backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 40 comment(s) - last by saiga6360.. on Mar 20 at 3:28 PM

One MD reaches out to the medical community, urging them to take steps to combat what he sees as a virtual epidemic with very real effects.

Anyone familiar with South Park's 2007 Emmy winning episode Make Love, Not Warcraft knows that popular culture has already started to recognize that addiction can come in virtual forms, especially with the ever-expanding online world.  The medical community remains divided, though, on whether to treat internet addiction as a serious mental illness akin to gambling, alcohol, or sexual addictions.

One psychiatrist is speaking out on the topic and lobbying for the problem to be classified as an officially recognized mental illness.  Dr. Jerald Block, a psychiatrist at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland wrote a controversial editorial, published in this month's issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry, which calls upon the medical field to add internet addiction to psychiatry's official guidebook of mental disorders.

Dr. Block describes internet addiction as "excessive gaming, sexual pre-occupations and e-mail/text messaging". Though stopping short of discussing what is classified as "excessive", Dr. Block states that these imbalances form a classic example of an obsessive compulsive disorder.  He says that akin to other addictions, users go through cravings, urges, withdrawal and tolerance.  These symptoms manifest themselves in desires for more and better hardware and software, as well as more hours online.

The addiction can cause people to lose all track of time.  He writes that addicts may neglect "basic drives" such as the need to eat and sleep.  He states that relapse rates for this addiction are particularly high.  Perhaps most controversially, he states that victims of the illness may need psychoactive medication to control their urges and may need to be hospitalized.

He says that of the internet-addicted population, 86 percent have some other form of mental illness.  This rate is rather high, but many addictions share a correlation between addict populations and rates of mental illness incidence.  He states that these other mental illnesses often mask the serious problem of internet addiction.  He argues that few in the psychiatry and psychology community will even pick out a person's internet addiction, unless they are specifically looking for it.  He argues that this oversight needs to be put to an end, with the addition of the illness to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the psychiatry profession's dictionary of mental illnesses.  The book's next edition is due out in 2012, with a public draft coming next year, open to public comments.

Whether internet addiction will indeed be added to the draft is uncertain.  Many psychiatrists take issue to Dr. Block's remarks and argue that the research into internet addiction is in its infancy.  They argue that without further research it is impossible to determine where the line is crossed between intended use and addiction, and that classifying the illness prematurely will lead to inaccuracy and confusion.

British psychiatrists recently published a study in the journal Advances in Psychiatric Treatment which stated that a "significant minority" of five to ten percent of internet users are addicted to the internet.  A similar study in America found that 1 in 8 people may be internet addicted.  If this were the case, it would make the mental illness have a rather large population numbering in the millions in the U.S. alone.  Interestingly, early research into the disease stereotypically suggested that the most vulnerable population was highly-educated, highly-introverted males.  However, more recent research has dismissed this as inaccurate; stating that the most effected population is surprisingly middle-aged women on home computers.

John Macdonald, of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, an expert addiction therapist, states that the line between use addictions is crossed when the user experiences negative effects in their life due to overuse.  McDonald states that preoccupation with getting and staying online is one sign of addiction.  McDonald questions, "If they're not able to engage in it, is it emotionally upsetting for them?"

He concludes, "The real proof in the pudding: is the amount that you do causing any problems in your life?"

In China and Korea, the problem is already officially recognized by the nations' medical communities.  These countries were spurred to action following 10 deaths at internet cafes in South Korea alone from cardiopulmonary-related illnesses induced by compulsive internet use.  Over 7 of the deaths have been attributed to online gaming.  Dr. Block cited South Korea's response in his editorial-- the nation has addressed the threat by deploying 1,000 additional counselors specifically trained in dealing with internet addiction.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Chris Peredun on 3/19/2008 12:46:01 PM , Rating: 5
Take up a job in IT.

After spending eight hours a day working with the damned things, you sure as hell won't want to see one at home.




By krichmond on 3/19/2008 12:54:45 PM , Rating: 2
COULD NOT AGREE WITH YOU MORE!!!!!!


By FITCamaro on 3/19/2008 1:01:11 PM , Rating: 3
Sit at one all day during work writing code and stuff. Still don't mind sitting at one at home. But I'm usually not just surfing the net.

I will admit though that that has attracted me to console gaming more. The ability to lay on the couch and play vs. sitting at a computer.

Course in the past 3 weeks I've had 2 days where I've been able to actually play games....


By rdeegvainl on 3/19/2008 1:07:33 PM , Rating: 4
I completely disagree. To each their own though.


By helios220 on 3/19/2008 1:18:39 PM , Rating: 5
I'm currently employed as a Software Engineer for a military contractor, and it never ceases to amaze me that I have many co-workers who can code for 8-10 hours a day, then go home to unwind by immediately coding and working on their hobby projects for the rest of the day.

Realistically, I still have a love/hate relationship with computer use... but suffice to say working in Software has given me a profound appreciation for the outdoors and actual human social interaction more than any other point in my life.


By Staples on 3/19/2008 1:54:01 PM , Rating: 3
Maybe if your job was 8 hours a day surfing the net, you would not want to come home and do more however, most computer jobs are maintenance, programming and data entry. I work on a computer all day and then I come home and play PC games over the internet.


By DeepBlue1975 on 3/19/2008 2:27:31 PM , Rating: 2
I work on IT, and as soon as I get home, I turn on my own PC, which has EVERYTHING I LIKE, and not "just what I need to get the job done". :D

BTW, I bought a 3g enabled phone with Symbian OS just to be able to have a nice browsing experience in my cell phone, too and use it as a "very portable extension" of my rig (and I plan to buy an EEE PC as soon as I can get a 8.9" one)...

Nevertheless, I'm far from addicted to the net. I'm addicted to hardware and technology, though.


By goku on 3/19/2008 3:04:07 PM , Rating: 1
For $400/$500, the EePC is a damned waste. My sister's bf bought one and I was excited to try it out but then when I started to use it, I realized it was a very expensive laptop with not much on it. For one thing it uses a touch pad which is completely impractical on a laptop of this size unless your fingers are the size of pencil, also the screen is a far too low screen resolution. It has only 4 GB of SD memory for the HDD and you can't upgrade the ram with out violating the warranty.

If you want a cheap laptop, just go on ebay and pick up a Pentium III based laptop, they'll do far more than the EEE PC and you won't feel like you've been ripped off after buying it. (Assuming you don't buy a DOA of course..) If you're looking for an ultra portable, then you should look up some of the ultra portables sold in japan circa 2000-2004.

It was very disappointing to use this machine because I had heard such good things about it and it seemed cheap.


By Flunk on 3/19/2008 2:36:37 PM , Rating: 5
I disagree, I work in IT and if anything I actually love computers more than ever. Although I do hate people a lot more.


By SlipDizzy on 3/19/2008 2:48:23 PM , Rating: 2
Hmmm.. I work in IT and usually can't wait to get home and sit at my computer. The only thing I can't stand is if someone ask me computer based questions while I am at home. It drives me crazy!


By goku on 3/19/2008 2:56:44 PM , Rating: 2
Why is this not a 6?


By saiga6360 on 3/20/2008 3:28:46 PM , Rating: 2
Because it tries to be logical when addiction is anything but.

It doesn't even have to be addiction. If you really like computers, an IT job will not necessarily kill it for you. That's like saying a gynecologist will be 'cured' of a healthy, heterosexual sex drive.

*Imagines what a nypho gynecologist might be like.* *shudders*


By Runiteshark on 3/19/2008 3:56:26 PM , Rating: 2
Amen.

Thats why my hobby turned to cars instead of dry ice cooled chips.


By Samus on 3/20/2008 3:35:35 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Take up a job in IT.


That deserves a 7.

Ohh wait, your the mod...


Agenda
By rdeegvainl on 3/19/2008 1:11:12 PM , Rating: 2
What bothers me about this is the following line.

"He argues that few in the psychiatry and psychology community will even pick out a person's internet addiction, unless they are specifically looking for it."

I don't know how they do their work, but if you are specifically looking for something, it seems to me you'll find it when it isn't even there.




RE: Agenda
By KeithP on 3/19/2008 1:35:50 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I don't know how they do their work, but if you are specifically looking for something, it seems to me you'll find it when it isn't even there.


You have pointed out the basic business model for their profession. If you asked the average shrink, they would probably tell you just about everybody has some form of mental illness that needs treatment.


RE: Agenda
By FITCamaro on 3/19/2008 1:51:33 PM , Rating: 2
They might be right about having a mental illness. The question is whether it needs to be treated. My tending to look toward the negative side of things is a trait I developed due to my childhood. Does that mean I need to pay some guy $150/hr to help me deal with it? Hell no.

Too many people see psychologists these days to deal with every day aspects of life. A breakup is no reason to see a psychologist. Nor is school being hard, people making fun of you, a divorce, etc. You deal with it and move on. Sure you might have some suicidal thoughts along the way(I know I did), but you either off yourself or you don't. Maybe the world used to be a better place because those who weren't cut out for it didn't survive.


RE: Agenda
By Brigandier on 3/19/2008 2:13:44 PM , Rating: 3
Major depression really isn't a joke, some people cannot live functional lives because of it. I'm not talking about emo kids that cut themselves in highschool, I'm talking about people that think of death and dying every single day. Just because you are a pessimist and occasionally thought of offing yourself does not mean that everyone should just buck-up and tough it out.


RE: Agenda
By gradoman on 3/19/2008 2:30:03 PM , Rating: 3
Sorry, but you haven't got a clue. Some of these things do need to be addressed by a professional and hey -- maybe you end up needing meds to improve your outlook, but believe me, being teased, being made fun of, beat up, going through a breakup -- those things can send a depressed person into a tailspin.

It's not always as easy as "getting over it".


RE: Agenda
By FITCamaro on 3/19/2008 4:39:40 PM , Rating: 3
If you've got some chemical imbalance that makes it so you can't, fine. If you're a normal, otherwise healthy person, you can get over things on your own. Our society though tells you you can't and that you should go see a doctor and possibly get on some medication with unknown longterm side effects for the rest of your life.

My mom is a pharmacist and even she admits people are overmedicated.

I firmly believe that some people can't cope with things only because either they are told they can't(and they believe it) or they no longer can because they've taken medication so long that they're not able to cope with real life on their own anymore.

We are the medication nation.


RE: Agenda
By Brigandier on 3/19/2008 5:44:10 PM , Rating: 2
RIght on, at first I thought you were treating major depression flippantly. I agree that a lot of people on anti-depressants really shouldn't be, but perhaps it prevents them from turning to harder drugs or alcohol to get that peachy keen feeling so it's all good in the end.


RE: Agenda
By gradoman on 3/19/2008 8:21:21 PM , Rating: 2
Fair enough. Reminds me of my past, lol, there were times where I did things that surely would have landed me in therapy and on medication in this modern world; instead I got an ass-whooping.


RE: Agenda
By Creig on 3/19/2008 3:32:07 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
They might be right about having a mental illness. The question is whether it needs to be treated. My tending to look toward the negative side of things is a trait I developed due to my childhood. Does that mean I need to pay some guy $150/hr to help me deal with it? Hell no.


Paying $150/hr to a psychiatrist should be considered a mental illness in itself.


RE: Agenda
By JustTom on 3/19/2008 2:05:30 PM , Rating: 2
This is all about what can and cannot be build to insurance. If it is officially recognized as a mental illness, bingo here comes the money.


Needs to be more narrow
By darkpaw on 3/19/2008 12:56:12 PM , Rating: 5
Frequent use of MySpace/Facebook/etc should be classified as a mental illness..




RE: Needs to be more narrow
By FITCamaro on 3/19/2008 1:03:06 PM , Rating: 5
With you on that one. It's pretty sad when someone's life is so pathetic that they have time to broadcast their every action on a social networking site.


let's get something straight.
By inperfectdarkness on 3/19/2008 1:32:10 PM , Rating: 5
internet "addiction" is a huge miscalculation.

if you are addicted to online gambling, you are a GAMBLING addict, not an internet addict.

if you are addicted to online pornography, you are a PORNOGRAPHY addict, not an internet addict.

apart from these two key points...there is little basis for anything being called an "internet addiction". any mentally ill person can fixate upon any one of a variety facets to his/her daily life (internet, handwashing, sex, exercising, etc). if their symptoms manifest through the internet; IT DOES NOT EQUATE TO A NEW DISORDER. it is simply the manner of symptom the underlying illness has chosen to display.

and i'd like to add that online gaming is a GREAT method of socializing. you can meet and interact with a variety of people...all of whom you can happily remain anonamyous from. this frees the individual from the constraints of "proper social norms" in their social interactions. in essence, we are more free to be ourselves.




By geddarkstorm on 3/19/2008 1:48:23 PM , Rating: 2
The real point he's saying is, "I want more money; please give me your life savings so I can 'cure' you of the interwebs. Once you're poor, you can't have them no moar!" Next they'll be trying to say it's an STD--anything to get them more patients and money.


What about TV and Reading Books?
By othercents on 3/19/2008 1:38:18 PM , Rating: 3
People can spend hours of time watching TV and Reading Books and based on "loosing track of time" these people are just as addicted as someone who surfs the web. We can add shopping to the list too. How many times has your girlfriend taken you for a quick trip to the mall and 5 hours later they are asking why you always want to eat and that you just don't love them enough?

What about children's preoccupation with toys? They spend way too much time playing with toys and always loose track of time. Working too much, cleaning too much, using the phone too much, talking too much, exercising too much, etc.

The truth is that everyone is addicted to something that allows them to relax. Take this away then everyone will need drug to stay normal.

Other




By nugundam93 on 3/19/2008 1:55:58 PM , Rating: 2
IIRC, a shopping done like that could be one of the signs of being bipolar, although my memory's rusty so don't quote mo on that. :)

i think impulsive buying's one too...


By Staples on 3/19/2008 1:59:17 PM , Rating: 2
The issue here is that internet addiction is very wide spread and it is one of the more common addictions that hinders peoples' abilities to take care of other things. You have named many other addictions and of course caffeine addiction but those do not affect people so much as internet addiction as far as making them useless.


By NicePants42 on 3/19/2008 1:04:59 PM , Rating: 6
Damn you, Hot Deals Forum!

quote:
These symptoms manifest themselves in desires for more and better hardware and software, as well as more hours online.




there is nothing new about this
By kattanna on 3/19/2008 1:13:32 PM , Rating: 4
this is not a new mental illness. this is the same desire to escape reality that has manifested since the beginning of man.

only thing "new" about it is that the internet is a new form of escape.

but hey.. lets not treat the root cause of an issue, instead lets label it and only work on "curing" it..of course those hours will be billable and hopefully you have good insurance

;>)




By SilthDraeth on 3/19/2008 3:49:08 PM , Rating: 3
"These symptoms manifest themselves in desires for more and better hardware and software, as well as more hours online."




well...
By zinfamous on 3/19/2008 12:45:57 PM , Rating: 2
sign me up.




So in other words...
By dflynchimp on 3/19/2008 12:57:05 PM , Rating: 2
99.9% of the U.S is mentally ill...and people stand a better chance living in third world countries...




Very spot on article
By DeepBlue1975 on 3/19/2008 2:33:46 PM , Rating: 2
That doctor is completely on the money IMO.

The problem in an addiction is not the object of addiction, but the addiction itself and what triggers it in an individual, which is something you can rarely blame on the object (aside of some substances known to have a really high psychotropic action, like cocaine, LSD, and the likes).

So, addiction to the net should be considered as important as any other addiction, as what counts is the addictive behaviour, that can get locked on any imaginable object.




Is it so?
By Sundox on 3/19/2008 2:44:09 PM , Rating: 2
I do know people that I'd classify as internet-, or let me say tech-addicts. these people do not take any date serious anymore, because they can tell you over their cellies that they'll be late. here in brazil you got people loosing their job because they can't get of the orkut. I don't believe that they are a new species of addicts, I believe that they are lonley and back in the days they had a huge collection of playboy and hustler magazines; wich they download now.




About time...
By LatinMessiah on 3/19/2008 2:53:06 PM , Rating: 2
That way I can be able to use my internet addiction as a legitimate excuse to miss work.




I agree somewhat
By Davelo on 3/19/08, Rating: 0
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki