Print 30 comment(s) - last by mpgenius.. on Dec 17 at 3:13 AM

Medfield will feature memory controller, graphics, and I/O on single die

A new roadmap has cropped up that shows the future of Intel's Atom processors that power the majority of netbook computers on the market today. The Atom has proven to be very successful for Intel and future versions will offer even more power and performance.

CNET News reports that the new roadmap shows a new Medfield Atom will debut in 2010. The processor will be built on the 32nm process, where as the current generation Atom parts are built on the 45nm process.

Before 2010 when Medfield pops up, Intel will be releasing Atom processors code named Pineview in 2009. DailyTech has covered the Pineview Atom processors before. The biggest difference between Pineview and today's Atom CPU will be the integration of a GPU core and memory controller onto the processor die.

In 2010, Medfield will integrate onto the die the processor, memory controller, multimedia functions, and I/O onto a single chip. A graphics core would be integrated as well. With this change, the netbook will gain the ability to handle HD video and move from a basic web surfing device into a full function entertainment device.

The information on the future Atom parts comes from a report created by UBS Securities. CNET News quotes the UBS Securities report saying, "[netbooks will evolve] from basic web page consumption to multimedia consumption including high-definition (HD) video."

Another bit of good news to look forward to is that battery life will increase for systems using the new Atom parts. Even with new features like touchscreen and WAN access the run time of netbooks will move from two to three hours up to near five hours according to the report.

Dual-core Atom parts are expected to be offered with the Medfield just as the current generation Atom parts feature dual-core variants.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why wait for the future?
By therealnickdanger on 12/8/2008 11:53:07 AM , Rating: 4
With this change, the netbook will gain the ability to handle HD video and move from a basic web surfing device into a full function entertainment device.

My MSI Wind can play 1080p videos no problem! Obviously, it's overkill for a 1024x600 screen, but the point is that is CAN BE DONE!

RE: Why wait for the future?
By Lord 666 on 12/8/2008 12:44:39 PM , Rating: 3
Why rate this post down as its the truth. Was very impressed with my Atom based netbook and the performance.

People are definitely underating the Atom by saying its just for "web surfing and email."

By therealnickdanger on 12/8/2008 2:50:13 PM , Rating: 4
I think part of the problem is that people are not underrating it - Intel and Microsoft are trying to underrate it by forcing all manner of restrictions onto netbook manufacturers. The reason is simple: the Atom performs TOO well for its price-point! You can load and easily use Vista with Aero enabled on most Atom netbooks, they are extremely capable. Netbooks are eating into the notebook market much too quickly. "Cannabalize" is a term that's being thrown around a lot, for good reason. Microsoft and Intel are trying to protect their partners in the notebook market with these netbook hardware restrictions.

They have limited gaming performance and you certainly wouldn't fold on it or encode video either, but they are more than acceptable for everything else. While I'm not a fan of the 945G as a supplement, my Wind can handle all the rich web content available now and I haven't been able to find a picture, music file, or video file that it couldn't play back. So when it comes time to buy another notebook - I'll be getting a netbook.

Get a dual-core Atom and a GeForce 9300/9400 GPU into one of these and then it'll be perfect! LOL

RE: Why wait for the future?
By King of Heroes on 12/8/2008 12:50:06 PM , Rating: 5
I agree.

A "fully functional entertainment device" with a 1024 x 600 screen is a waste of time. They need to allow manufacturers to ramp up the screen size before worrying about hardware processing of HD video (I think Intel contractually limits the screen size of the Atom platform to 1024 x 600).

Give Atom-based Netbooks a 1280 x 720 or 1280 x 800 screen, so they can watch actual 720p content in 720p instead of cramming it into a smaller screen which kills the entire point of it, and then you'll have something approacing a 'fully functional entertainment device'.

RE: Why wait for the future?
By Gul Westfale on 12/8/2008 4:33:24 PM , Rating: 2
i have a somewhat related question which i hope someone might answer:

i recently bought an aspire one (linpus/8GB SSD/512MB RAM) because i saw it on special for a lousy $229... i upgraded the RAM and got rid of the craptacular SSD (by ordering a used ipod drive off ebay), but have wondered why acer used the single-core version of the atom. i know of no netbook that uses the duallie, and yet the duallie seems to be only slightly more expensive to buy from intel.

i like the aspire one quite a lot, good keyboard, great screen, and teh performance is better than i had expected, but i would have gladly paid $30 more to get a dual-core CPU.

so does anyone know why there seem to be no duallie netbooks? do they really generate that much more heat/use that much more power?

RE: Why wait for the future?
By nomagic on 12/8/2008 7:44:53 PM , Rating: 2
Dual-core Atom would have performance that matches that of any entry notebooks. At $250 price point, Dual-core Atom will effectively castrate the market for entry notebooks.

Unfortunately, netbooks have lower margin than entry notebooks.

RE: Why wait for the future?
By Visual on 12/9/2008 3:23:00 AM , Rating: 2
there are several atom-based netbooks at 1280 X 768
actually i just ordered this for myself:

i hear it heats up a lot, thats a pity. i bet it's because of the craptacular chipset that goes with atom and not the cpu though. i hope it isn't too bad because i can't return it where i ordered it from.

i think dualcore versions aren't out not because of some anti-netbook conspiracy like many people imply, just because it wasn't available from intel until very recently and manufacturers haven't had time to adapt to it.

RE: Why wait for the future?
By djc208 on 12/8/2008 7:03:17 PM , Rating: 2
Video's in what format? MPEG2, I don't doubt it, a lot of integrated video devices can handle that OK, including my 3-year old Celeron laptop, which is probably about as fast and powerful, though with a (somewhat) bigger screen.

But most HD video is going to H.264, and that's a different animal all together. Without dedicated hardware you need some serious horsepower to do H.264 HD playback well. Hence the recent story (on DailyTech) of the Asus Atom box with the Radeon 3xxx series graphics card for HD playback.

RE: Why wait for the future?
By Lord 666 on 12/8/2008 9:22:44 PM , Rating: 2
What version of the Wind? Wanted to play it safe with something I could touch in a store and return if needed, so went with the Costco HP 1033CL. Not bad, especially with the split mouse buttons. But the battery life is sort of annoying with the 3 cell pack.

How do the mouse buttons work on the Wind as it appears to be only one button? Specifically looking at the U100-432US

By therealnickdanger on 12/8/2008 10:13:42 PM , Rating: 2
I got the U100-420US.

The button pivots in the center, it's pretty easy to get used to, but I do wish they had simply split them to make 2 seperate buttons.

So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By phazers on 12/8/2008 11:47:51 AM , Rating: 2
I think AMD really missed out by cancelling Bobcat, especially since it looks like netbooks is the most rapidly growing sector in a shrinking market.

RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Amiga500 on 12/8/2008 12:19:43 PM , Rating: 2
I disagree - they cannot afford to invest large sums of engineering resources in market areas that have questionable returns.

Intel now regrets making the Atom as it has bombed out a lot of their higher end chip's prices.

RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Lord 666 on 12/8/08, Rating: 0
RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By MadMan007 on 12/8/2008 1:56:22 PM , Rating: 2
It's good to be informed yourself before jumping on other people:

RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Lord 666 on 12/8/2008 9:29:52 PM , Rating: 1
Listen, if a company truly "regretted" releasing a product, they would submarine it... not develop successors as this post is about.

Intel is committed to supporting the N270 for 7+ years.

Intel regrets supporting RDRAM, not creating the Atom.

RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By Bruneauinfo on 12/8/2008 11:09:32 PM , Rating: 2
you didn't read the article he posted.

By SilthDraeth on 12/9/2008 10:25:16 AM , Rating: 2
There is a Raon Everun Note that uses a AMD 690 chipset, and a Turion x2. It is smaller than the EEE.

RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By UNCjigga on 12/8/2008 12:57:08 PM , Rating: 2
AMD may have missed out, but it looks like Nvidia might be getting into the game, and I'm curious to see if they manage to get a low power, all-in-one CPU+GPU+I/O chip before Intel does. I'd rather have integrated graphics from Nvidia than Intel.

RE: So where is AMD's competitor to Atom?
By King of Heroes on 12/8/2008 1:10:15 PM , Rating: 2
I know Nvidia announced they were collaborating with VIA for a netbook platform, but now it seems that was only a bargaining chip for some deal with Intel? If thats the case, I would avoid Nvidia on sheer principle (the principle being that asshats shouldn't benefit from dirty tactics like that).

If that dream is still alive, a VIA Nano + Geforce 9400 integrated graphics would be blow anything else out of the water right now.

By psychobriggsy on 12/8/2008 1:40:59 PM , Rating: 2
NVIDIA are going with Tegra - ARM11 + Graphics + Everything on a single chip. TI, Samsung, Apple, etc, are all doing similar things, with the far faster Cortex A8/A9 ARM core(s).

By sprockkets on 12/8/2008 4:16:09 PM , Rating: 2
Supposively it was just to have a chipset plus a nano processor. It would not be too big of a deal to make one.

There appears to be only one nano board for sale right now, and it is expensive. No one seems to want to match a mini itx board from Intel right now.

Shame. Intel has so many resources to beat AMD at every level, and now VIA. They will have their integrated system on a chip first even though they probably started on it later.

By LiquidIce1337 on 12/8/2008 11:45:25 AM , Rating: 2
Where are they gettin these names? Thats my town name but I doubt they are talking about Medfield Massachusetts here..

"The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes" anybody?

RE: Medfield?
By JonnyBlaze on 12/8/2008 11:47:36 AM , Rating: 3
Hopefully They come out with a Brockton CPU.


RE: Medfield?
By Drexial on 12/8/2008 1:05:47 PM , Rating: 2
From what I understand. They are names based on where members of the design team originated.

By Headfoot on 12/8/2008 2:47:09 PM , Rating: 2
The Atom has to be profitable. It's absolutely tiny, 25mm^2. They get huge amounts of them per 300mm^2 wafer. I remember reading on Anandtech that low power and low cost to manufacture were the primary concerns.

So many have criticized the netbook (various blogs, AMD etc), but I don't think "Atom" and "Netbook" are one and the same. I can see a beefed up Atom powering a 14" small notebook or a "nettop" as they are called.

Netbooks can be small and cramped, but doesn't a low power low cost processor have benefits elsewhere as well?

I believe thats why the Nano and Bobcatt have slightly higher performance and TDP's, because they envision this in MacBook Air style packages that are larger, but not huge. That mega el-cheapo surfing PC's for the bottom-liners.

By Headfoot on 12/8/2008 2:49:30 PM , Rating: 2
I don't mean to say "nettops" and small notebooks are the same; I just made a poor word choice there. I mean Atom can power either "nettops" or small notebooks as seperate entities.

Somehting I read....
By Gudhands on 12/8/2008 1:08:00 PM , Rating: 2
"At first, the netbook was cited by research firm IDC as a savior for the notebook market and was credited with helping to keep the market afloat in the tough economy. It didn’t take long for the realization to set in that the increasing sales of low margin netbooks would eat into the profitability of notebook makers and chipmakers. That reality is now setting in and analysts are changing earnings projections for some of the largest firms in the IT industry."

By mpgenius on 12/17/2008 3:13:23 AM , Rating: 2
In the mean time see some here

Intel's naming makes me laugh...
By on 12/8/08, Rating: -1
"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov
Related Articles
Intel Officially Shipping Dual-core Atom
September 22, 2008, 10:02 AM
Intel Roadmap Shows Next-Gen Atom in Q3 2009
September 5, 2008, 11:00 AM

Most Popular ArticlesTop 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki