backtop


Print 32 comment(s) - last by Spuke.. on Aug 6 at 1:39 PM


  (Source: Event Chaser)

Pocono Raceway, home to two Nascar races a year will now be home to the largest solar installation at a sporting arena. The installation is expected to dramatically cut costs and more than pay for itself over its lifetime.  (Source: Left Turn Girl)
Solar power races ahead -- thanks to NASCAR

Pocono Raceway is one of the most iconic sites on the NASCAR race circuit.  Independently owned, the track is home to two races per year and has featured victories by NASCAR greats such as Richard Petty, A.J. Foyt, Tim Richmond, and Tony Stewart. The facility, which seats over 76,000, will now be home to the largest solar installation at a sporting arena.

The big solar push is going to be paid for by Mattioli family, which owns the track and also owns the South Boston Speedway.  The installation, which has received NASCAR's blessing and approval, will be installed over the 25 acre parking lot across the street from the race track.  The 40,000 panel installation will cost $15M USD to $17M USD, but will more than pay for itself over the panels' lifetime. 

The track had pondered solutions when deregulation threaten to raise its power bills by nearly 40 percent, an increase of approximately $500,000.  The idea of solar power was a big hit.  A deal with PJM Interconnection, a regional transmission organization that operates a wholesale electricity market and grid, was signed.  The track should save in the "seven figures" per year, according to track officials, indicating that it could take 15 years or less to recoup the investment (modern panels are designed to last 20 years or more).

Pocono Raceway’s president, Brandon Igdalsky cheered the landmark deal, stating, "I think it’s unique.  I think that the fact that it’s a raceway that’s going to be the sports facility that’s really going to go all out and do this, I think it definitely puts us in a league of our own.  We needed a way — how can we save the most money on our power usage?  It’s good for us. It’s good for the environment. It’s good for the community."

Pocono may be the biggest sporting solar installation, but it isn't the only one.  Taiwan’s National Stadium, which recently hosted the World Games; AT&T Park, home of the San Francisco Giants; Progressive Field, home of the Cleveland Indians; and the Stade de Suisse Wankdorf in Bern, Switzerland are among other international arenas that have solar installations.

Christopher Moffatt, founder of Evolution Energies, one of the companies that is working with Pocono on the installation, says that several professional and college football teams, as well as a few NHL teams are considering similar deployments. Tristan Grimbert, the president and chief executive of enXco, the French company that is building the farm, states, "That’s the first time we’ve had a request from a racetrack; I was quite surprised.  I think it’s a promising market."

NASCAR's Mike Lynch, managing director of green innovation, cheered the deal stating, "We have a power footprint that can be addressed with renewable energy.  We see the Pocono project as one that’s a fantastic example of how it can be done."

Under his lead NASCAR will also plant 20 acres of trees per year to cut down the sport's net carbon emissions.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Now when I think "green", I will think of NASCAR
By AlexWade on 8/4/2009 1:51:21 PM , Rating: 5
Just ignore the cars running at 150 MPH and burning massive amounts of fuel. NASCAR is now green! Way to offset those carbon emissions. All we need to do now is to get Toyota to put have the Prius instead of the Camry for their NASCAR cars, especially the new one with the solar panel on top. Ford and Chevy can also put their hybrids in. Then we would be set. Each race could start with "Gentlemen, start your engines and save the environment!"




By Chudilo on 8/4/2009 2:11:39 PM , Rating: 2
Well they could compete with electric cars like the Wrightspeed X1.


By JDub02 on 8/4/2009 3:51:51 PM , Rating: 1
The hypocrisy struck me as well. If this were anything other than a publicity stunt, NASCAR would have switched to electric cars powered by these solar panels.

Why don't they just paint all of the cars green and be done with it? They're accomplishing about the same thing.

I also find it amazing that it will take 15+ years to break even on the investment .. that's at 3/4 of the panels' life, ignoring any maintenance, failures, etc.


By brybir on 8/4/2009 5:39:37 PM , Rating: 4
What hypocrisy?

1. Seriously, it’s a sport designed around gasoline powered vehicles driving in circles. How else was this sport going to be accomplished at this time? Electric cars? Right…..maybe we will get Tesla in here and we can have a 10 lap race and then 3 hour charging breaks. I am sure a 40 hour race would be fun right?

2. You calling Nascar a hypocrite is like me calling you a hypocrite for wanting to install solar panels on your roof because you drive a car. Haha right, you terrible hypocrite for polluting the environment in your daily life and then wanting to do something that is a financial gain as well as environmentally friendly as well….but in your world that makes sense.

3. In any event, the 30-40 cars running in circles around the track use but the tiniest amounts of fuel compared to all the fuel used by people in their vehicles to get to the race track in the first place, or the amount of fuel burned in power plants powering the millions of TV's and electronics that broadcast the race to the people watching around the world.

4. Would you have rather them not installed this solar panel? Seems that the net effect of doing nothing retains the status quo. If they install the panel at least some of their electrical needs will come from 100% renewable sources. Seems to me that beats none of their electricity coming from renewable sources. Then again, $20 million dollars of electricity generated by coal or gas power plants cant equal that much pollution can it?


By Nfarce on 8/4/2009 5:55:28 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly. As soon as Al Gore starts sailing around the globe on wind and solar power and stop flying around in private jets preaching about global warming, then maybe we should do as he/they say. Of course, Ted Kennedy also has the NIMBY syndrome with windmills near his Kennebunkport, Maine beach property.

But have you ever noticed that the only auto racing people ever complain about is NASCAR? There are hundreds of other professional racing organizations around the globe from F1 on down, and NASCAR is the only one constantly singled out. I know why of course, but I'm not saying it....yet.


RE: Now when I think "green", I will think of NASCAR
By rcc on 8/4/2009 6:26:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
and NASCAR is the only one constantly singled out. I know why of course, but I'm not saying it....yet


I'm not shy, I will. It's basically the only organization that 75% of the American population can name


By MrPoletski on 8/5/2009 9:00:41 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe one day Americans will realise there is more to racing cars than driving aorund in circles? =)

The only worse thing is drag racing, I mean what is the point?!?!?


By Nfarce on 8/5/2009 10:39:10 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Maybe one day Americans will realise there is more to racing cars than driving aorund in circles?


Actually NASCAR has two road racing courses (Watkins Glen in New York state and Sears Point (Infineon) in California) for a total of four races a year where you don't only turn left. But that's beside the point. NASCAR has become such a bloated, government-type run behemoth with too many rules that many people just don't care about it anymore. The races have become boring as the cars are too limited in modifications and too much alike due to rules.

quote:
The only worse thing is drag racing, I mean what is the point?


I take it you've never modded a car and done it then. You wouldn't have asked that question otherwise. It's fun as hell!


By Nfarce on 8/5/2009 10:47:51 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I'm not shy, I will. It's basically the only organization that 75% of the American population can name


Nope. Not even close. Actually the vast majority of Americans are also aware of Indy Racing League (read: The Indianapolis 500) known as IRL (used to be two racing leagues, CART and Indy Car).

No, the reason NASCAR gets singled out is because it has a stigma associated with right wing ignorant southern rednecks due to its heritage.


By rcc on 8/6/2009 12:32:08 PM , Rating: 2
Hmmm, what is a vast majority? 80%, 90%?

As of the last Census there were more women than men in the US. Perhaps you know a different type of woman than I do, but most of them that I know have little or no interest in auto racing.

Ah well, It doesn't really matter, I'll stand by my original statement, and you can have yours. : )


RE: Now when I think "green", I will think of NASCAR
By TSS on 8/4/2009 6:33:28 PM , Rating: 2
The non-hypocritical thing to do would be to abolish the sport alltogether, along with formula 1 as well. If they want to go green, that's the awnser.

We all know that isn't going to happen so why bother with any "green" at all?

However i'll bet that in this case it simply made economical sense to install solar panels, since their price increase in the elecrtical bill is pretty darn high. The green thing is, as usual, "good PR".

This all raises an interesting thought though. What if Nascar *did* go completly electric?

Formula 1 has given us alot of new technology, including alot of car aerodynamics. It has also driven the internal combustion engine to the max (if turbo's where allowed again they'd reach 2000hp for sure).

We've had electric cars longer then the combustion engine exists and yet they still can't compare.

I think that if such an organisation as NASCAR would go all electric, battery technology will greatly improve (holding a charge beats charging alltogether), electric engines will improve (drivetrains and such), and maybe we'll even find new aerodynamics that simply make more sense when driving an electric car round in circles.

If you want anything to improve there has to be a strong need to have stuff improved, outside of government incentives that is. If you have an entire sport wanting to go faster longer, that should give a little bit more motivation to technology to improve faster.


By Tsuwamono on 8/5/2009 12:59:13 AM , Rating: 2
I posted this for the OP but it seems to fit well for you too so I'll just quote it from my other post..

quote:
So your saying because NASCAR is about racing they should slap a coal plant in the middle of the field and pollute as much as possible and paint a big middle finger on it because anything else is hypocritical? Have you heard of trying to IMPROVE.. they cant just change the sport over night. One thing at a time.

That's why you're most likely even lower then an entry level supervisor at your work place and I manage people at mine. I see the big picture and you cant see the forest through the trees.


By JediJeb on 8/5/2009 2:02:54 PM , Rating: 2
Why stop at sports, lets just outlaw trains, airplanes and ships that use hydrocarbon fuels. People don't need to travel so far so fast, let's get back to using horses and sails to get us where we are going.

Some people waste time and fuel to have fun, others waste it to be productive. One can't be blamed more than the other.


By Tsuwamono on 8/5/2009 12:56:21 AM , Rating: 2
So your saying because NASCAR is about racing they should slap a coal plant in the middle of the field and polute as much as possible and paint a big middle finger on it because anything else is hypocritical?

Have you heard of trying to IMPROVE.. they cant just change the sport over night. One thing at a time.

That's why you most likely are even lower then an entry level supervisor at your work place and I manage people at mine. I see the big picture and you cant see the forest through the trees.


By wushuktl on 8/4/2009 1:15:40 PM , Rating: 2
Instead, I think they should use this system on the racetrack:
http://www.dailytech.com/England+Supermarket+is+Po...




By Daphault on 8/4/2009 1:19:52 PM , Rating: 2
Yea because a non-smooth, dynamic road surface is real safe at high speeds.


By bhieb on 8/4/2009 1:27:46 PM , Rating: 4
Might make it a bit more interesting. Hey look left turn.. and another and another and another.


By nvalhalla on 8/4/2009 1:51:05 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah, then the cars will go 140 MPH and stop for gas every 5 laps.


Good progress for solar
By Entropy42 on 8/4/2009 1:04:27 PM , Rating: 2
Good to see that private industry is starting to find large solar installations to be cost competitive.




RE: Good progress for solar
By Golgatha on 8/4/2009 1:35:51 PM , Rating: 2
I think it's inevitable. We have a few hundred years worth of non-renewable resources at best left, but I imagine the sun will keep on shining for quite some time.


RE: Good progress for solar
By Tsuwamono on 8/5/2009 1:01:10 AM , Rating: 2
a few hundred years? if you include all non-renewables yeah. But oil? I highly doubt we have a few hundred years when you take into account the exponential growth of our usage.


Being green on NASCAR
By blueboy09 on 8/4/2009 6:54:55 PM , Rating: 2
While they could paint the cars green for being "green", I understand the application behind it, but not the logic behind it. While you might save some electricity, the carbon emissions are still going to be thru the roof when you consider the people there just sitting, the RVs in the middle of the track that could be still running, cars that are zooming around the track, etc. And it will still take 15 years for the installation of the solar panels to play off? WTF? Meanwhile, there could be something more efficient besides solar panels that could be invented in the next 15 years that could help even more. Who knows, only time will tell . . . - BLUEBOY




RE: Being green on NASCAR
By Tsuwamono on 8/5/2009 1:06:08 AM , Rating: 2
You're the 3rd person to basicly say instead of reducing their costs and emissions they should just leave it be and let it pollute.

You're suggestion to them is to what? Shrug and say "Meh, its NASCAR... fuck the environment.. I hate the environment so much not only am I not going to install solar panels to save myself money but I'm going to leave every light on at home too 24/7"

You seem to be the same type of person that gets pissed off when an environmental group asks you not to heat your home with your oven set to 500 F with the door open or to use your fridge as an air conditioner. It boggles my mind that people get so pissed about some one giving you suggestions on how to save money.


RE: Being green on NASCAR
By Spuke on 8/6/2009 1:39:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It boggles my mind that people get so pissed about some one giving you suggestions on how to save money.
If it was just that (suggestion), most people wouldn't have a problem with it. The problem is that some people straight up tell you how to conduct your life here.


This is all great but....
By Scott66 on 8/4/2009 3:17:00 PM , Rating: 1
Where can I park my car if this is going to be built on the the parking lot?




RE: This is all great but....
By BZDTemp on 8/4/2009 4:16:23 PM , Rating: 4
Under the solar panels. In the shade so you car will be less oven like.


By siliconvideo on 8/4/2009 1:53:48 PM , Rating: 2
Who needs solar panels when we can just just kinetic energy as reported in an old DailyTech article.

http://www.dailytech.com/England+Supermarket+is+Po...

We should get plenty of energy just from the cars going around in a circle

</sarcasm>




By siliconvideo on 8/4/2009 1:55:29 PM , Rating: 2
I see wushuktl beat me to the punch ;)


if they only hold two races a year...
By bohhad on 8/4/2009 2:53:51 PM , Rating: 2
will the extra power be sold and put onto the grid?




By rcc on 8/4/2009 6:28:42 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sure the facility gets used far more than that. Fairs, etc. But, in all likelyhood, yes.


The Way it Should Be
By rcc on 8/4/2009 6:30:59 PM , Rating: 2
I honestly hope that they are right about their numbers. Because this is how it should be done, innovation because it helps your costs, not because you have to, or because someone is subsidizing it, etc, etc.




Not about NASCAR
By opuscroakus on 8/5/2009 8:25:16 AM , Rating: 2
Everyone here is bashing NASCAR but this article isn't about them. It is about an independently owned track installing solar panels. We should be applauding them.




"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki