backtop


Print 30 comment(s) - last by 7Enigma.. on Feb 12 at 7:10 AM

New battery breakthrough leverages nanotechnology and microstructures

In order to create batteries with sufficient stored energy to drive electric vehicles and the next generation of long life electronics, advances in battery technology are vitally needed.  One key target for improvement in lithium ion batteries are the electrodes, which transmit current into the battery.  Losses at the electrodes both limit the batteries' efficiency and lengthen their charge time.  So when Rice Researchers were looking to give batteries a boost, they came up with a clever idea -- put the electrons "behind bars".

In order to actualize this idea, they created arrays of tiny nanotubes.  The nanotubes are a hybrid consisting of a carbon nanotube core and a metal oxide outer coating.  In essence they've created the nanoscale version of the coaxial cable.

The new tiny cables conduct electricity ultra-efficiently and lock it up inside the structure, thanks to the strong insulating properties of metal oxides.  For the metal oxide shell the researchers are initially using manganese oxide, as magnesium is a well-researched battery material.  While other research teams have looked into using manganese oxide with carbon for electrodes, the Rice team was perhaps the first to look to coat the nanotubes and create the arrayed "coaxial cable" design.

Pulickel Ajayan, the Rice University Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and leader of the team, states, "It's a nice bit of nanoscale engineering.  Although the combination of these materials has been studied as a composite electrode by several research groups, it's the coaxial cable design of these materials that offers improved performance as electrodes for lithium batteries."

Another member of the team, Arava Leela, elaborates, "We've put in two materials – the nanotube, which is highly electrically conducting and can also absorb lithium, and the manganese oxide, which has very high capacity but poor electrical conductivity.  But when you combine them, you get something interesting."

Moving forward Rice wants to look into near-term commercialization of the technology.  Describes Manikoth Shaijumon, another researcher, "At this point, we're trying to engineer and modify the structures to get the best performance.  And the whole idea can be transferred to a large scale as well. It is very manufacturable."

The key aspect the researchers are currently investigating is how to bundle and configure the arrays of nanotubes to get optimal results.  They say that the breakthrough may allow flexible electrodes, and in turn flexible batteries.  They also say that the material should be able to be put to good use in fuel cell electrodes and electrochemical capacitors as well.

The work is published online in the journal Nano Letters.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Manganese or Magnesium?
By PhoenixKnight on 2/10/2009 9:45:40 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
...the researchers are initially using magnesium oxide...


quote:
We've put in two materials – the nanotube...and the manganese oxide


So, which is it, manganese or magnesium? They are 2 distinctly different elements.




RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By randomly on 2/10/2009 10:12:00 AM , Rating: 4
it's Manganese oxide.

There is no magnesium involved, it's just another sloppy Jason Mick write-up.


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By InsaneGain on 2/10/09, Rating: 0
RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By bobsmith1492 on 2/10/2009 12:44:41 PM , Rating: 5
It seems authors should put more care into their articles...


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By unrated on 2/10/2009 2:33:48 PM , Rating: 3
From what I’ve heard, the authors’ reimbursement is based on the number of replies to their articles. If this is true then there is an incentive to include grammatical errors, over sensationalized titles, etc.

If readers could vote on the content and quality of the articles and reimbursement was based on the results of those votes, then these types of “mistakes” would end.


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By PhoenixKnight on 2/10/2009 1:05:06 PM , Rating: 2
When I was taking a technical writing class at at art school, if I wrote an A paper, but had as many grammatical errors as half the articles on Daily Tech, I would be marked down to a C or D. And this wasn't even a class for writing or journalism majors. Is it really so much to ask that a professional journalist be held to the same standards as a student at an art college?


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By fangwoo on 2/10/2009 1:11:36 PM , Rating: 3
pretty important flaw to point out


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By InsaneGain on 2/10/2009 1:36:13 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah I see your point... because being misled into thinking this research is based on magnesium oxide rather than manganese oxide could have serious repercussions in your life.


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By tastyratz on 2/10/09, Rating: 0
RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By sld on 2/11/2009 1:08:41 AM , Rating: 2
Some people just want to know accurate facts and truth... you really need to get past that.


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By randomly on 2/10/2009 1:35:30 PM , Rating: 4
Unfortunately it's not just nitpicking and spelling Nazi stuff. If you look back historically at articles JM has written they tend to have a considerable number of errors, misquotes, flawed interpretations, and deceptive statements (sometimes dreadfully so).

JM seems to be very enthusiastic about the topics he writes about, but he gets carried away and does not take the time to make sure the information is correct, or properly and clearly stated.

I usually find his articles interesting. You have to take everything with a huge grain of salt however and go back to the source material to find out what's really going on before you jump to any conclusions based on his write-ups. I guess my frustration at this sloppiness comes through. I wish he'd tighten up his research and writing so I could trust his articles more instead of having to go to the effort of double checking everything all the time.

Read and enjoy, but read with great caution and skepticism.


RE: Manganese or Magnesium?
By DXRick on 2/10/2009 2:24:49 PM , Rating: 1
I am just grateful he didn't say Mongoose oxide . Catching them would be hard and would anger animal rights groups.


Home theater
By Adul on 2/10/2009 10:14:49 AM , Rating: 3
I want my carbon nanotube coaxial cable for use in my home theater! I bet Monster will sell it for the low low price 1000 bucks a foot.




RE: Home theater
By FeralMisanthrope on 2/10/2009 10:45:36 AM , Rating: 4
If you think Monster cables are overpriced, check this out:

http://www.usa.denon.com/ProductDetails/3429.asp

quote:
...the AK-DL1 will bring out all the nuances in digital audio reproduction...
quote:
Additionally, signal directional markings are provided for optimum signal transfer.

Selling Cat 5 for $100/ft takes some serious chutzpah!


RE: Home theater
By Chernobyl68 on 2/10/2009 11:01:11 AM , Rating: 2
AudioQuest Eagle Eye Composite cable - $650, 1 meter.


RE: Home theater
By ZeroGuardian on 2/10/2009 11:39:57 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Chernobyl68 wrote: AudioQuest Eagle Eye Composite cable - $650, 1 meter.


Bhuhahahaha!!! That is not even close to the most expensive cables out there... Audiophiles will pay $1000s of dollars for a 1m cable...

Here is a perfect example:
http://www.excelstereo.com/Purist/Proteus.htm


RE: Home theater
By Steve1981 on 2/10/2009 12:27:43 PM , Rating: 2
Pfft. That's nothing.

http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina60.htm

http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina31.htm

If you're a real audiophile, you'd be willing to pay hundreds of dollars for a couple bags of rocks and a phone call that will take your stereo to the next level.


RE: Home theater
By 7Enigma on 2/12/2009 7:10:00 AM , Rating: 2
My personal favorite:

http://www.pearcable.com/sub_products_anjou_sc.htm

Just reading some of the satisfied customer's comments makes me roll on the floor in hysterics....

"In extended listening sessions, I found the cables' greatest strength to be its PRAT. Simply put these are very danceable cables. Music playing through them results in the proverbial foot-tapping scene with the need or desire to get up and move. Great swing and pace—these cables smack that right on the nose big time."


Please step away from the crack pipe sir....


Nano-Coaxial Cable lol
By acase on 2/10/2009 9:28:00 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
In essence they've created the nanoscale version of the coaxial cable.


Hell even nano-particles are ready for the DTV switch in time.




RE: Nano-Coaxial Cable lol
By freeagle on 2/10/2009 9:44:08 AM , Rating: 2
because nano-particles are governed by laws of nature, not man


By Master Kenobi (blog) on 2/10/2009 10:33:00 AM , Rating: 5
You sir win this thread.


RE: Nano-Coaxial Cable lol
By rubyxc7 on 2/10/2009 11:08:26 AM , Rating: 2
How many coupons did it take?


What happened to...
By sleepeeg3 on 2/10/2009 10:37:31 AM , Rating: 2
RE: What happened to...
RE: What happened to...
By sleepeeg3 on 2/10/2009 10:44:07 AM , Rating: 2
RE: What happened to...
By freeagle on 2/10/2009 11:34:54 AM , Rating: 2
I believe the techs could be combined, as they target different parts of the battery. This one the electrodes, the other the material for energy storage


Okay, I apologise up front, but...
By Landiepete on 2/10/2009 11:31:19 AM , Rating: 4
This is the umpteenth article on revolutionary battery technology that is going to save the world and get uns to drive leccy cars in the last four weeks alone.

This, combined with the articles on equally new catalists that will fuel our fuelcells, is seriously getting on my tits.

The car manufactures are advertising 40 miles on a charge for their 2010-2011 models. Who's kidding wo here ?

Go on, pull the other one...it's got bells on...very efficient ones !

/gets off soap box




By bobsmith1492 on 2/10/2009 12:50:52 PM , Rating: 3
It's good that researchers are bandying ideas about. Eventually, one of these will hit the big markets and we'll have a revolution in mobile technology like when Li-ion/Li-po cells came out and made cell phones and laptops feasible. It would also have implications for electric vehicles.

My irritation is that the press releases always use so many buzzwords, i.e. "super," "ultra," "nano," and the like. You can tell they're aiming for the revolutionary battery technology. Honestly, though, sticking to the facts makes for a more readable article.


Ok, when?
By kontorotsui on 2/10/2009 1:19:51 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Moving forward Rice wants to look into near-term commercialization of the technology. Describes Manikoth Shaijumon, another researcher, "At this point, we're trying to engineer and modify the structures to get the best performance. And the whole idea can be transferred to a large scale as well. It is very manufacturable ."


Ok, when?




RE: Ok, when?
By albundy2 on 2/11/2009 4:29:24 AM , Rating: 2
when someone's willing to pay through the nose for it.

that's why we never actually see half of this stuff.

SED anyone?

IP... FTW/FTL depending on who holds the patents.


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki