backtop


Print 7 comment(s) - last by tensor9.. on Oct 26 at 2:45 PM


The newly discovered fulvalene diruthenium changes conformation, acting as a molecular heat battery. Similar, cheaper molecules could offer affordable solar power storage.  (Source: Jeffrey Grossman/MIT)

Current solar thermal energy storage methods, such as molten salt, aren't very efficient.  (Source: SolarReserve)
Technology could answer the need for power storage if affordable production methods are found

Scientists have long debated how best to store solar power.  The best current solutions -- like storing heat in tanks of molten salt -- aren't very efficient and tend to be quite expensive.

That's why it's exciting that that researchers at MIT have described how a recently discovered molecule called fulvalene diruthenium -- which consists of two aromatic carbon rings, plus attached transition metal -- acts as a molecular heat battery. 

The molecule stores heat energy by changing conformation and is remarkably stable.  But when you add a small amount of additional heat or a catalyst, the molecule snaps back to its original conformation releasing its stored load.

While this behavior was previously known to some extent, the MIT team led by Materials Science professor Jeffrey Grossman, determined how exactly it works.  Describes Professor Grossman, "[The compound] can get as hot as 200 degrees C, plenty hot enough to heat your home, or even to run an engine to produce electricity.  It turns out there's an intermediate step that plays a major role."

The discovery on an intermediate step helps to explain why similar molecules with the ruthenium replaced didn't work.

Professor Grossman says the material stacks up favorably compared to past technologies, stating, "It takes many of the advantages of solar-thermal energy, but stores the heat in the form of a fuel. It's reversible, and it's stable over a long term. You can use it where you want, on demand. You could put the fuel in the sun, charge it up, then use the heat, and place the same fuel back in the sun to recharge."

Unfortunately Ruthenium, a platinum-like transition metal, is relatively rare and costs as much as $650 for 150 g, making it somewhat impractical for large-scale commercial applications.  However, now that they know how the mechanism works, Professor Grossman and his colleagues are scouring chemical databases looking for cheaper analogues (i.e. without rare earth metal components) that behave in the same way.

The new research is published in the journal Angewandte Chemie and is funded by grants from The National Science Foundation and the MIT Energy Initiative.




Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Ruthenium not Rutherfordium
By mastard on 10/26/2010 12:28:40 PM , Rating: 4
Fulvalene diruthenium contains Ruthenium (Ru) not Rutherfordium (Rf). These are very different metals and have very different properties. Please read the article http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.20... Oh and the price for Ru is like $600 for 5 grams.

Dan




RE: Ruthenium not Rutherfordium
By avxo on 10/26/2010 12:37:37 PM , Rating: 2
Ah, I was just about to say that Rutherfordium is a transactinide element and not a "rare earth metal" whatever the heck that is.


RE: Ruthenium not Rutherfordium
By mastard on 10/26/2010 1:08:40 PM , Rating: 2
Looks like the rare earth metals include scandium, yttrium, and the lanthanides.

Dan


RE: Ruthenium not Rutherfordium
By avxo on 10/26/2010 2:05:37 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, that's wrong. They are rare earth elements , not rare earth metals . That term is meaningless, which is what my original comment meant to highlight.


RE: Ruthenium not Rutherfordium
By tensor9 on 10/26/2010 2:45:13 PM , Rating: 3
Actually, it's not wrong. They are known as rare earth metals as well. Why would the term be meaningless? All of the rare earth elements (Sc, Y, and the Ln) are, in fact, metals.

But to point out the flaw in the article, Ru is not a rare earth metal. It is a rare metal, in fact, more rare than the "rare earths" (which are actually not that rare at all).


RE: Ruthenium not Rutherfordium
By PCR on 10/26/2010 1:08:39 PM , Rating: 2
Rare earth elements are scandium, yttrium, and all the fifteen lanthanides, 17 altogether.


By geddarkstorm on 10/26/2010 12:48:58 PM , Rating: 2
I too was confused on that change in the article, since the molecule name itself contains diRUTHENIUM. Rutherfordium doesn't come in anywhere that I can see. Ruthenium has some cool structural properties and is used in many unique compounds in biology for instance, so I'm not surprised to see it here. All the best to the research team on finding an analog, this could be very useful tech.


"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs













botimage
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki