backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 21 comment(s) - last by FishTankX.. on Dec 1 at 4:44 AM

DTN network adds improved fault tolerance for deep space communications

One of the big challenges for NASA missions in orbit or on other planets and in the space between is communications. Sending data to and from spacecraft or rovers on the surface of Mars can take a long time even at the speed of light.

NASA has announced that it is now testing a new type of deep space communications, and while we are still far from the sub-space communications we see on sci-fi shows, the new system is a significant improvement over existing communications methods.

NASA is comparing the new communications system to a type of deep space internet. NASA manager of space-networking architecture, technology, and standards Adrian Hooke said, "This is the first step in creating a totally new space communications capability, an interplanetary Internet."

Internet communications on earth is made possible by the TCP/IP protocol. The new network being tested by NASA is based on Disruption-Tolerant Networking (DTN). One NASA test has used DTN to transmit dozens of images to and from NASA spacecraft around 20 million miles from Earth.

The new software protocol is able to withstand delays, disruptions, and disconnections that can happen in space as a spacecraft moves behind a planet, during solar storms, and long communications delays. NASA uses communications from Mars as an example and says that sending or receiving data from Mars can take anywhere from three and a half minutes to 20 minutes even at the speed of light.

Whereas the TCP/IP protocol internet users are familiar with assumes a constant connection, DTN does not. When data is sent using DTN and the destination path can’t be found the data packets are kept by each network node until it can communicate safely with another node at a later point. The data is eventually sent to the end-user despite delays encountered.

The DTN protocol was designed in partnership between NASA and Vint Cerf, a vice president at search giant Google. Leigh Torgerson from the JPL told the AP, "In space today, an operations team must manually schedule each link and generate all the commands to specify which data to send, when to send it, and where to send it. With standardized DTN, this can all be done automatically." The automatic scheduling and command component of the DTN protocol should mean that the communications workload for ground controllers and astronauts in space would be reduced.

NASA ran a month long test in October using the NASA Epoxi spacecraft that is en route to encounter the Hartley 2 Comet two years from now. Epoxi was used as a Mars data-relay orbiter. The simulated interplanetary network had ten nodes including Epoxi. The other nine nodes were simulated on the ground at the JPL to represent Mars landers, orbiters, and ground control stations. NASA plans to begin testing of the network from the ISS next summer.

NASA says that a new communications network using the highly-fault tolerant DTN protocol could enable a variety of new missions form complex space flights with multiple spacecraft and ensure reliable communications for astronauts on the moon.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

makes sense to me
By m1ldslide1 on 11/19/2008 11:17:50 AM , Rating: 2
TCP definitely seems inappropriate for these types of transmissions, as does UDP or RTP given the extreme unreliability and variance in these connections. Queuing the packets until a transmission path is established seems like a no-brainer for this application; so thumbs up to those guys for developing it.

And btw - is that picture the ship from Alien?




RE: makes sense to me
By jwbarker on 11/19/2008 11:24:41 AM , Rating: 2
It's the Discovery One from 2001.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_One


RE: makes sense to me
By MrBlastman on 11/19/2008 11:27:25 AM , Rating: 2
No, it is from 2001: A Space Odyssey.

It is funny how they had a fetish in the 70's and early 80's with ships having their bridge at the front of the spacecraft. We had this ship, the Blockade runner in Star Wars as well as the Searcher, the ship from Buck Rogers's 2nd season.

Buck Rogers... such a shame it only lasted two seasons...

Beedee beedee beedee


RE: makes sense to me
By Bateluer on 11/19/2008 11:35:24 AM , Rating: 2
Season 1 of Buck was cool. Season 2 was pretty lame and re-used a lot of special effects from Battlestar Galatica.


RE: makes sense to me
By Samus on 11/19/2008 5:50:39 PM , Rating: 2
BSG was probably the first show to put the bridge in the center of the ship where it was well protected, and centralized. It's not like having a window is going to help you, anyway ;)


404 Rover not found
By englisboa on 11/19/2008 1:06:24 PM , Rating: 5
The mars rover you are looking for migth have been removed, had it's name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.

Did NASA get this message yet? :)




How will they run the tubes?
By ggordonliddy on 11/19/2008 9:18:30 PM , Rating: 2
Won't the intertubes be too heavy to reach Mars? The logistics just won't work.




RE: How will they run the tubes?
By gtrinku on 11/20/2008 11:42:49 AM , Rating: 3
We could use dump trucks instead, just don't tell Ted Stevens.


So what will happen to all that undeliverable spam?
By Jimbo1234 on 11/19/2008 1:50:58 PM , Rating: 2
So what happens when the receiver is permanently decommissioned? Will the spam just keep queuing up, congesting everything?




By Murloc on 11/19/2008 5:01:59 PM , Rating: 2
I think there is some anti-congestin thingy, anyway if contact is lost you can just save messages in another thing and queue just 1 message telling to answer, if contact is probably permamently lost but there are still hopes.


Now that the spammers are gone
By amanojaku on 11/19/2008 9:41:24 PM , Rating: 3
The only way to test this thing is P2P. Get those astronauts to sharing. Space pirates ahoy!




VC
By Alphafox78 on 11/19/2008 2:04:52 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
designed in partnership between NASA and Vint Cerf...


So is Vint Cerf any relationship to VanCleef?




Network will increase GB/day
By tygrus on 11/20/2008 5:33:14 PM , Rating: 2
Larger the distance, weaker signal, worse signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) thus lower data rate. A straight point-to-point communication requires a straight line of clear space without too much interference. By reducing the distance with multiple hops you can get around obsticles, increase transmission speed and don't need all the planets to be alligned :)
One segment could have interference so data waits on the previous node, data can still move between remaining nodes/links. As soon as that interference clears, the data can continue to the next node. You don't need all links to be clear at the same time for a data to get from end-to-end.

It's a bit like traffic lights where you don't need dedicated continous stretches of road but traffic moves with batches and interuptions with traffic lights.

It could increase the KB/s into MB/s, reduce the size/power of transmitters of distant smaller devices. Easier to deploy (small, don't need a new relay per mission) and upgrade. Harder to dispose of more interplanetary space junk. Easier to manage radio frequency/bandwidth. Redundancy.
Problem with getting them either into orbit or stopped between planet solar orbits.




RUDP?
By kontorotsui on 11/19/08, Rating: -1
RE: RUDP?
By Tsuwamono on 11/19/08, Rating: 0
RE: RUDP?
By theapparition on 11/19/2008 12:12:41 PM , Rating: 3
Like people who comment on something with no clue?

Pencils produce graphite shavings when writing. Conductive graphite shavings in a zero gavity enviroment = bad.


RE: RUDP?
By maven81 on 11/19/2008 1:08:53 PM , Rating: 2
You're both wrong. The pen vs pencil is an urban legend. And pencils HAVE been used in space.


RE: RUDP?
By FishTankX on 12/1/2008 4:44:00 AM , Rating: 2
The Myth: "In the 1960s, NASA spent millions of taxpayer dollars developing
a pen that could write in zero-G. The Soviets used a simple pencil
instead."

The Reality: "NASA used pencils for Mercury and Gemini, but found them
unsuitable because the graphite dust posed an inhalation/eye hazard to the
crew, and being conductive, an electrical hazard if it drifted behind
control panels. The wood was also a fire hazard in an all-oxygen
atmosphere. The Fisher Pen Co., learning of NASA's problem, developed the
Fisher Space Pen with its own corporate funds and sold pens to NASA at
commercial rates. The Soviets also adopted the Fisher Space Pen in 1968."

And unlike the lot of you, i'm actually going to link to a source.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fact-or-fictio...


RE: RUDP?
By rcc on 11/19/2008 11:41:38 AM , Rating: 2
That's a bit like saying why develop a can opener when we already have bottle openers. They do different things.


RE: RUDP?
By Yames on 11/19/2008 4:27:47 PM , Rating: 1
RUDP works from the end points while DTN also works on the routers/hardware that make up the network. It is a complete system. The devices have to realize the link is not available and queue the packets.

NASA uses standard TCP/IP protocols and networking equipment in space right now. I don't know if this system uses Cisco, but if it did it would require a modified IOS.


RE: RUDP?
By Jacerie on 11/19/2008 9:50:24 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I don't know if this system uses Cisco, but if it did it would require a modified IOS.


And everyone thought CCNE certs were rough...


"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il




Latest Headlines