backtop


Print 9 comment(s) - last by cocoapuffer.. on Feb 14 at 8:57 PM


Dust storm in Iraq  (Source: AP)
To reduce dangers during live missions, the U.S. Army is developing a new radar system for helicopters

U.S. Army officials have worked with the Sierra Nevada Corp (SNC). To install next generation radar systems in UH-60L Black Hawk helicopters. The Army plans to fit 10 helicopters with the new radar-based technology, and will continue to upgrade additional aircraft as testing continues.

The new system is designed for flying in heavy snow or sandstorms that amplify the dangers of carrying out missions in poor weather. Non-hostile incidents -- such as degraded visual environments that include whiteouts, brownouts, and other dangerous flying scenarios -- have puzzled researchers.

However, it would offer troops a significant advantage if they are able to launch coordinated offensive attacks, even if flying conditions are less than ideal.

"What's driving the requirement are the environments we fly in," noted Major John Cochran, Army Aviation Directorate, in a statement to the Military Times. "Afghanistan is very mountainous and very dusty. In a given day, you could fly from the dust conditions in Kandahar into the southern Hindu Kush, and find yourself in clouds and snowstorms. The last thing you want to do between two 15,000-foot mountains is lose your ability to see.”

Army pilots must increasingly rely on training and instinct when flying missions in Afghanistan, while aircraft losses continuing to mount. The new radar, however, will be able to show pilots geographic anomalies that could make flying and landing more difficult.

The Pentagon is still interested in investing millions in research funds aimed towards developing new radar systems -- as modern radars are promoted in UAVs and fighter jets, helicopter aerial missions still need advanced technologies.

The SNC has a long-standing relationship working with the government, and was also given a contract to help develop a 3D imaging radar for helicopters. The use of 3D radar imagery could be implemented in other projects, such as SNC's efforts with the Black Hawk helicopter.

The future of helicopter development -- and continued missions in the battlefield -- is unstable, despite signs of progress. A shrinking military budget has already drained precious military resources, with the USMC helicopter programs suffering as F-35 development costs continue to skyrocket.

On a significantly more positive note, along with developing new radar technologies, military researchers are also working on unmanned helicopters able to deliver supplies in poor conditions. In mid-2011, Lockheed Martin was given a $47M grant to help develop autonomous helicopters for the Army, with the Army Aviation Applied Technology Directorate overseeing progress.

Source: Military Times



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Details...
By MrBlastman on 2/14/2012 12:28:27 PM , Rating: 5
The article is lacking details and instead is full of supposition. All I know now is there is a new radar system that lets them somehow fly better. How? That's the question to answer here... It sounds really neat--in the title. The rest of the article just leaves me asking for more information, oh, sorry, some information.

What's it do? How does it work? What kind of technologies is it based on? How is it displayed to the pilots? These sorts of things would be very useful here.

Current gen Helos as far as I know have no TFR (terrain following radar) and the radar that they do have is used to spot vehicles/tanks/buildings etc. Is this outputting to a display kind of like a FLIR or an like an ultrasound from a doctor's office?

In the words of Isaac Asimov and his pal Multivac,

"INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER."




RE: Details...
By Amiga500 on 2/14/2012 12:39:17 PM , Rating: 2
It'll more or less be terrain following radar.

Long term, I'd hope a next-gen version would integrate into the pilot's helmet in a manner similar to the F-35 HMD, even if only in presenting basic mesh of the ground plane.


Sorry what!?!?
By Amiga500 on 2/14/2012 12:35:03 PM , Rating: 3
They want helicopters to emit RF when ingressing into hostile air?

What bright spark thought of that!?!

Hopefully they'll have the wit to move it out of the general RF bands for RWRs at least.

Or failing that ensure that they use a low powered AESA pointed at the lower hemisphere of the helicopter with absolutely zero sidelobs.

If the author is looking for a high profile example of where this concept would be useful, the disaster when refuelling during the attempt to rescue the Tehran embassy hostages would be one such instance.




RE: Sorry what!?!?
By Ramtech on 2/14/2012 1:24:54 PM , Rating: 2
I think that they are relying on fighting low tech opponents

1 If that radar is operating in K band and those radars have really short range
2 conventional RWRs are operating from 2GHz to 18GHz...


Waste of Money
By hartleyb on 2/14/2012 2:53:02 PM , Rating: 2
Developing new radar systems to show ground terrain is a huge waste of money when we now have almost 100 satellite coverage of the world from which we can develop very accurate 3D mapping that could let a pilot fly without seeing outside the aircraft. We are seeing this now in some newer GPS devices for cars in a very small compact low computing environment. Imagine what you could have in a larger more powerful computing environment.




RE: Waste of Money
By MrBlastman on 2/14/2012 3:05:24 PM , Rating: 2
Considering that most GPS elevation maps rely heavily on interpolation between segments of the data set...

Are you brave enough to base your own life on this?

A bewildered man steps in front of his maker after ascending to heaven one day.

His maker looks at him and asks, "John, you didn't have to die, you know--you were watching that display intently instead of looking out the window.."

John, cleverly looks at his maker and says, "Well, why can't we just interpolate my life between the data points--if we did, I'd still be alive!"

I just doesn't work that way. For an accurate terrain-following system, you need realtime, exact system. Feet and inches matter here, not meters.


RE: Waste of Money
By Reclaimer77 on 2/14/12, Rating: -1
RE: Waste of Money
By cocoapuffer on 2/14/2012 8:57:04 PM , Rating: 2
You.


The Hell?
By cocoapuffer on 2/14/2012 8:56:30 PM , Rating: 2
Wow. This is cool.




"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki