backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 38 comment(s) - last by tcsenter.. on Sep 27 at 8:45 PM

MCP73 finally hits the market for Intel chipsets

NVIDIA is set to launch its long-awaited MCP73 integrated graphics solution for Intel processors – the GeForce 7 series and nForce 600i series. The new GeForce 7 series IGP solutions for Intel processors arrive in three variants – GeForce 7150 and 7100 with the nForce 630i and the GeForce 7050 with nForce 630i or nForce 610i.

The GeForce 7 series IGP features Vista aero glass compatible graphics with DirectX 9 and Shader Model 3.0 support. NVIDIA equips the GeForce 7150 and 7100 IGP with a native HDMI interface with HDCP compatibility for Blu-ray and HD DVD high-definition video playback. The GeForce 7050 and higher support a single-link DVI output with HDCP compatible. The cost-effective GeForce 7050 lacks DVI, HDMI and HDCP.  

NVIDIA’s flagship GeForce 7150 features a clock speed of over 600 MHz while the lesser GeForce 7100 has a 600 MHz clock speed. The lower GeForce 7050 has a 500 MHz clock speed.

Memory support differs on the GeForce 7150/7100 and 7050. The GeForce 7150 and 7100 feature support for DDR2-800 while the GeForce 7050 is limited to DDR2-667.

All IGPs paired with the nForce 630i feature support for 1333 MHz front-side bus processors. The GeForce 7050 with nForce 610i is limited to 1066 MHz front-side bus processors.

Other notable features of the GeForce 7 series iGP and nForce 600i series include support for one PCIe x16, two PCIe x1, four SATA 3.0Gbps, two PATA and RAID. NVIDIA differentiates the nForce 630i and 610i with a few networking, USB and storage features. The nForce 630i supports Gigabit Ethernet, ten USB ports and RAID 0, 1, 0 + 1 and 5. The nForce 610i is limited to 10/100 Ethernet, eight USB ports and RAID 0 and 1.

NVIDIA also offers a graphic-less nForce 630i with the same features as the IGP variants, including DDR2-800 and 1333 MHz front-side bus support.

Expect NVIDIA GeForce 7 series IGP motherboards for Intel processors to show up in the coming weeks with varying prices. NVIDIA expects the GeForce 7100 with nForce 630i to take on Intel’s G33 Express with a sub-$60 build cost.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By nerdye on 9/25/2007 12:31:44 AM , Rating: 3
Sure many people are dissapointed in the fact that we are yet to see integrated dx10 graphics solutions as of yet from the likes of nvidia, ati, and intel, yet as a gamer, what is the point? Ati and Nvidia have very nice decidated high end dx10 cards right now in the 2900 and 8800 series respectively, but who wants an underpowered 2600 or 8600 respectively as dx9 games are still prominent in the same price range as higher powered 7950gt's and 1950xt's? The same arguement can be made in the IGP market, what good is a dx10 gpu if it has no power to play games? Ati, Nvidia, Intel, give us full hd decode in an igp solution and you will see the sales, and people finally stop complaining about graphics power that will never be there in an igp solution.




RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By iGo on 9/25/2007 1:15:14 AM , Rating: 2
I think Intel already has IGP that's DX10 comaliant X3500 (on G35 chipset) and X3100 (mobile variant of X3000, but DX10 compliant). Though I haven't seen any board with X3500 yet.


RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By Anonymous Freak on 9/25/2007 2:29:44 AM , Rating: 2
G35 (and, claims Intel, also G965 and GM965,) will be DX10 capable with a software update, not on launch. (Latest estimate I've seen is early 2008.) Heck, the 15 month old X3000 in the G965 only just got T&L support a month ago! (And still doesn't have it in Vista.)

So, in short, all of Intel's "X3x00" series IGPs are supposedly hardware-capable of DX10, but the software hasn't come out yet. (Previous Intel IGPs had no real hardware rendering at all, they were just hardware conduits for software rendering. The X-series contains real T&L hardware, but still relies on the main processor for a bit of work, so the drivers have to have DX10 'software' in them.)


RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By defter on 9/25/07, Rating: 0
By IntelUser2000 on 9/25/2007 4:42:50 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
G35/G965/GM965 will NOT support shader model 4.0 which is the main new feature of DX10. Just having a DX10 driver available doesn't mean that the chip supports all DX10 features...


And you are sure of this because how?? G35/G965/GM965 all support different levels of DirectX. Please stop being ignorant and search for it before posting: http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/G35/index.h...

http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/14...

G965: DX9 SM3.0 Open GL 1.5
GM965: DX10 SM 4.0 OpenGL 1.5
G35: DX10 SM4.0 OpenGL2.0


RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By ET on 9/25/2007 4:44:35 AM , Rating: 2
Yes it does. DX10 has very few optional features.


RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By iGo on 9/25/2007 8:10:24 AM , Rating: 2
Are you sure about G35 not supporting Shader Model 4.0 ???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA

The table above says it does... can anyone confirm the facts please?


By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 9/25/2007 10:06:29 AM , Rating: 2
It did not on its first incarnation. I believe it does now.


By tcsenter on 9/25/2007 12:05:34 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
G35/G965/GM965 will NOT support shader model 4.0 which is the main new feature of DX10.
Well you have it partially right. DX9.0C and SM3.0 will be the limit for G965 (X3000).

GM965 and GL960 (X3100), and G35 (X3500) will in fact support DX10 with full SM4.0 support in hardware (and support for on-demand software vertex/geometry processing just like in X3000), but Intel won't have a driver ready to enable SM4.0 until Q1/2008 (probably bet on Q2/2008).

quote:
Just having a DX10 driver available doesn't mean that the chip supports all DX10 features...
Apparently, you aren't familiar with the concept of fully programmable unified shaders or execution units.


RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By ET on 9/25/2007 4:48:35 AM , Rating: 2
Previous Intel IGPs had no real hardware rendering at all, they were just hardware conduits for software rendering.

That's a gross misunderstanding (or misrepresentation). Only vertex processing was in software. Pixel processing, and all other processing, was of course in hardware. This was true for most integrated graphics over the years, from both Intel, NVIDIA, ATI, SiS and VIA (S3).


By cheetah2k on 9/25/2007 1:18:58 AM , Rating: 1
I wonder if we will ever see an onboard swappable IGUs with SLI capabilities?

This could be great for those of us who want a small form factor multimedia center but with gaming capabilities surpassing what is currently available in the IGU market now


RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By Maskarat on 9/25/2007 5:48:33 AM , Rating: 3
An underpowered passively cooled 2600/8600 is the ideal board for an HTPC. You would have to be crazy to put a bigger more hot card in small factor enclosure!! IGP's with HDMI and HDCP would further remove the need for a discrete graphic card, especially where gaming is of no issue.

What is interesting to know is if the new chipsets support PureVideo?? Having accelerated HDcontent would help push this boards, especially when paired with lower powered, cooler cpu's!


RE: IGP waits for dx10, but for what?
By Ajax9000 on 9/25/2007 9:39:13 PM , Rating: 2
I've just read the following Nvidia pages and the news is somewhat disapointing.

Summary PDF -- http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_35712.html
AMD (MCP78) features -- http://www.nvidia.com/object/mobo_gpu_features_ben...
AMD (MCP78) specs -- http://www.nvidia.com/object/mobo_gpu_tech_specs.h...
Intel (MCP73) features -- http://www.nvidia.com/object/mcp_features_benefits...
Intel (MCP73) specs -- http://www.nvidia.com/object/mcp_intel_techspecs.h...

PureVideo is only listed for the MCP78 (7050PV+630a) combination. All the other AMD chipsets and none of the Intel chipsets have PureVideo HD.

If, in the future, they release an MCP73 using (say) 7050PV+630i then memory will be limited to DDR667.

There is no details thus far, but what would be good is if the new chipset fixes the HD Audio problem that all current HDMI video cards seem to suffer from (i.e. the problem whereby the chipset supports HD Audio, but the video cards can only accept SPDIF-grade audio for HDMI pass-through).


By Maskarat on 9/26/2007 2:44:45 AM , Rating: 2
I think this is really really disappointing. Hardware accelerated HD content is the main reason behind putting discreet graphics in an HTPC. Nvidia are already falling behind in my opinion on the HD front, especially in quality terms. No doubt, gaming wise they a have very powerful chips, but driver support and HD, are definitely lacking.

I really hope AMD/ATI kick it up a notch, especially with their new Linux agenda.


Niiice
By RjBass on 9/24/2007 11:46:22 PM , Rating: 1
In my opinion NVidia has made some of the better onboard graphics solutions. I have an older AMD socket 754 board down in my shop with onboard NVidia graphics that can take up to 128megs of systems memory. When loaded with Vista Ultimate it can run in full Aero mode just fine. Another board with ATI on board graphics struggles with Aero.




RE: Niiice
By Spuke on 9/25/2007 12:00:52 AM , Rating: 2
Isn't this chipset supposed to support DX10?


RE: Niiice
By Cylee22 on 9/25/2007 12:13:58 AM , Rating: 4
no because according to my knowledge, the geforce 7 series is a dx9 chip. the geforce 8 series chips are the ones that are dx10 compatible.


RE: Niiice
By The Sword 88 on 9/25/2007 1:13:04 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly


RE: Niiice
By LogicallyGenius on 9/25/07, Rating: -1
RE: Niiice
By wordsworm on 9/25/2007 2:13:49 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Poor NVIDIA. with multi cores there is no need of special graphics chips, just one core is more than enough to do the job.
I agree. Who needs a chip that's good at floating point and has pixel shaders, etc, for graphics? 2D is enough, right guys?


RE: Niiice
By Samus on 9/25/2007 4:08:25 AM , Rating: 2
you're both cracked.