backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 26 comment(s) - last by Rike.. on Apr 30 at 12:16 PM


A piece of the reusable paper, eight hours ago read 'Reusable Paper. Xerox Parc Inside Innovation at Xerox'. Now it is blank.  (Source: Michael Kanellos/CNET Networks)
An outlandish Bond-esque idea actually may deliver real environmental and financial promise

What self respecting paper company would look to develop paper that could be reused multiple times at an affordable price?  One that is in the printer, apparently.  The Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) a child of printing giant Xerox have been developing a unique paper with fading "ink" that it soon hopes to market.

The process requires the works -- a special printer and a special type of paper -- but the results are intriguing.  After 16 to 24 hours the "ink," once printed clearly on the page fades.  This could have numerous uses such as being used for memos, restaurant menus, and much more.  After the "ink" fades, the paper can be reused.

The paper utilizes a coat of photosensitive chemicals, which darken when exposed to UV light.  The printer uses no real ink, but writes in UV light.  Users can wait for the ink to fade, or put it back in the printer, which will automatically wipe anything on the sheet, even if it hasn't yet faded.

According to Xerox, the technology is only a few years away from hitting the market.  Eric Shrader, area manager, energy systems, device hardware laboratory at Xerox says one key advantage is that the same sheet of paper, in testing, has been shown to be able to be reused hundreds of times.  Only damage or crumpling would prevent reuse.

The end result is a large savings in energy and production costs.  Reusing is better than recycling or making new material from scratch in that it takes less energy and resources.  It takes 204,000 joules to make a sheet of standard 8.5x11 paper, enough power to run a 60 watt lightbulb for an hour.  It takes 114,000 joules to recycle the same size piece of paper.  Printing that size on a traditional printer requires around 2,000 joules.

The UV printer only requires 1,000 joules to print with erase, or 100 joules to print to a faded sheet.  Thus not only are the paper production costs dramatically decreased, but the printing costs are as well.  According to Schrader, "Being able to reuse paper is a big energy win."

PARC has focused heavily on power usage over the years.  The enterprising center helped to create the PC, inkjet printing, and Ethernet networking.  In its early days it often failed to properly secure its inventions, so other companies like Apple Computer openly "borrowed" from it.  Today the center focuses on developing, securing, and licensing new innovative technologies.

While some documents such as reference manuals or important business documents obviously would not be appropriate for fading ink, much of the printing demands of business are one-time use.  Xerox estimates that 44.5 percent of documents are one-time use, and that 25 percent of documents are recycled within their day of creation.  With over 15.2 trillion pages printed worldwide, according to Lyra Research, the environmental, financial, and social ramifications of employing Xerox's technology are rather staggering.

Shrader sees paper as only going to grow with increased digital interaction and presence.  He jokes, "Think of the Google map you printed to get here.  Thirty years ago, we said the future was paperless."

The reusable paper is slightly more expensive than traditional paper.  The photosensitive molecule inside is proprietary.  The test version was yellow with purple ink so that testers could distinguish the special paper.  However, white paper is available with different ink colors.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Confusing statement
By shadowofthesun on 4/29/2008 11:01:24 PM , Rating: 2
Not trying to be a nazi, but:

quote:
a special printer and a special type of printer, but the results are intriguing.


is misleading. Perhaps you meant and a special type of ink?




RE: Confusing statement
By shadowofthesun on 4/29/2008 11:01:58 PM , Rating: 2
meant a special kind of ink*

Another reason i am not a nazi- I cannot type well myself.


RE: Confusing statement
By mdogs444 on 4/29/2008 11:10:34 PM , Rating: 5
Seeing as how they preferred blonde hair & blue eyes....im fairly certain that common reading & writing skills were not required!


RE: Confusing statement
By Samus on 4/30/2008 6:33:34 AM , Rating: 2
probably another reason they hated everyone so much...writing their diary's and such...


RE: Confusing statement
By dice1111 on 4/30/2008 9:34:56 AM , Rating: 2
Actually no ink is used, if you read the article. UV light from the "special printer" directly to the "special paper".


Crime
By Trisagion on 4/30/2008 12:44:36 AM , Rating: 1
This is going to open a whole new can of worms. Imagine if somebody printed out a contract or something on this, which they / you've signed. After a few hours the print disappears!

I can also see counterfeiters having a field day with this technology.
Print authentic looking cheques or money on paper, use it and it self erases. Brilliant.

What prevents people from doing this?




RE: Crime
By ViroMan on 4/30/2008 4:16:37 AM , Rating: 2
because you could easily test if its fake with a mini UV lamp.
Place the paper under the lamp and watch it turn black.

As a side note this paper better be kept inside lest it turn all black.


RE: Crime
By spluurfg on 4/30/2008 6:02:15 AM , Rating: 4
You wouldn't even have to do that... contracts have to be upheld in a court, where they should be determined that they were entered in good faith. It's not like if you trick somebody into signing over power of attorney or ownership of their house you can simply waltz all over them in court.

In this case, the fading ink requires a very specific kind of paper, which would obviously not be used for contracts and would be a dead give-away in a court enforcement. Further, you would presumably want a copy of the contract for yourself.

I could see how it might be used in some elaborate scam, but it's no different from the question of why there isn't rampant contract fraud with fax machines, photocopiers, photoshop, etc.


RE: Crime
By FITCamaro on 4/30/2008 6:27:58 AM , Rating: 2
The victim still has to go through the hassle of the legal system. Yes it should be a sure win case for them. But it will still greatly inconvenience them and cost them some money in lawyers fees.


RE: Crime
By spluurfg on 4/30/2008 9:04:46 AM , Rating: 2
Contract fraud usually follows one of two avenues -- either the perpetrator attempts to have the victim enter or appear to enter into a contract and attempt to enforce the contract directly against the victim, or the perpetrator attempts to use a fraudulent contract to take advantage of the victim through some other party (i.e. identity theft).

In the case of the former, it is the perpetrator who would have to sue the victim in order to enforce the contract -- the victim would simply ignore the perpetrator and would lose nothing. If the perpetrator did sue, this fading ink/paper tech would quickly reveal the perpetrator and he would go to jail. I.e. if the frauster got you to sign a contract saying he'll mow your lawn using a fading-ink contract and later changed it to say that you sold him your house for $1, he'd have to sue you to enforce it and would obviously lose.

In the case of the latter, such a technology makes little difference considering the wealth of other technologies and methods at a fraudster's disposal. Any store clerk or bank teller could obtain your signature for such a purpose, or if one had your personal details they could simply forge your signature so long as you didn't learn about it by the time they got whatever they were after.


RE: Crime
By spluurfg on 4/30/2008 6:05:04 AM , Rating: 2
Oh but if you meant for cheques, yeah, UV lights are definitely the way to do this. They already have UV lamps at bank teller desks to check bank notes, so it would be fairly easy for them to check for counterfeit checks like this.


Disappearing Act
By Harkonnen on 4/30/2008 5:43:48 AM , Rating: 2
Great! Not only does printer ink cost $5000/gallon but now its gonna disappear on you!




RE: Disappearing Act
By Trisagion on 4/30/2008 6:00:11 AM , Rating: 3
Looks like the print on this page is already disappearing for some people.

quote:
The printer uses no real ink, but writes in UV light.


RE: Disappearing Act
By aeroxander on 4/30/2008 8:25:03 AM , Rating: 3
If I correctly read the article, the printer doesn't use any ink, it uses UV light to "print" on the special paper.

I think this is a great idea, as the article points out, the amount of printing that we do that is for single use and doesn't require to be "kept"

Maybe an expansion of the concept would be that it could be "kept" indefinitely but could be reused by running it back through the printer.


I think "cheap" is not so cheap here
By KHysiek on 4/30/2008 3:14:50 AM , Rating: 2
If you have to get proprietary printer and paper both covered by patents and probably made only by Xerox. If so, this will never get to mass market and never get any ecological influence.




By Master Kenobi (blog) on 4/30/2008 8:12:04 AM , Rating: 3
Still cheaper to kill trees. Economics 101.


By Rike on 4/30/2008 12:16:01 PM , Rating: 2
Just because it is proprietary tech does not necessarily mean it will go no where. The owners just license the tech and sit back and reap the royalties. That would appear to be the company's goal as the article states that PARC "focuses on developing, securing, and licensing new innovative technologies." They don't want to make the stuff, they want to license other people to make the stuff.


I already have need of this...
By SectionEight on 4/30/2008 8:11:10 AM , Rating: 2
I'm in school and often print out PDFs of journal articles to read through, because I find it easier on the eyes than a bright screen. However, after I read through it once, I often just use the PDF on my screen when referencing it. This would satisfy my need of a printed copy without troubling me once it's disappeared. Too bad I'll be out of school when it released commercially.




RE: I already have need of this...
By Drexial on 4/30/2008 8:45:24 AM , Rating: 2
Another Use is separator pages at a business or school. I can tell you that 30-40% of the printer output is this.

Print a single page, along comes a separator page.


RE: I already have need of this...
By djc208 on 4/30/2008 8:45:24 AM , Rating: 2
I can't imagine the paper it would save at work. Most of my co-workers insist on printing documents for review (don't like reading from the monitor). They print the file, look it over, type up their comments and e-mail it back to the author, then toss the document. Repeat for each document and each revision and each person and I think we kill a few trees an hour here.

Only advantage is we burn all the paper to make steam for various purposes but it's still hugely in-efficient.


Won't fly
By wordsworm on 4/30/2008 9:31:53 AM , Rating: 2
I love the idea of reusing as much as anyone who's concerned with the rape of the environment. However, I can't see it as being practical for the simple reason that printers usually need pristine paper to work well. It doesn't take long for that paper to degrade to the point where the printer can no longer make use of it. Hence, I just can't see this as a viable technology for anything.