backtop


Print 25 comment(s) - last by themaster08.. on Feb 11 at 5:15 AM


Opera Mini for the iPhone  (Source: Opera Software ASA)
A big mobile browser launch and mounting frustrations add up to some intriguing iPhone storylines

Norway-based Opera Software ASA's mobile browsers -- Opera Mini 4 (currently in beta for Mini 5) and Opera Mobile 10 -- are the world's most used cell phone browsers.  One of the key challenges to Opera's mobile market share over the past couple years has been Safari, the browser used on the iPhone.

Traditionally Apple did not allow third-party browsers on the iPhone.  It recently relaxed these restrictions allowing third-party browsers -- but only those based on webkit.  Now Opera has offered a sneak peak of Opera Mini on the iPhone, leaving many unanswered questions.

Opera Mini is based on the Presto layout engine, not Webkit, and is underpinned by Java ME API calls.  Opera has already been welcomed on less unrestrictive platforms, such as Google's Android OS (which uses an emulation layer to translate the Java API calls to appropriate Android API calls).  However, it seems pretty amazing if Apple actually allows Opera Mini -- a huge threat to its big mobile browsing market share -- on the iPhone.

Jon von Tetzchner, Co-founder, Opera Software, speaking to the press at the 2010 Mobile World Conference (MWC) in Barcelona, certainly spoke about the preview as if it were for a sure-to-be-released product, though.  He stated, "We are thrilled to offer journalists and partners an exclusive preview of Opera Mini for iPhone during the year’s biggest mobile event. This is a unique opportunity to introduce the fast, feature-rich Opera Mini experience for the iPhone, and to showcase our latest beta releases of Opera Mobile and Opera Mini on other platforms and devices. Opera’s mission is to bring the Web to the world, and by making Opera Mini available on yet another platform, we are one step closer."

For iPhone users looking to cut potential data costs and speed up page load times, Opera's compression technology and easily switchable image quality settings should help the browser outpace Safari if it indeed makes it onto the iPhone.  Other key features include tabs, Speed Dial, and a password manager.

We're certainly hoping that Apple approves Opera Mini as an iPhone App.  After all, we feel it's perhaps the best mobile browser on the market right now.

It's important to emphasize how shocking that approval would be, though.  Mozilla CEO John Lilly has already totally ruled out the prospect of a Firefox derivative (Fennec) on the iPhone.  He stated in a 2008 interview with Wired, "Apple makes it too hard.  It says it's because of technical issues - it doesn't want outsiders to disrupt the user experience."

In other iPhone news, pressure is mounting for Apple to repeal its iPhone and iPad ban on Adobe Flash.  Apple has refused to support Flash on the iPhone since its inception (and now refuses to do so with the iPad as well) and remains firm in its stance, despite numerous competitors unveiling sleek mobile Flash browsing.  While Flash doesn't seem to be helping Android phones like the Nexus One sell particularly well, the threat of customers jumping to competitors is there for Apple.

According to Ryan Kim of The San Francisco Chronicle, sources at Adobe said that there were 7 million attempts to download Flash from Adobe.com in December, up from 3 million in June.  These kind of massive numbers indicate that people are coming to expect mobile phones to support Flash.

Adobe currently offers a beta version of Flash 10.1 which is compatible with Android and webOS (Palm) smart phones, among others.  A final version is expected later this year.  Market research firm Strategy Analytics predicts that by 2012 53 percent of mobile phones will supported Flash -- an estimated 250 million mobile Flash installations.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

N900 browser?
By Kwincy on 2/10/10, Rating: 0
RE: N900 browser?
By RjBass on 2/10/2010 10:31:07 AM , Rating: 2
That's fine, but can the N900 browser be ported over to other platforms like the iPhone, Win Mobile Phones etc... That's the point of Opera Mobile. A cross platform mobile browser that performs better then the stock browsers.


RE: N900 browser?
By Penti on 2/10/2010 3:59:30 PM , Rating: 2
Yes it can as it's a Mozilla browser.

Fennec is Mozillas own mobile browser. Alpha is available for Windows Mobile and Android build is planned. Opera is java so it's more portable for those platforms which doesn't allow native code though.


RE: N900 browser?
By SunAngel on 2/10/10, Rating: -1
RE: N900 browser?
By MojoMan on 2/10/2010 10:32:54 AM , Rating: 3
SunAngel, have you had a chance to use the web on the Nexus yet, or seen anybody that has compared the two? I was just curious. I saw a video comparing the two, and up until this point I believed the iPhone had the best mobile web experience. The Nexus has changed my mind after seeing the two compared though. Between the speed, slightly larger screen, and twice the resolution, I think the Nexus might finally have the edge. This especially rings true if you throw in flash support, and the the Nexus now having the pinch zoom feature like the iPhone.

I'm not an iPhone hater. It's a good product. I'm just not sure the iPhone still reigns as king in that department. If it isn't king anymore, it's certainly still runner up.


RE: N900 browser?
By SunAngel on 2/10/10, Rating: 0
RE: N900 browser?
By MojoMan on 2/10/2010 11:15:58 AM , Rating: 3
Very cool. I too am excited about the touch capabilities with Windows 7. I have a Windows 7 machine at home, and love it. It's what Vista should have been.

A note about Microsoft and Apple... I have a love/hate relationship with them. I think Windows 7 is fairly innovative, but I think they really could be setting themselves up to fail if they don't start innovating with more of their products. I can't stand Apple fanboys that think it's the second coming of Christ every time Apple releases something, but you have to admit, they are making some good products.

If Microsoft starts to fail as a company (which I don't see happening anytime soon), I think Google is actually setting the stage to take their place. Apple will always be there as long as they keep pumping out good products, but I think Google will be the new behemoth that could truly compete with both companies.

Anybody else have an opinion on this? Just curious. By the way, I'm an MCSE, so this is a bold step for me to take this opinion. Hehe...


RE: N900 browser?
By armulyman on 2/10/2010 11:26:14 AM , Rating: 1
As far as google competing with microsoft, yes...
I think in the long term google will beet both of them out on several platforms, specifically SAAS

Honestly as open source OS's becomes more and more user friendly, easier for the average user, and actually supported by companies, the major OS producers may start to dwindle, and unless Microsoft can change it's platform to doing more things cloud, they will dwindle as a company. Apple is and always will take it's own road, they are more focused on selling form and design.

But that's probably another 20-30 years down the road.


RE: N900 browser?
By armulyman on 2/10/2010 11:17:21 AM , Rating: 2
The name IE is synonymous with the word garbage, I can't believe you would use that as your comparison with all other smart phones.


RE: N900 browser?
By 67STANG on 2/10/2010 11:13:43 AM , Rating: 1
Perhaps that would be true if it didn't crash every 10 minutes or if it could remember authentication info.


RE: N900 browser?
By sprockkets on 2/10/2010 4:16:32 PM , Rating: 1
Safari? Never crashed on me.

Btw, just go to Safari's settings and you can have it remember your login info for sites that allow it of course.


RE: N900 browser?
By omnicronx on 2/10/2010 1:29:53 PM , Rating: 2
The Nexus One is a much faster device, and both browsers are webkit based. So its safe to say that the Nexus One browser most likely renders pages faster than the 3GS and much faster than previous gen iPhones. It also already has Flash 10.1 support giving you access to far more content than the iPhone.

So when talking about overall user experience, its pretty hard to claim that safari is decively better. Google has a bit more to go on the UI end, but from an experience perspective, the pages you can view and how fast you can view them, the Nexus One is certainly the better contender.


RE: N900 browser?
By omnicronx on 2/10/2010 1:33:37 PM , Rating: 2
Should say:
quote:
the Nexus One is certainly a contender.
Also responded to the wrong post..


RE: N900 browser?
By Johnmcl7 on 2/10/2010 1:46:04 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
(2)Mobile Safari web browsing experience REALLY IS the best out there at the moment. It ACTUALLY makes using a cell/pda to surf the internet enjoyable.


No, that's what Apple wants you to believe - the N900 has a better browser which is likely to remain the case with Apple's refusal to support Flash. The N900 has a higher resolution and can render most pages the same as a desktop browser does.

I don't know why the article mentions Android/WebOS getting full flash support but makes no mention of the N900 which already has it.

John


RE: N900 browser?
By kmmatney on 2/10/10, Rating: 0
RE: N900 browser?
By tdawg on 2/10/2010 10:32:18 AM , Rating: 2
Unfortunately, with so few people owning the N900, it won't get much focus compared to browsers installed on the iphone, android phones, and windows mobile phones, that are more heavily represented in the market.

Hopefully the next version of the N900 will bring a more refined user experience with Maemo 6 and offer a few different form factors that will appeal to a broader market.


Mini Sucks
By toyotabedzrock on 2/10/2010 11:00:50 AM , Rating: 2
I'm an avid Opera user, but Opera Mini is not gonna convince anyone to switch.

It's more likely that its going to convince iPhone users that Opera is a low end solution.

They need to put Opera Mobile on the iPhone, not Mini!




But
By BruceLeet on 2/10/2010 4:42:43 PM , Rating: 2
Wouldn't Flash eat up the 620Hz ARM processor and then iPhone owners complain when their battery dies MUCH quicker?

Flash is a big thing but I think that's why Apple made the appstore so developers could develop apps on their platform and wouldn't worry about Flash's CPU eatery.

I think they should implement Flash on the premise of "If you dont like it, rollback".

But those are just my thoughts, I have no idea the comparison between Apple's platform and Flash CPU usage.




Apps > Flash
By reader1 on 2/10/10, Rating: -1
RE: Apps > Flash
By armulyman on 2/10/2010 11:14:20 AM , Rating: 3
Wow, that's like saying: "Flash will be gone in 10-20 years, executables are just getting started."


RE: Apps > Flash
By stapleton87 on 2/10/2010 11:37:26 AM , Rating: 3
10 to 20 years? I think it'll be gone within the next 5 pretty easily. It's way too much of a cpu hog, as netbooks and tablets have shown. Flash provides many features on the web right now, but new standards are coming that will actually give flash some real competition. I actually find myself supporting apple in their desire to wipe flash from the marketplace. However, if they try to replace flash with Quicktime, I may just retire from computers all-together.


RE: Apps > Flash
By 67STANG on 2/10/2010 12:34:32 PM , Rating: 3
Gone in 5 years? As a developer/designer, I'll take that wager.

Flash will be used for interactive UI's until something more mainstream comes along. Currently the only thing that comes close is Silverlight, but even that is more purposed towards working with data rather than eye candy.

HTML5 may do a good bit of detracting from Flash's dominance in video playing online, but that's not everything that flash is used for, so that's a moot point.


RE: Apps > Flash
By CU on 2/10/2010 12:19:31 PM , Rating: 4
Lots of people play flash games on facebook and the like. I don't think you would be a moron to develop something for the millions that use social websites like facebook. If / when flash dies something will replace it, and it will have to be something that will install and run right from inside the browser. Apps don't do that. Apps have been around forever, and yet flash was created and survived within apps lifetime. As for being slow flash will get faster as will hardware. Then more intense flash content will be created and the process will continue. That is how everything in computers work with the software and hardware constantly going back and forth.


RE: Apps > Flash
By MScrip on 2/10/10, Rating: 0
RE: Apps > Flash
By themaster08 on 2/11/2010 5:15:53 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Apps make more money than Flash content. That's all that matters.

Sure, because quality, creativity and consumer support don't matter. Just making money.

Welcome to closed platforms, where lazy developers create half-baked Apps for devices and make a quick buck out of it.


“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki