backtop


Print 49 comment(s) - last by ebaycj.. on Jun 22 at 1:30 PM


Over 40 percent of Tongans live in poverty.  (Source: Torsten Blackwood/AFP )

The island nation is currently looking at a small nuclear plant for an energy solution. However, it has fallen victim to scams in the past and additionally has been a haven for the terrorist group al-Qaeda in the Pacific.  (Source: Fiji Vacations)

Most of Tonga's power is currently provided by expensive diesel fuel.  (Source: preetamrai on Flickr)
Some officials skeptical of plan; nation's government has fallen for scams in the past

Even as the U.S. contemplates its own nuclear future, other countries around the world are looking to follow in the footsteps of clean nuclear pioneers like Japan and France.  Among the most surprising potential new homes for nuclear power is the tiny Pacific island nation of Tonga [Google Maps].

Tonga's small kingdom consists of 186 islands spread out over 500 miles.  The islands offer 289 sq. mi. of dry land (748 sq. km.) and are home to approximately 104,000 people.  The islands are found to the northeast of New Zealand, approximately a third of the way to Hawaii. Tonga is unique in many respects -- it's the only Pacific island nation to have a monarchy and the only major group of islands in the South Pacific to avoid formal colonization.

According to Forbes, Tonga's monarch, King George Tupou V, announced to the nation's Parliament on Friday, June 11 that he was working with the U.S. to develop small 30-megawatt nuclear plants to satisfy the nation's power needs.  King George stated, "Should this development prove successful, it would be of enormous value in protecting our environment and reducing our use of diesel fuel."

Tongans currently consume [PDF] between 10 MW of power at peak use (average yearly power consumption is approximately 47,000 MWh/yr, according to the CIA in 2006).  Most of this power is produced by diesel generators.  As shipping diesel fuel to the remote nation is expensive, power costs remain high. 

The Tongan government last year proposed its "Tonga Energy Road Map", which called on 50 percent of Tongan power to be provided by renewable sources within three years.  The plan did not include nuclear power.  Currently Tonga only receives approximately 5 percent of its power from solar panel installations -- the other 95 percent still comes from diesel generation.

The plan could allow Tonga to solve its drinking water issues.  Most of Tonga's current supply comes from underground and is polluted by fertilizers and pesticides.  Nuclear power would allow for power-hungry desalination plants to operate.  States King George, "The government maintains that nuclear power is our best hope of resolving our water problem as we can produce abundant supplies through desalination very cheaply.  The quicker we move in this direction the better."

While Tonga is a close ally of the U.S., supporting the country's "Coalition of the Willing" during "Operation Iraqi Freedom", the U.S. government has offered no indication that it is helping with or approves of Tonga's plan.  Some fear that if the government is relying on private entities in the U.S., it may be falling into a scam.

States New Zealand-based Molly Melhuish, "The only plants of that size are research reactors and it would probably be an old second hand one or alternatively, and even worse, an old ship reactor which are around that size. Both of those require very specialist fuel particularly ship reactors require highly enriched fuel, very expensive and very hard to handle."

Indeed, some in the government expressed surprise at or skepticism of the plan.  One Parliament member, Clive Edwards, states, "We don’t know what’s happening. There’s been nothing come out from the government before on this issue, or any paper or proposal which we could refer to, to see how it’s to be done. So it’s a statement that’s out of the blue as far as I’m concerned and I don’t know what and how it’s intended to be done."

Indeed under the rule of King George's father King Taufa'ahau Tupou IV, who passed away in Sept. 2006, the nation reportedly lost millions on scams/risky investments, including reportedly $26M USD to Jesse Bogdonoff, a financial adviser who was officially appointed as the first Court Jester in modern history.

King George does seem quite different from his father, though.  After being labeled as a playboy in his younger years, he has implemented a number of progressive reforms, including the creation democratic elections on the islands for the first time.

Even if the scheme proves successful it may prove to be a major concern to the U.S.  Despite being our ally, the nation reportedly is a safe haven to al-Qaeda terrorists.  Reportedly three ships of Tongan origin have been caught ferrying terrorists, weapons and explosives for al-Qaeda.  This is pretty significant considering the CIA only believes Tonga to only have 62 major cargo ships. 

The possibility of terrorists and nuclear materials in such close proximity certainly raises red flags.  To the credit of the Tongan government, it does have a small 450-person military (some of which served with U.S. soldiers in Iraq).  The military has several patrol ships and is armed largely with light arms like U.S. M4 carbines, U.S. M16s and Israeli Uzis. 

But the nation needs an answer fast.  Much of the nation's $728M USD GDP currently comes from citizens living in foreign nations.  The island has no major industries, other than a minor tourism business, and also relies on international aid.  Over 40 percent of Tongans live in poverty, according to The World Bank.  And the nation's debt and unemployment have both been rising steadily over the last several years.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Sounds like they need this...
By Harkonnen on 6/20/2010 11:23:53 PM , Rating: 3
Tonga meet the Hyperion Reactor.

http://www.hyperionpowergeneration.com/product.htm...

Seems like a good place for this system to be built. What with the sealed core and all.

Al thought they may need two of them to support their energy needs.




RE: Sounds like they need this...
By Samus on 6/21/10, Rating: -1
RE: Sounds like they need this...
By kontorotsui on 6/21/2010 4:32:31 AM , Rating: 4
You're joking.
To enrich uranium you need a big industrial base, something that a 100,000 people poor country can't afford at all.
They would buy the fuel from the market.


By namechamps on 6/21/2010 8:50:55 PM , Rating: 3
Exactly.

Selling someone a LEU reactor and closed fuel cycle doesn't give them access to enriching anymore than an American buying a Hummer gives them access to oil refining.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By hughlle on 6/21/2010 5:05:08 AM , Rating: 4
because the tongans are notorious for their hatred for the white devil. i really deplore how paranoid we are that we force other countried from trying to better itself, all because it stops us being in complete control. what a scary thought, the idea that other people could have the same rights as you/us, wow.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By FITCamaro on 6/21/10, Rating: 0
By seamonkey79 on 6/21/2010 9:23:01 AM , Rating: 2
US friendly governments being overthrown after we give (sell) them state of the art technology?

Nevar!

Oh, well, except Iran and some other places, but that can't happen in the modern world.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By hughlle on 6/21/2010 10:02:10 AM , Rating: 3
when was the last time you heard of "harboured terrorists" taking out an entire conutries military, be it only 450, terrorists have never to my rather limited knowledge, performed a raid and achieved more than getting themselves killed.

if tonga decides it needs nuclear power then it is more than possible to alter security to allow this. hell, i'm sure the 1st world would be more than willing to privide contracted security.

i think it totally silly to think that it is more sense to ban the use of nuclear power, something they could obviously greatly make use of, in place of simply shifting security and proceedures to make it safe.

it is all rather complicated to get to a stage when we acn abbsolutely trust people with nuclear though, so i acn't try and be an ideologist here, it is too complicated. but we should be doing everything in our power to help out others.

hell, if they can afford it, just build it somewhere else and have the hosting country compensate them for the free enrgy they are getting on a like for like basis be it in terms of oil etc, but this really is a step backwards at the end of the day


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By Boze on 6/21/10, Rating: 0
RE: Sounds like they need this...
By fic2 on 6/21/2010 1:30:24 PM , Rating: 4
You forgot:

Dec 16, 1773: band of terrorists board and destroy three shiploads of tea. I think something major happened after that, but I don't quite remember.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By Reclaimer77 on 6/21/2010 5:46:52 PM , Rating: 2
Hmmm I don't remember the part in the Boston tea party story where those men blew themselves up expressly to take others with them...

On a serious note, they were patriots, not terrorists.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By thurston on 6/21/2010 6:43:07 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
On a serious note, they were patriots, not terrorists.


One man's patriot is another man's terrorist. While in my eyes they were patriots, I'm sure King George saw them as "terrorists".


By Reclaimer77 on 6/21/2010 7:52:26 PM , Rating: 2
Yes but King George was the bad guy, and we were the good guy. And the spoils of history go to the victors :)


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By knutjb on 6/21/2010 11:56:37 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
One man's patriot is another man's terrorist. While in my eyes they were patriots, I'm sure King George saw them as "terrorists".
That is moral relativism at its worst. They were not terrorists, they rebelled against unfair taxes placed only on the colonies. It was rebellion against an oppressive dictator's behavior. At that time most still wanted to stay under the crown.

A terrorist has the sole purpose of inciting fear on the masses to gain power and oppress. The Tea Party was not an attempt to coerce the population to submit to their rule they were telling the king he had gone too far in a manner that he was more likely to understand through loss of income, both tax and English owned traders assets.

Therefore, by definition, "One man's terrorist is another man's patriot" is a fallacy that marginalizes our history by linking it to thuggery.

The two, patriot and terrorist, are not co-equals in any such way.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By nafhan on 6/21/2010 9:40:57 AM , Rating: 4
Actually, you're wrong. Giving them the tools to enrich uranium gives them the tools to enrich uranium.
It's a bit of a stretch, but that's kind of like saying the gasoline engine in your car gives you the tools to refine crude oil...


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By dnd728 on 6/21/2010 5:23:48 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah, there are a several desingn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_nuclear_reactor , but:
A. They're all several years away.
B. With "186 islands spread out over 500 miles" - I don't know if it makes much sense... max. capacity 0.16MW average per island, some probably much smaller...


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By MrPickins on 6/21/2010 2:31:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Over 70% of the 101,991 inhabitants of the Kingdom of Tonga live on its main island, Tongatapu.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonga

Sounds like it would only be worthwhile to place a reactor on the main island.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By MrBlastman on 6/21/2010 9:54:53 AM , Rating: 4
I have always thought the Hyperion is a great idea. In this island nation, though, you have to worry about a. Them being islands and b. Volcanic rock.

I'm not sure how deep these reactors need to be buried--if it is too deep, they'll be below sea level and subject to corrosion via the salts within the water. Also, Volcanic rock is pretty challenging to drill/dig/blast into, which would also pose another large obstacle towards installation.

Also, what about seismic activity? Would it be easily serviceable if below ground should an earthquake hinder it significantly?

I like the idea, I just somehow wonder if an above-ground solution, or, semi-above ground (i.e. not as deep as this one) would be better.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By Desslok on 6/21/2010 10:34:51 AM , Rating: 2
Hyperion is a joke, their "CEO" is a marked man in Las Vegas for stiffing the casinos on a software deal. Not to mention he has gone bankrupt more times than I care to count. The technology has also been panned by the majority of nuke scientists at Los Alamos.


By MrBlastman on 6/21/2010 11:03:17 AM , Rating: 3
Big words--do you have any facts that you can back up with references you could share with us?

It all sounds plausible, but I'd like to read more about it.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By sleepeeg3 on 6/21/2010 4:53:48 PM , Rating: 2
8.1 earthquake hit them recently: http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world/strong-e...

10MW for a little island? Natives must love their porn...

The Hyperion reactor looks promising, but you have to account for the seismic activity, power lines and cost. Tropical storms or earthquakes could wipeout the power lines and all major energy technologies require tons of capital to build - capital it sounds like they don't have.

Solar is inefficient and costly, but if any site would be a good candidate for solar - it would be Tonga. They are relatively close to the equator and would likely receive high intensity sun year round. It would not require the power distribution lines that every other technology would require. Capital costs would only have to be paid for by individuals that can afford it.


RE: Sounds like they need this...
By knutjb on 6/21/2010 6:58:21 PM , Rating: 2
Water desalinization is power hungry and they do have a fresh water problem. Also they could be a good case for EVs since all fuels are expensive to deliver. It could be a good proof of concept and PR effort for the Hyperion power plant and other similar ideas.


Really?
By martinrichards23 on 6/21/2010 4:32:15 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
Tongans currently consume between 20 to 30 megawatts of power yearly.


Do any journalists on this website have even a basic understanding of physics?




RE: Really?
By Bladen on 6/21/10, Rating: 0
RE: Really?
By martinrichards23 on 6/21/2010 6:51:09 AM , Rating: 5
I was more concerned that they think you can consume a number of watts per year.

That's like saying "I drive at 100mph per year". Doesn't make sense.

You can drive 100 miles per year or at 100mph but not 100mph per year.


RE: Really?
By MrPickins on 6/21/2010 2:36:21 PM , Rating: 2
I'd rate you up if I could...

Some people might call it nitpicking, but on a tech site, I expect the authors to know the difference between energy and power.


RE: Really?
By Bladen on 6/22/2010 6:47:37 AM , Rating: 2
Watts is a measure of power though...


RE: Really?
By rcc on 6/21/2010 3:08:35 PM , Rating: 2
lol, I caught such a ration of crap on this site for pointing out a similar problem last year. Hopefully understanding has grown.


RE: Really?
By Bladen on 6/22/2010 5:35:30 AM , Rating: 2
I know. I was replying to one inaccuracy with another inaccuracy, in a not so serious manner. It looks like those that rate are not the sharpest tools in the shed though.

Of course the statement in question has now been replaced with one that attempted to make technical sense, but failed on making grammatical sense:

Tongans currently consume [PDF] between 10 MW of power at peak use....

How can something be between only 1 other thing?

According to the linked PDF, that statement should have read: 'The current Tongan infrastructure can handle outputting 9.6MW of power at peak load...'.


RE: Really?
By Bladen on 6/22/2010 5:36:51 AM , Rating: 2
Also, by the first "one inaccuracy", I refer to the inaccuracy in the article.


RE: Really?
By Bladen on 6/22/2010 6:57:05 AM , Rating: 2
On second though, isn't a Megawatt-year is no less technically accurate than a kilowatt-hour.

Does 47,000 MW-hours per year actually make sense? Isn't it really 47,000 MW-years?


RE: Really?
By Bladen on 6/22/2010 7:08:04 AM , Rating: 2
Scratch that last sentence, brain fart.

I should have asked "Then wouldn't 47,000 MW-hours per year equal 5.365296804 MW-years?"


Good idea
By xsilver on 6/21/2010 3:02:28 AM , Rating: 2
Sounds like a good idea but shouldnt wave power also be considered on an island such as this? It would be the perfect place to implement it.




RE: Good idea
By Skilty on 6/21/10, Rating: -1
RE: Good idea
By NullSubroutine on 6/21/2010 4:56:24 AM , Rating: 2
With Islands so small, you have to consider the fact there is not a lot of real state for such wind/solar, let alone tons of concrete/steel to make enough for the power they need. Nuclear power is their best bet for limited space and material. If you consider the fact there are now pre-built reactors, they could save a lot of money switching to uranium as a fuel source over diesel engines.


RE: Good idea
By Bateluer on 6/21/2010 5:23:55 AM , Rating: 2
Wave/Tidal power might be viable, but wind and solar, not likely. They simply don't have the land required to actually get meaningful power from it.

Smaller nuclear reactors may be right up there alley.


RE: Good idea
By FITCamaro on 6/21/2010 6:11:59 AM , Rating: 5
Wave is far more expensive than a small nuclear reactor. They don't have the courts and red tape we have here in the states to drive up the cost of nuclear. For them it will be as simple as buying the reactor and installing it. They won't spend years doing environmental impact studies and fighting lawsuits from hippies too stupid to realize nuclear power is safe and clean.


RE: Good idea
By sleepeeg3 on 6/21/2010 4:57:34 PM , Rating: 2
Biggest argument for nuclear there. Was thinking the same thing. Hard to say, though.


RE: Good idea
By amagriva on 6/21/2010 6:43:20 AM , Rating: 2
That is a perfect place for OTEC energy. The king is nut! Look at the Nehla laboratory in Hawaii they have already did it.


Who will control it?
By drycrust3 on 6/21/2010 1:43:33 AM , Rating: 2
New Zealand has anti-nuclear legislation, and one of the requirements of that is NZ citizens are not allowed to control nuclear devices. I'm not sure if that is a problem or not, but it does limit the people that can be employed to those who aren't NZ or joint Tongan - NZ citizens.
Another point that needs to be considered is the total energy content of this project. About 30 years ago I heard on the radio how the total energy content used to build a reactor and to refine the material was more than the energy output of the reactor for the first 15 to 20 years. The point being that while Tonga won't be refining the radioactive material (although it will have to pay for the refining and shipping and eventual return for disposal), it will still have to import additional fuel to build the reactor (as well as importing many of the materials, again using energy), which raises the question of how long it would take for the additional fuel used during construction to be offset by the subsequent savings in diesel.




RE: Who will control it?
By DrizztVD on 6/21/2010 10:02:51 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
(average yearly power consumption is approximately 47,000 MWh/yr, according to the CIA in 2006)


So you're saying that in the best case scenario it takes 47 000 MWH/yr x 15 years = 705000 MWh to build a nuclear reactor? That's completely ridiculous.


RE: Who will control it?
By Jaybus on 6/21/2010 12:22:59 PM , Rating: 2
It won't take long if the plan is desalinization plants. Those take a huge amount of energy.


An old ship reactor...
By EJ257 on 6/21/2010 9:47:02 AM , Rating: 2
With CVN-65 USS Enterprise about to be decommissioned there will be 8x Westinghouse A2W available soon. I hope whatever private company is floating this deal are not trying to scam Tonga with these.




RE: An old ship reactor...
By marvdmartian on 6/21/2010 10:34:31 AM , Rating: 3
Yeah, I read this part:
quote:
States New Zealand-based Molly Melhuish, "The only plants of that size are research reactors and it would probably be an old second hand one or alternatively, and even worse, an old ship reactor which are around that size . Both of those require very specialist fuel particularly ship reactors require highly enriched fuel, very expensive and very hard to handle."


Okay, having actually operated the reactor plants on Enterprise (approx 25 years ago now), I can say that they are fairly simple to handle, and built with inherently safe controls for operation. They DO require specialized fuel, that a private concern (or country like Tonga) is not likely to get their hands on, nor could afford.
However, after 40 years of operation, it's highly doubtful that you would want to "transplant" one of the A2W plants anywhere, as you're dealing with 40 years of neutron bombardment, and the subsequent metal fatigue that goes with it (not to mention the fact of the crud that has to be in those plants, and the radioactivity you'd deal with, during shut down, because of it).

On the other hand, the old nuke cruisers had (for the most part) D2G reactors, which were rated at 150MW. However, they've all been "recycled" now, and likely those reactor vessels are buried somewhere in Idaho. Which is also where I would imagine the vessels from the Big E's plants will end up too, in time.

Bottom line? I'd say it's 99.9% certain they wouldn't end up with an old US Navy reactor to satisfy their needs. Pretty sure the navy wouldn't be too amenable to the idea, even if they could afford it. Not to say, however, that there's not other countries out there with nuclear powered ships/subs, that wouldn't be willing to sell.

They should pray that they don't get stuck with an old Soviet Alfa sub reactor. ;)


Wise man
By Danish1 on 6/20/2010 11:53:17 PM , Rating: 2
Wise man that king.

Refreshing.




do like the cable companies..
By Pessimism on 6/21/2010 3:44:16 PM , Rating: 2
Build a full size, full output reactor and slap a giant, tamper proof resistor pack on the output port. If they want to upgrade to the next output tier they must pay an additional $19.95 thousand per month and schedule a service call from a technician, who may or may not know what they are doing and will make the entire island take a day off work to wait idly by their doorways for him to show up.




Toshiba 4S
By ebaycj on 6/22/2010 1:30:14 PM , Rating: 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toshiba_4S

Sounds like they need one of these now, with existing diesel generators to backup, and another one in ~20 years.




Open Letter
By brshoemak on 6/21/2010 8:13:32 AM , Rating: 1
Dear Private U.S. Nuclear Energy Firm,

Please do not fuc|< this up for the rest of us in the states. People have long memories and no patience for nuclear catastrophes.

Sincerely,

The rest of us




Geography
By PhilM on 6/20/10, Rating: -1
"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki