backtop


Print 15 comment(s) - last by xrodney.. on May 10 at 3:56 AM


The new NEC technlogy could target video mash-ups such as the ever popular "nine thousand" remixes on YouTube.

It could also target fan subs or dubs uploaded to sites like CrunchyRoll.
Tech has many legitimate uses, and some potentially questionable ones as well

NEC Corporation has unveiled a new digital fingerprinting technology aimed at screening out illegal content online.  Movie studios could use it to hunt for unapproved distributions of their works on video sharing sites like YouTube.  And authorities could use it to try to locate and remove unwanted content such as videos containing child predation, terrorist themes, or leaked confidential performances (such as celebrity sex tapes).

Most current digital fingerprinting schemes work by compressing a video stream and comparing it to a known signature.  The new technology uses this approach.  An advantage is that the technology can detect short clips -- as little as 2 seconds (60 frames) of video.  Also, as the signature is small, 76 bytes in length, an average PC can match 1,000 hours of video in 1 second.  

NEC also claims a very low false alarm rate -- 5 ppm (5 in one million) in independent testing.  And it claims a high accurate detection rate of 96 percent.

The company boasts, "This new technology enables content holders and service providers to automatically detect illegal copies and prevent illegal upload of video content on the Internet by registering original video content. These developments are expected to significantly reduce the time and cost of manual content inspections as well as improve the scale and accuracy of content assessment. "

Early targets may be copyrighted videos with caption overlays, camera captured copies and analog copies, all of which can be detected with the tech.

Possible downsides include that copyright holders may use it to take down mash-up videos, a growing form of internet expression, or remove fan subtitled anime or foreign videos, not currently available for legitimate purchase in the U.S.  For NEC, a Japanese corporation, fan subbing hits very close to home.  Anime studios argue that if they don't release a title in the U.S., viewers in the U.S. should not have access to it.

NEC explicitly mentions these kinds of uses, so it seems very likely that this may occur.

Another issue is that the technology could be used to prevent you from making backup copies of videos you own.  Movie and music industry legal representatives have insisted that making copies of content you legitimately own is just another form of stealing.  Advocates, though, claim that you should be free to do what you want with content you purchase and point out that many kinds of content like CDs or DVDs are easily damaged.  It's often hard to obtain replacement discs from the seller, and even when you can do so, they often charge high fees $5-$10 USD or more.

In this case, NEC did make it clear that it primarily envisions this tech being used online, but it could just as easily be included as part of a DRM package.  And under the upcoming ACTA legislation attempting to circumvent such protections becomes a crime.

Ultimately, the technology won't do a whole lot that isn't already done on YouTube or other major video sites.  The big difference will be it will do it just a little bit better.  However, it will allow for fan subtitled and mash-up videos to be detected and removed, perhaps for the first time.  So enjoy your "Power Level 9000??!?" videos while they last.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Performance Claim a Lie
By jdietz on 5/7/2010 10:17:22 AM , Rating: 4
Process 1,000 hours of video in one second?

1) Get video
2) Break video into 2 second chunks
3) Compute CRC for each chunk. Compute intensive. In 1,000 hours of video there are 1.8 million 2-second chunks.
4) Compare each CRC against the database

It seems like it will take longer than one second.
If they build this technology into, say, the Youtube player application, they will be able to have user PCs compute the CRCs for them while Google looks at CRCs on the backend.




RE: Performance Claim a Lie
By MrWho on 5/7/2010 10:39:23 AM , Rating: 2
And how would it work if you just compress it with a different codec, or different bitrates, or even if you resize the video, or crop it? Or change the bitrate? Or add something (subtitles, captions, noise) to the video?

Could it be that good?


RE: Performance Claim a Lie
By RW on 5/8/2010 2:29:30 AM , Rating: 2
So what if they remove the copyrighted content ?

The less people will see copyrighted content on the web the less they will be interested into it, the less the copyrighted content will gain market adoption, the less celebrities will gain fame and money.


RE: Performance Claim a Lie
By RW on 5/8/2010 2:46:23 AM , Rating: 2
And BTW "A WORLD WITHOUT COPYRIGHTED CONTENT IS A PERFECT WORLD"


RE: Performance Claim a Lie
By adiposity on 5/7/2010 11:55:15 AM , Rating: 2
Just check the middle 5 chunks. If it's an infringing video, something should stick.


RE: Performance Claim a Lie
By Riven98 on 5/7/2010 12:13:16 PM , Rating: 2
If you check the linked article, (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nec-develops-vide... ), it seems the tech computes a hash of each frame to compare against and then uses at minimum 60 frames to determine if it "matches" a registered video sequence by some statistical model. (For example, if 45 of the 60 hashes match ones in a registered video then what you are watching is pirated.)


RE: Performance Claim a Lie
By OUits on 5/8/2010 12:24:11 AM , Rating: 2
Not quite. A simple hash cross reference on a frame by frame basis would not be able to detect analog capture, re-encoding, or caption overlay as this technology claims to.

In order for the hashes to match, the frame has to be exactly the same as the reference frame and resulting hash. Slight differences, even cosmetic, will result in vastly dissimilar hash outputs.

My guess is that what makes this technology advanced is that it uses methods other than hash calculations.


RE: Performance Claim a Lie
By jimhsu on 5/8/2010 11:06:30 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe perceptual hashes? http://www.phash.org/. That algorithm is pretty darn smart.


How exactly.
By bhieb on 5/7/2010 12:46:54 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Another issue is that the technology could be used to prevent you from making backup copies of videos you own.
Pretty big jump there Jason. Now yes it could be used to find my "backups" that are available publicly online, but how is this supposed to ID my local backups? If I share them sure, but they are hardly a backup once I share them publicly.

Once one throws out your absurd notion that this can be used against Personal Domain, then I see no problem with this tech. They are scanning for their copyright, nothing wrong with that. It is theirs after all, and the uploader has no rights to share it. If he/she does have legal rights, then he/she can protest the removal.




RE: How exactly.
By johnbuk on 5/7/2010 1:13:00 PM , Rating: 3
"...but how is this supposed to ID my local backups?..."

Incorporate it into ripping or encoding or playback software and then have that software 'call home' when it detects offending media.


RE: How exactly.
By xrodney on 5/10/2010 3:56:13 AM , Rating: 2
You can block it by using firewall and if it tries to go around then class action suit for hacking your computer.

There will be no call home crap on my pc without my personal approval.


RE: How exactly.
By mcnabney on 5/7/2010 1:16:11 PM , Rating: 2
I imagine a modification to the viewer (that sends random CRC data instead of the calculated data) will sidestep this control. It isn't like Google cares a whole lot about the content being sent.


Crunchyroll is legit
By KayDat on 5/7/2010 2:24:57 PM , Rating: 2
You know, last I checked, Crunchyroll now legit nowadays. They have distro rights from the publishers/stations themselves.




By neothe0ne on 5/7/2010 10:55:37 PM , Rating: 2
Nice citations you provided there for that claim.




"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki