Print 14 comment(s) - last by mezman.. on Nov 24 at 3:24 PM

The new material for implants is a nanoporous ceramic membrane, like the one pictured here. The researchers found that such a membrane is immune to rejection and protein build-up.  (Source: Hessel L. Castricum, Ashima Sah)
Revolutionary material could offer clean, non-rejected implants of artificial organs or monitoring devices

Breakthroughs in medical science are almost always welcomed by the millions of people around the world that suffer from numerous illnesses and diseases.  The cutting edge cardiovascular implants and treatments, the tiny blood sugar monitoring devices, and advanced medical scans and tests are just some of miracles yielded by these kinds of breakthroughs that save lives yearly.

Now researchers at NC State have achieved a significant medical breakthrough of their own, devising perhaps the safest and most effective material for implants to date.

The challenge of designing implants is two-fold.  First, implants naturally tend to create inflammatory responses, as the human body's immune system is designed to attack foreign objects.  This can lead to the device being walled off, or rejected completely.  It can also put severe stress on the patient's body.

The second challenge is dealing with the deluge of proteins floating around the body.  Past implant materials, even if they could minimize inflammation, experienced a buildup of body proteins, which clogged any sensors.

In the new study researchers discovered that a special nanomaterial -- nanoporous ceramic membranes -- can fix these problems.  Dr. Roger Narayan, an associate professor in the joint biomedical engineering department of NC State and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, devised the method and says the membrane can "create an interface between human tissues and medical devices that is free of protein buildup".

The material should allow previously unfeasible implants to reach the market.  The most pressing application of this tech will likely be to offer new dialysis devices.  Other potential applications contain blood glucose sensor implants for diabetics and artificial hemo-dialysis membranes that can scrub impurities from the blood.

The study is the first one to look at the biological and physical properties of nanoporous membranes in-depth.  The researchers were somewhat surprised to discover that the material was not rejected by the body.  However, the team's hand in the new research is unsurprising as Dr. Narayan is a pioneer in the field of nanoporous ceramic membranes.

Also contributing to the study were materials science engineering doctoral students Ravi Aggarwal and Wei Wei; NC State postdoctoral research associate Dr. Chunming Jin; Dr. Nancy Monteiro-Riviere, professor of investigative dermatology and toxicology at NC State's College of Veterinary Medicine and the Center for Chemical Toxicology Research and Pharmacokinetics; and Rene Crombez and Dr. Weidian Shen of Eastern Michigan University.

The new research will is published in a special issue of the journal Biomedical Materials.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Nano. Really?
By austinag on 11/12/2008 11:44:53 AM , Rating: 5
I dunno about you, but when I think of "Implants" nano usually refes to the pre-operation state.

RE: Nano. Really?
By jgvandemeer on 11/12/2008 11:46:34 AM , Rating: 2
From the look of that picture, the implants they're considering isn't breasts, but something a bit lower down on the body.

RE: Nano. Really?
By ZaethDekar on 11/12/2008 11:48:30 AM , Rating: 3
Yeah, I already got it done, it was pretty sweet. Now my belly looks like a smily face all the time. It also tells the time and my location via lat/long. Oh and my weight.

RE: Nano. Really?
By shoopdeewoop on 11/12/2008 12:20:46 PM , Rating: 2
Can I get a third arm please?

RE: Nano. Really?
By daar on 11/12/2008 12:31:29 PM , Rating: 1
I'm holding out for the schlong enlargement. Actually a second one wouldn't be bad either...

RE: Nano. Really?
By shoopdeewoop on 11/12/2008 12:41:48 PM , Rating: 2
Pfft, I'm coverd in that departmant.

RE: Nano. Really?
By Joz on 11/12/2008 1:22:37 PM , Rating: 2
pppft, im triple covered, I wouldn't mind an enlargment however, maybe to a stuffed full douflebag and a couple bowling balls.

RE: Nano. Really?
By Smartless on 11/12/2008 1:57:23 PM , Rating: 2
That's the diet coke of evil.

RE: Nano. Really?
By mezman on 11/12/2008 2:03:41 PM , Rating: 2
That's a shame. I'll bet you could make some really nice, natural feeling breast implants with nanotech.

RE: Nano. Really?
By mrteddyears on 11/14/2008 6:16:54 AM , Rating: 2
See that just wrong !!!!

RE: Nano. Really?
By mezman on 11/24/2008 3:24:23 PM , Rating: 2
But it feels so right! :)

By Chipper Smoltz DT on 11/13/2008 9:14:49 PM , Rating: 3
Guys and gals, this seems weird, but almost all of those breakthroughs now is something that could be attributed to nano-technology... Solar Cells, Medicine, Biology... the possbilities are endless?

But since I have a limited knowledge about nano-technology, are these nano-particles "thingies" safe? What materials are they exactly composed of? Does it mean that because they're super miniature, that they don't pose a risk for us humans and the environment, flora and fauna....? Are they guaranteed to have absolutely no side effects whatsoever?

Just want to be sure since we might have opened Pandora's Box with this one.... But I definitely don't oppose anything that supposed to save and improve human lives... just that is there a study that's being done that such nano-particles are absolutely safe?

Maybe advances with battery technology next with nanos or alternate fuel with nanos...?!

I hope we're not destroying the environment if there should be advances in fuels and batteries with nano-tech. Just that our ancestors during the time when they thought that fossil based fuels are ok maybe were not aware of the negative impact it has on the environment for the coming generations. Are we bound to commit the same mistakes for this era or generation? Is everything really safe without any bad trade-offs?

By Mr Alpha on 11/13/2008 8:18:58 AM , Rating: 2
Now I have always been a little fuzzy on this, but shouldn't this classify as a biomaterial, not a nanomaterial?

Yeah, sure
By cete on 11/13/2008 6:00:58 AM , Rating: 1
Every time I see the words "nano"-something and ("revolutionary" or "breakthrough") in these articles, I know it will never happen.

"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki