Nobody likes to pay taxes, but they are reality of modern U.S. government as we know it. However, if you have to pay taxes, you at least want them to be fair. That's the mentality driving a rather revolutionary, albeit controversial, new plan in the state of Oregon.
In Oregon, as in other states, people have long complained about using fuel taxes to finance road work. Such measures place a larger tax burden on those in professions requiring heavier vehicles. So Oregon's Gov. Ted Kulongoski (D) has developed a new plan -- pay by mileage.
Oregon, whose highways recently gained attention via a new solar project, is now looking to legislate the governor's plan. The new legislation will provide Oregon with "a path to transition away from the gas tax as the central funding source for transportation" via a mileage tax implemented with the help of GPS satellites.
While the exact details are still being ironed out, Gov. Kulongoski's web page gives the basics of the plan. In it he states, "As Oregonians drive less and demand more fuel-efficient vehicles, it is increasingly important that the state find a new way, other than the gas tax, to finance our transportation system."
He is creating a task force "to partner with auto manufacturers to refine technology that would enable Oregonians to pay for the transportation system based on how many miles they drive." Key studies were performed in 2006 and 2007 that indicate that such a program would indeed be possible.
In the 2007 test which lasted 10 months with 300 motorists at two service stations, drivers were taxed 1.2 cents per mile and were refunded the 24 cents a gallon state gas tax. When the motorists got to the pump, their vehicles connected to government computers informing them of the mileage (calculated via GPS tracking) and issuing tax. Equipment for the test came from Oregon State University.
While clever, the program faces one enormous thorny obstacle -- concerns over the loss of privacy.
The governor's online outline states, "The governor is committed to ensuring that rural Oregon is not adversely affected and that privacy concerns are addressed."
Despite assurances from James Whitty, the ODOT official in charge of the project, that the new GPS system would not be used for continuous tracking of citizens' cars, many advocacy groups are outraged and many remain fearful. The final report on the 2007 test deployment was conscious of this fear, stating, "The concept requires no transmission of vehicle travel locations, either in real time or of travel history. Accordingly, no travel location points are stored within the vehicle or transmitted elsewhere. Thus there can be no ‘tracking’ of vehicle movements."
Advocates point out that the devices are not developed by Oregon, but rather by industry partners. The program's policy page states, "ODOT would have no involvement in developing the on-vehicle devices, installing them in vehicles, maintaining them or having any other access to them except, perhaps, in situations involving tampering or similar fee evasion activities."
However, even if privacy concerns can be laid to rest, there will also be a large price tag associated with initially implementing the program, one which may give residents sticker shock. An initial investment of $20M USD would be needed, according to the governor, just to see if the program was viable. A full deployment would require GPS be gradually added to gas stations and to all vehicles in the state.
The proposal also calls for a punitive tax against those not adopting the new device -- the gas tax will continue for vehicles not equipped to pay the mileage tax, but it will be increased 2 cents.
quote: The only thing I like less than politicians trying to justify increasing my taxes are politicians finding stupid, wasteful boondoggles as a means of justifying raising my taxes.
quote: In the 2007 test which lasted 10 months with 300 motorists at two service stations, drivers were taxed 1.2 cents per mile and were refunded the 24 cents a gallon state gas tax.
quote: ..it is increasingly important that the state find a new way, other than the gas tax, to finance our transportation system.
quote: No it makes it fair.
quote: What are you rambling on about?
quote: Taxing gas is the only way to distribute responsibility fairly amongst drivers.
quote: Taxing gas is the only reasonable way to distribute responsibility somewhat fairly amongst drivers.
quote: so now we are saying that larger vehicles (read:rich) now pay less taxes and the small kias and civics (read:poor) will pay more
quote: there will be less or no ways to actually bypass it on anything newer than the 2004 models.
quote: a smaller vehicle < 2000 lbs makes a MUCH smaller impact on the roads than does the 1/2 ton trucks.
quote: or are those potholes down the street caused by some magical 12 ton object that bounced in there?
quote: (calculated via GPS tracking)
quote: Ironically, a lot of cars already have GPS built in with much more sophisticated capabilities than this that are completely exposed to the private corporations that make the vehicles (on-star anyone?). No one has really raised the conspiracy flag about that.I'm more concerned about a private company knowing my whereabouts at all time than I am about the government. If they get an idea to abuse the information a private company is far more likely to be competent at doing so...
quote: raise taxes which leads to even less fuel being purchased (through reduced driving and/or purchasing more higher mpg vehicles
quote: What do you think happens every time you go through an automated toll booth?
quote: For those concerned with the *tracking* aspect of legislation, your worries are misplaced.What do you think happens every time you go through an automated toll booth?Or, even every time you swipe that credit/ debit card.You've been tracked for years, now it's just in your face.
quote: If you're buying fuel to use on your farm, it makes sense to complain