backtop


Print 25 comment(s) - last by omglol.. on Apr 19 at 10:41 PM


One of the first images produced by Keppler  (Source: NASA)
NASA continues its hunt for Earth-like planets

The NASA Kepler planet-hunting telescope has successfully transmitted its first images back to program directors on Earth, as the U.S. space agency continues to hunt for Earth-like planets.

"Kepler's first glimpse of the sky is awe-inspiring," Kepler program executive Liia LaPiana said in a statement.  "To be able to see millions of stars in a single snapshot is simply breathtaking."

One of the images shows a 100-square-degree portion of space that has more than 14 million stars and at least 100,000 different ones that could be selected for further evaluation.  An Earth-like planet is described as small, rocky bodies that orbit stars similar to the sun, with temperatures and climates that can support water in oceans, lakes and rivers.

Kepler uses a 95-megapixel camera -- the most powerful camera ever launched aboard a satellite -- to help astronomers add to the 300 extrasolar planets already discovered.  Kepler will specifically target the Milky Way galaxy, and try to determine if Earth-like planets in the habitable zone are frequent or rare.

Its range is relatively small, but all collected results will allow astronomers to have accurate estimates of earth-sized planets located in the Earth's galaxy.

The Kepler mission is "poised to contribute to a new age of astronomy for NASA and scientists around the world," NASA contractor Ball Aerospace & Technologies said in a statement.  

The $600 million Kepler mission originally launched last month and is scheduled to be in deployment for at least 3 1/2 years, though NASA hopes to keep it operating even longer.  Researchers plan to adjust the scientific instruments on Kepler in the next couple of weeks, and then will begin searching for new Earth-like bodies.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

My god, it's full of noise...
By Xenoterranos on 4/17/2009 9:22:06 AM , Rating: 5
Sure it's 95MP, but look at all that noise at such a high ISO...oh wait, those are stars :D




RE: My god, it's full of noise...
By TMV192 on 4/17/2009 10:01:52 AM , Rating: 2
I see what you did there!


By rdeegvainl on 4/17/2009 10:47:24 AM , Rating: 1
definately worth a 6!


RE: My god, it's full of noise...
By DeepBlue1975 on 4/17/2009 10:52:26 AM , Rating: 2
Soon to come on your next point & shoot camera!

All for $100 with ISO 51200 support + UNDOT (Ultra Noise&Detail Obliteration Technology)

Sensor size = 5x3 sq. millimeters.

Seriously: I'd like to know more about that come in the Kepler. Granted, the ultra low temps of outer space help reduce noise, but it has to have an awesome sensor anyways (or a very large one for what matters)


RE: My god, it's full of noise...
By Shig on 4/17/2009 3:31:06 PM , Rating: 3
Here's some nerdy information on the actual sensors they used in it, if anyone is interested.

http://www.satnews.com/cgi-bin/story.cgi?number=42...


Haha, 3 years
By rudolphna on 4/17/2009 9:54:09 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
Kepler mission originally launched last month and is scheduled to be in deployment for at least 3 1/2 years, though NASA hopes to keep it operating even longer.


All I can think of is the Voyager program. That was only supposed to be a 5 year program if I remember correctly. Now look, they are projecting it so last until 2020 (launched in 1977). So this will probably be around for much longer than that. What they should do is build a new voyager, and put one of these onboard, so we can get deep space pictures from deep space! and make it launch faster, so we dont have to wait 30 years or more. Surely we can achieve speeds better than the current 35,000 MPH. And build much bigger RTG (Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator) with less load so there will be more power overhead and it will last 60+ years. Its a sad fact that voyager wont last much longer. I think its inspirational to know that it takes 14 hours for radio transmissions from the furthest man-made object to reach earth.




RE: Haha, 3 years
By Ratinator on 4/17/2009 11:08:03 AM , Rating: 2
Though by the time this ship would get deep enough to take relevant pictures, we would most likely have the technology capable of performing the same capability from space near earth. Unless of course you could get the ship to do a few million MPH, but I don't see that anytime soon.


RE: Haha, 3 years
By hduser on 4/17/2009 2:05:31 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think taking a picture from the vantage point of Voyager is of any particular benefit. Voyager's current location is still an ant crawl in the scale of space. Not to mention you complicate waiting for results for the space craft to get out there and hopefully survive the trip.

There's a reason why NASA choose these shorter criteria. No one wants to stake their career on hardware to last 10 or 20 years. If the mission last 5.01 years, they can call it a success. If last 4.99 years it's a failure. No one wants a failure in their record book. If it last more than 5 years then get a mission extension.


RE: Haha, 3 years
By rudolphna on 4/18/2009 1:15:58 AM , Rating: 3
Sure there is. Absolutely no light pollution from earth, the sun... anything. Truly interstellar space. Imagine the clarity we could acheive from there.


and this has to do with "beaming" images how?
By invidious on 4/17/09, Rating: 0
RE: and this has to do with "beaming" images how?
By rudolphna on 4/17/2009 9:48:21 AM , Rating: 3
Oh, shut up. "beaming" refers to the transmission of images, which it did. If you dont find this interesting, go read something else and stop complaining about it. Its pointless and completely unproductive.


By MozeeToby on 4/17/2009 12:25:47 PM , Rating: 3
I think his problem with the title here is that it could be taken to mean that Kepler had successfully photographed Earth Like planets.

He was probably assuming that the new space telescope worked by taking actual photographs of alien worlds, rather than doing surveys of the night sky and looking for transits. If I didn't know how the Kepler mission works I would probably have thought the same thing.


By Ratinator on 4/17/2009 11:09:54 AM , Rating: 1
Or better yet allow for ratings of less than -1 for posters.


Where does the water come from?
By Grast on 4/17/2009 5:43:28 PM , Rating: 2
I guess this is great news. But I have one question, if the find a planet in a solar system with the same climate and temperature as the earth, how do they know it will have water.

I have never really seen a good explaination of where all the water on our planet came from. It seems to me that just because a planet has the same type of start, orbit, climate, and temperature range of the earth is no guarantee that water is on the planet.

Just my mind wondering.




RE: Where does the water come from?
By Goty on 4/19/2009 10:34:34 PM , Rating: 2
One possible way is to measure the absorption lines in the spectrum of the parent star, if the atmosphere of whatever planet is extended enough.

Another good clue is the metalicity of the parent star. If the metalicity of the parent star is close to Solar metalicity, then there's a good chance that water should form at roughly the same distances from that star as it does in our solar system (since the abundance of the elements present in that solar system should be roughly the same as our solar system when averaged over the whole system).


Earth 2!
By Alphafox78 on 4/17/2009 9:03:57 AM , Rating: 1
Wow, they look JUST like earth!!




Aliens live in our Earth's atmospher
By Ilya Stavinsky on 4/17/09, Rating: -1
RE: Aliens live in our Earth's atmospher
By Fnoob on 4/17/2009 10:51:45 AM , Rating: 5
Drugs are bad, mmmkay?


RE: Aliens live in our Earth's atmospher
By Ilya Stavinsky on 4/17/09, Rating: -1
RE: Aliens live in our Earth's atmospher
By Balrog1978 on 4/17/2009 1:43:04 PM , Rating: 2
We call them Clouds in this part of the world


RE: Aliens live in our Earth's atmospher
By Ilya Stavinsky on 4/17/2009 2:58:14 PM , Rating: 1
I quite understand your doubts about the existence of hardly noticed ionized whitish-grey clouds produced by AFO in the sky. But if you at night (it is the best time for the beginner) will pick up one and concentrate your eyes on it you will notice that it will start to move in your direction with accelerating speed from 0 to 20-30 and more miles per second . Natural clouds normally move with speed 1-150 miles per hour . Above all, at night in these clouds you can see very weak signal lights creating a circle (1 - 3 yards in diametr) which is a contour of AFOs body. What is more at one point you can notice that these clouds can disappear and show up again: AFO has technology to manipulate those clouds. And remember if you read karate manual it is not enough to become even a beginner in karate, you have to practice for a while. The same rule applied to those who read my article and try right away to spot AFO. With my help it will take couple minutes, on your own - much more.


RE: Aliens live in our Earth's atmospher
By HaB1971 on 4/17/2009 6:19:21 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The same rule applied to those who read my article and try right away to spot AFO. With my help it will take couple minutes, on your own - much more.


So you teach people to inhale then?


RE: Aliens live in our Earth's atmospher
By Ilya Stavinsky on 4/18/09, Rating: 0
By omglol on 4/19/2009 10:41:16 PM , Rating: 2
Heard of these, ????
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprites_(lightning)
Sorry, but I know of no ??? version of that page.


By 16nm on 4/17/2009 10:42:08 PM , Rating: 2
How long will it take the beginner to learn the crane kick?


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki