backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 29 comment(s) - last by PrinceGaz.. on Sep 9 at 7:47 PM

This week Opera pushed out the latest build of their browser, the 9.5 Alpha Edition. Initial tests show it to be faster than current offerings from Firefox and IE.

The Opera Desktop Team released the alpha build of version 9.5 of its desktop browser, available here.  The browser represents the first release under the new "Kestrel" name--previous 9.x versions were named Merlin.  The release supports Windows, Linux and Macintosh platforms.

The browser market, today is dominated by IE7 and Firefox 2.x.  IE7 holds about 60% marketshare, with Firefox coming in second place, with 35%, according to the latest figures.

According to the latest statistics, "alternative" browser Opera holds a mere 1.9% of the market.

Opera's development is based out of Oslo, Norway.  The first public release of the Opera browser was in 1996, with version 2.0.  Opera, like Mozilla's software, has traditionally been offered free of charge, starting with version 5.0.  Version 5.0 to 8.0 used in-browser advertising to pay for the development costs, but the ads were removed in version 8.5.

Opera introduced several innovations in terms of browsing.   Some notable features are:
  • All keyboard controls and shortcuts are easibly mappable in the browser.
  • Page zooming of both images and text, from 20% to 1,000%.
  • Voice control, co-developed by IBM, which reads webpage text aloud and accepts user input.
  • Pop-up blocking and privacy control.
  • Built in download service.
  • Tabbed browsing--note: Opera was the first browser to offer this.  Opera displays thumbnails of the page in the tab, and opens pages as true documents, unlike many other browsers.  This allows you to resize different tabbed pages to different sizes.
Despite Opera's history of innovation, the question with this new release was if the challenge of competing with much larger production teams and budgets at Mozilla and Microsoft, would/ /be too much for Opera's development team.

Initial reports indicate that the browser is shaping up quite nicely, despite the adversity of playing the underdog to IE7 and Firefox 2.x.

Improvements in the 9.5 release include:
  • Higher performance (faster page loadtimes)
  • Full history search
  • Improved site compatability
  • Preview of bookmarks
The design team has released detailed change logs of the improvements and fixes.  For a look at the Windows release change log, go to here.

The 9.5 build was put in a speed test against Firefox 2.x and IE7 on the blog Ars Technica and showed surprising performance.  The test used Celtic Kane Online's javascript speed tests

Run on the same platform, the 9.5 release at 281 ms load time was nearly twice as fast as the previous version 9.23 (546 ms).  The new version also held significant speed advantages over Firefox 2.x and IE7.  On Windows Vista, Opera 9.5 was reported to be around 50% faster than Firefox 2.x and 100% faster than IE7, according to these speed tests.

The blog also reports that the speed of torrent downloads using the built in download manager that supports torrents is greatly improved.

The blog also commends the new "Speed Synchronization" feature, which lets you remotely load your bookmarks and features remotely to a seperate machine in mere seconds.

One key feature that may offset some of these improvements, is the fact that the Opera browser still does not allow extensions, a very useful feature of the Firefox browser.  The Opera browser does support Java widgets and user Javascripts, including scripts written for Firefox's Greasemonkey utility.

Despite this noticeably absent feature, Opera's alpha release sports good performance and seems indicative that final Opera 9.5 build is shaping up to be a solid competitor in the Firefox and Internet Explorer-dominated browser market.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Imaginer on 9/7/2007 12:53:13 PM , Rating: 2
And not to mention, that only on my Core 2 Duo machine does it have this latency/lag/delay after browsing/watching streams/flash content it will sort of give a freeze before continuing.

But overall, as a browser you don't need to tinker or mess with other than installing it and (for me) setting the various cookie settings, It is a highly unrecognized browser. Most people I talk to are still under the impression it is not free...




By GrandMareg on 9/7/2007 12:59:38 PM , Rating: 1
Have they fixed that problem with flash?

On some websites when I expand the flash viewer it goes off the entire screen in while I'm staring at a corner of the video fillig up my entire browser.

Aside from that, it has everything that I need in a browser. I haven't gotten a single pop-up from any of the websites that I go to which is something that I can't say about Firefox or IE.


By ChronoReverse on 9/7/2007 1:39:48 PM , Rating: 2
Test driving it right now and seem okay in that regard. I've been trying Opera with every version that was released for a while since even before Phoenix but there's also just _something_ that brings me back to Firefox.

At this point, if they implemented something as simple to use as Noscript for the script management, I might never look back.


By ForumMaster on 9/7/2007 2:13:31 PM , Rating: 2
then suggest it. register and post it in the forum and they may very well do it. since it is a small company, requests are usually fullfilled.


By Staples on 9/7/2007 6:42:49 PM , Rating: 2
I have been using Opera almost 100% of the time since it went free and it is my favorite browser. I have a slow computer and work and it is easy to see that Opera is faster than both FF and IE. There are a handful of web pages that do not work as well with Opera as they do FF but most of them have been fixed since. I use Google Calendar and I always had to use FF for it until recently. Now the only things I notice that do not work with it are 1)WebCT and the new Hotmail ajax version which I do not care for.


opera improving
By KamiXkaze on 9/7/2007 7:35:37 PM , Rating: 2
This is good that Opera is improving hopefully Opera will get a bigger marketshare than 2%




RE: opera improving
By TomZ on 9/7/2007 8:23:27 PM , Rating: 2
I think they're hoping to get to 2.5% next year, LOL.

Seriously, I like Opera, my only problem with it is that most web sites don't test for Opera compatibility, and I found a lot of sites that didn't work right with Opera.


RE: opera improving
By damncrackmonkey on 9/8/2007 5:28:57 PM , Rating: 2
why test for opera compatibility? testing for browser compatibility is the problem. sites just need to check for standards compliance. if a site doesn't work in opera, ctrl+alt+shift+u tends to give a few hundred reasons why


RE: opera improving
By daftrok on 9/9/2007 2:02:33 AM , Rating: 2
Whereas in Mozilla if a site doesn't work you just use the IE tab


Autocomplete please
By smilingcrow on 9/7/2007 3:38:30 PM , Rating: 2
I’ve been using Opera as my main browser since Firefox lost the ability to force any new tab or window to open in the current Window; that was version 1.5 Beta 2 I believe, about 2 years ago. I’m glad Firefox lost that ability otherwise I doubt I’d have got to know Opera and all it’s excellent features.

I really like Opera even though it lacks autocomplete and ‘forgets’ various login details sporadically. It’s also a RAM hog and seems to crawl to a halt every so often, but hey, nothings perfect. It does struggle for compatibility with certain sites and then I use Firefox and IE7 as a last resort.

Perversely, after writing this I may give Firefox a go again and see how it’s evolved.




RE: Autocomplete please
By Imaginer on 9/8/2007 2:18:47 AM , Rating: 2
Not to mention the little things besides that like the "paste and go" deal when you just copied something and want to paste it in the search drop down or in a search text box in google's webpage. Or for that matter, the address bar as well.

Something that whenever I use Firefox or IE, I miss that feature....

And the speed dial is nice too.


RE: Autocomplete please
By PrinceGaz on 9/8/2007 1:50:03 PM , Rating: 2
I've never found Opera to forget log-in details (I'm assumning you mean the 'Wand') though it will need to be told about them again if a site allows you to log-in through two or more different domains when you use the other area.

As for being a RAM hog, by default it caches a lot to memory which would otherwise be unused. Task Manager is showing it using 230MB for me atm, which isn't a problem as it has been open a few hours and I've visited many sites. Given that I currently still have over 1.2GB of free physical memory, I consider it a good thing that Opera is actually using as much as it wants to speed things up.

The one thing I would like Opera to have is a spell-checker, but I'm resonbaly good at sppeling so I can live without that feature. (edit: just done a search for Opera spell check and it seems there is a supported way to add it, I wish I'd done than sooner).

One often forgotten point about Opera only having ~2% market-share is it is rarely if ever targetted by hackers, which combined with using a mainly unique code-base makes it much safer than IE or Firefox. When I setup computers for other people, I always install Opera as I know there is much less chance of a vulnerabilty being discovered and exploited compared with the usual IE and Firefox.


Publicity
By kextyn on 9/7/2007 3:39:16 PM , Rating: 2
It's nice to see Opera getting some good publicity. Maybe someday it will get more than 2% market share. I have been using Opera almost exclusively since version 5 and I even paid for the software once. There are hardly any times I need to use IE for something, but I'm glad they're still working on site compatibility. Also in their forums they deal with stuff like that on a site-by-site basis if you're having problems.

They mention the lack of extensions, but honestly Opera doesn't need them. It comes with plenty of features and feels like a complete product (can't say the same for Firefox...I've tried to like it, but I always end up frustrated.)

If you have never tried Opera I would strongly suggest spending some quality time with it. Don't just use it for 15 minutes, try it out for a week as your primary browser and play around with the customization and advanced options.




RE: Publicity
By SmokeRngs on 9/7/2007 4:23:24 PM , Rating: 2
I started using Opera back in the paying days. The main reasons I began using it was for the mouse gestures (which to this day I cannot live without), very fast page load times (beat the pants off of IE and Netscape at the time) and the small disk and memory footprint.

However, it seemed around version 5 (my memory is a bit hazy) that it became more bloated and didn't really have any page load time advantages. I stuck with an older version even as a new version came out because I liked the old one much better. I used that up until the time when the featureset became too outdated for things like secure websites.

It was at this time I started to use Firefox as I could not go back to not having tabbed browsing. At first, tabbed browsing took some getting used to with Opera but I can't live without it now. Of course Firefox does not have mouse gestures built in but it didn't take me long to find an extension for it.

It has been extensions which have kept me using Firefox since that time. I have Opera installed on my Linux machine and I use it from time to time, but the lack of customization from extensions I have grown to rely on with Firefox keeps Opera from being a prime candidate for my main browser.

If they opened up extension support like Firefox and had even a fraction of the extensions Firefox does, there is a good chance I would go back to Opera.

Opera introduced me to mouse gestures and tabbed browsing which changed my browsing habits forever. It's a testament to what they have done and I think what they can still do.


Opera Security
By DesertCat on 9/8/2007 12:41:23 PM , Rating: 2
I've been using Opera since version 4 and paid for it back when that would remove the banner ads. I really like it and find some comfort that it isn't a big target for security exploits. I really don't know one way or another whether it is written more securely than IE or Firefox, but with 2% market share there is very little reason for hackers to even consider it.

I'm really hoping for a more robust bit-torrent client than the current version. It kind of works but I always find myself going back to utorrent because I feel like I have much more control and information about what's going on.




RE: Opera Security
By PrinceGaz on 9/9/2007 7:47:09 PM , Rating: 2
I never use Opera's built-in Torrent client; something like Azureus is much more capable. But I do use it generally because it does everything I waant with the minimum of fuss. As an Opera user, browser security breaches rarely happen, and when they are discovered, they are fixed long before any exploit appears in the wild.

Its not perfect; no software is, but it does what it sets out to do pretty damn well. Lack of plug-ins? Opera can satisfy most people's brosing requirements without installing plug-ins, that's the beauty of it. Fast, efficient, but also fully functional from the start.

Not needing to download plug-ins also enhances its security, if its seperate code-base weren't secure enough already. The PC/Windows version of Opera is one of the most overlooked software products around today; it is full-featured and supported commercial software but without the licensing charge, because Opera recoup the money on the versions for other OS's (and the work they need to do for those allows the PC version to be done almnost for free, I imagine).

Without Opera, I'd probably use Firefox but that would mean regular chacks for security fixes (Firefox is getting compromised quite rehguarly now). That or IE, and Firefox would be the lesser evil.


All it needs
By Ringold on 9/7/2007 3:37:29 PM , Rating: 2
If they stick 4 Arbalest Standard Missile Launchers in there it'll be great.

*alt-tabs back to Eve*




RE: All it needs
By mikeyD95125 on 9/7/2007 8:18:28 PM , Rating: 1
huh??

Anyway the more browsers the better. I feel that if I want a browser with a ton of functionality I use Firefox for all the extentions. If I want a browser for pure speed I'd choose Opera. So im kinda glad they leave out extensions and stuff like that because then they would just look like a Firefox imiataor. As long as the speed and basic functionality are there then Opera can make a name for itself.


By nodamnspam on 9/7/2007 6:03:30 PM , Rating: 2
I've been using Opera since V5. It's fast, stable, and other than some compatibility problems with some pages darn near perfect. I paid to register it back during the 6.0 days but I have problems with 7.01 (I think- due to a reported video driver issue), so I didn't pay to upgrade to that one. Regardless, if you haven't tried it.. do so.




Great news.
By PaxtonFettel on 9/7/2007 7:06:42 PM , Rating: 2
Nice to see it's still continually improving, I love this browser and can't wait til this version hits beta (I'm not really keen on alpha software, to be honest). I'm just suprised it's still languishing in the sub 2% share region...




Opera and Safari are realy fast
By mataoanu on 9/8/2007 5:55:56 AM , Rating: 2
I have entered the test site and did run the test on my installed browsers.

firefox 2.0 1800 ms
ie 6.0 1800 ms
opera 9.2 640 ms
safari 3.0 450 ms

But the aggregate score doesn't say much about the feeling when using the browser. What is most interesting, and I ha