backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 21 comment(s) - last by JonnyDough.. on Jun 11 at 12:31 PM

New binoculars use brain waves to activate enemy detection algorithms based on threat response

The enemy is the area.  You scan the perimeter alert, tense.  Your pulse races.

In the past such situations called for constant surveillance via binoculars either discrete or in headgear to try to spot the approaching enemy.  However, such binoculars were limited by reaction times and luck, and the skilled enemy could sneak up on friendly forces and catch them unaware.

Northrop Grumman Corporation, a major defense contractor, is looking to solve this problem and take binoculars and imaging technology into the next century.  The company is leading a consortium of academia and industry that has just received an award to begin design prototypes of its panoramic binocular day/night system that uses brain wave monitoring to trigger target detection and alert soldiers of threats.

Brain wave monitoring is nothing new.  The consumer industry this year received some device sporting the technology in the form of brain mice.  Users found the new mice to be particularly handy in first-person-shooter games, but also handy in analyzing stress responses for mediation and athletics.

The new Cognitive Technology Threat Warning System program, or CT2WS, is a logical extension of these ideas and is funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).  Its goal is to not only provide the soldier with an extremely wide, panoramic field of view, but to also implement a neuro-optical interface to trigger target detection for fast-moving, elusive targets.  The first phase of objectives for the project is to develop the basic circuit model for the device on a breadboard and to complete the Human-aided Optical Recognition/Notification of Elusive Threats (HORNET) system, which will include the brain interface and the threat detection algorithms.

The HORNET utilizes special electro-encephalogram electrodes sandwiched in a custom helmet against the scalp.  These electrodes provide constant monitoring of the soldier's electrical brain activity.  Over time, the system will learn and be trained.  By accepting whether a soldier is in a threatening situation or not, and comparing it to their brain response, the system will learn to recognize combat situations and react appropriately.

Michael House, Northrop Grumman's CT2WS program manager states, "Northrop Grumman's HORNET system leverages the latest advances in real-time coupling of human brain activity with automated cognitive neural processing to provide superior target detection.  The system will maintain persistent surveillance in order to defeat an enemy's attempts to surprise through evasive move-stop-move tactics, giving the U.S. warfighter as much as a 20-minute advantage over his adversaries."

The system will be put to use both at home and abroad.  Among its possible uses are border patrol, IED detection, and active combat in areas like Iraq.  The initial phase of development will take 12 months and will grant up to $6.7 million to the project.

Among the many collaborators with Northrop Grumman on the project are SAIC, San Diego, Calif.; Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.; Theia Technologies LLC, Wilsonville, Ore.; Sensics, Inc., Baltimore, Md.; L-3 Communications Infrared Products, Dallas, Texas; Georgetown University, Wash., D.C.; Portland State University, Portland, Ore.; and the University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Reminds me of G.R.A.W
By Fusible on 6/10/2008 1:37:48 PM , Rating: 3
Kind of reminds of the helmet visor from GRAW. Seems very interesting, we keep advancing our military prowess but keep lacking in other areas seems like we need to also fund other areas of need just like our military.




RE: Reminds me of G.R.A.W
By Cheapshot on 6/10/2008 1:45:36 PM , Rating: 3
I envision Steve Bushemi with the auto flip visor kickin back in a chair.


RE: Reminds me of G.R.A.W
By AlexWade on 6/10/2008 4:30:26 PM , Rating: 2
Imagine if there was a network system too. If one soldier, police saw someone and identified him as a threat, it would relay that information to all nearby systems.


RE: Reminds me of G.R.A.W
By mrkun on 6/10/2008 6:51:12 PM , Rating: 2
That would be like BF 2142.


RE: Reminds me of G.R.A.W
By MBlueD on 6/11/2008 2:30:18 AM , Rating: 3
Yes - Imagine the whole police precinct parked just outside an officer's mother-in-law's house...


RE: Reminds me of G.R.A.W
By JonnyDough on 6/11/2008 12:31:58 PM , Rating: 2
I completely agree. It's one thing to stay a step ahead of the enemy, it's another to be turning warfare into some sort of video game. Dehumanization is very very sad. At what point do we just not give a hoot about anyone, or value ourselves? We spend SOOOO much on the military. Want to know where that 90's economic boom went? Out the door. We have money and we waste it. I for one am from now on paying my taxes AFTER the year is over. I don't trust Uncle Sam with my money anymore. It's FAR too mismanaged.


moving between helmets
By kattanna on 6/10/2008 1:52:34 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Over time, the system will learn and be trained


with that, it makes each helmet uniquely trained for each soldier. wonder if there will be a memory chip in it that can be moved from one helmet to another so you dont have to train each one from scratch should it become busted or damaged somehow.

on a humourous note.. boy picking up the wrong helmet could be enlightening to what your buddy might find as a "threat" hehehe




RE: moving between helmets
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 6/10/2008 3:04:03 PM , Rating: 2
I don't want no other guy touching my helmet. :)

I would think it would be some sort of small flash drive to hold your personal settings.


RE: moving between helmets
By BruceLeet on 6/10/2008 3:55:57 PM , Rating: 2
Kinda like switching SIM cards in cell phones eh.


RE: moving between helmets
By ccmfreak2 on 6/10/08, Rating: -1
Question
By FITCamaro on 6/10/2008 3:51:24 PM , Rating: 2
So does this scan for enemies and basically tell the soldier when someone is coming or does it just recognize when a soldier has spotted a threat? Because the former seems useful while the latter does not.




RE: Question
By Fnoob on 6/10/2008 7:45:20 PM , Rating: 3
I wondered the same thing - but posting questions may get you downrated here.... sigh.

Hopefully, this system could detect when you 'think you saw something in that bush', and then monitor that sector for you while you are looking elsewhere.

At least this time around, you won't have to 'think in Russian'. ;)


Cheaper alternative
By rebturtle on 6/11/2008 4:02:52 AM , Rating: 2
There's an easier way to make soldiers more alert with better response times and less trauma. How about shortening the combat tours and getting them some more R&R? Quit trying to make them all superhuman to overcome the human elements we are neglecting...




RE: Cheaper alternative
By FITCamaro on 6/11/2008 8:18:22 AM , Rating: 2
It doesn't matter how much rest you have. You can't see in all directions at once. And you can't hear everything on the battlefield. The fact is they have the element of surprise. Not us.


US ground forces need low tech, not high-tech
By fri2219 on 6/10/2008 7:53:42 PM , Rating: 1
This is cool, too bad they won't have the heavy lift capability to get them there in any sort of useful time frame, or the meat sacks to wear them, or the ammunition to shoot what they see in their super night vision goggles.

Maybe we can get the Chinese to wait on their Straight of Formosa crossing until we arrive, or the Russians will stop their tank columns from entering Tbilisi for us. No doubt the Iranians and Syrians will wait on lobbing a few A-Bombs so we have the time to ship anti medium range ballistic missiles countermeasures to Israel as well.

The US Armed Services have been neglecting the nuts and bolts of recruitment, manufacturing, and logistics for so long, this is the last thing anyone should be trying to get into service. I don't even want to mention how badly Captain AWOL of the Champagne Squadron and his puppet master have screwed vets, especially Non-Coms over- you'd be nuts to re-enlist.




By FITCamaro on 6/11/2008 8:22:38 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
This is cool, too bad they won't have the heavy lift capability to get them there in any sort of useful time frame


Umm....our ability to get troops and material on the ground, anywhere in the world is unmatched. Have you ever heard of the C-17? Do you know what its motto is? Anything, Anywhere, Anytime.

They require a very short runway, can unload cargo without even stopping, and can even go backwards on their own.


The enemy only need...
By EntreHoras on 6/10/2008 2:23:35 PM , Rating: 2
...an Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie (http://zapatopi.net/afdb/).




What happened to OICW?
By Smartless on 6/10/2008 2:23:56 PM , Rating: 2
I kinda liked the idea of having a heads-up display with a camera on your gun. Combine the two and you may get an instant sniper scope that could operate in any condition. Well the military folk can correct me on all these points but wouldn't that be cool.




moving between helmets
By cmontyburns on 6/10/2008 3:42:36 PM , Rating: 2
(whip-cracks)...

wwkkssshhhhhhh!




Marketing...
By iFX on 6/11/2008 6:37:20 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
New binoculars use brain waves to activate enemy detection algorithms based on threat response


Word.




moving between helmets
By cmontyburns on 6/10/2008 3:39:38 PM , Rating: 1
they already did something like this on world champions and put them on chess engines. now, world champs can barely win against a computer program ( they boast of being able to beat 99.xx% of players worldwide regardless of skill level).

if they can "successfully" put them helmets on a robot and make it work, then the future filled with android soldiers walking around and taking over the world when they have a masive computer glitch on their disposition subroutine may not be too distant.

hail our new android overlords!




"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini

DailyTech Poll
Which web browser do you use on your primary personal machine? 






44 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki