backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by Trisped.. on Feb 23 at 5:33 PM


Luminous material triggered by UV light  (Source: Marcin Szczepanski, U-M College of Engineering)
Material has use in electronics and lighting

It never ceases to impress that many of the things we take for granted today were the result of accidents or unintended properties discovered when trying to create something else. Such is the case with a breakthrough by researchers at the University of Michigan that has produced a material that may be able to one day reduce the cost of OLED screens and lighting.

Researcher Jinsang Kim and other colleagues developed a new class of organic material that shines with phosphorescence that has only been seen previously in non-organic compounds. Kim and the other researchers developed a material that needs no metal, unlike the current materials, and can radiate light in different colors. The new material needs no precious metals like current non-organic OLEDs require, thereby reducing costs.

The new material is able to radiate white in visible light; and in ultraviolet light, they radiate blue, green, yellow, and orange. The composition of the material can be changed to emit different colors as well making the new material ideally suited to color tunable lighting.

The unique phosphorescent properties of the material was discovered when a former doctoral student Kangwon Lee was researching a biosensor. The phosphors he discovered have use in the biosensor application and were then studied and tweaked for use as pure organic metal-free luminous materials. The new luminous material may one day be used to create larger and cheaper OLED panels for electronics in addition to the solid state lighting applications.

"Purely organic materials haven't been able to generate meaningful phosphorescence emissions. We believe this is the first example of an organic that can compete with an organometallic in terms of brightness and color tuning capability," said Kim, an associate professor of materials science and engineering, chemical engineering, macromolecular science and engineering, and biomedical engineering.

The new phosphors have a quantum yield of 55%. Science Daily reports that quantum yield is a measure of a materials efficiency and brightness in as far as it can dissipate energy as light rather than heat as it returns to ground state from an excited state. The phosphors created by Kim create light from molecules of oxygen and carbon known as "aromatic carbonyls."

The aromatic carbonyls that Kim created are unique in that they form tight halogen bonds with halogens in the crystal to pack molecules tightly. That tight packing of the molecules suppresses vibration and heat energy losses as the electrons return to ground state.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Not bright enough
By genedude on 2/15/2011 12:55:44 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
That tight packing of the molecules suppresses vibration and heat energy losses as the electrons return to ground state.


Nice, but according to Val Kilmer, you can get an display bright enough to blow holes in buildings. All you need to do is apply a field, and you will couple to a state that is radiatively coupled to the ground state.




RE: Not bright enough
By Etsp on 2/15/2011 12:58:47 PM , Rating: 2
Blow holes in buildings or make popcorn. (or both!)


RE: Not bright enough
By Chernobyl68 on 2/15/2011 2:32:51 PM , Rating: 2
In deference to you Kent, its like Lasing a stick of Dynamite!


RE: Not bright enough
By FITCamaro on 2/15/2011 3:16:37 PM , Rating: 2
Damn. Been a while since I've seen that movie. Grats to you sir.


RE: Not bright enough
By snakeInTheGrass on 2/15/2011 3:22:54 PM , Rating: 2
Lol. I don't know which movie you mean, and I'm afraid to ask.


Cheaper OLEDs?
By TheSev on 2/15/2011 1:00:08 PM , Rating: 2
I've been keeping a close eye on OLED technology and it's possible uses, and I think it's got potential - and in far more than just TVs and media screens. I'm still waiting to see OLEDs come to the consumer market at large. Hopefully more discoveries like this will help it gain momentum.




RE: Cheaper OLEDs?
By Smilin on 2/15/2011 1:44:33 PM , Rating: 5
Yep, been drooling over the tech ever since the Zune HD.

The contrast melts faces. The Samsung Super-AMOLEDs are the best looking displays I've seen on a mobile device.

I think we might already have the necessary tech to push this to the masses cheaply...we just need production capacity to drive prices down.



RE: Cheaper OLEDs?
By Omega215D on 2/15/2011 11:27:12 PM , Rating: 2
Stuff that have AMOLED seem pretty cheap now unless you're talking about large displays. The ZuneHD 32GB is going for $220 - 260 and I bought my Cowon S9 (before the ZuneHD) for $200 brand new 2 years ago (AMOLED screen made by Samsung btw). I liked OLED ever since I saw it used on those Creative V players and this Samsung and LG phone had it as outer displays in blue and yellow.

LCD is still good though as I've seen Super LCD displays on Samsung phones and their P3 mp3 player.


RE: Cheaper OLEDs?
By Jeffk464 on 2/16/2011 12:27:19 AM , Rating: 2
Yes thats what we are talking about. I want my 150" OLED flat panel TV now, and for say $500. :)


RE: Cheaper OLEDs?
By Silver2k7 on 2/17/2011 3:34:44 AM , Rating: 2
A 24" for $500 would be nice too ;)


Oxymoron?
By saf227 on 2/15/2011 1:41:11 PM , Rating: 4
"The new material needs no precious metals like current non-organic OLEDs require, thereby reducing costs."

Isn't non-organic OLED an oxymoron? OLED is Organic Light-Emitting Diode. Non-organic organic?




RE: Oxymoron?
By menace on 2/15/2011 2:14:16 PM , Rating: 2
From other readings, organometallic compounds built around a heavy metal atom (e.g. Iridium or Platinum) are typically doped into the phosphorescent component of the OLED cell. This somehow increases the quantum efficiency (which I assume leads to brighter light emission). The new material has high enough quantum efficiency without the doping.


RE: Oxymoron?
By MartyLK on 2/16/2011 8:30:45 AM , Rating: 2
I was wondering if someone was gonna catch that...LOL


RE: Oxymoron?
By Trisped on 2/23/2011 5:33:29 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, he probably meant LED. I have noticed a number of people don't know the difference between LED and OLED so the just use the most common one.


Where discoveries really come from
By DanNeely on 2/15/2011 1:32:53 PM , Rating: 3
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm... that's funny...'"

Not

quote:
It never ceases to impress that many of the things we take for granted today were the result of accidents or unintended properties discovered when trying to create something else.




By Galcobar on 2/16/2011 6:45:25 AM , Rating: 2
Best line in physics: "Who ordered that?"

Isidor I. Rabi in 1937 when the muon was discovered as an entirely unexpected result of a cloud chamber (ionizing radiation detection) experiment.


Where's my red?
By melgross on 2/16/2011 11:21:00 AM , Rating: 2
I noticed they didn't mention red as a color this can do. If that remains true, then this won't be useful in a color display for computing or media.




organics
By Queonda on 2/16/2011 3:14:33 PM , Rating: 2
And if it's organic it must be (and taste) better!




"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain











botimage
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki