backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 27 comment(s) - last by FaceMaster.. on Jun 9 at 4:00 PM


Professor Ayanna Howard works on the new SnoMote robts, which will help researchers get an unprecedented look at on-ground weather measurements in the most dangerous parts of Antarctica.  (Source: Rob Felt/Georgia Institute of Technology)

Enough to make any researcher happy; two of the three working SnoMote bots are shown here. They are fully autonomous robots.  (Source: Rob Felt/Georgia Institute of Technology)
Tough, fully autonomous bots are ready to take on Antarctica's worst conditions and further human climate knowledge

Antarctica, the great southern polar desert, holds many mysteries from climatological to ecological.  Cracking these mysteries is limited by the troublesome logistics of sending human explorers out into wasteland where winds, storms, and frigid temperatures could easily spell the death of would-be pioneers.

The Georgia Institute of Technology, collaborating with Pennsylvania State University came up with an exciting high tech solution to the problem of Antarctic exploration -- robots.  They designed a series of small robots known as SnoMotes.  The SnoMotes resemble miniature snowmobiles and are capable of navigating complex terrain and surviving severe conditions.

The new robots will help up the accuracy of climatological data collection.  Data on temperatures, wind speed, humidity, and radiation is typically derived from satellites; however, this data can be significantly skewed from actual on-ground metrics.  While climatologists would like to collect more on ground data, they're handicapped by the weather conditions.  Also, many of the locations that would make for interesting climate data -- such as cracking ice sheets -- are too dangerous for human explorers.

The SnoMotes aren't loners either.  The robots signal each other, forming a team which intelligently sweeps areas, collecting rich climate data.  Their results will help scientists develop a better understanding of the factors that affect ice sheet stability.  Ayanna Howard, lead on the project and an associate professor in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering states, "In order to say with certainty how climate change affects the world’s ice, scientists need accurate data points to validate their climate models.  Our goal was to create rovers that could gather more accurate data to help scientists create better climate models. It’s definitely science-driven robotics."

A little celebrity is in store for the robots as well.  After their debut at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) in Pasadena on May 23, they will be coming to an exhibit at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry in June.

Derrick Lampkin, an assistant professor in the Department of Geography at Penn State who also worked on the project, is excited as it will give a chance to validate the ice sheet models, which he studies and develops.  He states, "The changing mass of Greenland and Antarctica represents the largest unknown in predictions of global sea-level rise over the coming decades. Given the substantial impact these structures can have on future sea levels, improved monitoring of the ice sheet mass balance is of vital concern.  We’re developing a scale-adaptable, autonomous, mobile climate monitoring network capable of capturing a range of vital meteorological measurements that will be employed to augment the existing network and capture multi-scale processes under-sampled by current, stationary systems."

The new robots are quite technically impressive in that they're fully autonomous.  Cameras and sensors help them navigate the terrain safely.  Current models have a limited set of weather sensors, but the finished product will have a greater variety.  Howard's team continues to work on perfect the artificial intelligence for the navigation portion, while Lampkin is working on designing an optimal sensor package for the bots.

All the robot's "guts" -- processors, sensors, and motors -- fit into a 2 feet by 1 foot snowmobile frame.  The use of the common frame greatly reduces the cost.  The low cost of the rover will allow more to be built, and it will be less catastrophic if one is lost.  Most other universities with similar projects are focusing on custom rovers, according to Howard, and could not afford to send out more than one in the field.

There are currently three working SnoMote robots.  The size of the final team can be as large as production and funding allows.  Final models may be scaled up to be larger in size.

The robots navigate together via two methods.  In one method robots evaluate various points at which data needs to be collected and "bid" on the locations in an auction like process in which their bid is representative to their proximity and their sensor health.  A second, more mathematical method, is also used which coordinates the robots in a net to optimally cover the target area.

A key new navigation method was also developed.  By using lines in snow banks, the robots can derive distance and direction.  In the absence of snow banks, GPS is used.  The first field testing will begin in Alaska this month.  After that models will be deployed to testing in Antarctica itself.  These models will be equipped with a heater, to prevent the cold from making its sensors and circuitry brittle.

The research was NASA-funded through a NASA’s Advanced Information Systems Technology (AIST) Program grant.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What?
By SandmanWN on 6/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: What?
By SandmanWN on 6/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: What?
By tastyratz on 6/2/2008 10:22:27 AM , Rating: 1
No the masses ignore arrogance.
The spelling nazi's of dailytech may troll on, but your phrasing it like an attack more than constructive criticism. Try not to draw TOO much attention to yourself.


RE: What?
By SandmanWN on 6/2/2008 10:37:56 AM , Rating: 5
I see, well pardon us spelling nazi's for holding people who have writing jobs for a living to expectations of being able to write coherent and reasonably intelligent sentences. Silly us!


RE: What?
By G2cool on 6/2/2008 11:02:09 AM , Rating: 2
I don't believe that even the spelling nazis would use an apostrophe to show there plurality.


RE: What?
By louzamos on 6/2/2008 11:57:12 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
to show there plurality.


"their" maybe?


RE: What?
By G2cool on 6/2/2008 12:24:03 PM , Rating: 2
this is true... </shameful head hanging>


RE: What?
By FaceMaster on 6/2/2008 2:48:44 PM , Rating: 1
oh FUCKING HELL this is the stupidest post that I have ever red. Apart from mine, of course.


RE: What?
By timmyeatchips on 6/3/2008 10:38:40 AM , Rating: 2
Ever read. Your retarded. =)


RE: What?
By FaceMaster on 6/9/2008 3:55:31 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Ever read. Your retarded. =)


LOL

It's spelled 'you're'. You're not even very good at being a spelling nazi, you noob! Oh sorry, I think I spelled that with an extra 'o'.


RE: What?
By FaceMaster on 6/9/2008 4:00:41 PM , Rating: 2
...and there was a reason as to why I said 'apart from mine'.

WOW some people are devoid of humour. I'd say that if this post gets voted down the majority of Daily Tech readers have no taste! /SARCASM (I now know why I see this being used quite a lot.)


RE: What?
By Screwballl on 6/2/2008 3:24:23 PM , Rating: 1
DT has been without a proof reader for some time now... I notice this stuff in almost every single story.

quote:
Tough fully autonomous bots are ready to take on Antarctica's worst and extend its climate knowledge


There I fixed it good... /laughing/


RE: What?
By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 6/3/2008 1:35:26 PM , Rating: 2
Hey fellow spelling and grammar nazi, what you meant to question here:

Antarctica's worse and => Antarctica's worse what?

should have been asked as:

Antarctica's worse and => Antarctica's worst what?

"Worse" is a weak comparative, and the author meant to use the superlative "worst."


Power
By drank12quartsstrohsbeer on 6/2/2008 10:05:11 AM , Rating: 2
How are these things powered? I cant imagine batteries working well in the extreme cold.




RE: Power
By FreeTard on 6/2/2008 10:14:27 AM , Rating: 3
I'm not sure about the batteries not working that well. I work for an O&G company, and we run tools with a type of lithium battery. I spent a good number of winters in Northern Canada, seeing temps below -50C, we could leave the batteries outside and not see a big drop in battery life.

Temps are colder down there, but there is actually some decent technology for batteries that will run in these extreme conditions.

On a sidenote:

My Killbot features Lotus Notes, and has a machine gun.


RE: Power
By animedude on 6/2/2008 7:35:26 PM , Rating: 2
Battery leakage slows down when in cold -- including extreme cold.


RE: Power
By JimmyC on 6/6/2008 10:03:10 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, I've known a few ghetto-fabulous individuals who when their kids' batteries die in their toys, they take them and put them in the freezer for a bit and give them back, kid gets more time to play without said individual having to buy batteries.


A bit more fun for the wildlife
By jahinoz on 6/3/2008 8:23:25 AM , Rating: 2
Polar Bear Cubs: "Aww its so boring here in the cave while daddy's working at the fishing hole.."

Polar Bear Dad: "Hey kids! Look what I found on the way home from work!"




RE: A bit more fun for the wildlife
By amanojaku on 6/3/2008 10:41:26 AM , Rating: 2
Funny. :D But there aren't any polar bears in Antarctica. They're native to the Arctic in the north.


By jahinoz on 6/3/2008 10:58:26 AM , Rating: 2
I know, I just thought it'd sound more humane than:

Penguin Dad: "Hey kids! You'll never guess what ran over your mother this morning!"


Please get an editor
By amanojaku on 6/2/2008 10:09:34 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Also, many of the locations that would make for interest climate data -- such as cracking ice sheets -- are too dangerous for human explorers.

Shouldn't that be "interesting"?
quote:
The SnoMotes aren't loners either.

There's a comma missing.
quote:
The low cost of the rover will allow more to beat built, and it will be less catastrophic if one is lost.

"Built" must be one tough SOB to need so much opposition. XD It's not "beat," it's "be."

On an unrelated note, Professor Ayanna Howard's a cutie. She's got brains, too. I'm in love. :D




RE: Please get an editor
By fri2219 on 6/2/2008 10:25:33 AM , Rating: 2
worst conditions

not "worse conditions"

New to English, or someone having a bad day?


RE: Please get an editor
By Reclaimer77 on 6/2/2008 1:50:15 PM , Rating: 2
Please get a LIFE man.


Something aint right
By AntiM on 6/2/2008 12:25:46 PM , Rating: 2
If you look at the picture with the professor, the SnoMote robot in the back looks like it has a little seat and handlebars. These things look like some kind of cheap plastic toy that you would buy for your Barbee doll. The bottom picture is definitely a pose for the camera. And as someone pointed out, they didn't mention how these things would be powered. Solar power maybe?




RE: Something aint right
By amanojaku on 6/2/2008 12:42:27 PM , Rating: 3
They're powered by batteries and they are toys.

quote:
But after an initial failure, they decided to move on to something designed for consistent abuse — a toy. Instead of building yet another expensive prototype, Howard instead opted to start with a sturdy kit snowmobile, already primed for snow conditions and designed for heavy use by a child.


quote:
The first is an “auction” system that lets the robots “bid” on a desired location, based on their proximity to the location (as they move) and how well their instruments are working or whether they have the necessary instrument (one may have a damaged wind sensor or another may have low battery power).


http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-05/gio...


Watch out for the Penguins...
By KessGarrido on 6/2/2008 10:08:00 AM , Rating: 2
I heard they were drillin' for oil down there.</silly>




field testing?
By kattanna on 6/3/2008 1:33:08 PM , Rating: 2
im getting the feeling that once field testing happens they willn't be using the toy anymore.

the things are so small they will tip over at the first small snow drift, much less anything they will find in alaska.

a childs toy isnt meant to be used when its -50F out as the child couldnt handle such temps. im guessing the plastic frame will get way to brittle and crack easy, along with the skies on it.

all in all, this leaves me with the impression that while it sounds like a good idea in the lab, reality will show otherwise.




"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki