backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 106 comment(s) - last by Pirks.. on Oct 22 at 5:31 PM


  (Source: Apple)

  (Source: Apple)
Apple sets a date for Leopard

The last time that DailyTech extensively covered OS X v10.5 Leopard was back in April. At the time, Apple announced that it would delay the introduction of the long-awaited operating system due to needs of the iPhone program. The delay forced OS X v10.5 to an October ship date instead of June.

"We now plan to show our developers a near final version of Leopard at the conference, give them a beta copy to take home so they can do their final testing, and ship Leopard in October," said Apple in April. "We think it will be well worth the wait. Life often presents tradeoffs, and in this case we're sure we've made the right ones."

"We can't wait until customers get their hands (and fingers) on it and experience what a revolutionary and magical product it is," the company continued.

The wait is almost over and eager Apple fans will be happy to know that OS X v10.5 will ship on October 26. Apple says that the revised operating system contains over 300 new features and “installs easily, and works with the software and accessories you already have.”

Some of the highlighted features include a revamped desktop, a new Finder which includes Cover Flow technology, Quick Look which gives full-scale previews of documents before opening them and Time Machine which creates incremental backups of files.

Pricing for Apple's OS X v10.5 may make some Windows Vista users green with envy. A single-user license of OS X v10.5 costs just $129.00 direct from Apple. A five-user license will set you back just $199.00.

Customers who pre-order OS X v10.5 today from Apple are guaranteed to have their copy on their doorstep on October 26.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

$129????
By DeepThought86 on 10/16/2007 11:14:52 AM , Rating: 5
Imagine if MS tried to charge $129 for service packs!! The uproar would be deafening. Apple gouges their customers by $129 EVERY YEAR and accelerates the obsolescence of their OS's to "encourage" people to upgrade. Where's the outrage?




RE: $129????
By stubeck on 10/16/2007 11:19:45 AM , Rating: 5
Tiger came out in 05. Leopard is coming out in 07. How is that "EVERY YEAR?"


RE: $129????
By Lonyo on 10/16/2007 11:37:15 AM , Rating: 5
By that logic, MS charging $390 should be acceptable, since XP came out in 01 and Vista in 07.

As it is, a Vista Home Premium upgrade is only $15 more than an OSX upgrade ($145 on Newegg), so despite the much longer time between OS's, the upgrade price is pretty much the same for MS and Apple.


RE: $129????
By stubeck on 10/16/2007 1:50:47 PM , Rating: 2
By what logic? I stated a fact of when the last two OS's from Apple were released, nothing more.


RE: $129????
By artemicion on 10/16/2007 5:59:49 PM , Rating: 3
I think he means that the 01-07 gap justifies a $390 OS cost, if you were to pro-rate the amount over the years it serves you . . .
Personally, I would agree that I dislike the frequency of "new" operating systems on Macs. Everybody has different tastes, but looking over the leopard features, I don't see anything that justifies $129 for me. Which, of course, isn't an issue as long as they don't discontinue support for 10.4 for at least a decent while . . .


RE: $129????
By stubeck on 10/16/2007 8:56:11 PM , Rating: 1
So basically he's going off on to something I've never talked about. Gotcha.


RE: $129????
By artemicion on 10/17/2007 12:08:16 AM , Rating: 2
yeah well, nitpicking his argument by pointing out the arguably superficial distinction between "every year" and "every other year" when his general thesis is obviously that he believes Apple releases new OS's too frequently doesn't exactly make you the master of debate.


RE: $129????
By stubeck on 10/17/2007 8:59:14 AM , Rating: 2
I don't see how a doubling of a time frame is nitpicking. I also never said I was the master of debates.


RE: $129????
By scrapsma54 on 10/17/2007 9:40:27 AM , Rating: 2
These questions remain:
Q: Why charge money for an "update/upgrade", when in reality the update is just features we may never use?
A: In terms of Updates, You are think in the box called Microsoft. Microsoft see's updates differently because they are not Apple.
Of course it is stupid to pay a premium for a petty update. Apple likes to make it hard on its customers and only promote the elite.
remember these were the people who some time ago required that you toss your old computer and get a new one,and considered it an upgrade.

Q: Apple products costs a lot but in reality the hardware is cheaper than it really is software should never cost more than $50 Per Gigabyte.
A: Apple designs the software for their computers and because apple products are not even competitive so prices will continue to hold up.
Part of the problem also is that Apple operates like family with a tradition that should never be broken. Apple should have dropped that a long time ago and
decided to make products that are affordable and practical in bulk by businesses and should have some degree of programabiliy.

Q: why no games?
A: #1 Open gL is tedious (not hard) to program to because it requires also
other programs to interface because Opengl has no input capabilities.
#2 Many game developers are already slaving over console titles, and pc titles and are aware that
Apple's platform base is not as big as the PC base. So less base less titles sold, which equals wasted time.

Q: Why no killer apps?
This is Apple, they want to maintain a clean and expensive Apple'y look to their computer. No little programs that inflict heavy contrast on the overall look of the computer.

Q: 300 Updates?
I look up lepard and nothing new is mentioned on their website


RE: $129????
By Spivonious on 10/16/2007 11:28:28 AM , Rating: 2
Well, this is like going from Win95 to Win98, or Win98 to WinME; they're all Windows 4.0.


RE: $129????
By Frank M on 10/16/2007 11:39:13 AM , Rating: 5
Now, don't be silly. Nobody would go from Win98 to WinMe.


RE: $129????
By Chris Peredun on 10/16/2007 12:22:00 PM , Rating: 5
I tried to install WinME once out of curiousity, just to see how bad it was.

When it bluescreened during the install, I figured that was a pretty good indicator of the overall experience.


RE: $129????
By JBird7986 on 10/16/2007 1:10:01 PM , Rating: 2
LMAO!!!


RE: $129????
By Spivonious on 10/16/2007 12:31:12 PM , Rating: 3
LOL


RE: $129????
By bdewong on 10/16/2007 1:09:04 PM , Rating: 3
+6


RE: $129????
By Pale Rider on 10/16/2007 2:18:02 PM , Rating: 1
I went from Win98SE to WinME. I never had any problems with WinME.


RE: $129????
By elegault on 10/16/2007 5:27:48 PM , Rating: 2
I never had a problem with WinME. Lucky? Or rather compatible hardware to do so.

If memory serves me correctly...didn't WinME not support motherboards with ISA slots?


RE: $129????
By Pale Rider on 10/16/2007 7:31:59 PM , Rating: 2
Yes I believe that was the case, that ISA support was dropped with ME. I had an old ISA NIC (3comm Etherlink II) that had served me well up until that point. I then moved up to a PCI Etherlink III 100 MB card. I actually still use the card to this day, and it will transmit the packets for this post shortly. :)


RE: $129????
By Dug on 10/16/2007 12:42:42 PM , Rating: 1
Because this isn't a service pack that just tries to fix what's already there. It's an actual operating system that offers a lot more features than any Microsoft product does.


RE: $129????
By gospastic on 10/16/2007 1:00:14 PM , Rating: 2
I think the prices come out pretty much even...

Windows:

XP Pro Retail - $299?
Windows Vista Ultimate Retail - $399

Total - $700

OS X

10.0 - $129
10.1 - free if you already had 10.0
10.2 - $129
10.3 - $129
10.4 - $129
10.5 - $129

Total - $645

How is Windows a ripoff? You can get them cheaper than retail too, but that's a different kind of comparison.


RE: $129????
By stubeck