YouTube is back in Pakistan’s good graces again, with the
country deciding to remove YouTube from its censor blacklist after it removed a “blasphemous” video from the site.
The actual video in question seems to differ, depending on
who’s telling the story. According to the AP, the video clip in question was a
trailer for the upcoming film Forbidden,
made by a Dutch filmmaker who said wanted to “release a movie portraying Islam
as fascist and prone to inciting violence against women and homosexuals.” Meanwhile,
Pakistani Telecommunications Authority officials told the AFP that the video in question featured cartoons of the prophet
Muhammad as published
by Dutch newspapers in 2006.
Regardless of which videos were considered “totally
anti-Quranic” and “very blasphemous,” some seem to think that the Pakistani
government had a deeper agenda. Wahaj us Siraj, chief of the Pakistan Internet
Service Providers Association, noted that “some Internet users are skeptical”
over Pakistan’s official explanation.
“[They think] the government banned YouTube because it
contained clips from a private television station which showed election rigging,”
“No Muslim would want to view the blasphemous content on any
website,” said an anonymous internet user to the AFP, “the government is really disturbed over its defeat in
elections and afraid of critical videos and remarks on YouTube.”
When Pakistan initially blocked YouTube last Sunday, an
implementation error triggered a worldwide outage of the site for almost two
hours. According to a senior PTA official, “this was not intentional and might
have happened when an international company, which is routing Internet traffic
to Pakistan, tried to block [YouTube].”
The Pakistani government says it blocked YouTube to prevent
a repeat of the violent protests that sprung up over the 2006 cartoon, which
featured Muhammad with his head uncovered and a bomb for a turban. PTA
spokeswoman Nabiha Mahmood said the government originally filed a
complaint through YouTube’s complaint system, but YouTube never replied.
quote: Although I have a human right to pour a bottle of piss with a crucifix in it on their heads.
quote: we denounce hatred, both against Islam and other religions. It is against Islam to disrespect other religions.
quote: In days of yore, the cloth was, as default, white. So all clothing in the area would be white, or a shade thereof. The men, being (for the most part) rather practical, and spending their days doing menial, practical tasks, were (for the most part) content to wear this shade. The women, who (forgive my generalisation) seem to be more interested in the social scene, wanted to liven up their garb - so they invested in dyes. The dyes in the area were all a sort of deep purple, and were quite costly and hard to obtain. As such, most women could only afford to dip their clothing in the dye once, or maybe twice... producing a rather pale tone. The more wealthy you were, the more dye you could afford. Your clothing would be correspondingly richer in hue... eventually becoming more or less black. So black clothing amongst women would have become a kind of status symbol, which eventually became a tradition.
quote: People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.
quote: by Gul Westfale on February 27, 2008 at 11:58 PMnow all they need is some computers. and internet.