Citing irreconcilable ethical differences with One Laptop
Per Child’s management, Ivan Krstic announced that he resigned his post as OLPC’s
Director of Security Architecture, as of three weeks ago.
“Not long ago, OLPC undertook a drastic internal
restructuring coupled with what, despite official claims to the contrary, is a
radical change in its goals and vision,” wrote Krstic. “I cannot subscribe to
the organization’s new aims or structure in good faith, nor can I reconcile
them with my personal ethic. Having exhausted other options, three weeks ago I
resigned my post at OLPC.”
Writing
in his personal blog, Krstic said that he considered the OLPC project a “second
home,” and his coworkers “another family.”
“I learned what it meant to believe in a mission so much
that nights and days blur together, and the prospect of success keeps you going
even when your brain begins to defocus and your body craves sleep with
desperation.”
Krstic said he was responsible for “everything from advising
firmware development to debugging … I designed OLPC’s entire back-end server
infrastructure, created its staggered software build process, came up with Bitfrost … and had the
incredible pleasure of personally deploying our very first laptops and
bootstrapping the second deployment.”
The security chief’s last straw came with OLPC president
Walter Bender’s forced demotion: “adding
insult to injury, I was asked to stop working with [Bender], without a doubt
one of the most stunningly thoughtful and competent people I’ve ever worked
with.” wrote Krstic. Instead, he reported to a manager “with no technical or
engineering background,” who the project “put in charge of all OLPC technology.”
Krstic’s departure is just the latest in a string of
misfortunes for Nicholas Negroponte’s OLPC project, which in the past year has
been beset with supply and relationship issues: the project’s November 2007 “Give
1 Get 1” initiative, which sold 83,500 laptops commercially at a price of $400 –
one laptop for a buyer and one for a poor child – fell flat when the project encountered
fulfillment and shipping issues.
At around the same time, the partnership between OLPC and Intel
– which
has always been a stormy affair – dissolved
once again with the company deciding to pursue its competing “Classmate PC”
instead.
With domestic buyers outraged, business relationships crumbling,
key staff leaving, and bulk laptop sales that most describe as “sluggish,” many
wonder if OLPC’s floundering is a temporary growing pain, or
something more permanent.
To that end, Negroponte says he is working hard at turning OLPC
around – earlier this month, Negroponte announced
to BusinessWeek that he was
looking for a new CEO to take the helm: “I am not a CEO … management, administration,
and details are my weaknesses. I'm much better at the vision, big-picture side
of the house,” said Negroponte. He expects his headhunters to find someone by
April or May, but he is having a hard time finding candidates who would “view
the world as a mission, not a market.” Many potential candidates, he said, come
from the PC industry – and Negroponte would much rather have someone who has a
leadership profile similar to former UN secretary-general Koffi Annan.
The restructuring that Krstic left OLPC for refers to Negroponte’s
initiative to transform the project into a company that would conduct itself “more
like Microsoft,” as OLPC’s current form runs itself “almost like a terrorist
group, doing almost impossible things.” He would like OLPC to offload its
development and support operations to specialized companies better equipped for
OLPC’s challenges, like Red Hat or Microsoft.
“In the end, we should not be in the hardware or software
business. We should be in the learning business,” said Negroponte.
Krstic writes that he still believes in the idea
behind OLPC, even though he objects to the company’s new direction: “My belief in the mission
is in no way compromised … It’s been an outstanding experience, and I truly
wish OLPC the best in its future endeavors.”