backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 109 comment(s) - last by biohazard42042.. on May 13 at 10:07 PM


Navy scientists claim that slices of CR-39 plastic, like this one, have recorded the passage of atomic particles emitted during successful cold fusion nulcear reactions. Photo by Steven B. Krivit, New Energy Times
New proof that cold fusion works could fuel additional interest in generating power from low energy nuclear reactions

Cold fusion, the ability to generate nuclear power at room temperatures, has proven to be a highly elusive feat. In fact, it is considered by many experts to be a mere pipe dream -- a potentially unlimited source of clean energy that remains tantalizing,  but so far unattainable.

However, a recently published academic paper from the Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (SPAWAR) in San Diego throws cold water on skeptics of cold fusion. Appearing in the respected journal Naturwissenschaften, which counts Albert Einstein among its distinguished authors, the article claims that Spawar scientists Stanislaw Szpak and Pamela Mosier-Boss have achieved a low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) that can be replicated and verified by the scientific community.

Cold fusion has gotten the cold shoulder from serious nuclear physicists since 1989, when Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann were unable to substantiate their sensational claims that deuterium nuclei could be forced to fuse and release excess energy at room temperature. Spawar researchers apparently kept the faith, however, and continued to refine the procedure by experimenting with new fusionable materials.

Szpak and Boss now claim to have succeeded at last by coating a thin wire with palladium and deuterium, then subjected it to magnetic and electric fields. The researchers have offered plastic films called CR-39 detectors as evidence that charged particles have been emerging from their reaction experiments.

The Spawar method shows promise, particularly in terms of being easily reproduced and verified by other institutions. Such verification is essential to widespread acceptance of the apparent breakthrough and is an important precursor to scientists receiving the necessary funding to fuel additional research in the field.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Bladen on 5/5/2007 5:41:52 AM , Rating: 1
Most forms of electricity generation require enough heat to boil water (to make steam to turn a generator), with the exception of photovoltaic conversion of light into electricity.




By Soccerman06 on 5/5/2007 6:25:04 AM , Rating: 4
Magic


By S3anister on 5/6/2007 11:04:13 PM , Rating: 2
They use the magical loller-berries.


By Griswold on 5/5/2007 6:32:47 AM , Rating: 5
The difference between "hot fusion" and "cold fusion" is that the former uses super heated plasma and high pressure to force two nuclei together and thus generate energy/heat. One of the big problems currently: you have to invest much more energy than you can get out of it, which also limits the time you can keep the fusion process going to a few seconds.

Cold fusion on the other hand, is supposed to skip the part where you need extreme heat and pressure (and therefore enormous amounts of energy) - but the result would still be energy/heat if it worked.


By ilmdba on 5/6/2007 4:09:13 AM , Rating: 4
christ googer, who pissed in your canteen?

go hang out on usenet if you wanna just post flames.


By doctor sam adams on 5/6/2007 8:03:50 AM , Rating: 5
The funny part is, he's replying to himself.


By S3anister on 5/6/2007 11:04:53 PM , Rating: 3
Dude, that doesn't even make sense, is that person bi-polar or something?

split personality?

lolololol


By powermil on 5/7/2007 12:33:54 AM , Rating: 2
The REALLY funny part is, he is RIGHT.
MOST power is made using boiled water to drive steam turbines. Water is boiled using oil, gas, or nuclear fuel, it is sent through a steam turbine attached to a generator...
However, to Googers point, the photo-voltaic blurb did not represent a full thought...uh, process.


By mindless1 on 5/11/2007 10:31:24 PM , Rating: 2
The REALLY REALLY funny part is he wasn't right and your reading skills are off a bit. He wrote:

"Most forms of electricity generation...".

No, most forms don't use boiling water. Those most commonly used for producing consumable power for a large number of people might, ie - power plant, but that is not what was written. He was probably thinking the right thing but did not express it correctly.


By QuantumPion on 5/8/2007 11:11:48 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
According to your logic; I guess that batteries, methane fuel cells, hydrogen fuel cells, diesel/gas generators, solar panels, electric eels, wind turbines, tribocharging, hydro-electric, and hand cranked radios all require boiling water to operate?


Batteries, fuel cells, solar panels and wind turbines are not heat engines. They don't create energy, they merely capture or release energy generated previously. In order to generate sizeable amounts of energy with any realistic efficiency, you need to use a heat engine which obeys the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The max efficiency you can get is 1-(Thot/Tcold) (temperature in kelvins or rankines). In order to get 30% efficiency, you need a temperature difference of 90 K ,which would be above the boiling point of water (starting at room temperature).


By ccnuke on 5/8/2007 1:09:00 PM , Rating: 3
Cold Fusion will NEVER work without the MOST important ingredient that you have all seem to have forgotten....

The Flux Capacitor

:)


By SomeYoungMan on 5/11/2007 6:15:02 PM , Rating: 2
Plus they need more cowbell. I'd say over 9,000.


By Brick on 5/10/2007 11:32:29 AM , Rating: 2
The fusion energy from the experiment was not enough to power even a small light bulb so converting it would be meaningless. I would say the results of the experiment were an effect of tunneling just like we learned in physics about the non-infinite energy wells. If there is a "barrier" with a non-infinite energy level and we directed a particle with a kinetic energy below that barrier's energy it would have a probability of tunneling through the barrier. The probability would be dependent on the difference between the kinetic energy of the particle, the barrier's energy and the thickness of the barrier. So, because there is a barrier to overcome in fusion that is not infinite in energy or depth a particle could possibly tunnel through and "get stuck" (fusion). The issue is to fine tune the kinetic energy of the particles so that enough tunnel through without continuing through and tunneling out the "other side" to obtain useful energy. Another issue is that if we took a nuclei and tried to accelerate them toward target a nuclei we would have a small probability of the accelerated nuclei even coming close to the target. So to get useful energy would take a lot of nuclei. Therefore the probability is extremely small that nuclei would fuse together in the table top experiment used and therefore only a few neutrons would be detected.


Everything is Impossible...
By Xavian on 5/5/2007 7:48:29 AM , Rating: 2
Everything is Impossible to science, until some smart git figures out how.

If this is true, then this is a massive step forward in our technological evolution. Free Energy... amazing.




RE: Everything is Impossible...
By S3anister on 5/6/2007 11:03:41 PM , Rating: 2
We should have a way to harness gravity to make energy.

ridiclous. lawl.


RE: Everything is Impossible...
By powermil on 5/7/2007 12:25:12 AM , Rating: 4
Yeah, gravity making power...hahaha, ridiculous...oh wait, Niagra Falls generator station...


RE: Everything is Impossible...
By Korvon on 5/7/2007 11:46:18 AM , Rating: 2
They already have one in process...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_power


RE: Everything is Impossible...
By S3anister on 5/7/2007 5:58:49 PM , Rating: 2
same with the hydroelectric generator being built in iceland.... but that's not what i was talking about.


RE: Everything is Impossible...
By Cincybeck on 5/8/07, Rating: 0
By