backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 23 comment(s) - last by 91TTZ.. on Sep 28 at 11:51 PM

The little rovers that could...

NASA is sending the aging Mars rover Opportunity on a 7-mile, two-year journey towards a larger crater than the one it has studied since 2006.  After spending two years examining the Victoria crater, researchers from the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory sent it towards the much larger Endeavour crater.

Opportunity began its Mars mission in January 2004, scheduled for three months, but has continued over numerous hurdles to help provide more information about the Red Planet.  NASA understands that trying to navigate to Endeavour may be a death march, but the sheer size of the crater has grabbed the attention of researchers.

NASA expects Opportunity to travel around 110 yards per day and getting to the crater in two years is an optimistic goal.  The rover only has a limited time frame when it can operate per day and will shut down in the winter when temperatures drop too low for it to go any further.  Every day involves a thermal cycle because of the rovers' positions around the Martian equator, which leads to 180 degree Fahrenheit temperature changes in a 24-hour period.

"We may not get there, but it is scientifically the right direction to go anyway," said Steve Squyres of Cornell University, principal investigator for the science instruments on Opportunity and its twin rover, Spirit. "This crater is staggeringly large compared to anything we've seen before."

Endeavour is almost 14 miles wide in diameter, where as the Victoria Crater measures only 800 meters in diameter.

The NASA Mars rover Spirit, also exceeding initial expectations, continues its journey around Mars.  The rover is traveling backwards due to a locomotion problem caused by a jammed wheel.

Using the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera will help researchers create the safest, most navigable route for Opportunity on its journey to Endeavour.  Furthermore, upgraded software uplinked to the Spirit and Opportunity allow both rovers to have better autonomous travel.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Go go little rovers
By bhieb on 9/26/2008 10:00:29 AM , Rating: 4
Is it just me or are they trying to break these little suckers now. Seems like NASA realized...crap they were only supposed to make it 90 days, what else can we do with em. Hey lets just point em at another crater, come back in 2 years and see if they make it (over statement I know someone will still be monitoring them).

Don't take the comment negatively, astounding performance, and if your all done in the area then logically it makes sense to send them somewhere else. Just kind of awesome that they've run out of stuff for them to do.

Hope they make it!




RE: Go go little rovers
By amanojaku on 9/26/2008 10:03:45 AM , Rating: 4
Why not push 'em till they break? We can't get 'em back, and they'll be nothing but garbage on Mars' surface. This is just an example of practicality and prudent use of money.


RE: Go go little rovers
By Solandri on 9/26/2008 11:25:54 AM , Rating: 3
I suspect there's a bean counter somewhere in the government saying, "You NASA guys want us to pay to send another rover to Mars? Don't you already have two working ones there right now?"


RE: Go go little rovers
By MozeeToby on 9/26/2008 11:57:35 AM , Rating: 3
Quite frankly I think you're right. The've sent the rover on a death march to free up engineers and capital for other projects. To be fair, there probably isn't much left for the rovers to do, at least not at their present locations. Why not take the risk to send them off to a new target that offers new opportunities and if they make it, Celebrate.


RE: Go go little rovers
By Oregonian2 on 9/26/2008 5:27:03 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly. There seem to be no downside. At worst they'll be where they would be anyway.

But on the upside they may run into the martian cave entrance to the kingdom of Helium and take photos of Deja Thoris. :-)


RE: Go go little rovers
By foolsgambit11 on 9/26/2008 1:45:12 PM , Rating: 2
This news was on Science Friday last week on NPR. They actually talked about why heading to the crater, even if they don't make it, is scientifically interesting. As they progress toward the crater, they will be able to see new and varied terrain and rocks that were the result of the formation of the larger crater.

They've gotten pretty much all of the data they can from their current location (with the tools the rovers have), so they're going to gather info on the surface and possibly deeper layers of the Martian crust.


RE: Go go little rovers
By Ammohunt on 9/26/2008 2:36:20 PM , Rating: 4
I am waiting for them to take the rovers over some "Sweet jumps"


RE: Go go little rovers
By therealnickdanger on 9/26/2008 5:18:38 PM , Rating: 2
LOL

Beat me to it. A little "Dukes of Mars" action would be amazing.


"Scotty time"
By Fnoob on 9/26/2008 10:15:52 AM , Rating: 3
Do you think it's possible that they stated the 'MTBF' of these rovers in 'Scotty time' in order to make them seem more sucessful?




RE: "Scotty time"
By austinag on 9/26/2008 11:23:41 AM , Rating: 2
If they didn't, they should have their engineering degrees revoked:

Dear NASA Mars Rover engineering staff,
It has come to our attention that in the offering of an estimate for the time to completion of a major mission you used accurate data. Please consider yourself accountants until further notice.


RE: "Scotty time"
By Suntan on 9/26/2008 12:11:15 PM , Rating: 2
They didn’t use MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure) which is a measure of the “average” time it takes something to fail.

They designed them so that they had very high confidence that they would last and be successful for a planned mission of 3 months.

There is a very big difference.

-Suntan


RE: "Scotty time"
By marsbound2024 on 9/26/2008 3:35:16 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah they didn't use MTBF because NASA assumed that as the rovers' solar panels accrue dust, they would generate less and less power until the dust accumulation was substantial enough to render the rovers inoperable. They figured this would take about three months to happen. Turns out, they didn't count on the Martian dust devils wiping the solar panels clean.


RE: "Scotty time"
By Fnoob on 9/26/2008 6:21:57 PM , Rating: 2
I'm surprised they couldn't incorporate some sort of dust removal technology ala DSLR sensor tech.


RE: "Scotty time"
By 91TTZ on 9/28/2008 11:51:42 PM , Rating: 2
Why shake the whole solar panel assembly when they could simply use a brush?


By middlehead on 9/26/2008 9:02:46 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Endeavour is almost 14 miles wide in diameter, where as the Victoria Crater measures only 800 meters in diameter.

Why not just say "Victoria's diameter is only half a mile" ?




By dice1111 on 9/26/2008 9:19:52 AM , Rating: 2
Because she would probably get upset...

She's not large, she's just big walled?


By amanojaku on 9/26/2008 9:41:40 AM , Rating: 2
Agreed, but I'm more worried about the accuracy of the information than the units they're presented in. I've been doing conversion as early as elementary school, so different units don't bother me. I figure the average person interested in geology is used to conversion, as well.


By KingstonU on 9/27/2008 4:05:17 AM , Rating: 2
If I remember the story right. One of the earlier mars missions failed because one scientists sent data in international metric standard, and the scientist at NASA used the imperial system so the lander ended up crashing instead of landing safely. So much time and money burned up because of the dumbest mistake.


By Believer on 9/26/2008 11:32:27 AM , Rating: 2
At least he used the metric system on one accord, better then nothing.

NASA urges the use of the metric system regarding all space issues though: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2007/08jan_metr...

As when you start to mix units and formulas, like above, made for the metric system with input in the obscure none SI units some seem to support, you ultimately risk costly mistakes...

There's quite a few 'very' costly mistakes made in history based on the record of use of different unit systems.

So, go metric for the win! ;)


By stirfry213 on 9/26/2008 1:52:25 PM , Rating: 1
I'm indifferent if they use standard or metic, but use the same value for the whole article.


NASA is great1
By Milleman on 9/26/2008 10:48:07 PM , Rating: 2
Heck! I wish NASa would make cars. Then I could just buy one and keep it during my lifetime!




RE: NASA is great1
By Bremen7000 on 9/27/2008 6:07:43 PM , Rating: 2
NASA didn't "make" them, I believe Lockheed Martin did. Go buy some F-22s. :D


A timely reminder...
By initialised on 9/26/2008 7:57:39 PM , Rating: 2
That while China may have three colonels in space the USA has two little Rovers on Mars.