backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 32 comment(s) - last by Mojo the Monke.. on Jul 30 at 1:07 PM


Block Diagram for Intel EP80579 Integrated Processor  (Source: HotHardware)
New System on a Chip will lead to smaller Internet connected devices that need less power

Intel held a conference call this week to talk about its line of new System on a Chip (SoC) designs. The branding for the new SoC’s will be Intel EP90579 according to HotHardware. The product line is based on the Intel Pentium M processor core and integrates a Memory Controller Hub (MCH), I/O Hub (ICH) and some chips in the line will also get specialized security, data path acceleration and TDM. The optional services are called Intel Quick Assist Technology.

Development began on the Intel EP80579 line to get ready for all of the internet-connected devices that are hitting the market and will be hitting market in the months and years to come. Intel’s Gadi Singer said, “We’re now able to deliver more highly integrated products ranging from industrial robotics and in-car infotainment systems to set-top boxes, MIDs and other devices.  By designing more complex systems onto smaller chips, Intel will scale the performance, functionality and software compatibility of IA while controlling the overall power, cost and size requirements to better meet respective market need.”

The big benefits of the new Intel EP80579 SoC line are small size and low power needs. Intel says that the SoC will lead to platforms using up to 45% smaller board footprints and platforms that feature up to 34% lower power dissipation. One of the biggest benefits is that the new SoC’s run standard x86 architecture which will make software and applications easier to port to devices using the EP80579.

The different components of the SoC will communicate over an internal front side bus on the chip that connects the processor core, MCH and ICH. Intel also says it has developed a high performance bus to connect the security, TDM, and data path engines to the I/O complex.

Future products in the Intel EP80579 Integrated Processor family will be based on the Atom processor.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Another money maker
By crystal clear on 7/25/2008 10:10:08 AM , Rating: 2

Prefer to refer to the Intel press release-

Intel Outlines Plans for New Category of Smarter, Purpose-Built 'System on Chip' Designs, Products
First Eight Products Target Applications for Security, Storage and Communications

Intel has more than 15 SoC projects planned internally, including the company's first Consumer Electronics (CE) chip codenamed "Canmore" scheduled for introduction later this year and the second-generation "Sodaville" next year. In addition, Intel's second-generation embedded product line is scheduled to arrive in 2009, with Intel's next-generation platform for Mobile Internet Devices code-named "Moorestown" and featuring "Lincroft," scheduled for release in 2009/2010. Many of these new products will be based on the Intel® Atom™ processor core. All of these chips will provide increased performance and energy efficiency, along with the ability for customization, leading to faster development schedules and time-to-market delivery for customers while bringing more innovation, choice and lower costs to consumers.

"We're now able to deliver more highly integrated products ranging from industrial robotics and in-car infotainment systems to set-top boxes, MIDs and other devices. By designing more complex systems onto smaller chips, Intel will scale the performance, functionality and software compatibility of IA while controlling the overall power, cost and size


http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20...




RE: Another money maker
By TennesseeTony on 7/25/2008 11:05:03 AM , Rating: 2
"... The branding for the new SoC’s will be Intel EP90579..."

I'm confused, is it EP-NINE0579 or EP-Eight0579 as the title and the picture suggests?

If it is EP80579, why bother with this entry, as Anandtech ran a full article on it the day before this blog entry?


RE: Another money maker
By crystal clear on 7/25/2008 11:13:33 AM , Rating: 2
Product Brief
Intel® EP80579 Integrated Processor

Intel® EP80579 Integrated Processor
for Embedded Computing
Complete System-on-a-Chip for Communications,
Storage and Embedded Designs

http://download.intel.com/design/intarch/ep80579/3...


RE: Another money maker
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 7/25/2008 11:06:48 AM , Rating: 3
Intel's rolling with all hands on board right now. Between solid revenue, the pushed up Nehalem launch into September, the demand for Atom, and now this, they seem to have all their ducks in a row. Only question left is the entry into discrete graphics, if that turns out to be halfway decent this should be an outstanding year for Intel.


RE: Another money maker
By Mojo the Monkey on 7/25/2008 11:47:36 AM , Rating: 2
regarding the move into discrete; do you have any info on this? I've heard nothing but rumors/speculation. Are there any projected specs?


RE: Another money maker
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 7/25/2008 11:59:03 AM , Rating: 2
Your guess is as good as mine. Intel seems to be very hush hush about it all.


RE: Another money maker
By crystal clear on 7/25/2008 12:44:48 PM , Rating: 2

Intel's recent fourth quarter earnings conference call contained more surprises than just slightly lower-than-expected earnings. In response to an analyst's question about a timeframe for company's forthcoming discrete graphics product, codenamed Larrabee, Intel CEO Paul Otellini spilled the beans. "Larabee first silicon should be late this year in terms of samples and we'll start playing with it and sampling it to developers," said Otellini. "I still think we are on track for a product in late 2009, 2010 timeframe."



http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080117-larr...

Intel will have to persuade game developers to build their engines around the new part, and that will take time.


RE: Another money maker
By erikejw on 7/25/2008 12:22:29 PM , Rating: 2
2 Giga flop computing power late 2009 or 2010 with Larrabee. That equates to a chip that is faster than the GTX 280 or HD 4700.

ATi and Nvidia will have faster solutions by then but the Intel chip will be a very good mainstream chip.


RE: Another money maker
By Clauzii on 7/25/2008 8:14:48 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, You mean "2 TERA flop"!


RE: Another money maker
By crystal clear on 7/26/2008 8:26:42 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
ATi and Nvidia will have faster solutions by then


I can tell this -

Be sure the Intel solution will knock out both AMD & Nvidia.

After integrating HAVOK technologies & years of R&D for what a mainstream chip ?

No way, be sure to get a rock solid product & a performance winner.

This is NOT fanboyism but based on access to hardcore information .



RE: Another money maker
By JustTom on 7/27/2008 1:27:58 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
This is NOT fanboyism but based on access to hardcore information .


So you are claiming to have specific insider information for Intel, NVidia, AND AMD?


RE: Another money maker
By dare2savefreedom on 7/27/2008 2:06:27 PM , Rating: 2
Itanium it is unstoppable!!!! FTW

you are right intel has never been wrong,

cpu with math problems, pentium4, itanium, the glorious list goes on


RE: Another money maker
By Mojo the Monkey on 7/30/2008 1:07:33 PM , Rating: 2
yeah, just like their smashing x3100 dx10 compatible integrated video chip. I have one, what a god damned joke. That was supposed to steal the _300 market from Nvidia and ATI/AMD right?

I simply do not believe you


RE: Another money maker
By crystal clear on 7/25/2008 12:13:29 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Only question left is the entry into discrete graphics, if that turns out to be halfway decent this should be an outstanding year for Intel.


That could be the K.O. punch for AMD...

As for the Nehalems launch -the first clue sent out by Intel was the price cuts recently announced.

Most notably, the price of the top-of-line Core 2 Duo - the 3.1GHZ E8500 - dropped from $266 to $183, a 31 per cent plunge. The slightly slower E8400 also received a cut, an 11 per cent drop from $183 to $163. And at the lower end of the Core 2 Duo line, Intel lopped 15 per cent from the price of the E7200, a 2.53GHz chip with a 3M L2 cache and a 1066MHz front side bus.

Over on the server side, the company slashed away on three low-end Xeon chips: the 2.40GHz X3220 (12 per cent), 2.13GHz X3210 (also 12 per cent), and the 3GHZ E3110 (11 per cent).

Meanwhile, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 - a 65nm desktop chip - is now 14 per cent cheaper. The prices of all other chips are unchanged.


http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/INTC/364725...

They have already started their inventory clearance...

Only wish I could have given you that link from Intel - INDIA page (now access restricted or page pull down).

They gave a detailed product roadmap with just everything you did not know & would like to read.

Have a nice day........


...
By voodooboy on 7/25/2008 11:06:58 AM , Rating: 2
Not to sound like a member from the Rambus legal department, but it's QuickAssist without the space in between.

Also, I'm not sure if you're referring to those individual units in the "Acceleration and I/O complex" as QuckAssist...it's actually the framework for allowing programmability of those FPGA-like units that's referred to as QuickAssist.




RE: ...
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 7/25/2008 11:09:48 AM , Rating: 2
Given that Intel and Rambus were in bed together at one point, it would not surprise me if Intel has a deal to get way with using this sort of thing.


RE: ...
By voodooboy on 7/25/2008 11:45:58 AM , Rating: 2
That's not what I meant. I didn't mean to imply that QuickAssist is a Rambus patented technology.
What I meant to say was, the term coined by Intel is "QuickAssist" without the space in between. And RAMBUS has a whole page dedicated to how different "parties" should spell their product/brand names.

So by pointing that out...I didn't want to make myself sound like I am/was working for the Rambus legal department.

You can have a look at it here...funny sh!t..

http://www.rambus.com/us/news/trademark_guidelines...


RE: ...
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 7/25/2008 12:01:03 PM , Rating: 2
They seem to be pretty uptight about it all.


RE: ...
By