backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 86 comment(s) - last by My Croft.. on Aug 21 at 1:41 PM


The F-35 JSF in all its glory
Lockheed has proposed a JSF that fly by remote control

Lockheed Martin’s new single-engine F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is the latest Swiss Army Knife of fighter aircraft for the US military.  The plane, which is destined to replace the F-16, AV8-B, A-10 and F/A-18, will be available in three variants:

  • F-35A: Conventional Take-Off and Landing (CTOL)
  • F-35B: Short Take-Off Vertical Landing (STOVL)
  • F-35C: Carrier Based Variant (CV)

Lockheed is now proposing a fourth variant that it has been working on for the past two years. The design proposal is for an unmanned version of the F-35 that could operate as a hybrid -- that is, it could be configured to either fly by remote or if need be with a human pilot in the cockpit. Many have stated that the F-35 would be the last manned fighter jet for the Air Force as the military has been pouring more and more dollars into unmanned combat systems. Lockheed's proposed unmanned J-35 would bridge the gap between the past and the future of aerial combat. From the Washington Post:

The Pentagon, looking to save money, has accelerated spending on unmanned systems since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. This year, it allocated $2 billion for unmanned aircraft and millions more in the supplemental budget, compared with $363 million in 2001. The figure is projected to reach more than $3 billion by the end of the decade. What has resulted is a hodgepodge of unmanned vehicles, such as small, bomb-seeking robots that can be carried in a backpack, and airplanes that provide surveillance for days at a time. The systems have become bigger and more expensive in recent years, such as the Predator, built by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc., and the Global Hawk, which has a 134-foot wingspan, comparable to the Boeing 737.

Lockheed has been playing second fiddle to other names in the industry, namely Boeing, when it comes to unmanned aircraft. The price tag of the F-35 program has also ballooned from $201 billion to $276 billion. The price increase along with the government's increasing fascination with unmanned drones is probably why the initial order for 2,000 planes could likely drop significantly in the near future.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

zomg
By shadowzz on 8/17/2006 11:57:08 AM , Rating: 4
Did I read a quarter of a TRILLION dollars on this thing?




RE: zomg
By Knish on 8/17/2006 11:58:43 AM , Rating: 2
RE: zomg
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 8/17/2006 11:59:15 AM , Rating: 2
That's for the entire program including 2,000 planes (at the moment) plus developmental costs IIRC.


RE: zomg
By GoatMonkey on 8/17/2006 1:20:01 PM , Rating: 2
I expect to see them build the SDF-1 for that kind of money.


RE: zomg
By NerV04 on 8/17/2006 1:47:00 PM , Rating: 2
and mayb a few veriteks? dont know if i spelt it right...


RE: zomg
By GoatMonkey on 8/17/2006 2:20:17 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly! I expect to see some freakin giant robots with lasers and a thousand missiles on their shoulders, with a super flying aircraft carrier that can also change into a freakin super giant robot and kick everyone's asses.

But no... all we get is a little stealth fighter. I guess it's ok. But man $250,000,000,000,000.00 holy crap!



RE: zomg
By glennpratt on 8/17/2006 2:34:24 PM , Rating: 2
Umm, now I don't know where you went to school but where I went 250 billion dollars looks like this: $250,000,000,000


RE: zomg
By GoatMonkey on 8/17/2006 2:44:21 PM , Rating: 2
Hah... I thought it said 250 trillion. Same difference though, huge amount of money.


RE: zomg
By thegrimreaper3 on 8/17/2006 8:58:46 PM , Rating: 2
Well if you think about it the government buys nails at $5 or whatever it was so you can only imagine how much an aircraft is!


RE: zomg
By Dustin25 on 8/17/2006 2:17:57 PM , Rating: 3
Everyone knows the J-10 owns the f-35. Cherry busted hymen ftw!


RE: zomg
By Lord 666 on 8/17/2006 9:38:10 PM , Rating: 2
Why such surprise, this is using proven technology as it was used on 9/11 to pilot the planes.

Of course DoD increased spending on unpiloted planes after 9/11 because their Proof of Concept worked tremendously well.



RE: zomg
By Nfarce on 8/17/06, Rating: 0
RE: zomg
By Lord 666 on 8/17/06, Rating: -1
RE: zomg
By johnsonx on 8/18/2006 12:38:07 AM , Rating: 3
dumbass


RE: zomg
By TomZ on 8/18/06, Rating: -1
RE: zomg
By Lord 666 on 8/18/2006 12:54:27 AM , Rating: 1
I was actually in NYC on 9/11/2001, where were you?!

Not to get personal, but to sheepishly believe the US Government story (full of holes perpetuated by mindless "patriots") when this article PROVES the aerospace engineers have the technology to pull it off... then not to question is more disgraceful and disrespectful to those no longer with us.


RE: zomg
By TomZ on 8/18/06, Rating: -1
RE: zomg
By Lord 666 on 8/18/2006 1:37:10 AM , Rating: 3
Likewise, there is no factual proof 19 amatuers hijacked planes on 9/11. A passport that somehow survived fire and collapsing of the WTC buildings? Some blurry footage of people taking money out at a ATM machine? A split second video showing something appearing in front of the Pentagon?

For every "fact" that suggests it was genuinely terrorists who did this, there are conflicting forensic items that dispute the events. What about the FAA tapes that are still classified showing the flight patterns? Firefighter recordings that state the fire was under control and "small." Firefighter recordings that are still classified. Seismographs showing explosion like activity. The very fact that all of the remains of WTC were sent to scrap yards and not forensically analyzed. The fact that several of the named terrorists have been found to be still living. First and only time steel buildings collapsed because of fire.


RE: zomg
By johnsonx on 8/18/2006 5:19:14 AM , Rating: 2
my oh my, you've been drinking LOTS of the kool-aid, haven't you?


RE: zomg
By Chillin1248 (blog) on 8/18/2006 6:29:44 AM , Rating: 3
You know something asshole, I was in NYC staring out at the burning towers as well. So don't make it like your the only god of this forum who saw 9/11.

You are so full of conspiracy nonesense it is almost funny if it weren't so sad.You take a line from "V from Vandetta", then take another from Metal Gear Solid in the form of "Patriots", and then to top it off you read into everything that the "Loose Change" video said. I suggest you search for "Loose Change Lies", maybe that will teach you some common sense. But kids like you need to feel that they are superior and "in the know" while everyone around them are idiots, so I doubt anything will convince you no matter how concrete the proof; so I am not going to bother.


RE: zomg
By Shoal07 on 8/18/2006 10:21:55 AM