backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 35 comment(s) - last by HighWing.. on Nov 13 at 12:57 PM


iPhone 1.1.1 prepped for 1.1.2 jailbreak  (Source: TUAW)
Apple's latest effort to thwart iPhone and iPod touch hacking futile

When Apple announced the release of the iPhone for the UK, it also announced that iPhone and iPod touch firmware version 1.1.2 would be released at the same time. Released today, firmware 1.1.2 closes the TIFF vulnerability in mobile Safari that was used to jailbreak firmware 1.1.1.

Confirmed by DailyTech, the TIFF vulnerability no longer works. However, despite Apple's effort to lockdown the iPhone and iPod touch, firmware 1.1.2 has already been jailbroken.

Credit go to the people behind AppSnap, the same utility used to jailbreak 1.1.1 devices. According to TUAW, testing of the new jailbreak began several nights ago, when the new 1.1.2 firmware was made available for download not through iTunes, but through Apple's website.

In its current stage, the new jailbreak requires several steps in order to complete, and is by no means release ready and user friendly. AppSnap and jailbreakme.com still remains open for 1.1.1 only, but the new jailbreak is being prepared for the same single tap installation.

According to TUAW's report, firmware 1.1.1 is required in order for the jailbreak to work with 1.1.2, although it is unclear at this point whether or not this will still be a requirement once AppSnap is officially updated.

Those with hacked 1.1.1 devices may wish to hold off from upgrading to 1.1.2 since it does not appear to provide any significant upgrade. The only noticeable change is the inclusion of several international language packs.

Jailbreaking may become a thing of the past if Apple keeps its promise. Apple announced in early October that come February 2008, developers will have an official iPhone SDK. The announcement was well received by the developer community. Currently, third-party applications for the iPhone are done via web applications and are mostly cumbersome to use and slow in nature.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What?
By OblivionMage on 11/9/2007 6:05:26 PM , Rating: 5
Apple, I thought your products and programs "Just worked?". When you release something that people have a real reason to hack, they do it extremely well (IE. iphone firmwire). Yet you rant on about how you can make something that people cannot hack/exploit, or in the case of the Macintosh computer, cannot make 'virus's' for, even when there is no reason for people, or not enough of a reason, to try.

Cheers, OblivionMage@gmail.com




RE: What?
By ImSpartacus on 11/9/2007 6:25:55 PM , Rating: 2
I agree. Apple finally got something popular and hack-worthy.

Yet this is still surprising that something like the iPhone is continually broken. I honestly hope Apple patches it up better.


RE: What?
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 11/9/2007 6:53:39 PM , Rating: 5
Not surprising at all. How long did Apple expect that Security through Obscurity bullshit to last? Welcome to the big leagues, I suggest soap on a rope.


RE: What?
By Talcite on 11/9/2007 6:58:53 PM , Rating: 2
LOL!


RE: What?
By Quiescent on 11/9/07, Rating: -1
RE: What?
By Locutus465 on 11/12/07, Rating: -1
RE: What?
By Locutus465 on 11/12/07, Rating: -1
RE: What?
By bigboxes on 11/10/2007 2:55:28 AM , Rating: 3
F'in A man. F'in A! It's not about the technology. It has everything to do with the amount of peeps using that tech. Live it. Learn it Apple.


RE: What?
By Ralph The Magician on 11/11/07, Rating: 0
RE: What?
By theapparition on 11/11/2007 6:38:32 PM , Rating: 2
What kind of stupid argument is that?

By your same reasoning, there should be at least as many viruses for Vista as there are for XP. Clearly, the amount of time that a system has been on the market has some bearing on the amount of viable malware attacks, don't you agree?


RE: What?
By Ralph The Magician on 11/11/2007 7:48:18 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
By your same reasoning, there should be at least as many viruses for Vista as there are for XP.

Exactly! But Vista doesn't have as much malware as XP, because Vista is more secure.

The point is that OS X can't be secure because of security through obscurity. OS 9 had a lot of problems, and yet OS X has had virtually zero, despite the fact that the Mac userbase is bigger today than it ever was before. OS 9 was not secure because of security through obscurity—and neither is OS X.


RE: What?
By HighWing on 11/13/2007 12:57:08 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Mac userbase is bigger today than it ever was before.


that may be true, but it's still a fraction of what windows users are.

If you deny the claim of security through obscurity then I have just one question for you. If you were a virus/malware writer looking to profit from it, which platform would you write a virus for? The system that has less then 10% of users or the one that has the other 90%? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out


RE: What?
By Locutus465 on 11/12/2007 12:18:34 AM , Rating: 2
Except for the fact that Mac Classic OS has absolutly nothing at all in common with OSX... Not even the same execution engine... Vista and XP share the same execution engine (32b Vista maps to XP 32 and 64B vista maps to 64B XP)... Where vista try's to fool malware authors is by changing the underlying libraries and making them more secure... But the core architecture is the same...


RE: What?
By BioRebel on 11/10/2007 10:03:19 AM , Rating: 2
Greatest post ever


RE: What?
By Funksultan on 11/12/2007 7:24:14 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
How long did Apple expect that Security through Obscurity bullshit to last? Welcome to the big leagues, I suggest soap on a rope.


ROFLMAO! Ok, now THAT'S a quote worthy of being in the DT footnote...

Give yerself a 6 Kenobi, you earned it on that one.


Didn't some...
By sj420 on 11/9/2007 6:38:58 PM , Rating: 4
Didn't some other big name company try to release firmwares that prevented hacking of the firmware, instead of releasing actual features and options recommended by the community so they DON'T have a reason to hack it?

Oh yeah! Sony and the PSP!

You certainly don't go to Sony to use your PSP to its full potential. I would expect the same from Apple and any other company.

That is where the community always comes in. Its called modding, modders are what drive the community to push a technology to its limits and further. This provides progress. Without the modding community games like oblivion and stalker would be simply desktop trash - Don't even get me started on those games released for consoles.

The point is, if you release something with "limits" or "rules" someone out there is bound to think "Well they must of made these rules for a reason, lets break them and find out what happens". There will always be that person, thats where the phrase "you can not make something idiot proof" comes from. Some idiot, whether on purpose or on accident, will figure something out that the original manufacturer didn't intend the product to be used for.

However in no way do I support companies that go out of their way to limit their products capabilities or limit the market of their own individual choices. Its like a PC company today that would limit their OS options to Windows 3.1 floppy and the internet options to AOL. Preventing, by hardware limits, other options from being added or chosen. So what do you think someone will do? Go out of their way to hack it and figure out if they can use OTHER things.

If your hardware is capable of something you should be trying to push it to always meet that capability. Then push its abilities in revisions. Companies that don't do this are functioning by bad business practice.

No one that knows me has EVER heard me say anything good about a mac, let alone anything apple composts, thats for sure.

Even though I hate everything related to it, I will root for the hackers, just like with the psp.

The community will always be justified against these money-hungry companies.




RE: Didn't some...
By hiscross on 11/9/07, Rating: 0
RE: Didn't some...
By Gibby82 on 11/9/2007 9:46:13 PM , Rating: 4
Um...did you read the article(s)? Dailytech's specifically states that the developers working on a 1.1.2 jailbreak and have succeeded but it's not ready for release. They also stated that the patch kills the current jailbreak-which is what the article you linked stated.


RE: Didn't some...
By hiscross on 11/9/07, Rating: -1
RE: Didn't some...
By clovell on 11/10/07, Rating: 0