backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 83 comment(s) - last by MekhongKurt.. on May 19 at 3:02 AM

Adds a new set of armor to United States copyright law

The so-called Hollywood-friendly PRO-IP Act sailed through a House of Representatives vote last Thursday, securing victory with an almost-unanimous 408-11 vote.

Known formally as H.R. 4279, or the “Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008,” the PRO-IP Act makes substantial changes to federal copyright law. Among other things, the bill strengthens criminal and civil penalties for copyright infringements, in addition to providing “safe harbor” for inaccurate copyright registrations, strengthening restitution and forfeiture provisions in a civil infringement case, and requiring courts to protect seized data.

The PRO-IP Act also adds a brand new cabinet-level copyright czar to the White House, whose job will be coordinate the antipiracy efforts of a variety of federal agencies – including his or her ten new intellectual property attachés, which will be added to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Previously, the PRO-IP also contained a provision that allowed copyright owners to seek fines for individual songs on a compilation CD, as opposed to the CD itself – meaning that damages for a 10-song compilation disc would have increased from a maximum of $150,000 to $1.5 million. However, that provision did not make it past a House committee meeting last March.

 “Intellectual property protection is among the key issues that will determine America's competitiveness in the 21st century,” said Rep. John Conyers. “The ability to create, innovate, and generate the best artistic, technological, and knowledge-based intellectual property is the formula for continued growth in the global economy, and is fundamental to the promotion of human progress.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the bill’s creation of a new and “unnecessary” federal bureaucracy “outrageous,” noting that the bill’s new criminal provisions would drag the Justice Department into a war that it has historically and vocally opposed.

Last March, Rep. Rick Boucher announced an attempt to use the PRO-IP Act to strengthen fair use, which weakened significantly with the passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in 1998. Unfortunately, it appears that Boucher’s additions – which would have allowed the circumvention of copy protection for the purposes of non-infringing personal use, among other things – never made it into the House’s final draft. For now, his ideas will remain in H.R. 1201, aka the “FAIR USE Act of 2007,” which Boucher himself admits to have shelved.

The PRO-IP Act now awaits passage through the Senate, before reaching the President’s desk.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

America
By mendocinosummit on 5/13/2008 10:11:25 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
“Intellectual property protection is among the key issues that will determine America's competitiveness in the 21st century,”
That is sad that a congressman actually believes that copyright laws made us great. If nothing else laws and attitudes like this will further widen the gap between the rich and middle class and put the government closer to representing the corporations.




RE: America
By mdogs444 on 5/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: America
By mendocinosummit on 5/13/2008 10:24:37 AM , Rating: 2
Whoa! I would like to know more about your background and your ideals. I am guessing big business and big government. I personally am small business, state rights (small government), and even theoretical breakup of the states.


RE: America
By mdogs444 on 5/13/2008 10:28:54 AM , Rating: 2
No, I work for a non-profit hospital, 28 yrs old, financially conservative male. I work hard for what I have, and spend my money wisely. Im a tax paying & law abiding citizen.

I believe that these artists & companies who they are signed with have the rights to the intellectual property that they are licensing to us. If they wanted to stop selling it all together, its their right to do that.

The liberal class warfare rants are getting old, especially in a scenario where its obvious that you are breaking the law by obtaining something that you did not personally pay for. It may not be "stealing", but copyright infringment is illegal and you know it. Sure, Id like to have free stuff, but thats not the case.

Dont cry class warfare and rich getting richer, etc. If you dont like them, dont buy it jack off. If you take it, copy it, etc, then be prepared to pay them. Its not rocket science.


RE: America
By FITCamaro on 5/13/2008 10:35:57 AM , Rating: 5
I agree with you. My below post was just concern for those who do purchase media and being able to move it to their format of choice. If I buy a song from iTunes, I should be able to play it wherever, whenever, and on whatever I want.


RE: America
By mendocinosummit on 5/13/2008 10:36:39 AM , Rating: 5
For one thing I am not liberal. I am 24 year old construction worker with a freaking business degree living in Eastern Nevada. And you just don't get it. Laws like this one are proving were a governments intentions lay. It has nothing to do with stealing their intellectual property. Also, who do you think makes most the money off those CD's? The artist? Even artist are feed up with what you believe in and there has been more and more cases of that popping up. I am just tired of the way the government is being run and your stuck in this anti-pirate rage of yours.


RE: America
By FITCamaro on 5/13/2008 10:39:19 AM , Rating: 2
So what should you do? Steal it? No. If you don't like the situation, don't buy it. Stealing it only furthers their cause. Then the free market will work itself out as the companies comprising the RIAA go out of business from a lack of sales. Buy music from independent artists.


RE: America
By Polynikes on 5/13/2008 1:07:42 PM , Rating: 5
Strengthening copyright laws was absolutely unnecessary. The reason this situation sucks is because it simply shows that lobbyists have too much influence in Washington.

This isn't about piracy, this is about politicians listening to money more than the people.


RE: America
By FITCamaro on 5/13/08, Rating: 0
RE: America
By daInvincibleGama on 5/13/2008 10:33:00 PM , Rating: 5
Copyright, by definition, is a restriction of the free market to create an incentive for those who make content. In a theoretical totally free market, someone else would just copy a work (a movie, lets say) and distribute it for cost of replication (which is about 50 cents a DVD) + some profit.

I'm not saying that copyright shouldn't exist. I'm saying that it has gone too far just because corporations that have a vested interest in it are somehow getting congress to pander to them (corruption?). It's a good time for the pendulum to go the other way (copyright terms < 12362 years, authorized personal replication, no bs DRM protection, etc).


RE: America
By mdogs444 on 5/13/08, Rating: 0
RE: America
By mdogs444 on 5/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: America
By mendocinosummit on 5/13/08, Rating: 0
RE: America
By virtuallyserved on 5/13/2008 12:40:33 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Who gives two flying S***s about what the scenario is between the recording artists & record companies.


I do, and many of those who actually have a deep love and appreciation of music do as well. So do those artisits, which is why there's a substantial number of popular/influential bands/artists looking for alternate ways of distributing their works including torrents, free myspace downloads, and even leaving USB drives with new music in bathrooms of their venues.

Which is why many of those who love Trent Reznors music listened when he told his fans to "steal" his music.

These may not be a personal problem to me as a consumer, but they do pose a problem when the artists I care about don't produce the kind of music they could because of the dominating/monopolistic stance of the recording industry. There have even been one or two cases where the RIAA has tried to collect money from people over works not copyrighted by any member organization.

Check out this link about settlements and how much the artists actually get for infringement cases:
http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-keeps-settlement-mone...

The interesting thing is that artists like Britney Spears, Metallica, and several others were pawned out in the fight against downloading, and yet you don't hear much from them anymore- I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that they figured out it wasn't money they were ever going to see.

You obviously take things from a consumerist standpoint rather than someone who cares deeply about the art. It's fine if you want to take this standpoint. My loyalties and my standpoint is one who cares about the artist and THEIR work.

As for copyright laws perceived effect of stimulating creativity- I don't believe in it. There's a whole industry that works and thrives on the idea free licensing. This proves that copyrighting works does not even guarantee the creators of their fair share, and that there is incentive to contribute irrespective of copyright law.

At best, existing copyright law works to obscure the systems of "ownership" and ensure proprietary domination of markets.


RE: America
By virtuallyserved on 5/13/2008 12:45:03 PM , Rating: 4
Oh, and don't go mistaking my whole argument as another "class" rant. In fact, I never referenced class once.


RE: America
By herrdoktor330 on 5/13/2008 5:40:18 PM , Rating: 2
I advise you all see "Good Copy / Bad Copy". It was a documentary about file sharing, piracy, and the whole topic everyone is on how.

I advise you watch it. The authors put it on The Pirate Bay so you shouldn't have any problem getting it. Or buy it on Amazon. It's definately worth a purchase. (I bought it.)

For those who don't watch it, one of the ideas is that America can pass all the laws they want. The only people making money off someone elses work are living in Russia. Those laws here don't stop what they do over there. In my opinion, that's the real problem that should be focused on. And that's if anything can be done at all.

Plus, Girl Talk is awesome. He's in the documentary for the music he makes, which is done using heavily modified copyrited content mashed up into something amazing.


RE: America
By TheDoc9 on 5/13/2008 6:43:35 PM , Rating: 2
that's an interesting perspective, russia is becoming strong again. Glad I don't use pirate bay.


RE: America
By herrdoktor330 on 5/13/2008 8:06:22 PM , Rating: 2
Well, I'm not trying to single Russia out. But one of the segments of the film focused on a mall in Russia where 90% of the media outlets there were selling pirated goods. Obviously, it's not just Russia doing this. But that's where the efforts should be taken to eliminate that kind of business if they can. It's people that make a living selling copyrighted material that should be prosecuted. P2P people should be left alone.

P2P is never going to go away. "P2P" has existed in many forms for years, from BBSes to Commodore 64 floppy copy parties. When I was a kid, I used to copy cassettes with my stereo. But there wasn't as big a hubbub about how I was "stealing" like there is today. (I'm not admitting to stealing today... just stating a point about yesteryear: the '90s)

The only way to reverse P2P as we know it today is to do something radical and over the top, like impose limits on consumer hard drives.