backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 32 comment(s) - last by Fritzr.. on Apr 8 at 7:05 AM

New bio fuel cell prototype does away with platinum-based catalysts and fuel-separation membranes

Pulling electricity out of air may be a feasible option in the future according to researchers at Oxford University. Fraser Armstrong, Ph.D. and his research team have managed to develop a revolutionary bio fuel cell which promises clean and renewable energy.

The bio fuel cell contains two electrodes that are covered with oxygen-sensitive FeFe hydrogenase enzymes. The enzymes are attached to the electrodes using strong covalent and non-covalent linkages to allow for fast electron transfers. The electrodes and enzymes are then placed within a container of air which has a 3% mixture of hydrogen.

Current testing shows that the prototype fuel cell is capable of powering small electronic devices such as a wristwatch.

"We are at the tip of a large iceberg, with important consequences for the future, but there is still much to do before this generation of enzyme-based fuel cells becomes commercially viable," said Armstrong. "The idea of electricity from hydrogen in air, using an oxygen-tolerant hydrogenase is new, although other scientists have been investigating enzymes as electrocatalysts for years. Most hydrogenases have fragile active sites that are destroyed by even traces of oxygen, but oxygen tolerant hydrogenases have evolved to resist attack."

Armstrong notes that typical hydrogen fuel cells require expensive metals like platinum ($1,000 USD per ounce) to serve as a catalyst for electricity production. Hydrogenases also have roughly the same productivity rate as platinum-based catalysts and do not require complex fuel-separation membranes to operate.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Not quite "thin air"
By masher2 (blog) on 3/30/2007 12:43:41 PM , Rating: 2
The electricity is generated from air to which a 3% hydrogen mixture has been added...so not quite energy out of thin air.




RE: Not quite "thin air"
By Hulk on 3/30/2007 12:55:05 PM , Rating: 1
Exactly. And the power for a LCD watch is virtually nothing. Any galvanic reaction could do the same thing but we don't have galvanic power plants do we?

This will never see the light of day for commercial application.

It's good to explore all avenues but I hope not too much money is being spent on this.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By Xavian on 3/30/2007 2:01:44 PM , Rating: 5
Everything has to start somewhere, my friend.

I suppose if you were around when the first combustion engines were made, you would of said 'look! this thing will never match steam engines in speed or power!'

Just because its a new technology and doesn't produce a lot of power to begin with, doesn't mean that it isn't worth more investigation that could lead to a breakthrough in Fuel Cells, for all technology has evolved from something that is lesser.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By TimberJon on 3/30/2007 3:00:41 PM , Rating: 2
Yea cmon man. Don't slap it down like you know for certain that its development, or offshoots of its development won't become fruitful.

Dozens of technologies today were stumbled upon accidentally. Sometimes an offshoot, and sometimes an offshoot of an offshoot. Tip of the Iceburg experiments are worth keeping an eye on. A theory is different from a lab product that is proving the theory, and supplying raw data.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By masher2 (blog) on 3/30/2007 3:12:21 PM , Rating: 2
I can see potential uses for it. Imagine a home or office building with a hydrogen generator in it, constantly keeping a low-H2 mix distributed throughout the building. Now, you can replace all your battery-powered (and low-draw "wall-wart" powered) devices with this instead, eliminating the need to ever change batteries or run wires. You'd obviously lose some energy through convection with the outside air, but you'd gain a great deal in convenience and simplicity. And, if one assumes the enzyme-based cells were highly-efficient, you might even wind up saving on energy costs.

Obviously, the generator would require some automatic safety features, but otherwise the scheme appears feasible.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By Oregonian2 on 3/30/2007 4:25:28 PM , Rating: 2
Why would one want to use a box of hydrogen (or even batteries) to replace a one-dollar non-explosive, wall wart in a home that will have to be recharged when it runs out of hydrogen fuel someday? This hydrogen device is a battery of sorts.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By masher2 (blog) on 3/30/2007 4:32:27 PM , Rating: 2
You misunderstand how it would work. You wouldn't keep a "box of hydrogen"; you'd have a generator costing a few hundred dollars permanently installed. It would generate hydrogen directly from water, itself supplied via tap. No boxes or batteries to refill or replace, ever.

If you only had a single "wall-wart" to replace, such a system wouldn't even be close to feasible. However, I easily have 100 of the things in my home, not to mention a few dozen battery-powered devices. Replacing all of them with a system that needed no wires and never needed replacing would be a huge step forward.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By Oregonian2 on 3/30/2007 7:08:59 PM , Rating: 2
Ah! You use wall electricity and piped in water to produce a chemical hydrogen battery of sorts which you then use to produce electricity to power things via wires one runs through the house from the hydrogen unit. Or perhaps a power over power unit can be made to distribute that hydrogen generated electricity over the house's built-in power lines. Sorry I misunderstood! Or does one pipe the hydrogen through the house through hydrogen lines so one can produce electricity at the end points only? I don't think this would work well in my house.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By masher2 (blog) on 3/30/2007 7:31:26 PM , Rating: 2
I was envisioning direct release of the hydrogen into the air...probably via a small connection into your HVAC system, to ensure good circulation.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By borismkv on 3/30/2007 9:56:36 PM , Rating: 2
I'd hate to see what happens to the house that catches fire with that mixture. Or the people who live there.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By masher2 (blog) on 3/31/2007 7:58:35 AM , Rating: 2
> "I'd hate to see what happens to the house that catches fire with that mixture"

You didn't read the thread. A 3% H2 mixture is too low to support combustion.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By Oregonian2 on 4/2/2007 3:23:45 PM , Rating: 2
Doesn't mean that it doesn't burn if combustion is being supported by something else.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By Oregonian2 on 4/2/2007 3:28:15 PM , Rating: 2
As well as health concerns (long term breathing of gaseous hydrogen?). As well as having to use a LOT of hydrogen, most houses -- despite seemingly sealed -- "leak" 100% of their air every few hours (or some number like that). More if somebody opens a few windows on a nice summer day, or a sliding glass door to the deck (something we have).


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By masher2 (blog) on 4/2/2007 5:26:16 PM , Rating: 2
> "Doesn't mean that it doesn't burn if combustion is being supported by something else."

Not sure of your point. The oxygen in air burns also...if that combustion is being supported by something else. The point is that a 3% mixture doesn't increase in any way the risk of explosion or fire.

> "As well as health concerns (long term breathing of gaseous hydrogen.."

None. Hydrogen is a simple asphyxiant...dangerous only in concentrations high enough to supplant oxygen entirely.

> " most houses -- despite seemingly sealed -- "leak" 100% of their air every few hours"

A well-sealed home is actually on the order of a few days. Many office buildings are significantly less than that...which is why an office is probably a better environment for this.

In any case, your standard "wall wart" usually pulls a few watts of power...even when the device it powers isn't active. When it is active, most of them are extremely inefficient, often well below 50%.

So while the H2 approach certainly wastes some energy, I don't think the differential is nearly as large as you might think.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By Oregonian2 on 4/3/2007 2:25:44 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
> "Doesn't mean that it doesn't burn if combustion is being supported by something else."


Things that are 'flame retardant' won't sustain combustion, but if put into a flame they certainly do burn. Not sure if that's the right term to use or even what would happen with a 3% hydrogen atmosphere next to the fireplace that's roar'ing away. Our house has two of them.

As to houses, my understanding is that a typical house has a full recycling of air 3~5 times a day. And yes, modern office buildings can be much tighter than that (causing unhealthy air, I understand), although probably not near the doors. :-)

Air turnover can be quickened further when one turns on the outdoor venting fan in the kitchen while cooking or in bathrooms when the outdoor-going vents are turned on, or when a clothes dryer (also blowing air outdoors) is running -- and that one, at least ours, blows a LOT of air and does it the whole time it's running (which seems like forever -- and daily).


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By ralith on 3/30/2007 10:16:59 PM , Rating: 3
Wouldn't the hydrogen tend to pool at the ceiling? How would it stay mixed? What the heck is a "wall-wart"? A fire alarm?

Now the big question! Is 3% hydrogen enough to make your voice all high pitch like when you've sucked in from a helium ballon? That'd be hilerious.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By masher2 (blog) on 3/31/2007 7:56:55 AM , Rating: 1
> "Wouldn't the hydrogen tend to pool at the ceiling?"

No. Once mixed, two gases stay mixed. Otherwise, all the oxygen in our atmosphere would settle to the bottom, leaving nothing but nitrogen in the upper atmosphere.

> "What the heck is a "wall-wart"?

Colloquial term for the wall-socket transformer that powers consumer devices.


RE: Not quite "thin air"
By AnotherGuy on 3/30/2007 1:00:15 PM , Rating: 2
Still not so hard to achieve... u could create the battery with a small container of hydrogen in condensed form... which is released to the small main container of regular air up to 3% in volume... IF the whole idea is worth it.