backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 26 comment(s) - last by strikeback03.. on Aug 13 at 8:26 AM

OCZ introduces another SSD product, bolstering an already impressive lineup

OCZ has publicly launched a new SATA solid state drive, adding another product to the company's impressive SSD lineup. Despite a higher price tag than regular hard disk drives, OCZ expects a more fairly priced SATA SSD will help convince consumers to begin adopting SSD.

"While solid state drives offer exceptional performance, the high cost of ownership has been a barrier for many consumers," according to Eugene Change, OCZ VP of Product Development.  "It has always been our goal to make quality SSD drives affordable to the complete range of customers.  By making use of the proven Indilinx controller coupled new flash technology, OCZ is excited to introduce the Solid 2 that delivers increased reliability and performance over competing traditional and solid state solutions at a price point that is truly within reach of mainstream consumers."

The OCZ Solid 2 Series will support storage capacities from 64GB to 128GB. OCZ is aiming the new product towards laptop owners looking to upgrade their storage and anyone building a RAID array for a home or work network.

The OCZ Solid 2 Series offers 125MB/s read and 100MB/s write speeds, with 64MB of onboard cache for each drive, the company said in a press release.

Storage companies and other tech-related businesses have flooded the SSD market, realizing that even though SSDs are still expensive at the moment, the benefits compared to hard disk drives will eventually cause a migration to the faster, more reliable technology.  Joining in the fray alongside OCZ are Kingston, Corsair, Super Talent, Western Digital, Seagate, Samsung, and Intel -- the companies are investing heavily into the emerging technology that offers lower energy consumption, faster transfer speeds, and no moving parts.

Manufacturers are also under heavy pressure to lower prices -- which is happening -- but it's becoming increasingly difficult to turn a profit as prices are lowered.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Meh
By Natfly on 8/11/2009 9:31:35 PM , Rating: 5
No random reads, no random writes, no IOPS, no access time, no price.

Sequential read and write speed might be the most irrelevant spec on SSDs, why do manufactures insist on using them as primary selling points?




RE: Meh
By yacoub on 8/11/2009 10:31:15 PM , Rating: 5
Same reason LCDs are marketed by their zomg 2ms response time: Most people don't know any better.


RE: Meh
By Fnoob on 8/12/2009 12:26:34 AM , Rating: 5
That, and their marketing departments are just smart enough to realise that if they published those other numbers, it might be bad for sales...

People might then actually look at the cost per GB and wonder why they even considered the purchase for 3 whole seconds.


RE: Meh
By MrPoletski on 8/12/2009 5:38:45 AM , Rating: 4
simple:

They are bigger numbers. Big numbers sell.

Sad but true.


RE: Meh
By PascalT on 8/12/2009 10:07:22 AM , Rating: 3
I disagree. I upgraded my boot drive to an OCZ SSD drive and everything is blazing fast now. I would never go back to a standard HDD.

Buzz numbers or not, the results are there. I'm eager to get another one once they drop in prices further for 256gb drives.


RE: Meh
By clovell on 8/12/2009 11:12:29 AM , Rating: 2
An OCZ Drive, eh? Which one?


RE: Meh
By clovell on 8/12/2009 1:17:30 PM , Rating: 2
FFS people - rate me down? There's effing more than 3 different OCZ SSD models out there - all with different specs. The most important ones being, as the OP stated, random read/writes, etc.

Without knowing which model the above poster has, it's a bit difficult to understand why he's disagree with the OP's viewpoint on this. Random read/writes are what sets SSDs apart from HDDs - NOT sequential speeds.

Now, feel free to understand the question, noobtards.


Tittle????
By dijuremo on 8/11/2009 8:37:05 PM , Rating: 3
OCZ Launches Latest Its SATA SSD Product

Did you mean:

OCZ Launches its latest SATA SSD Product

It really seems the editors have absolutely no knowledge of grammar on DT.




RE: Tittle????
By rudy on 8/11/2009 8:42:56 PM , Rating: 2
Why would they care they get paid and you still read.


RE: Tittle????
By diego10arg on 8/11/2009 9:11:39 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
OCZ Launches Latest Its SATA SSD Product


Maybe they wanted to state that OCZ is the latest to enter the SSD market.

/sarcam


RE: Tittle????
By therealnickdanger on 8/12/2009 9:40:55 AM , Rating: 2
They get paid?


RE: Tittle????
By MrPoletski on 8/12/2009 5:41:23 AM , Rating: 4
There's not knowing your grammar, there is also making a genuine typographical mistake (that a spell checker wouldn't find) and not spotting it before submission.

Point these mistakes out, but don't whine about them.


RE: Tittle????
By Howard on 8/12/2009 11:11:09 PM , Rating: 2
Sure, but it's not like spell check is ever run anyway.


RE: Tittle????
By sdsdv10 on 8/12/2009 1:18:40 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
OCZ Launches Latest Its SATA SSD Product

Did you mean:

OCZ Launches its latest SATA SSD Product

It really seems the editors have absolutely no knowledge of grammar on DT.


Must be channeling Jason! :P


RE: Tittle????
By Alexvrb on 8/12/2009 10:44:07 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe they should add mandatory preview before posting articles. Or do they already have it and just ignore it like we do? :P


By Alexvrb on 8/11/2009 9:20:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
OCZ introduces another SSD product, bolstering an already impressive lineup
Impressive price tags too, at least on the ones that don't have JMicron controllers. Especially as you start to hit higher capacities. Certainly I'd want something larger than 128GB on a modern laptop (though it would be OK for a netbook). I'd say they *need* this new drive to replace their outdated entry-level offerings (the older Core drives).
quote:
OCZ is excited to introduce the Solid 2 that delivers increased reliability and performance over competing traditional and solid state solutions at a price point that is truly within reach of mainstream consumers."
This price point being what now? How do the prices on these compare to competing Indilinx drives of the same capacity?




By strikeback03 on 8/13/2009 8:26:27 AM , Rating: 2
Depends how you use your laptop. If it is your primary system, then you probably want more space. For people like myself, who need more power than a netbook but don't store stuff on the laptop for more than a few weeks at a time before it is moved to the desktop, 128GB would probably be OK.


$1.50 per Gig
By ranger203 on 8/11/2009 9:26:13 PM , Rating: 2
As soon as they reach this mark I will buy. I want 128GB for $192 with 200MB/s read. That'll convince me to buy.




RE: $1.50 per Gig
By highlandsun on 8/12/2009 12:09:36 AM , Rating: 2
Dell has been selling the 256GB Samsung PB22-J for $480, or $1.87 per GB. So I think you won't have much longer to wait. (Me, I bought at $2/GB. 256GB G.Skill Titan, 128GB OCZ CoreV2, and 128GB Transcend PATA. But now I've got the 256GB Samsung and am extremely pleased - my laptop runs cooler than with the Titan, battery lasts longer, and performance is top notch.)


Hit that Edit button
By gucio69 on 8/11/2009 8:39:28 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
OCZ Launches Latest Its SATA SSD Product


Yay for dyslexia. Long live proof reading.




price?
By tastyratz on 8/11/2009 9:17:59 PM , Rating: 3
Any mention of price?

I have to admit - ocz has such an aggressive release schedule for ssd drives it actually hinders my decision to purchase ssd drives. As a consumer you cant have faith in a product (or its reviews) when its replaced almost monthly. Just how many ssd drives has ocz released? It most likely works AGAINST their favor to release SO MANY consumer confusing drives in such a short period of time. A new technology wont instill consumer confidence with constant model abandonment...




Does this replace Agility?
By rmlarsen on 8/11/2009 9:25:37 PM , Rating: 3
Yet another (relatively) inexpensive line of SSDs using the Indilinx controller. Aren't they cannibalizing their own Agility line with these? It would seem to me that the difference in performance between Solid 2, Agility, and Vertex would be too little to justify having three lines on the market with the same controller. No?




Waiting for SATA 3.0/6GB/s
By Belard on 8/12/2009 6:00:00 AM , Rating: 2
With todays drives hitting the limits of SATA-II/2.0 and SATA 3.0 & USB 3.0 just around the corner...

I think 2010 will be a good year to get the 3 threes with the parts to support them.

SATA 3.0
USB 3.0
PCIe 3.0 (Been pushed back due to compatibility issues to be worked out).




price?
By tastyratz on 8/11/09, Rating: 0
We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone? 




14 Comments









botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki