backtop


Print 12 comment(s) - last by superPC.. on Sep 6 at 9:03 AM


New GPUs will land in time for holiday shopping  (Source: NVIDIA)
400M series are the first GPUs to use Fermi

NVIDIA today announced the debut of several of its new mobile GPUs. The new GPUs should be on the market in rigs that can be purchased in time for Christmas.

"The GeForce 400M Series takes the award-winning Fermi architecture across a complete line-up of DirectX 11 GPUs for notebook," said Rene Haas, general manager of notebook GPUs at NVIDIA. "Coupled with Optimus technology, 400M Series notebook GPUs deliver great performance for visual computing applications when you need it, and great battery life when you don't."

The new mobile GPUs are in the GeForce 400M series and will be available from OEMs like Acer, ASUS, Dell, Lenovo, Samsung, and Toshiba. The new enthusiast GPUs in the 400M family include the GTX 470M and the GTX 460M.

"NVIDIA has a history of innovation with unique technologies for battery life, 3D and even in-game physics," Ben Thacker, Vice President, Systems Business Group, ASUS North America. "Including NVIDIA GPUs in ASUS systems keeps them on the bleeding-edge of computing technology and allows us to be the first to deliver these advances to our customers."

Performance users will get more GPUs to choose from than the enthusiast crowd with the GeForce GT 445M, 435M, 425M, 420M, and 415M. All of the GPUs will support NVIDIA Optimus technology, which allows the seamless switching from the discrete GPU to an integrated GPU to save battery life depending on the demands of the system.

All of the 400M series GPUs have support for DirectX 11 and are built using the Fermi architecture. NVIDIA claims that the 400M GPUs deliver as much as ten times the gaming performance on StarCraft II than previous generation GPUs. The GPUs will support 3D gaming and 3D Blu-ray content on compatible notebooks, PhysX, CUDA, Verde drivers, and 3DTV Play software.

NVIDIA launched the GeForce GTX 480M GPU earlier this summer.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

And unlike GF100
By LordSojar on 9/3/10, Rating: 0
RE: And unlike GF100
By Lonyo on 9/3/2010 9:44:49 AM , Rating: 3
Um, hate to break your bubble, but the GF104 isn't particularly efficient (compared to what ATI has).
The desktop version is slower than the HD5850 and uses more power.

It's still, like you say, a lot better than GF100, but it's not going to necessarily be "very power efficient and cool", just moreso than GF100.


RE: And unlike GF100
By spread on 9/3/2010 10:54:58 AM , Rating: 3
The GF104/GTX 460 almost matches the HD5850 in performance, but you forget, the HD5850 has more mature drivers.

But yes, the GF104 does consume more power while on full load than the HD5850. I'd still buy it. I have a pair of HD5770s that give me problems in OpenGL... things like dissappearing polygons and textures. I guess this is what people mean by bad Catalyst drivers.


RE: And unlike GF100
By Wolfpup on 9/3/2010 7:10:52 PM , Rating: 2
It doesn't use THAT much more power-the 768MB version is the same actually, so it's conceivable this could use less, depending on how things are clocked, etc.

At any rate, I'd take a significant hit in performance to go with Nvidia because I've never had issues with Nvidia drivers, and always have SOME issue or other with AMDs.

I'm thrilled these are out! (Especially since my notebook will be coming up on it's second birthday soonish :-D )


RE: And unlike GF100
By LordSojar on 9/3/2010 9:21:13 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Um, hate to break your bubble, but the GF104 isn't particularly efficient (compared to what ATI has). The desktop version is slower than the HD5850 and uses more power. It's still, like you say, a lot better than GF100, but it's not going to necessarily be "very power efficient and cool", just moreso than GF100.


Hate to break your bubble, but we are talking about mobile here, not desktop. nVidia's track record of mobile and ultra mobile solutions is excellent. They have years of experience over AMD, and it really shows. Their products, TDP to performance, have always been better than ATis, and will likely continue to be. Optimus is the proverbial nail in the coffin.

nVidia has always beaten ATi in mobile; ATi has no ultra mobile products (yet), and really... the Mobility 5000 series was sub par, using too much power for too little performance over the last generation 4000 series. I do like that my comment was down rated so much because it was "pro nVidia", and the pro ATi comments sit high above. Really mature guys, really mature. You may proceed to down rate this post as well, as it's your childish nature with your multiple accounts and cheating the system.

GF104 is radically different from GF100 in terms of efficiency and TDP. GF106 and GF108 are scaled beautifully. And let's face it, nVidia has a lot more experience optimizing mobile drivers than ATi/AMD does, and it shows. Don't believe me? I'll just quote DailyTech's partner site, Anandtech...

"Given NVIDIA's experience in optimizing desktop GPU drivers, I've got no problems giving NVIDIA the benefit of the doubt here." -Anand Lal Shimpi

As a former user of ATi's HD5870 and their drivers... it's fairly evident who has the edge here. I'd bet on nVidia any day of the week when it comes to mobile products, because they have a track record that is fantastic (the only glaring issue was the 9600/9800M overheating and failure issue, and nVidia rectified that, so holding that against them is rather stupid)


RE: And unlike GF100
By Reclaimer77 on 9/4/2010 7:42:19 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
As a former user of ATi's HD5870 and their drivers... it's fairly evident who has the edge here. I'd bet on nVidia any day of the week when it comes to mobile products, because they have a track record that is fantastic (the only glaring issue was the 9600/9800M overheating and failure issue, and nVidia rectified that, so holding that against them is rather stupid )


Ati rectified whatever driver issue you claim to have had, so holding that against them is rather stupid.


RE: And unlike GF100
By superPC on 9/6/2010 9:03:35 AM , Rating: 2
do you realize that you're comparing a 220$ GPU with a 270$ GPU? there's almost 50$ price difference between them while only about 20% incerase in performance. (check it yourself http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/180?vs=164 ). I'd say GF104 is really good. and after desktop version of GTX 475 (with 384 shader processor) comes out, we can all see just how good GF104 is in high end segment.


RE: And unlike GF100
By inperfectdarkness on 9/3/2010 9:45:04 AM , Rating: 2
i'm more interested in how these will stack up against the gf-m 200 series. i have a hard time believe performance has increased 1000%. i haven't actually played sc2 on my gtx 260m yet, but i'm sure it won't have display issues--so the impetus behind upgrading my 1 year old sager is nil.

i would like to know if they can fit their top of the line mobile card in a 15" size form.


RE: And unlike GF100
By TheRequiem on 9/3/2010 10:42:15 AM , Rating: 2
I've played it on my laptop, which is a GTX260m and it runs just fine...


RE: And unlike GF100
By the goat on 9/3/2010 11:06:01 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
i have a hard time believe performance has increased 1000%.


Be careful with your terms. They claim the new chip delivers 10x the performance. That means a 900% increase in performance. (The old chip has 100% performance.)


By Phoque on 9/4/2010 4:37:09 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
award-winning Fermi architecture


Has it won any global warming effect award yet?

This is absolutely laughable.




By CZroe on 9/3/2010 10:18:31 AM , Rating: 2
I'm still rockin' my GT335M in my M11x but I have to wonder if it'll see another refresh soon with this announcement...




"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer




Latest Headlines
2/13/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 13, 2012, 1:43 PM
2/10/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 10, 2012, 5:50 PM
2/9/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 9, 2012, 11:54 AM
2/8/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 8, 2012, 1:11 PM
2/7/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 7, 2012, 12:23 PM










botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki