backtop


Print 77 comment(s) - last by tastyratz.. on Dec 19 at 10:26 AM

Close to half of women surveyed said that they would choose to abandon sex for two weeks rather than give up their Internet access.

Almost half of women questioned by Harris Interactive said that they would choose to abandon sex for two weeks, over sacrificing their internet access, according to a study released Monday by Intel, which delegated the survey.

The survey results, comprised of 2,119 adult respondents surveyed last month in the U.S., make up part of Intel's broader commissioned study on Americans' reliance on the internet in today's economy.

Although nearly 46 percent of women respondents showed their willingness to give up sex life over Web access, only 30 percent of men surveyed would do the same.

The age bracket ranging from 18 to 34 years old displayed even more differences between women and men. Women in this group responded 49 percent favorably to choosing internet access over sex, and 39 percent of men respondents answered similarly.

Moving up in years, 52 percent of women between the ages of 35 and 44 years old said that they would choose to sacrifice sex over a loss in Web access.

Although men's willingness to give up sex for internet drags behind women's scores, bringing in other sacrificial options, such as television, presents slightly different results. For example, According to Reuters, a survey from earlier this year conducted by Comet on Britons resulted in nearly half of men respondents choosing to forgo sex for six months if they could have a 50-inch plasma TV. Only just over a third of women would make the same choice. 

In terms of a TV versus internet battle, the majority of adults would prefer a two-week loss of watching TV over a one-week loss of internet access. Nearly 40 percent of respondents said that they would not want to give up either.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By Rodney McNaggerton on 12/16/2008 8:35:47 PM , Rating: 5
The reason is simple economics, we learned about it in 8th grade.
The supply of sex from men is high, creating a low demand, from women, for sex. Unfortunately drugs like viagra have increase the supply of old man sex as well, making the demand that women feel for sex even lower.
Emos then are just economists who have tried to fix the supply/demand sex graph but failed miserably and become depressed lunatics.

WE can prove all of this with a little calculus.




RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By SRoode on 12/16/2008 8:38:48 PM , Rating: 4
Increased supply does not create a decreased demand... What middle school did you go to?


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By kake on 12/17/2008 3:41:11 AM , Rating: 2
When I met my wife and told her I was waiting for marriage she looked at me like I was insane. And then convinced me of it a month later.

Way hot is a bitch when you're trying to be patient and she's not insisting on anything more than the occasional shower . . .

*sigh* I think I'll go to bed now, eh?


By headbox on 12/18/2008 4:05:35 AM , Rating: 2
nice of you to choose the DT comment section to come out of the closet.


By Dreifort on 12/17/2008 8:54:37 AM , Rating: 2
But the increase supply of Dustin Diamond videos on the internet have all the ladies demanding it...

Damn you Screech!!


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By tastyratz on 12/16/2008 8:46:33 PM , Rating: 4
I have been saying my penis needs a bailout plan for years.

I'm sure with the right pitch and pouty face we could get the government to agree to tax funded brothels... Who's with me?


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By codeThug on 12/16/08, Rating: -1
RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By ebakke on 12/16/2008 10:55:16 PM , Rating: 2
Wow. Brutal.


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By codeThug on 12/17/2008 1:15:48 AM , Rating: 2
forgot the :)


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By on 12/17/08, Rating: -1
By LRonaldHubbs on 12/17/2008 8:33:54 AM , Rating: 5
You are an inanimate object. Stop saying words.


By Adonlude on 12/17/2008 5:06:24 PM , Rating: 2
Sex life or internet. Me thinks this survey just confused him becuase his sex life is on the internet.


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By Bonesdad on 12/17/2008 7:11:35 AM , Rating: 2
$100 in a whorehouse wouldn't buy much of anything anymore, methinks. Maybe off the street, but not a good establishment like my mom runs.


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By cleco on 12/17/2008 10:46:12 AM , Rating: 2
When I lived in Germany, whores typically cost around no more than 50 Euros for 30minutes. And its like a dealing with a car salesman.... they tend to go lower than 50 euro.

German whores are typically average to good looking but in Amsterdamn all the whores typically look like they should be modelling or in a Pron mag....


By tastyratz on 12/19/2008 10:26:52 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
they tend to go lower than *for* 50 euro.


typo?


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By afkrotch on 12/17/2008 11:53:12 AM , Rating: 2
$100 in a Japanese whore house gets you a shower, hand job, and some anal licking. If she likes you, free sex included.


By Spuke on 12/17/2008 12:15:38 PM , Rating: 3
How much without the anal licking?


By Ammohunt on 12/17/2008 2:31:38 PM , Rating: 4
Who does the licking?


By flydian on 12/18/2008 5:18:38 PM , Rating: 2
I was thinking the same thing. Clearly, the poster has never been to a legitimate establishment here in the states. $100 might buy some drinks and the chance to negotiate a real deal.

Then again, I was never a cheapskate about it, and may have been an easy mark, so maybe that was just my experience.

Not that I've ever been! I just lived in Nevada for 15+ years, and heard some stories! I promise!


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By Quiescent on 12/16/2008 11:06:53 PM , Rating: 3
It's probably because you men are too casual with sex. I prefer a little bit of play. Make things interesting.

I would give my internet for two weeks, if the sex was interesting.


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By BruceLeet on 12/17/2008 6:37:16 AM , Rating: 5
ASL?


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By mikeyD95125 on 12/17/2008 6:07:07 PM , Rating: 2
Haha at least for me things seem to be the opposite. I try to spice things up and the girl just wants it to be done quickly.


By Quiescent on 12/17/2008 10:40:17 PM , Rating: 2
You poor man. I always like being my boyfriend's catgirl. Yes. I will not mention his DT name here because I am sure he did not want me to say anything about that! Hahaha!


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By notolerance on 12/17/2008 7:15:40 PM , Rating: 2
The only "Casual" thing about sex for us males is usually in it's frequency... ;)


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By Quiescent on 12/17/2008 10:44:42 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, please read the above statement that I have placed and this: My boyfriend likes his sex before and after sleep at the LEAST. And he gets horny every time he even LOOKS at me, so yeah. I have a hard time keeping up, and even though I don't know how I do it, I manage somehow.


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By notolerance on 12/17/2008 11:41:40 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sure the majority of males here would like at least that amount as a minimum, if not they wouldn't knock back the offer if it was laid out in front of them. Though that decision for the most part, rests solely with the woman, and is sometimes accompanied or followed up by a "request"...

So let's just say you're man's one of the "luckier" ones then. :)


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By Quiescent on 12/18/2008 3:58:46 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I keep telling him he's lucky. He's been thinking that it's common for guys to get it at least once a day and that I should be giving him more. Even though I'd rather spend my time wisely and not waste it on sex, sex, sex!


By notolerance on 12/18/2008 6:10:21 PM , Rating: 2
What waste of time?! I would consider it time well spent! All one needs to do is throw in a beer, chuck the cricket on and feel content in the productive afternoons work! There's some food for thought for him! :P


By AstroCreep on 12/16/2008 11:24:45 PM , Rating: 5
Hmmm...

Well sir, the Internet tells me that you are wrong.
The Internet tells me that all women love sex and will bring their naked, heaving bodies to me with nothing more than a sausage pizza, beer, and my inability to answer long algebraic equations.


RE: It's so simple a cave man could do it...
By defter on 12/17/2008 6:27:36 AM , Rating: 5
One reason for skewed supply/demand ratio is the western society and feminists which try their best to demonize prostitution.

One working woman can easily satisfy sexual needs of 5-10 men, significantly balancing supply and demand in the society.


By Aquila76 on 12/17/2008 7:05:14 AM , Rating: 4
At the same time even.


By omnicronx on 12/17/2008 10:10:15 AM , Rating: 2
There are more woman in the united states than men.. (its basically 1:1, no calculus needed)

I also think this survey is flawed! I think member size of your partner(you know what I mean) should be the first question! Size matters!

I would give up sex too if my female partner had a couch the size of a baseball glove!


By Samus on 12/18/2008 12:33:51 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The supply of sex from men is high, creating a low demand, from women, for sex.


I'd have to disagree. I had a girlfriend a few years back that wanted to have sex so often we broke up over it. My girlfriend now is beginning to follow the same trend, but its somewhat manageable since she has at least some will-power to not crave it when she knows I don't want it.

Women think about sex equally as much as men, if not more.

Men and Women are equally always ready for sex, with the exception of a few days of any given month for women.

Women have the physical ability to enjoy sex more, take your part in showing them how.

I'd take the internet over sex during a 2 week time period, but no longer than a month.

You're either unlucky with women or terrible in bed.


50% of women
By chmilz on 12/16/2008 8:27:24 PM , Rating: 5
would give up two weeks of sex for pretty much anything, as long as they got something out of it. Sex is a commodity for the empowered female.




RE: 50% of women
By sh3rules on 12/16/2008 8:47:10 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Sex is a commodity for the empowered female.


I couldn't agree more!


RE: 50% of women
By Runiteshark on 12/16/2008 11:07:45 PM , Rating: 2
proud ^

As in the term "Proud empowered female"

Proud empowered female
WOOO, I HAVE A VAGINA, THIS MEANS I CAN DO IT

Guy:
Want to get some coffee after its done?


RE: 50% of women
By Aquila76 on 12/17/2008 7:06:12 AM , Rating: 2
This needs a six.


RE: 50% of women
By afkrotch on 12/17/2008 11:56:49 AM , Rating: 2
So all empowered females are prostitutes?


RE: 50% of women
By ZmaxDP on 12/17/2008 4:36:05 PM , Rating: 2
Yes,

As it stands now, the only difference between the ones you want and the ones you don't are the number of concurrent partners they're willing to entertain...

Heck, marriage/civil unions until the feminist movement were basically single customer prostitution. Prior to women as wage earners, women would get hitched basically as a source of income. Half the world still largely operates in this sense. Now, you marry and the woman can easily match or exceed the man's earning power - and this radically changes the valuation of sex between partners. The only question is whether this is a good thing or not, and for who...


RE: 50% of women
By someguy123 on 12/17/2008 5:36:31 PM , Rating: 3
true. it's also a lot harder to please a women to orgasm than it is for a guy as well, though.

for women you need money, a house, a nice car, a job with more than six figures salary, nice clothes, a good looking body, good family relationships, lots of friends, funny, want to spend lots of time together, want to do all the manual labor, foreplay, and a big penis.

for men just gotta tug on it for a while.


Memories...
By SRoode on 12/16/2008 8:18:41 PM , Rating: 2
Reminds me of my college buddy who said he's rather take a nice dump than have sex...

But, he then conceded it was most likely because of his clientele...




RE: Memories...
By BruceLeet on 12/16/2008 8:31:08 PM , Rating: 3
Id rather ditch 2 weeks of sex over 2 weeks of no internet. Girlfriend and I are in different colleges anyway so there wouldn't be much a sacrifice if I ditched the sex for 2 weeks.

It all depends, would a sex addict ditch sex over the internet? Or would World of Warcrafters ditch the internet for sex (something tells me they would LOL, after all...it is a real life experience)


RE: Memories...
By Alexstarfire on 12/16/2008 10:11:52 PM , Rating: 2
And that's one of the things that needs to be looked at, the reasons behind it.

If the sex was horrible, or current circumstances prevent you from having sex, then giving up sex for 2 weeks is no big deal. If we had reasons behind their choices then perhaps we could get more out of this. As we don't..... who cares.

My girfriend is 5000 miles away, give or take a couple dozen miles, and I haven't seen her in 5 months, with another 7 to go till I see her again. Makes this as easy choice for me. If she was here, I'd give up internet in a heartbeat. I think she would too. She addicted to The Sims 2.... just like every girl.


RE: Memories...
By Sanity on 12/17/08, Rating: 0
RE: Memories...
By Quiescent on 12/18/2008 4:00:38 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe if you date a bitch for a girlfriend. I have been in a long distance relationship for almost 3 years with mine and I reserve myself for him only.


RE: Memories...
By notolerance on 12/17/2008 8:27:46 PM , Rating: 2
I'll let her know you said hi... :P


RE: Memories...
By SavagePotato on 12/17/2008 10:42:48 AM , Rating: 2
It could be an indication of being a flagrant homosexual.


One has to wonder...
By Nfarce on 12/16/2008 8:42:49 PM , Rating: 5
Are those 46% of women who would rather have the internet over sex the same Cosmo readers who constantly whine that there are no good men out there?

This may come as a shock to women, but men don't need women for sex either. However, men do need internet smut every now and then. (Insert Randy's no-internet, no smut experience from South Park here).




RE: One has to wonder...
By FITCamaro on 12/17/2008 6:29:35 AM , Rating: 4
It's ectoplasm....There was a ghost...


RE: One has to wonder...
By SavagePotato on 12/17/2008 10:45:28 AM , Rating: 2
Slippery slope, the Romans and Genghis Kahn's armies decided they didn't need women for sex as well, look where that led.


No surprises
By excelsium on 12/16/2008 8:47:06 PM , Rating: 2
Female masturbation is better than most man-woman sex anyway, not surprising.




RE: No surprises
By excelsium on 12/16/2008 8:48:33 PM , Rating: 2
men need sex more than woman do, I think.


RE: No surprises
By i3arracuda on 12/16/2008 9:04:06 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
men need sex more than woman do, I think.


Clearly you've never been to Singapore.


RE: No surprises
By Doctorweir on 12/16/2008 9:22:26 PM , Rating: 5
Hmmm...living in Singapore you got me thinking...
But well, it's clearly a women majority here, so men are definitely in demand...and Internet is slow anyway... ;-)


Next study, Men vs WOW
By feelingshorter on 12/16/2008 10:28:51 PM , Rating: 4
I'd put money on it that a large % of both men and women would give up sex vs giving up playing WOW.




RE: Next study, Men vs WOW
By Kibbles on 12/16/2008 11:24:33 PM , Rating: 5
As an update to the study, when the men were reminded that online gameplay counts as "internet" the number suddenly jumped to 83%.


The difference is:
By kyleb2112 on 12/17/2008 2:46:39 AM , Rating: 2
Women know they can have all the sex they want after the two weeks. Must be nice.

But it's all gonna change when the holodeck comes online...




RE: The difference is:
By Spuke on 12/17/2008 12:29:41 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Women know they can have all the sex they want after the two weeks.
Interestingly, not very many women look at it that way. It's almost like listening to men talk about a lack of sex or sexual partners. Women are looking for a particular man, even if it's just to have some fun (including sex). If they can't find him, they assume there's none available. Men have a "range" of types of women so it's easier for us to find one but if we don't meet the woman's criteria, we're not the right one for them even when we are the right one for them. I find that men need to learn to sell themselves to women. It's more work and, quite frankly somewhat ridiculous, but we (men) get what we want and the women get what they want in the end.


By Ordr on 12/16/2008 8:45:22 PM , Rating: 2
Pun tangentially intended.




By Spuke on 12/16/2008 9:34:05 PM , Rating: 2
Ok, let the puns, haiku's, etc stop now LOL!


The reason seems obvious....
By CurtOien on 12/16/2008 10:35:48 PM , Rating: 2
Of course these women are choosing the internet over sex...they have never been with me ;)




RE: The reason seems obvious....
By Senju on 12/17/2008 5:21:33 AM , Rating: 1
or me either! :D


RE: The reason seems obvious....
By FaceMaster on 12/17/2008 8:22:57 AM , Rating: 1
Surely Internet includes sex?


polled online?
By Visual on 12/17/2008 5:20:39 AM , Rating: 2
Half of them would ditch sex for the internet...
... and did just that half of them take the poll online, or they all did? ;)

If the poll was online, it's a safe bet to claim that the half that chose sex are in fact men acting like women. Though that seems like a too low percentage.




RE: polled online?
By Belard on 12/17/2008 6:55:43 AM , Rating: 2
Or... how about half of those women are NOT worth having sex with.

Bad sex isn't worth it. Been then, done that... would have rather have picked my nose in public.

But having great sex with someone you live is better than good sex with two bi-sexual nympos girls :)

But a 50" plasma.... hmmmm... for free, vs all sex with I want with cute women (younger... like 20~25) over 6 months. Guess I'll need about 6-8 boxes of Trojans.

I'll live with my old-tube TV a while longer ;)


Demographics?
By whirabomber on 12/17/2008 7:51:36 AM , Rating: 2
I sure wish the article would have broken the men vs women down by married/unmarried/divorced demographics. Unhappy married women could skew the results and divorced guys realize a 50inch TV is more exciting than a woman (at least until he realizes he is single again).




RE: Demographics?
By Screwballl on 12/17/2008 4:02:33 PM , Rating: 2
exactly... being a married man (content, not exactly happy or unhappy) I typically go 2-4 weeks without it anyways. Thats why there is always key websites to keep me from going out of my mind...


But...
By GTaudiophile on 12/17/2008 8:33:01 AM , Rating: 2
But what happens when Internet = sex?

Perhaps women are just choosing between the real deal and simulated?




RE: But...
By afkrotch on 12/17/2008 12:06:03 PM , Rating: 2
I think the sex part should be all forms of sexual activity to include masturbation. I can give up on sex, if I was allowed porn and some lotion, but take that away and I'd have to give up the internet.

Not like I couldn't still play games, watch TV, or snort some blow.


Women need more than one man to be happy
By SpaceJumper on 12/17/2008 12:04:45 AM , Rating: 1
It has been preprogrammed for million of years in the women genes that women need more than one man to yield a better child by the natural selection of sperms competition. Internet may be the next best thing for a woman to fantasize about the multiple partners.




By Spuke on 12/17/2008 12:22:11 PM , Rating: 2
Saw this on a show once.


By Cogman on 12/16/2008 8:38:26 PM , Rating: 2
Nearly 50% of women WOULDN'T give up sex for the Internet (for 2 weeks). Honestly that number is higher then I expected (think facebook).




Autoerogeny
By Phlargo on 12/16/2008 10:25:07 PM , Rating: 2
I wonder if this survey included self-stimulation under 'sex'. I think that would heavily influence the percentage of men. I could easily go without sex for several months in exchange for internet.. but if you throw in masturbation, it becomes a more difficult calculus.




"even more differences"?
By ET on 12/17/2008 1:42:29 AM , Rating: 2
How is 49 vs. 39 in the 18-34 group more of a difference than 46 vs. 30?

Interestingly, this is the same in the linked article, but it's been paraphrased (apparently without noticing the inconsistency).

Frankly, though somewhat interesting, I wonder what the percentages are of people who aren't having sex once in a fortnight anyway, so would have little problem giving it up. Could it be that it's not that far from these figures?




and if i do it while surfin....
By neofox on 12/17/2008 1:06:09 PM , Rating: 2
For 2 weeks .... hope the line dont drop would have to start it again :9




By callmeroy on 12/17/2008 4:45:53 PM , Rating: 2
Granted I only had about a half dozen GF's my entire life so far, but of them all but two had a higher interest in sex and a higher "drive" than me. And I thought I have a pretty healthy drive myself for my age.

I also can't help but wondering --- what did these women look like in the survey, and I guess what did their partners look like? I'm not just talking about the normal conclusions of hot looking women = hot sex life, but also physical fitness. Surely heavier folks tend to be more sedentary and introverted in the first place and probably also have more issues and esteem issues with having sex in the first place -- so naturally if you have all that going on, going 2 weeks w/o it isn't that much of a deal.




Need sex, try Houston,texas
By GotDiesel on 12/17/08, Rating: 0
"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki