backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 77 comment(s) - last by silverfang77.. on Jun 8 at 11:20 AM

Some health care professionals worry texting is hurting teens mentally and physically

People today text while they drive, they text while they eat, and kids text while they are in class. Texting has changed the way mobile phone users communicate for the better and according to some for the worse.

The New York Times (NYT) reports that some physicians and psychologists fear that the overuse of texting is harming children in America – it also believes that texting can lead to anxiety, distraction in school, and falling grades. Doctors worry that the overuse of texting may also lead to repetitive injuries and sleep deprivation.

The NYT talked to Dr. Martin Joffee, a pediatrician from California, who claims that many teens commonly send hundreds of texts per day. Joffee said, "That’s one every few minutes. Then you hear that these kids are responding to texts late at night. That’s going to cause sleep issues in an age group that’s already plagued with sleep issues.”

There are no studies that show empirical evidence that texting causes any kind of harm, researchers studying the effects of texting point out that the rise in texting is too recent for any conclusive data. However, MIT researcher Sherry Turkle has been studying teens in the Boston area for three years and says that texting could be affecting the way that adolescents develop.

Turkle told the NYT, "Among the jobs of adolescence are to separate from your parents, and to find the peace and quiet to become the person you decide you want to be. Texting hits directly at both those jobs."

The problem, according to Turkle, is that the fast and easy access to communication between kids and parents leads adolescents to ask parents to make the decisions for them that they need to be making for themselves in order to develop. She also says that the constant vibrating or ringing of the phone makes it hard to concentrate and get quiet time.

Turkle added, "If you’re being deluged by constant communication, the pressure to answer immediately is quite high. So if you’re in the middle of a thought, forget it."

Michael Hausauer, a California-based psychotherapist says, "Texting can be an enormous tool. It offers companionship and the promise of connectedness. At the same time, texting can make a youngster feel frightened and overly exposed."

Mental health professionals may worry about the well-being of text message deluged teens and tweens, but physicians worry more about the physical side effects of mass texting. The act of texting could be taking a toll on the thumbs of teens in the same way that typing takes a toll on the wrists of many computer workers. One teen interviewed by the NYT said that she got painful cramps in her thumbs from texting on her LG phone.

Peter W. Johnson form the University of Washington says that it's too early to tell if stress form texting could be causing damage. He says, "Based on our experiences with computer users, we know intensive repetitive use of the upper extremities can lead to musculoskeletal disorders, so we have some reason to be concerned that too much texting could lead to temporary or permanent damage to the thumbs."

At the same time some researchers and health care professionals worry about the toll texting is taking on teens today, some studies show that there is a benefit to texting. According to a recent study, texting improves language skills in children.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

You think?
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 10:57:39 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
it also believes that texting can lead to anxiety, distraction in school, and falling grades.


Those people are crazy. No way texting could be related to that. /sarcasm

God forbid they just ban phones in schools and confiscate them if found, require the parent to show up to get it back, and not give it back after the 2nd time it's confiscated. BAD parents will argue that puts stress on them. Well then tell your damn kid to keep his phone off in school.




RE: You think?
By WW102 on 5/27/09, Rating: -1
RE: You think?
By Kaldor on 5/27/2009 12:15:00 PM , Rating: 5
Maybe not take it away permanently. But schools should have a no phone policy. Leave it your locker. Last I checked every school has a secretary and every classroom has a phone, so getting in touch in a emergency is still very easy.

They are a huge nuisance in general. After getting rid of my cell phone I know understand how obtrusive and obnoxious they really are. I can honestly say that I dont miss it. There are times when I dont want to be reached. Unplug!!

As far as teens sending 100's of texts a day. As a parent, maybe the parents need to step up and do something about it.


RE: You think?
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 12:15:23 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah really. Don't give them an unlimited texting plan. If they go over their allowance, take the damn phone away. Crazy talk I know.


RE: You think?
By Kaldor on 5/27/2009 12:25:43 PM , Rating: 2
The issue with NOT having an unlimited plan, is that if the kid goes over the limit, guess who gets it with no lube?

Cell companies are just as much to blaim IMO. Every cell company should have the ability for the account holder to limit the amount of texts sent and received by phone number. The system should be built with some exceptions, IE when the kids phone runs out of texts, still allow them to text certain numbers in case of emergency.


RE: You think?
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/27/2009 1:53:55 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
The issue with NOT having an unlimited plan, is that if the kid goes over the limit, guess who gets it with no lube?

Only once. If they aren't responsible enough to stay within the limit then revoke their texting altogether...and also make them pay the fee themselves. It's called parenting, and I realize it's gone out of fashion, but believe it or not, kids are capable of knowing and respecting limitations.

quote:
Cell companies are just as much to blaim IMO. Every cell company should have the ability for the account holder to limit the amount of texts sent and received by phone number. The system should be built with some exceptions, IE when the kids phone runs out of texts, still allow them to text certain numbers in case of emergency.

The cell company is to blame? Are you kidding? They are doing exactly what they should: making as much money as possible off of soft parents. Texting is not a necessity, and in fact I have it disabled on my plan.


RE: You think?
By Kaldor on 5/27/2009 2:16:38 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Only once. If they aren't responsible enough to stay within the limit then revoke their texting altogether...and also make them pay the fee themselves. It's called parenting, and I realize it's gone out of fashion, but believe it or not, kids are capable of knowing and respecting limitations.


Only once is enough honestly. Id rather have the insurance of the unlimited plan for a few extra bucks a month, than get hit with a $1000 cell bill one month because my kid had a brain cramp. Go ahead and try to make a 14 YO kid pay a $1000 cell bill. Not happening.

quote:
The cell company is to blame? Are you kidding? They are doing exactly what they should: making as much money as possible off of soft parents. Texting is not a necessity, and in fact I have it disabled on my plan.


I should have explained myself better. Would it be that hard for cell co's to provide a way to limit texting on a per phone basis? Nope. And yeah they are raking in the dough off soft parents. You may have it disabled, but I think your in the minority here.


RE: You think?
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/27/2009 2:59:25 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Go ahead and try to make a 14 YO kid pay a $1000 cell bill. Not happening.

What do you mean 'not happening?' It's quite simple actually. Does the kid have an alowance? Not anymore. Does the kid have a job? If they are 14+, they do now. Does the kid play many videogames? Not anymore, now that they are working to pay off that $1000 they owe. Yep, it's very simple for a 14-year-old to pay you back for that fee.

And btw, I don't have kids yet, as I'm only 22 myself. However, in high school I worked my ass off during the summers doing manual labor for minimum wage, and if I racked up a $1000 cellphone bill, you can bet I would have had to pay for it. My parents taught me responsibility, and I will be doing the same.

quote:
I should have explained myself better. Would it be that hard for cell co's to provide a way to limit texting on a per phone basis? Nope. And yeah they are raking in the dough off soft parents. You may have it disabled, but I think your in the minority here.

Yes it would be easy for them to do, but I'm arguing that they should not. Soft parents deserve to be exploited. Text messages are 100% profit for the cell companies anyway, so why not milk it further with fees? Maybe parents will eventually start to wise up...erm, nope, that won't happen.


RE: You think?
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 3:31:51 PM , Rating: 4
Word. I was in high school when people first really started getting cell phones. Since I went to a private school, the school put a blanket ban on cell phones on campus. If caught with one in class the teacher confiscated it. You didn't get it back.

There were a few parents who complained. But the vast majority didn't. Parents cared about the quality of the education their kids were getting and didn't give a sh*t if the rich kid (since that's who mainly had a cell phone then) lost his/her cell phone.


RE: You think?
By ssjwes1980 on 5/27/2009 5:40:04 PM , Rating: 2
Why the hell did this get down rated? Maybe not at 14 but 16 would be more like it for me to put them through that but then again I wouldnt be paying for the phone out of hand to begin with... My nephew has a phone and hes 13 but doesnt use it like a moron at school and does things around the house/neighborhood to help out with his bill.


RE: You think?
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 3:23:10 PM , Rating: 2
At any time you can log on and see how many texts your kid is sending. A $1000 cell phone bill is a little more than a "brain cramp". That's 1800 text messages(typically 50 cents a message) if you assumed the bill itself was $100. If you think they're sending too many, go online and check. If they are shut off the phone.

Parenting isn't easy. And cell phone companies don't exist to make it easier for you. Have you ever tried to go into a store and see if they can limit it though? My guess is no. My parents had to put a block on my brother's phone from being able to subscribe to monthly fee based services for his phone. They may not be able to but if you don't trust your kid to not obey the limits of the plan, don't give them the f*cking phone.

But hey what am I saying. It's always someone else's fault.


RE: You think?
By EricMartello on 5/27/2009 5:25:17 PM , Rating: 2
What is this madness you are implying? People should take responsibility for their own decisions and their offspring? Insanity!!!

Seriously tho, I don't disagree at all. Nobody NEEDS a cellphone, certainly not in school. My school would also confiscate stuff like walkmans/MP3 players, beepers (before there were cell phones, there were beepers), drug paraphernalia and such from students caught with it. Too bad, they shouldn't have brought it in the first place.


RE: You think?
By Spivonious on 5/27/2009 1:54:10 PM , Rating: 3
<grammar nazi>
Blaim? Are you serious?

IE, assuming you meant i.e., should actually be e.g.

i.e. = "in other words"
e.g. = "for example"

</grammar nazi>


RE: You think?
By Kaldor on 5/27/09, Rating: -1
RE: You think?
By Aquila76 on 5/27/2009 10:37:26 PM , Rating: 2
You text a lot, don't you? Oh, wait:

u txt 2 mch k ?


RE: You think?
By Kibbles on 5/27/2009 4:37:17 PM , Rating: 2
There are prepaid monthly plans that differ little from regular plans. They go over their texting limit? Too bad you can't text anymore. Use up your free minutes? There goes day time calling.
It's kind of like teaching your kids money management skills with your creditcard and saying "Don't use more than $100 a month dear."


RE: You think?
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 12:14:04 PM , Rating: 1
Teachers are there to teach. Not to babysit your kids due to your lack of parenting skills. If you don't want your kids phone to get taken away, tell them not to use it. If they do it anyway and it gets taken away the first time, you tell them if they lose it again, they won't have one. Simple as that.


RE: You think?
By WW102 on 5/27/09, Rating: -1
RE: You think?
By ebakke on 5/27/2009 3:02:44 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
...but I am saying DO NOT TAKE THE PHONE AWAY FROM MY KID.
Then teach your kid some f'ing discipline. Cripes.


RE: You think?
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 3:25:29 PM , Rating: 2
Even if they just confiscate it for the day, then you'll b*tch because you have to go down to the school to get the phone from them. I say that because that's one of the complaints I've seen against such policies when school's have tried to enact them.


RE: You think?
By mherlund on 5/27/2009 4:40:19 PM , Rating: 3
I agree that the schools should not take the phone away from someone just because, but if a kid is using it in class they have every right to. They should be banned from the classrooms altogether and kept in lockers.


RE: You think?
By clovell on 5/28/2009 2:03:24 PM , Rating: 2
I'd just have it done like it is at the airport - school confiscates it, and they'll mail it back to the kid's house after the student pays for shipping. Being without a phone for a few days ought to teach them. Oh, and require the parents to sign for it, too.


RE: You think?
By WW102 on 5/27/2009 5:30:12 PM , Rating: 1
LOL you say it like its my kid doing it. Keep up with the post son. I am saying you can take up game systems etc.. and they can wait for the parents to come to the school to pick them up that way you make a point of saying "Hey do not bring this in to the class room". But phones are different. Yes they should have a very strict phone policy in school. They should be kept in bags or lockers and on vibrate. If someone is caught on the phone then they should be delt with accordingly. But the reason many kids have phones from a parents prospective is to keep tabs on there kids. If you take the phone away then like I said the school and I will have a problem. True they use the phone to text and call friends a lot but they should not prevent a parent from calling their kid.


RE: You think?
By WW102 on 5/27/2009 5:33:24 PM , Rating: 2
If thats the case then police and movie theater ushers should start collecting phones on a regular basis. At least its unlikely someone will die in school if someone is on the phone, unlike some drivers.


RE: You think?
By ClownPuncher on 5/27/2009 1:36:01 PM , Rating: 1
Yea, I would hate it if a teacher took away my kids bong, HE PAID FOR IT. Seriously, if the school has a no phone/no texting policy (which they all should) then don't text in class.


RE: You think?
By WW102 on 5/27/2009 5:37:28 PM , Rating: 2
Really? Why even post?


RE: You think?
By ClownPuncher on 5/27/2009 6:56:58 PM , Rating: 2
Why not? Cell phone in class = contraband. The school isn't going to keep the phones, but you won't be getting it back until the day is done at the very least. If the rules say you can't be messing with your phone in class, then don't.

Do people really need to call their kids while they are in class? Do you need to text them?


RE: You think?
By WW102 on 5/28/2009 12:02:38 PM , Rating: 2
I never said you need to call or text in class. I am talking about after class... Keep up with all the post Son...Thanks


RE: You think?
By Hakuryu on 5/27/2009 2:12:32 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe I'm just old (38), but in my day, if you brought anything into class that wasn't part of that class (books, pens, paper, etc), it got taken away. Walkmans, candy, magazines, skateboards and other items were regularly taken and given back at the end of the school day - usually after parents were informed that kids were bringing things to class that they should not have.

Phones would be a top thing taken if we had them when I was in school... I can't believe teachers and schools let them bring them to class.


RE: You think?
By xRyanCat on 5/27/2009 4:49:40 PM , Rating: 2
The vast majority of schools do in fact have some form of policy limiting cell phone use in school.

Some have a policy where the phone must be turned off and out of sight while on school campus.

Others have a policy where no cell phones are allowed on campus, period.

Then there are some schools that are extremely lenient and have policies but the teachers don't always enforce it.

And there are stiff penalties for having a cell phone at school. The local high school gives kids In School Suspension for 3 days on the first offense and require the parent to pick the phone up.

The problem isn't the cell phones, regardless if they are allowed kids will continue to bring them. Kids break rules and they're not going to stop texting because their school tells them not to.

If the parent feels the child isn't responsible enough for texting, then it's up to the parents to remove that privilege. That being said the same students that don't listen in class because of texting will find other things to catch their boredom. It's not really fair to blame texting.


RE: You think?
By GatzB on 5/27/2009 6:15:04 PM , Rating: 2
Considering that would give the parents something else to complain about I know it would not work at my old High school. Just install phone signal scramblers!!


RE: You think?
By FaaR on 5/28/2009 8:29:16 AM , Rating: 2
Extra, extra! Read all about it!

News flash:
Doing anything too much is not good for you.

Strange, I know, but true.


RE: You think?
By DeepBlue1975 on 5/28/2009 5:30:00 PM , Rating: 2
100% agreed.

Cell phones should be completely banned in classrooms, and if any single pupil gets caught, he should just get expelled.

I'd also vote for jamming devices which would impair the cellphones' signal in every single classroom, preventing them from ever getting the signal while on the premises, and also preventing teachers from getting distraught by a perfectly irrelevant call while lecturing their pupils.


Sub-title typo
By Raidin on 5/27/2009 10:09:18 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Some health care professionals worry testing is hurting teens mentally and physically


Testing should be texting, still funny to read it as it is from the main page.




RE: Sub-title typo
By AnnihilatorX on 5/27/2009 10:15:05 AM , Rating: 5
Very true. Examinations and tests are indeed hurting teens mentally and physically.

I am getting PTSDs at the moment for exams. Pre-traumatic stress disorder and soon I'd get Post-traumatic stress disorder.


RE: Sub-title typo
By rdeegvainl on 5/27/2009 10:16:59 AM , Rating: 2
testing hurts too, as it gives a false sense of knowledge, without any indication as to the individuals ability to practically apply the subject matter.
I tried to send a message to the author about this typo, but the "verification" code at the bottom was blocked here at work, so I failed. Is there anyway you (dailytech) can impliment an alternate verification system?


RE: Sub-title typo
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 11:00:04 AM , Rating: 2
So what do you propose instead of testing? Just assume the kid has learned it and move on? Testing a kid on a subject is fine. It's when only the knowledge that's on the test is taught that causes a problem. Too many schools do nothing but teach to the tests that determine whether the schools get a passing grade so they can secure their funding.

I'm seriously going to look at home schooling when I have kids.


RE: Sub-title typo
By rdeegvainl on 5/27/2009 11:24:28 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
So what do you propose instead of testing? Just assume the kid has learned it and move on?

This is getting off topic, but I would say practical application demonstration.


RE: Sub-title typo
By callmeroy on 5/27/2009 12:12:12 PM , Rating: 2
Which ironically is anything but practical to implement across the nation in all public schools , all grades, all students (re: millions)...


RE: Sub-title typo
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/27/2009 1:11:53 PM , Rating: 2
This is true. Technical courses are best taught with a lab corequisite, but many subjects do not so easily lend themselves to a hands-on lab environment.


RE: Sub-title typo
By Danger D on 5/27/2009 11:30:11 AM , Rating: 3
On a similarly relevant topic, did anyone see the "Idol" finale? Thoughts?


RE: Sub-title typo
By nixoofta on 5/27/2009 2:03:42 PM , Rating: 2
txt mom & pop
mom txt vot for krs alln
pop txt vot for adm lmbrt
15 frnds txt vots for krs
23 frnds txt vots for adm
ai is bllsht man!
it wuz fxd
adm lmbrt shuda 1!
:P


RE: Sub-title typo
By deltadeltadelta on 5/28/2009 6:57:41 PM , Rating: 2
Finally someone makes a txt joke! It needed to happen ppl


RE: Sub-title typo
By Scabies on 5/27/2009 1:53:00 PM , Rating: 2
Reminds me of when I got a 5/5 on the essay portion of a Texas standardized test after deviating from my topic and title and writing a couple of pages on how poorly the preceding test was written and pointing out some of the larger flaws in the standardized testing mentality. And yes, I had run-on sentences (see above.)
Good times.


RE: Sub-title typo
By ninus3d on 5/28/2009 7:36:18 AM , Rating: 2
RE: Sub-title typo
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/27/2009 1:09:08 PM , Rating: 2
When done correctly, tests can give a very good indication of what students know/understand. The problem is that they often are not done correctly. Far too often tests are crafted to check exactly what was taught, or even just parts of what was taught, and this is worsened when students are given free boosts, such as hints of exactly what topics will be covered or the allowance of cheat sheets.

In an ideal case, key concepts are taught in class, along with some examples, while further examples are covered in homework, and tests are then varied heavily from the examples that have already been covered. This makes memorization of routines a useless tactic and forces students to actually understand the concepts well enough to adapt and apply them during an exam. This is how you actually find out what a student understands and not what they have memorized. I had a few professors at college who operated this way, and though the tests were more difficult, those courses ended up being the most beneficial.


By frobizzle on 5/27/2009 10:42:05 AM , Rating: 5
Texting...violent TV & movies...sex on TV...too much salt in the diet...not enough salt in the diet...blah blah blah...
Why do we try to blame the ills of the world on everything except, what is the real problem? Lackadaisical (and sometimes) bad parenting! We plant our kids in front of the TV (or PC or PS3) and expect these devices to be a surrogate parent. It don't work, folks! Spend time with your kids. Actually care for them and maybe, just maybe they will grow up right.




By cscpianoman on 5/27/2009 11:02:26 AM , Rating: 2
But, like most things we like to take the easy way out. It's funny how we spend so much time and research on looking for the problem, when it is staring at us in the face. We have become much too complacent with our situation, and yet we still don't do anything about it.


By Luticus on 5/27/2009 11:13:32 AM , Rating: 3
I think the real issue here is how much we underestimate our own children. I mean of course too much texting is bad, so is to much TV or to much of anything for that matter. I believe that everything should be in moderation. Notice how adults aren't really mentioned anywhere in the article, but how many morons do we see going down the road everyday with a cellphone glued to their heads or actually TEXTING WHILE DRIVING! Adults are just a stupid as any teen or kid for that matter!

What's really annoying, though, is how people seem to view teenagers in such a way where they are just a bunch of brain dead idiots who can't figure out when something is bad for them. I know people tend to get smarter and wiser with age, but kids are people too! I think people should have a bit more faith in the way they raise thier kids (assuming said person is actually doing a good job at raising their kid). Parents, in my opinion, are way to nurotic these days. In the words of Gerorge Carlin: "You want to know how you can help your kids, leave them the #U(|< ALONE!"


By Luticus on 5/27/2009 11:14:52 AM , Rating: 2
Sorry, forgot to spell check before posting... please ignore the stupid out of place typos... I know they are there and I know what they are.


By frobizzle on 5/27/2009 1:26:34 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Notice how adults aren't really mentioned anywhere in the article, but how many morons do we see going down the road everyday with a cellphone glued to their heads or actually TEXTING WHILE DRIVING! Adults are just a stupid as any teen or kid for that matter!

Stupidity knows no age limits! Teens do not have the market cornered!


By WW102 on 5/27/2009 5:44:29 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah Well said. An article like this can almost covered with comments about bad parents this, bad parents that. Well complaining how bad of parents everyone else is doesnt seem to be working either.

Funny thing is, when called on it everyone's response is, when i was growing up my parents would do <XXXX> type of discipline to me.


By iFX on 5/27/2009 4:52:08 PM , Rating: 2
Bad parenting includes letting your child spend enormous amounts of time sending and receiving text messages at the expense of education and physical activity. If your child is fat or has failing grades and sends over 1,000 text messages in a given month I think we have found the problem.


By frobizzle on 5/28/2009 10:33:12 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
If your child is fat or has failing grades and sends over 1,000 text messages in a given month I think we have found the problem.

While I agree with the overall point you make, you cannot use that as a template that ultimately applies to all cases. My college aged daughter averages 2500+ texts a month and got a 4.0 GPA last semester. One size does not fit all.


WHAT??!!!
By rdeegvainl on 5/27/2009 10:08:07 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The problem, according to Turkle, is that the fast and easy access to communication between kids and parents leads adolescents to ask parents to make the decisions for them that they need to be making for themselves in order to develop

So the problem with Texting is kids asking for advice from their parents? We should only be so lucky.




RE: WHAT??!!!
By Jansen (blog) on 5/27/2009 10:24:21 AM , Rating: 2
LOL.

I think it is more constant texting from parents to kids that is a problem, rather than two-way communication between parents and kids.

I've seen some way too overprotective parents texting their kids constantly.


RE: WHAT??!!!
By rdeegvainl on 5/27/2009 10:24:46 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah overprotection is pretty bad, but how bad can it really be if the parent has given the kid their own cell?


RE: WHAT??!!!
By Luticus on 5/27/2009 11:20:24 AM , Rating: 2
Usually half the features are disabled and the talk time is limited and they can only call certain numbers... stupid stuff like that.


RE: WHAT??!!!
By rdeegvainl on 5/27/2009 11:28:17 AM , Rating: 1
that doesn't sound bad at all.


rots yer brains!
By tastyratz on 5/27/2009 11:25:48 AM , Rating: 3
omg lol wtf y u think txt hurts pplz cuz u just don txt enuf

Seriously I have to admit that it seems a tiny keypad has destroyed our entire educational system in just a few short years.




RE: rots yer brains!
By rdeegvainl on 5/27/2009 2:04:22 PM , Rating: 3
That is why we should be pimping cell phones will full keyboards like there is no tomorrow.


Decisions decisions
By Danger D on 5/27/2009 11:28:21 AM , Rating: 2
So, as a parent, I want to be in uninterrupted contact with my child so he never has to learn how to deal with a decision more vexing than "regular or supersized?"

On the other hand, if I don't panic in response to these scientific findings, I risk letting my child become yet another victim of the immoral and influential monster that is technology.

I'm so confused.




RE: Decisions decisions
By nixoofta on 5/27/2009 1:04:45 PM , Rating: 3
....text your parents.

:P


RE: Decisions decisions
By FITCamaro on 5/27/2009 4:44:39 PM , Rating: 1
They'll come over and bitch slap you.


By siliconvideo on 5/27/2009 10:26:31 AM , Rating: 5
I hypothesize that reading the New York Times could harm development of teens. It teaches them that all good comes from the government and self reliance is evil.




The end is near
By Danger D on 5/27/2009 11:21:32 AM , Rating: 2
We eradicate smallpox and along comes another devastating threat to our health and safety. God help us.




RE: The end is near
By geddarkstorm on 5/27/2009 12:53:55 PM , Rating: 3
I wonder if the NYT has heard that if a person contracts a little thing called "living", they have a 100% chance of death? Friggin' scary, I know.


cellphones at school
By stlrenegade on 5/28/2009 12:00:13 PM , Rating: 2
I find it odd that kids need cellphones at school. Who are they calling/texting there? Aren't their friends at the same school? Don't they see them in class, the halls, during lunch? Granted there are exceptions, but it seems pretty ridiculous to have them there. Do you need constant contact with your parents? Out of the 12 years of public school, I think my parents called me at school twice. Or if I needed to contact them, I'd go to the school office.

I don't have a problem with teachers taking away phones, mp3 players, game systems. Those devices don't need to be at school.




RE: cellphones at school
By WW102 on 5/28/2009 12:05:30 PM , Rating: 2
They shouldn't be allowed to be used in the halls class room etc.. but they should be allowed to keep them on silent in bags or lockers. After school if they go somewhere or will have practice late, they should have the ability to call or be called.


OMG! :(
By VoodooChicken on 5/27/2009 5:34:59 PM , Rating: 3
Forget all this other stuff, texting dumbs down the vocabulary of already dumb kids. (FTW, FAIL >:| gtg, PIR)
I remember reading an article some girl turned in a report completely in chatspeak. Kids will always work very hard to get more lazy.




orly
By LRonaldHubbs on 5/27/2009 10:07:07 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
...it also believes that texting can lead to anxiety, distraction in school, and falling grades . Doctors worry that the overuse of texting may also lead to repetitive injuries and sleep deprivation.

Who'da thunk it?




Peter Johnson?
By acase on 5/27/2009 10:21:12 AM , Rating: 2
What a wiener!




Wrong test
By Ozziedogg on 5/27/2009 6:25:48 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Doctors worry that the overuse of texting may also lead to repetitive injuries and sleep deprivation.


..thats not from Teens texting, thats from Teens masturbating.




RE: Wrong test
By AlmostExAMD on 5/28/09, Rating: 0
Causality
By Frallan on 5/28/2009 9:53:58 AM , Rating: 2
According to a study I have read. Made in Sweden by students at bachelor level. Young people (activly) using the Mobile more than 5 hours a day (over half the girls - guys play games more) there might be some effect on sleep.

However the causality is not proven.

BR
Fredrik larsson




There is even more danger
By Adetutu on 6/3/2009 8:50:51 PM , Rating: 2
Since the texting devise is really a mini computer with a miniscren, these teens are indeed subject to all the brain and eye consequences of computer use.Most people do not realize how they are affected. This topic is so important these days because of the dangers people face as a result of the effect of computer use on neurotransmitters, nerves, body chemicals, minerals, vitamins, vision etc. I have written a book I have actually written a book "Lessons I Learned the Hard Way - How to identify, minimize, manage and treat computer related health issue" it is available at http://www.strategicbookpublishing.com/LessonsILea... I believe it is a must read for all health care providers computer users. I have written this book to alert others to the health dangers inherent in computer use using medical research from all over the world and explain solutions. I hope you get hold of a copy. I also have a website. The URL is http://www.computeragehealthrisk.com.I can be reached at lessonsilearnedthehardway@gmail.com for further discussions.




By silverfang77 on 6/8/2009 11:20:03 AM , Rating: 2
I myself spend hours on the computer and text a lot. I do not think I am anti-social.

I think texting is just something that teens do that makes them happy. Would you rather they were doing drugs, smoking and drinking? I bet not.

I would love to know why every time youth culture embraces something new (comic books, TV, video games, Internet and texting) that their elders condemn it and try to ban it.

Why not just let teens do what makes them happy as long as they're not harming others?




"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki