backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 152 comment(s) - last by ThePooBurner.. on Oct 21 at 3:34 PM


The Ozone how has been growing since the 1990s, The hole is pictured in dark blue, with red indicating areas of recovery (high ozone).  (Source: KNMI/ESA)

This graph shows the area of the hole over the course of each year for the last decade.  (Source: KNMI/ESA)

This year there was more active chlorine particles from CFC pollution, thanks in part to weather patterns. These particles helped destroy extra ozone, increasing the size of the hole.  (Source: KNMI/ESA)
We're back in the hole

Last year brought some seemingly good news -- the ozone hole shrunk for the first time in years.  While it’s illogical to try to glean too many conclusions from an event so dependent on yearly weather variations, nonetheless many chimed in that the decrease was a sign that environmental-protection efforts were working.

Unfortunately, the news for this year is decidedly mixed.  Again, like those who became over-excited last year, many may become overly gloomy at this latest report -- but it’s important to bear in mind that ultimately only long term trends paint the true picture.

In 2008 the European Space Agency (ESA) reported that the ozone hole over the Antarctic grew in both size and amount of ozone lost from 2007.  While still not as large as the hole in 2006, the hole marks the reverse of a year of gains.

Ozone, O3, is a special chemical that exists in a thin layer found 25 km above the Earth in the upper atmosphere.  This chemical blocks ultraviolet radiation, helping protect marine life, and protecting humans against skin cancer and cataracts.  Unfortunately, this protective layer is being broken down by volatile halogens, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).  While most of these compounds have been banned for decades by the 1987 Montreal Protocols, they remain in the atmosphere for decades, destroying massive amounts of ozone.  This exacerbates yearly natural losses due to cold temperatures.

The ozone hole for 2008 reached a maximum size of 27 million km2, compared to 25 million km2 in 2007, and 29 million km2 in 2006 (approximately the size of North America).  The overall CFC picture has remained relatively unchanged in the last several years, rather, the key difference in the hole size has been the weather.  During the Southern Hemisphere's winter, the air over Antarctica is cut off from warmer airflow by the polar vortex.  This leads to the formation of stratospheric clouds (PSCs).  These clouds contain halogen pollution, which is energy by sunlight, forming radicals.  These radicals go on to breakdown ozone, leading to the formation of an ozone hole.

Julian Meyer-Arnek of the German Aerospace Centre (DLR), who participated in the ESA's data analysis, commented on the 2007-2008 shift, stating, "In 2007 a less concentric and larger polar vortex led to an early onset of the ozone destruction in the sunlit parts of the polar vortex.  Therefore, we saw an ozone hole formation in the beginning of September 2007 which corresponded to the average behaviour of the years 1995-2006."

He continues, "In 2008 a more concentric polar vortex led to a delay of the onset of the ozone destruction of about one week. The preconditioning of the polar chemistry was about the same for both years, although in 2008 the temperatures were slightly below the 2007 temperatures leading to slightly improved formation of PSCs.  Since the polar vortex remained undisturbed for a long period, the 2008 ozone hole became one of the largest ever observed."

The thinnest areas of ozone measured just 120 Dobson Units this year, just slightly better than the 100 Dobson Unit minimum in 2006.  Dobson Units are the standard method of measuring ozone, and is based on the height of the column of ozone at a specific location.  The latest measurements come courtesy of the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY) atmospheric sensor onboard ESA’s Envisat, the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) aboard ESA’s ERS-2 and its follow-on instrument GOME-2 aboard EUMETSAT’s MetOp.

While yearly variations may not bear great significance, it is important to closely monitor ozone levels to detect trends, the ESA's top researchers say.  Professor Meyer-Arnek states, "In order to detect these signs of recovery, a continuous monitoring of the global ozone layer and in particular of the Antarctic ozone hole is crucial."

The ESA's measurements this year were special as it used data collected by students from the ESA’s Advanced Atmospheric Training Course at Oxford University.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

So....
By FITCamaro on 10/9/2008 5:27:40 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
While most of these compounds have been banned for decades by the 1987 Montreal Protocols, they remain in the atmosphere for decades, destroying massive amounts of ozone. This exacerbates yearly natural losses due to cold temperatures.


So perhaps its getting colder?




RE: So....
By Denigrate on 10/9/2008 5:35:00 PM , Rating: 4
Or maybe this is a natural cycle. Looked like 2002 nearly closed the hole based on their graph.


RE: So....
By ThePooBurner on 10/9/08, Rating: -1
RE: So....
By apcguru on 10/9/2008 6:56:34 PM , Rating: 5
When will you ever realize that humans do have a significant impact on the planet in oh so many ways?

Stop denying the fact that we are the major reason for several catastrophes on Earth including the problem of the reduced ozone layer.

Without us there would be forests on most of the planet, not farmland as there is now. Fifty percent of mammal species wouldn't be on the brink of extinction. There would be plenty of fish in our oceans. There would be no dangerously high concentrations of heavy metals and pesticides in fish. There would be no toxic lake in Canada due to their experiments in extracting oil from sand, sand that is "conveniently" located under one of the three last boreal forests. We wouldn't have an epidemic of asthma as we do today, likely caused by emissions from our fossil fuel driven engines. Just to name a few things we have wrecked up beyond repair already. There are so many problems - caused by us - noone else.

There are over 6 billion of us. We're a great force on this planet today, and we need to start taking responsibility for our actions. Each and everyone of us.

There is overwhelming proof CFCs break down ozone. Thinking the ozone hole is "just a natural variation" is a blind man's way of convincing himself he is innocent and that all is well. It isn't .


RE: So....
By ThePooBurner on 10/9/08, Rating: -1
RE: So....
By goz314 on 10/9/2008 7:39:04 PM , Rating: 2
So ignorance is the solution in your summation then?


RE: So....
By DigitalFreak on 10/9/2008 9:11:25 PM , Rating: 5
No, I believe it would be murder.


RE: So....
By ThePooBurner on 10/9/08, Rating: -1
RE: So....
By mindless1 on 10/10/2008 1:46:37 AM , Rating: 2
Unfortunately you are barking up the wrong tree, people are executed for crimes against state, not humanity in any real sense. What are we to do about crimes against humanity if the crime is senseless pollution? The first step would be killing all those who waste power doing senseless things like running a computer to argue about ideals in response to a news article. Hint - this means you and I. You go first, then email me when it's done.


RE: So....
By bupkus on 10/10/2008 3:15:27 AM , Rating: 1
I believe what you are endorsing is "Give me liberty or give You death."


RE: So....
By ThePooBurner on 10/10/2008 1:21:55 PM , Rating: 4
Logic dictates that that is what the phrase means. Make no mistake that it was ever meant in a peaceful way. It is either liberties are maintained and there is peace, or there will be war and death on one side or the other until there is a victor and either freedom remains, or enslavement.

And technically there is no reason to render the sentence differently. It says "give me death." It doesn't specify who's death is being asked for.


RE: So....
By ThePooBurner on 10/9/2008 9:27:09 PM , Rating: 4
No, ignorance is part of the problem. Ignorance mixed with the fear mongering that people of the alarmist camp do create problems out of thin air "that the public is worried about." Of coure they are worried when they are lied to day in and day out about the "horrible cataclysms" that await them "if they don't change now!" The general populous is stupid and ignorant. They are like sheep. And if you make a living by selling products that keep sheep "safe" from the new mystical ghost wolf that can get through your normal fence unless you put this expencive device on it, you aren't going to like it much if people discover that there is no such thing as a ghost wolf. So to make sure that people think they are real you make up a bunch of stuff and pay some false witnesses and scare the masses into thinking they need your product.

So it is with all the alarmists have on their agenda. They fear monger and prey on those who haven't yet learned that there are no mystical ghost wolfs.


RE: So....
By download7 on 10/9/08, Rating: -1
RE: So....
By borismkv on 10/10/2008 1:05:58 AM , Rating: 5
Are you sure? I think Al Gore's charge for public speaking appearances has increased exponentially since his movie came out. Then there are the European governments that are taxing the hell out of people to "fix" the problem, when they really aren't doing a damn thing. Then there are the scientists whose very living depends on them playing three card monte with their data. I'm sorry, but I just don't trust the scientist that has to invent his own statistical methods for his findings to be accurate.


RE: So....
By ThePooBurner on 10/10/2008 3:25:42 PM , Rating: 2
Couldn't


RE: So....
By Denigrate on 10/10/2008 9:59:28 AM , Rating: 5
So tell me why Carbon Credits are a Billion Dollar industry.


RE: So....
By ThePooBurner on 10/10/2008 3:28:14 PM , Rating: 2
agree