privacy on the internet should be taken in to acount, to actually encurage the wonders of privacy that internet is. Basically maying mining/attacking users very illeagal.


RE: He's serious?
By Christopher1 on 3/25/2007 6:03:54 PM , Rating: 2
Deceives them? Every file-sharing application I have ever used, from Shareaza to E-Mule to..... whatever, basically, tells you EXACTLY what files and folders they are going to share, and asks for your permission before they share them.

This is more a problem with people not reading what the applications are doing, and just pressing 'Next' a few times too many!


It is written
By JohnTheTechnologist on 3/21/2007 5:00:47 PM , Rating: 2
It is written "You shall not steal."




RE: It is written
By bldckstark on 3/22/2007 1:07:44 PM , Rating: 2
I believe that was "Thou" and it was in Latin too.


I wonder........
By marvdmartian on 3/18/2007 3:14:28 PM , Rating: 3
.....could I find a copy of this report on bittorrent??? ;)




By rika13 on 3/19/2007 12:04:11 AM , Rating: 2
notice BT is not mentioned, even though this is rather recent

they mention that no corporation or the military has a use for p2p technology, i offer this as proof against that: http://www.americasarmy.com/downloads/files/AA28Fu...

if you notice, this report was made at the request of a third party about such things, the only work the PTO did was put their name on it, also note how many adjectives like intricate and difficult are used

recursive use of folders is actually the normal and expected behavior when dealing with a folder as an input or when dealing with outputs that create subfolders




Why is the patent office saying ANYTHING?
By Targon on 3/17/07, Rating: -1
RE: Why is the patent office saying ANYTHING?
By masher2 (blog) on 3/17/2007 8:23:33 AM , Rating: 6
> "Why is the patent office saying ANYTHING..."

Because its their legal duty to do so. Under the AIPA act, the USPTO is the primary body responsibly for providing guidance and conduct studies on all matters off intellectual property protection, be it patents, trademarks, or copyrights.


RE: Why is the patent office saying ANYTHING?
By creathir on 3/17/2007 11:28:24 AM , Rating: 2
Somehow, I have missed all of your postings recently... I thought you had disappeared. Even though you never did, welcome back! lol ;)

A rating of 6 at that!

- Creathir


RE: Why is the patent office saying ANYTHING?
By jtesoro on 3/18/2007 6:02:44 AM , Rating: 2
What the? I didn't know one could get a 6. I checked if I could mod up someone with a 5 and I couldn't. This is either a bug or an indication that something fishy is going on! :p


RE: Why is the patent office saying ANYTHING?
By creathir on 3/18/2007 9:01:12 AM , Rating: 2
The only thing I can imagine, is that the admins can mod on top of the rest of us? Just a guess?
- Creathir


RE: Why is the patent office saying ANYTHING?
By masher2 (blog) on 3/18/2007 2:04:47 PM , Rating: 2
No idea myself how it went above 5...I'm surprised it was uprated at all actually. Usually my remarks on IP protection wind up a solid -1. :)


By creathir on 3/19/2007 10:49:07 AM , Rating: 2
Mine as well...

For some reason, I do not believe our conservative mindset is... appreciated here at DT... ;)

- Creathir


By DigitalFreak on 3/17/2007 10:10:13 AM , Rating: 1
Because the RIAA/MPAA paid someone off?


By bob661 on 3/17/2007 11:25:04 AM , Rating: 3
I agree 100%!!! We should also enforce the speed limits because WAY too many damn people can't friggin drive to save their life and going over the posted limit (even by 5 mph) is extremely dangerous. Also, the lack of turn signal usage is appalling and those people should face stiffer penalties than speeders because they cause and accidents and hinder traffic with slow downs.

What we need is some enforcement of our laws. Get these criminals behind bars where they belong or fined into submission. People are getting way too out of control.


By shabby on 3/17/2007 12:27:14 PM , Rating: 2
I sense sarcasm in your post... or stupidity. Which is it?


By Avalon on 3/17/2007 3:06:14 PM , Rating: 5
Stupidity from you, sarcasm from him.


By Cypherdude1 on 3/18/2007 12:11:33 AM , Rating: 2
I sense a lot of hostility here. ;^)

IMO the RIAA members for years have been raking in money so their CEO's, etc..., can enjoy their beachfront properties and Christmas bonuses. They used their lawyers to sue thousands of people and collect $3,000 each. It's hard to believe they actually went to this length. IMO they want things to return to the pre-Napster days when they were charging $16 per CD with one or two good songs and the rest is filler. I remember when you could get a 320 KBit version of a song on Napster. The selection was incredible. I doubt we'll ever have that again, unless someone sets up a huge server system offshore somewhere away from the RIAA's lawyers. :^(

BTW, AnandTech's comment voting system is garbage. Is there some reason why I no longer have any options for voting? Is there now only a small elite group which can vote on AnandTech? Have the elite taken over AnandTech??!! How much must I pay to enable voting!!?? BAWAHAHAHA!


By tfk11 on 3/18/2007 12:58:15 PM , Rating: 1
The voting system has somehow become very biased. It seems the moderators have been revoking the ability to vote from anyone that posts an opinion they disagree with.


By masher2 (blog) on 3/18/2007 2:00:07 PM , Rating: 3
No, you simply need a certain number of posts before you can vote..and your total voting ability is (I believe) based on the average score of those posts.


By rcc on 3/19/2007 11:00:24 AM , Rating: 2
Ok, attack the red herring. The fact that various entities do or don't make more money than anyone else, has little to do with the article.

But hey, if we don't like the topic let's just fire off a troll round and see of we can redirect the thread.


By PWNettle on 3/21/2007 7:24:28 PM , Rating: 2
So, because people speed (against the law) and fail to always use turn signals (a curtesy that has nothing to do woth law) that makes it OK to pirate/steal software/music/movies/intellectual property.

Intellectual property thieves come up with the most amazing justifications for thier acts (not trying to imply the previous poster IS a thief, just saying in general).


By Christopher1 on 3/25/2007 6:14:20 PM , Rating: 2
Thieves? Look at what the most abundant stuff on the filesharing networks is: porn (most of which is amateur or non-copyrighted), music (most of it IS illegal, but then again, the big music guys should be working with filesharing networks, not against!), games (some of which are illegal, some of which are impossible to get by legal means or are not sold in the United States) and pictures (some of which are porn, some of which are not).

Now, I for one only download stuff that is not copyrighted or sold in the United States (music is TOTALLY out because I don't want to even INDIRECTLY support the big music labels!) or that is not sold for a fair price (japanese games that are being sold for 50+ dollars, when they are only 10 over in their country).

That makes me not a thief, that makes me a concerned citizen who is voting with his wallet and not buying things that are overpriced and price-fixed.


"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki